From GamesReviews:
"For years, EA have tried to take the battle to Activision and for years they've fallen short. The PR smack talk every year DICE has released a shooter has been intense, and every release does respectfully by almost any measure, except that of Call of Duty.
"It's not that they're especially similar, because they're not - outside of the basic premise of running around shooting one another anyway. Rather, it's just two big games in a single genre. But now, Activision has given EA a lifeline by publishing a Call of Duty that leaves even the pretence of realism completely behind."
Former director at Activision, Bret Robbins, revealed that Advanced Warfare 2 had a working prototype, but it was eventually shelved for COD WWII.
That is a shame. AW is my favourite CoD. I hope they do a sequel one day.
I still prefer CoD based on historical settings or in near future settings(like CoD: Ghost) ... even though I liked infinite Warfare's campaign ... it was top notch
A lot of people who never played a shooter prior to like 2012 get really mad about anything that isn't a modern combat game.
Game Rant Writes "With rumors swirling about a sequel to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Sledgehammer Games can bring back a few weapons for a modern encore."
Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.
Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.
I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them
Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.
EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here
if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.
Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.
Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect
Neither Betafield or CoD are realistic.
Call of Duty was partially realistic with 1 and 2 on PC, after 3 it became the Quake mod that it was envisioned to be. Meaning it is not realistic at all.
And Battlefield, tried to be a bit "Counter-Strikish" with recoil and such, but Battlefield 4 has sullied the game, and the fact that EA is now trying to follow Activision releasing a shooter a year and is failing.
Both great games once upon a time.
everything battlefield bad company 1/2, bf3 and bf4 offered is better than CoD
CoD is designed for everyone to die immediately, spawning people nearest the guy who killed you, all guns having straight line no recoil shots, and horrible P2P network system that basically controls whether or not you get the kill.
half the time you can shoot immediately when a guy comes around a corner, but on his screen he came out, zero'd you in immediately, aimed and shot before you see him run blindly around a corner?
they need dedicated servers without auto aim badly.
Advanved Warfare is a great game but the whole time i was thinking how awesome maps like Gulf of Oman or Kharg Island would be with the exo moves.
online to messed up... rewards people with bad connections {
lag compensation}
BF4 is better