100°

UCraft No Longer Wii U Exclusive, Now Planned For PC First

Hoping to relieve that Minecraft itch with Nexis Games' Wii U exclusive title called UCraft? Sorry, it's now planned for PC first.

Read Full Story >>
nintendonews.com
DarthZoolu3467d ago

Smart move if you are trying to make money.

Ck1x3467d ago

It really isn't since pc owners can already buy and play the real Minecraft

wonderfulmonkeyman3468d ago

I won't be surprised if it still sells better on Wii U.

Why?

Because PC already has Minecraft, and Wii U doesn't.

So, really, this is just an unnecessary split of production costs and effort for the sake of spreading their game over to PC, which already has something that fills the spot they're trying to take up with Ucraft.

DarthZoolu3467d ago

nothing had Bayonetta 2 and it still didn't sell

Ck1x3467d ago

We know that it made your day to post that, but the game still isn't coming to your favorite no matter how much you try! ;(

wonderfulmonkeyman3467d ago (Edited 3467d ago )

Still sold better during its first week than the original did during its first week, and it had two consoles to sell to.

And that's before including digital.
It's at over 300K and it's not even into Christmas yet, let alone its first 6 months, which is what the first game took to get even semi-decently close to 1M.

Troll harder.

Ck1x3467d ago

I couldn't agree more! I am more surprised that someone hasn't tried to get a version of these types of games on the 3DS. Now there's an open market...

Dubaman3468d ago

The Kickstarter, intended to fund UCraft as a WiiU exclusive fails, so obviously the best next step is to create it on multiple platforms. :/ I really dont get the reasoning behind this decision. If you can create multiple versions of the game then why go to kickstarter in the first place?
Is the name going to change?
Is it really worth spending time, money and resources to release this game on PC when there are more than enough Minecraft clones and crafting games in general already available on the platform?
What exactly is the thinking behind this decision?

Pandamobile3468d ago

If they release it on Steam Early access they can still fund the development if they open up the alpha to the community.

Hereiamhereibe23468d ago

The point is no one will buy, well not enough to fill that 19k void. Theres no way it can be better than MC and its blatantly a clone so that alone will kill this game on PC, everyone is right they should just develop it on nintendo or create an original IP with their supporters graces.

wonderfulmonkeyman3467d ago

No one would do that, though.
Minecraft exists.

Ck1x3467d ago

Not only that but WiiU owners aren't going to jump on many kickstarters/crowd funding after the whole Project Cars burn. Just not going to happen!

Hereiamhereibe23468d ago

And why is there no Minecraft on Wii U again?

Monster_Tard3468d ago

Because they didn't feel that the install base was large enough to justify porting it over to the Wii U.

iplay1up23467d ago

Minecraft is coming to XB1. Wii U has a larger base than XB1. Of coarse Microsoft bought Minecraft a few weeks or so back.

I have never played MC, I want to play UCraft though, cause it sounds like it expands on the MC experience.

Monster_Tard3467d ago

@GotHDGame Yeah I didn't understand that either. Maybe Microsoft will release it on the Wii U now that they own it, might be a way they could make back a small chunk of that 2.5b.

DarthZoolu3467d ago

@gothdgame Xbox one gamers buy more games. also many Xbox one game reserve have the game on xbox 360 and wanted the bigger worlds. remember that MS is the reason MC came to console.

mysteryraz113467d ago

wiiu cant even keep its games

40°

UCraft will be Exclusive to Nintendo Platforms

In a shocking press release that was just sent out a couple of minutes ago nintendonuggets learned that Nexis Games has made the decision to keep UCraft exclusive to the Wii U. When asked how they (Nexis Games) came to this decision they had this to say.

Read Full Story >>
nintendonuggets.com
Maybay3284d ago

Shocking.

I'll wait on reviews (or gameplay footage) to determine if it's worth a purchase or not.

wonderfulmonkeyman3284d ago

Good to see.
Everyone else has gotten Minecraft so it'll be nice to have an equivalent of our own to enjoy.

PigPen3284d ago

If Minecraft set the foundation. UCraft should be a delight.

tinkypop3284d ago

going have to get it for my son.....

ZeekQuattro3284d ago

If it plays half as good as cube creater 3D I'm sold.

40°

UCraft screenshots

Nexis Games has shared another three screenshots from UCraft.

Read Full Story >>
nintendoeverything.com
4Scarrs_Gaming3300d ago

This game looks promising for the Wii U. Lets hope it has some good production values.

marloc_x3300d ago

Texture modding,RPG elements..

Game is starting to look really good.

90°

UCraft Kickstarter Fails To Meet Goal By 94% Funding

If you were hoping the UCraft Kickstarter would reach its ambitious $20,000 funding goal, you're out of luck. It only managed to collect $1,283 dollars.

Read Full Story >>
nintendonews.com
Concertoine3469d ago

Errr, might wanna work on that math.

nintendo_fan_4life3469d ago (Edited 3469d ago )

You might want to work on yours, actually. :P

1,283 / 20,000 = 6.415%

100% - 6.415% = 93.585%

... that's how much the Kickstarter failed by.

Concertoine3469d ago

Oh yeah youre right, haha. Not sure what i was doing.
Will vote up your site as declaration of defeat.

nintendo_fan_4life3469d ago

@Concertoine: Happens to the best of us. Have a great weekend!

3468d ago
R00bot3469d ago

UCraft looks like it could be good, however even as a follower of sites like N4G I had not heard about it's Kickstarter. Perhaps they needed to get the word out there that they had a Kickstarter, most people knew about the game itself, but the Kickstarter not so much.

Vendredi3468d ago

I know that Nexis Games is not exactly a role model of success, but does Shawn Taylor (the article writter) have to disqualify the guy's efforts on pretty much every line of every paragraph? Not to mention his " jornalistic neutrality": is it really necessary to compose a proposition suggesting that the producer contradicts what he says just because he started a kickstarter for some 20 k? Really? If so, why Shawn does not send the producer an e-mail asking what he plans to do with the money, instead of implicitly accusing him? I guess Shawn does know very well that you can't do much with that amount of money, maybe buy a new computer or some software...
True, it's hard to know what will happen to the game, but again: why don't he ask the producer instead of just speculating? I mean, ain't this an elementary procedure in journalism when you intend to extract information: to ask?

Please excuse me if I sound rude on this, but it seems to me that Shawn Taylor never intended to actually inform his reader on what is going on with the game he is writting about: he just wanted to judge and disqualify the producer's efforts. If the producer is trying to go for "an awful tall order", what's the big deal with it? Let him be dude.

Dunban673468d ago

I think the article and it's author did an excellent job communicating and informing re the story and subject matter

By the way, why do you keep using the authors name over and over - we can all read - therefore we know who the author of the article is

The guy/dev making big promises and asking for people's hard earned money does it have a good track record and has illustrated questionable behavior re a well deserved critical review of one of its games

I up voted the story and site due to this article

donthate3468d ago

From what I can tell, clicking on a few of Shawn Taylors (the autors) articles, it reeks of bias against and dare I say almost hatred for Nexus Games.

I don't know the individual, nor do I know the developer.

However, I see problems with Shawn Taylor adding his own dash of negativity towards the game like "an awfully tall order for a single man studio."

I down voted the site and article due to Shawn Taylor!

Show all comments (14)