Kelly from GamersFTW says:
Call of Duty: Black Ops III is due out in just over a couple of months’ time and when I heard of its release back in April of this year, I did a little groan.
Don’t get me wrong, the game itself looks fantastic visually and I am sure fans of the series will no doubt find the new game exhilarating. But isn’t it about time Call of Duty developers focused on bringing back the good ol’ First Person Shooter days of the likes of Call of Duty 1-3, World at War and Black Ops which were based on true historical events of past wartime?
Discover the impact of Microsoft's decision to include Call Of Duty in Game Pass. Explore the pros and cons and speculate about future changes.
Most folks that have a Gamepass subscription will not spend the $70, they will use Gamepass instead to play COD. MS will most likely make their money from some solely PC players & some solely PS5 owners. Even some PC players may opt to use Gamepass instead of spending $70. I would think MS would want to make every dime they could from retail sales. As long as they put new releases of COD day one on Gamepass, MS will lose out on some sales of COD.
Most that don't have Gamepass will just buy the game and he done with it. People that do will just result in a retail sale being lost. Some will buy the subscription for the month then be done. This is lose lose. Casuals aren't going to pay almost 300 dollars a year for COD.
The reality is that Microsoft already knows the answer as stated by them in their documents. PlayStation gamers have built up an ecosystem of games and they aren't migrating over and dropping what they have to buy an Xbox to play one game in a service you have to pay monthly for. Cheaper to just buy the game. And, I'd bet many casual COD players don't know or care about the acquisition.
Which is why Jim Ryan pushed to make sure that that one game continues to be sold as usual on Sony's platform to keep the status quo. Every other IP owned by Activision are worthless. And Activision has shown they don't care about other IP like Tony Hawk by cancelling them.
Sales WILL be lost on Xbox. That's for certain. Microsoft can only hope that Xbox gamers continue to buy up those micro transactions to make up for those lost sales. Only positive for Microsoft is that they get to dip into PlayStation game sales that we all know from history and NPD, that Sony's console sells more games. But increase subs from Sony fans for game pass? Not happening in any way that matters.
Sony, on the other hand, can have their cake and eat it too. They get COD and they can continue dropping more content for their fastest selling GaaS game which is Hell Divers 2. As the game passes 12 million sales and doesn't beat you over the head with micro transactions, Sony has a win win situation and can support the game getting more content to keep players engaged.
As a side note, COD is probably going to turn into some version of Sea of Fortnite Duty. Games as a service sitting in game pass being milked dry with micro transactions and constant updates making you feel you're playing an unfinished game that keeps going and going with no soul.
I'm not sure why everyone is acting like COD is a surprise. That was always the plan. They said in court during the FTC case they were doing this. They have said repeatedly and recently all first party games are going to Gamepass.
gamepass like PS Plus are rental services. Games like COD you buy not rent. So in my case unless I plan on keeping gamepass for 2yrs minimum than the benefit of adding cod is pointless.
We've put together 5 reasons why we believe the arrival of the Call of Duty franchise on Xbox Game Pass will be a big deal for Microsoft.
Microsoft will reportedly add new tiers and pricing to its Xbox Game Pass subscription with the addition of Call of Duty to its game catalog.
gotta make back that money somehow. but its definitely a scummy move before cod comes to gamepass haha.
It doesn't surprise me, it's very clear that MS is trying as hard as possible to recover all the money spent on Activision and Bethesda, they will do whatever they can, doesn't matter if people will like ir or not, as long as the higher ups see money arriving, it's all fair game
While a rumour cant say Id be surprised if true.
Certain other subscription services I sub to have increased in price while adding nothing and we expect theyre potentially offering up the biggest game of every year and its back catalog for "free"?
But I'd happily skip it if there are options (or upgrade for a month for the campaign)
Something's gotta give - they need to inject some life into the series. It's a cash cow, so I don't think they will :( nice article.
Let have a Vietnam or Korean War version of cod. Go back to basics. Don't make it anymore complicated than MW. Bring back the fun factor instead of brining on the frustration factor.
I always thought it would be sensible to have different versions of CoD represent different eras.
CoD Advanced Warfare... Future combat (50+ years from present day)
Modern Warfare... 2000 to present day
Plus a historical series going back to WWI and specific wars such as Vietnam, Cold War etc.
Unfortunately everything seems to be gravitating towards future / near future in CoD - I assume because focus groups told them that's what they like... Along with zombies...
I absolutely loved the games back in the day and my favourite is still the one with the same scenes as Saving Private Ryan... they should definitely go back to basics.
I've always said a Gulf War/Desert Storm CoD would be cool, and it would be pretty close to COD4 in terms of weaponry and terrain, but I'm sure the current Infinity Ward would find a way to screw it all up somehow.
Maybe Treyarch can take a crack at it three years from now if COD is still relevant then lol