Matthew from Enthusiast writes:
"Crysis, 5 months later. No excuses about immature drivers or API issues. We look at how Crysis DX9 compares to Crysis DX10 and what GPU is best for it. We analyze real gameplay and IQ. Did DX10 deliver on its promises? Should we stick with it?"
A Crysis VR mod is now available for download, allowing users to experience the first entry in the series in VR
No one cares. The whole can it run Crysis is old, dead and stupid. It's also irrelevant, considering only less than one percent of pc owners, own a high-end PC. Second, I believe Crysis wasn't even optimized properly.
Let's hope the modders can get the other Crysis games working in VR as they use the same Cryengine.
GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."
I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.
Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.
It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good
Digital Foundry: "When Alex Battaglia got his hands on a Steam Deck, this was inevitable, right? So can the Steam Deck really run Crysis? And if so, what type of optimised settings produce the best performance? What's the best balance of features and battery life... and what about 60fps?"
Vista has not a complete success so far so....
Short answer: No
Long answer: Hell nah.
Crysis, no, but dx10 as a whole, yes. DirectX 10 is still in its infancy and will take time to become fully utilized, like dx9 did. Anyone who knows the inner works of a GPU or DirectX knows that "technically" dx10 offers a lot more promises and should come good over time.
Dx10 is not the problem. The problem is the OS needed to run it which cripples your PC's gaming performance by around 20%. Yes, I know someone managed to get "some" Dx10 features to work on XP but this will not be the case as the software progress'
Even if complete Dx10 compatibility was possible on XP, MS will not allow it, they need at least one thing that XP cant just to encourage people to "upgrade"
No, OpenGL kicks the crap out of it. hahahahahahaha.
When was the last time Microsoft delivered on its promises?