380°

EGM September '08 Rumors: Banjo XBLA, More Star Wars, Bungie PS3 Games

The September 2008 issue of Electronic Gaming Monthly features it's monthly rumor section providing us with more juicy inside information

• Banjo Kazooie and Tooie for XBLA will incorporate Stop N' Swap.
• Konami bringing back a retro classic in 2D. Not Bucky O' Hare or Biker Mice From Mars.
• More Star Wars characters will come to Soul Calibur IV as downloadable content.
• LocoRoco 2 and Patapon 2. Q Entertainment making adventure game that is not a sequel to NNN.
• Halo Wars, Fable 2, and Call of Duty: World at War will not make it out in 2008.
• Namco are bringing back Dead to Rights.
• Bungie are developing multiplatform and PLAYSTATION 3 games.

Read Full Story >>
scrawlfx.com
Omega45768d ago

Well this is either just plain fake or egm arent very well informed even for rumours

-Banjo was confirmed to come to xbla at E3
-Peter M said Fable 2 was "completed" at E3 so why woulnt it come out in 08
-MS gets to publish all Bungies games unless MS chooses not to

Vojkan5768d ago

-MS gets to publish all Bungies games unless MS chooses not to / lol no. Bungie is now independent studio, they can do what ever they want. MS owns HALO IP and thats it.

The gaming GOD5768d ago (Edited 5768d ago )

Wasn't bungie independent now?

I know that they said they would give MS the right to accept or decline new IPs before they pitched them to nintendo or sony. But it's not what MS allows, it what Bungie chooses.

In other words Omega, it's Bungie that has the say. Not Microsoft.

Omega45768d ago

Yeah thats what i was talking about, which kinda means the same thing really

The split only really means that MS cant force Bungie to pump out a Halo every other year since they choose what they want to make

Xi5768d ago (Edited 5768d ago )

While bungie is independant, they signed a contract which made sure that all bungie games get first approval from MS, if MS passes on these new titles they can then choose to find a second publisher.

I doubt MS is dumb enough to pass on bungie exclusives, and I doubt bungie is dumb enough to alienate their fanbase like that.

Otherwise bungie maybe independant but contracted to second party, like Silicon Knights and nintendo a while back.

Dark vader5768d ago (Edited 5768d ago )

The thing is the relationship with bungie and microsoft is not too hot. Bungie probably regrest doing any bussiness with microsoft. If bungie left microsoft even after having such a massive sucess with halo, then that would tell you right there something must be wrong. Bungie and microsoft for some reason are not getting a long. I think this is a bigger lost for microsoft then bungie.

Dark vader5768d ago

You never know, Square enix is alienating there fanbase. And do you have proof such a contract even exist?

Xi5768d ago

http://www.bungie.net/news/...

"... Bungie will become an independent company and will retain a long-term publishing agreement with Microsoft Game Studios"

"We’ll continue to make Xbox 360 games, and we’ll continue to make amazing games for MGS. In that regard, nothing has changed. All that has changed is that now Bungie Studios is once again, the property of the folks of Bungie Studios. Microsoft is and will continue to be, a brilliant, inventive and creatively collaborative publishing partner"

also (the blog is the initial source who broke the story).
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsou...
stating that MS has a contract with first refusal rights on new bungie titles.

Dark vader5768d ago (Edited 5768d ago )

"Bungie will become an independent company and will retain a long-term publishing agreement with Microsoft Game Studios for “Halo” titles."

They only made an agreement in regards only to "halo" titles. Meaning any other titles is up for graps.

morganfell5768d ago

You had better look closely at the agreement. Bungie can make Playstation 3 games and use other publishers.

From the news release:

Microsoft Corp. today announced a plan for Bungie Studios, the developers of the "Halo" franchise, to embark on a path to become an independent company. Microsoft will retain an equity interest in Bungie, at the same time continuing its long-standing publishing agreement between Microsoft Game Studios and Bungie for the Microsoft-owned "Halo" intellectual property as well as other future properties developed by Bungie.

There is this:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...

This is from artredis1980 from Neogaf, he was the guy to post about the 360 3 SKU price drop 3 days before it was leaked, sounds pretty legit

* Microsoft will own around 45% of Bungie stocks
* Bungie will become a public gaming company like Rockstar and Epic
* Bungie will be allowed to create thier own engine and thier own games for any console/system they want
* If Bungie makes a game for any other console other than MS, MS will still get royalty $ from the profits obtained from that game
* Microsoft will have majority rights in the board room and financial decision making of Bungie
* Bungie is now allowed to make games for Nintendo and Sony but it also needs to be on Xbox 360 as well
* Microsoft made this financial decision as Gamers are more likely to buy 360 games than PS3/WII games per system
* An Independent Bungie will be more valuable than a Microsoft owned Bungie, More games are potentially to be sold on 360 with an independent Bungie
* Microsoft has all rights to Halo, ONI and Myth, Bungie will develop Halo for Microsoft and it will be published by Microsoft.
* Bungie will develop 2 more Halo games in Collaboration with WETA published by Microsoft
* The only games Microsoft will not have exclusive rights for are the ones which are new IPs.

Last year Frankie said they were going to concentrate on the 360. That was last year. Remember last year when FF13 was a PS exclusive? Think about that. With the PS3 being the top selling core gamer machine, the machine with a more advanced technology - argue all you want but the Cell plus Bluray allows directions not possible otherwise. MGS4 proved that with one hand behind it's back - it is only naturally that Bungie would gravitate in that direction.

Homicide5768d ago

EGM rumors have pretty much come to be true. They're way more reliable than Surfer girl and gamesblow. They were the ones who brought up the 40GB PS3, Bioshock for PS3, Eternal Sonata PS3, P4 coming out this year and lots more rumors. It'll be pretty interesting to see if some of these come true. Fable 2 being delayed will not help the 360's momentum, if it has any.

gambare5768d ago

funny, when they said "FFXIII to be on 360 - unlikely" you were saying that it was a fact even if Sony was the publisher of the FF series, but now that they say "bungie to publish on PS3 - unlikely" now you are yelling "MS gets to publish all Bungies games unless MS chooses not to "

please... you were the first one remarking about the exclusivity stuff were a thing of the past, make your mind and accept it. Like you said with FFXIII, now say it about Bungie "it's a matter of time to be on my console"

fresco5767d ago

MS wouldn't let bungie go under that condition.

Meaning MS has the option to publish all bungie projects, if MS passes another publisher can pick it up.

its quite possible they're developing a ps3 game under EA or someone else.

Superfragilistic5767d ago

"This is from artredis1980 from Neogaf, he was the guy to post about the 360 3 SKU price drop 3 days before it was leaked, sounds pretty legit..."

Your giving a lot of slack to a guy who makes questionable statements...

Chief among those you posted are Myth being MS owned - it's owned by Take 2 as a result of the Bungie sale to MS!, and the publishing relationship - MS is Bungie's publisher http://www.neogaf.com/forum... (Bungie's Luke Smith).

@EGM

Err Fable 2, confirmed @ E3 for October 2008?! lol

otherZinc5767d ago

all they want, they just cant take HALO with them. Now, chew on that!

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 5767d ago
Vojkan5768d ago

• Bungie are developing multiplatform and PLAYSTATION 3 games. / so are they making multiplatform game that is also for ps3 or single game that is ps 3 excvlusive?

smokeymicpot5768d ago

Hopefully bungie can make a game other then halo. Last time i remember doing this they made a game called Brute Force that was not a good game

Nathaniel_Drake5768d ago

They also made a game called Oni, on don't know how well that did, and they made a pc game called Myth which did good.

Delt45768d ago

Brute Force was developed by Digital Anvil. Just an FYI

Panthers5768d ago

I have Oni. It was fun, but bland. It was published by Rockstar

PirateThom5768d ago

I'm in the minority, and I tested this before, but I prefer Oni over any Halo game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5768d ago
eagle215768d ago

Please Call 1-800-A-BOT-NEEDS-A-SHRINK :)

morganfell5768d ago

Ha ha, true. But now you know why Microsoft yanked Bungie from the stage presentation.

iceice1235768d ago

Yeah right, you know you'd kill to have a superior developer like Bungie studios make games for your console, don't lie kid.

TheColbertinator5768d ago

@Pwnpause I get what you are saying.You dont want Halo on the PS3.Thats fine.Its not EVERYBODY who loves the game so its allright.

@Icewake Its true that Halo is a huge selling franchise.Sony does not want Halo so to speak just its profit share.Millions have been generated from Halo which Microsoft likes or any other company wants not just Halo specifically.I know Microsoft wants a title like Gran Turismo or Metal Gear Solid not because its "cool" to have on the 360,Microsoft just wants the profits.Gran Turismo has sold over 50 million units as a franchise.I'm pretty sure Microsoft wants a slice of Sonys profit cake.

Microsoft is actually more jealous of Nintendo whose Mario and Pokemon franchises have sold over 80 million units each.

pwnsause5768d ago

im not lying, i dont want halo. maybe marathon.

silverchode5768d ago

to many fps for the ps3, the only people who want halo already own a 360.i like gears of war better.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5768d ago
Show all comments (87)
100°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

80°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow1d 23h ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 3h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie18h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

12h ago
Hereandthere8h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8h ago
Notellin14h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

12h ago
Hereandthere8h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Hereandthere8h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

OtterX1d 6h ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

RNTody1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno1d 5h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 3h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 3h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

12h ago
fsfsxii14h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno12h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (26)