270°

Check Out Ten Minutes of Ryse: Son of Rome's Multiplayer Gameplay

If you missed the live coverage by the good folks of Twitch.tv, but still want to get a taste of Ryse: Son of Rome's multiplayer demonstrated directly by Microsoft and Crytek's own staff, you now can check it out.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
mafiahajeri3890d ago

Wow such bad hit detection and choppy animations, I already said this games was average looking and I got disagrees saying I was trolling. I was wrong its not average it's much worse.

Abriael3890d ago (Edited 3890d ago )

From what I saw at Gamescom the game itself looks incredible, if you talk models, effects, lighting and that kind of "static" production values.

Animations and collision detection do still need a LOT of work, especially during executions, where enemies just bump on you since they can't attack you.

The game plays a lot like Space Marine (minus the bolter), but Space Marine did a better job with combat than this demo. of course there's still time to fix the stuff that needs fixing.

mafiahajeri3890d ago

Hardly enough time. If we have learned anything from Crytek is that their game look good but play badly. No ones debating if the game looks good but so far it look like it plays really badly.

I loved Space marine it was not trying to be something g it wasn't and turned out really great.

Now if you want to play a good gladiator type colleisum game, try shadow of Rome on the Ps2 from Capcom that was a good game.

iamnsuperman3890d ago (Edited 3890d ago )

It does look pretty (no-one can deny that) but those are notable issues that need improving before release (edit: it could just be an older build or a poor demonstration)

Abriael3890d ago

@mafiahajeri: eh, i would say we shouldn't count it out before release. The biggest issues I see are animation sync issues and AI issues, that don't take ages to fix if you have a good team. The base of the game is pretty solid. It needs work, and IMHO we should give a chance to crytek to do that work.

mafiahajeri3890d ago

It's not so much giving Crytek a chance it's MS. This game was a kinect game so you can tell it wasn't easy to devolpe the last couple of months ain't going to help.

When I said MS its clear they are just rushing their 3rd party game deals to make their launch lineup look good and this is the result.

Same with dead rising. I mean it was supposed to be a 360 game an it shows, lol. It's just a joke of people think these game are going to be good. Their falling for MS's tricks.

HammadTheBeast3890d ago

From what I've seen, the models and set pieces are what are focused on, the environment generally doesn't look too good, and the enemy models aren't nearly as good as the main characters, unless you go into execution mode, where the graphics suddenly look way better.

gamertk4213889d ago

@abriael. Looks like there are a lot of SDFers really hoping that the game turns out badly. Hoping desperately,...needfully.

plaZeHD3889d ago

Isn't AI a pain in the ass to program? I have heard that a lot of devs are having a hard time with programing AI.
And c'mon do you seriously think those character models are impressive?
http://abload.de/img/joelma...
This is what we have achieved this gen and you tell me that's incredible?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3889d ago
slimeybrainboy3890d ago

I dont think this game will be that bad. We don't know how good the story or singleplayer will be yet. I think this game will be a 6.5-7.5 out of 10, To me the gameplay looks like it will get dull and it's rare to get a good story so I think this will end up basically being a great looking tech demo.

3890d ago Replies(3)
BallsEye3890d ago (Edited 3890d ago )

Seems like you guys didn't read that Crytek clearly stated its PRE-ALPHA build... PRE ALPHA! DO you understand? Anyone remember BETA of BF3? It was a disaster. Give it time Im sure retail version will be polished and as for pre-alpha this looks fkin awesome. WE know you fanboys wanna play it.

If it would be a ps4 game you would praise the crap out of it on n4g.

torchic3890d ago

you can't fix (change) gameplay in 2 months. taking your example, yeah sure the graphics of the BF3 beta were bad but apart from weapons being nerfed, it played identically to the retail version.

people are voicing concerns over gameplay; that the game looks boring, is button-mashy, etc. and not that the game's presentation is disastrous

the gameplay you're seeing now is the gameplay you'll see when you load the disc into you X1.

QuickdrawMcgraw3890d ago

And if it was a PS4 game you would run it down.Here on N4Xbox.The site were the majority are Xbox fans. Who will hurl insults instead of facts,At anyone who dares to say anything positive about another console.

BallsEye3890d ago

@torchic

Oh no no no. You obviously didn't play the beta of BF3. Check your facts man, you're just wrong!

*bf3 beta was running in much lower resolution than retail version

*in bf3 beta animations were awful, often you would see characters bending so much when turning that it looked like they'd be sliding on their side

*draw distance was lower than in retail version

*weapon animations were clunky at times

THIS ALL WAS 2 months BEFORE RELEASE.

Now don't try to be a smart guy here. I know gameplay won't change and I don't want it to change. I'm saying animations will probably be improved.

tokugawa3890d ago

torchic and the gameplay looks like a good ol hack and slash fest... nothing wrong with that. even the mighty sony has them on their systems.

the choppyness, input lag and dodgy hit detection come no doubt from the build.

nothing to worry about... if you plan on buying it

HammadTheBeast3890d ago

Lol. Apparently you guys don't want to play it, when pre-orders are less than Knack's.

gamertk4213889d ago

Haha, Hammad just inadvertently slammed Knack as an unworthy title!

DinoNYC3889d ago

Pre-Alpha when it's 2 months from release? no...it's beta at the very least. You seem to be in denial.

torchic3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

@balls

can you read? are you blind?

all the points you noted are clearly PERFORMANCE issues, not GAMEPLAY issues. I played the heck out of the BF3 beta, and I can tell you that gameplay wise (apart from nerfing) it was IDENTICAL to the game I purchased two weeks later on a Thursday morning.

people are complaining about Ryse's gameplay, not performance/grahics. you can't change that shit as it makes up the spine of the game, the animations being improved might slightly aid gameplay mechanics, but largely the gameplay will remain the same, and that's what is making people complain!

read and understand the post next time ok chief?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3889d ago
warewolfSS3890d ago

You don't think the fact that your a known rabid fanboy had anything to do with your decision right??

Grow up kid.

trywizardo3889d ago

choppy animations ?! WTF its better than most games on the next gen line-up get a life dude

omi25p3889d ago

Look how much its changed since E3. There is more than enough time to fix issues with hit detection. There is also patches they can use to fix small bugs

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3889d ago
FlunkinMonkey3890d ago

Boring, clunky, repetetive, stiff.. With an odd mix fighting with supernatural powers that looks weak.

You can't polish a turd.

FlunkinMonkey3890d ago

haha. awesome. my bad. polish away Crytek :P

FlameHawk3890d ago (Edited 3890d ago )

Wow the beginning scene where the gladiator is walking is so bad, its like it is freezing or something. And you got textures popping out in the beginning, jeez very clunky.
At the 4:59 mark, the game just starts spazing out lol. And one of the guys just starts keep walking towards the gladiator at the right and doesn't attack him lmao.
5:48, the dude walks through the gladiator .
6:04, more screen going crazy.
6:24, more screen going crazy.
7:35, more screen going crazy.
9:53, my favorite part, the guy gets 3 spears through the chest and no hurt animation but like a second after the last one goes, that is when it goes off, perfect /s.
Also am I the only one who found it annoying how the screen went to execution mode and slowed down time, did like 5 times in 12 seconds. And the running animation for the bad guys are so terrible.
The multiplayer looks so terrible and tacked on.

Megaton3890d ago

Yeesh. That looks so bad. Crytek's games have always been little more than glorified tech demos, sporting painfully generic and uninteresting gameplay, but this looks to be without a doubt the worst thing they've ever made.

tokugawa3890d ago

your one of the sony gang on neogaf as well..

DigitalRaptor3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

http://uk.ign.com/videos/20...

Oh yeah tokugawa, I guess Damon and Mitch are "one of the Sony gang" too, out to get Ryse.

corvusmd3890d ago

I'm really looking forward to this game, but I honestly don't think I care for this mode, just the SP

Show all comments (85)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil369d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz369d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused369d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X624d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts624d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12624d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90624d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty624d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts624d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89623d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 623d ago
CrimsonWing69624d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer624d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804624d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889624d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer624d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad624d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72624d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play624d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90624d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad624d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast630d ago (Edited 630d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad630d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast629d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.