150°
Submitted by ChaosKnight 672d ago | video

E3 2013: Crytek Sort of Confirms Crysis 4, Talks Crysis 3 Flaws

Hardcore Gamer: Crytek apparently wanted to be able to give players the ability to shoot someone in the leg for example, to be able to bring them to their knees, and allow for a more lethal killshot to the head or another vital part of the body. It's great to see Crytek being open enough to talk about a significant flaw in an otherwise terrific game, but you know what's even greater than that? (Crysis 3, Crytek, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

Attached Video
ElitaStorm  +   672d ago
Crytek, STAAP!!!
ATi_Elite  +   671d ago
Crysis 4.........WHY?

You have Ruined it. just be done with it UNLESS you go back to the ORIGINAL Crysis format.

I still have hope Crytek will come to their senses now that next gen consoles have proper power.
Prcko  +   672d ago
new ip time...
onyoursistersback  +   672d ago
They need to drop Crysis for a year or 2 and bring back "TimeSplitters!!"

Agree 100% with NYC gamer!! :D
esemce  +   672d ago
Yeah pretty bored of Crysis, they should take a break and Make timeplitters 4, ffs even a Hd collection would be cool.

Then focus on a real open world game worthy of the original but with interesting gameplay and a actual story that people will give a sh1t about.

It won't happen though we will get the same dull but pretty crap again.
Masterdon   672d ago | Spam
NYC_Gamer  +   672d ago
Crysis is boring
AngelicIceDiamond  +   672d ago
Agreed.

No matter what new game they introduce, they'll always choose presentation over gameplay.
reaper24  +   672d ago
It's a shame because I really liked the first one.
I loved the freedom and the beauty of the island.
I bought Crysis 2 at day 1 and I never before was more disappointed in sequel. Crysis 3 looked like more of the same. I dont have much faith in Crytek any more..
#3.1.1 (Edited 672d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report
aawells07  +   672d ago | Well said
Whats wrong with the gameplay in Crysis 3? Just curious.
NarooN  +   672d ago
Agreed. I played the first one and Warhead. Warhead was somewhat entertaining, but it got old about halfway through. 2 & 3 weren't even worth buying to me. You can tell most of the work goes into working on the tech rather than the gameplay or anything.
The_Infected  +   672d ago
No more Crysis! Time for a new IP.
AO1JMM  +   672d ago
So true. It is time for Crytek to RYSE up and bring forth new IPs.

:P
esemce  +   672d ago
'Time to Split!' They have most of free radical in house and they are wasting them like Microsoft wasted what was left of Rare, the Bstardos.
#4.2 (Edited 672d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
MrSwankSinatra  +   672d ago
great.... another boring crytek game, that looks pretty.
#5 (Edited 672d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
TRU3_GAM3R  +   672d ago
OMG!! crysis 4 for next gen console will look ridiculous!!!
#6 (Edited 672d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
coolmast3r  +   672d ago
So, tru3 gam3rs nowadays play graphics benchmarcs? Sad, sad.
Harmonizer  +   672d ago
Yea, cause it will look like crysis 3 on PC...oh wait...
esemce  +   672d ago
Will look the same as it does on a decent PC.
LAZL0-Panaflex  +   672d ago
I know. I can't understand these kids. Crysis is like call of duty with good graphics. Crysis plays like call of duty on speed. Air stomps are awesome. And I liked the story. Different strokes I suppose.
spicelicka  +   672d ago | Well said
Only idiots play it like call of duty. If people enjoyed it like i do, it would be a lot more appreciated. I could use stealth whenever I like, it made me feel like a hunter, armor abilities were awesome to balance with, and the gameplay actually made me choose how i wanted to play.

I'll admit the approach of Crysis 1 was the best because it was open world, but as standalone games, crysis 2 and 3 were a lot less linear then COD and Battlefield 3.
mydyingparadiselost  +   672d ago
Well, I would be excited.... but I'm not.
My_Outer_Heaven  +   672d ago
Crysis 2 and 3 both had really bad anti-aliasing.
CGI-Quality  +   672d ago
You mean bad aliasing. Anti-aliasing would fix most of the issue. AND, if you have a decent enough PC, anti-aliasing took care of it.
My_Outer_Heaven  +   668d ago
No I meant anti-aliasing because even when applying it there is no noticeable difference accept for a performance hit.

I've got two GTX680s running in SLI mode but the aliasing looks bad and anti-aliasing is terrible because I honestly can't get it to look good.
CGI-Quality  +   668d ago
You could easily turn on FXAA in the Control Panel (or download a super sampling method). It wasn't "bad" anti-aliasing, it's just a lack of it.
#8.2 (Edited 668d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
MrTimesplitters  +   672d ago
SCREW CRYSIS AND RYZE WE ALL WANT TIMESPLITTERS 4!!!!!!!!!!
gazgriff2k12  +   672d ago
they should make a crysis 1 remake. That said crysis 4 should should show us how much more grunt the ps4 has compared to xbone 1 if they choose to push each console to the max.
UNGR  +   672d ago
Crysis 3 flaws. Everything, except for the pretty graphics. I've never played a driving section in a game so bad, I don't even know how it was possible.
CJDUNCAN  +   672d ago
Maybe Crytek's problem is focusing so much on tech and visuals rather than putting together a great game. If you really thought the game was flawed why release it for full retail price?

While Crysis 3 was pretty cool, it was just more of the same from the previous iterations of Crysis, even down to the same weaponry and gimmicky gameplay for multiplayer.

Congrats on having great tech, start focusing on developing a great game now that you have no excuses as to console limitations.

That's the one thing I can get behind with the next gen consoles, game developers can no longer say how limited they are.
RedDeadLB  +   672d ago
Crysis 1 was excellent, Crysis 2 was good, Crysis 3 was on the border between good and bad and they should stop there. What's left story wise for Crysis 4 anyway? They can't continue developing the story because they finished it.

I hope to god they don't make another one. Crysis 3's story seemed rushed, no introduction to the world, no backstory.. Nothing. Just guns blazing from the beginning. The game had no personality, just pretty graphics and mediocre gameplay.

That's not what games are supposed to be. Let Crysis go Crytek, go make something else.
Mr Tretton  +   672d ago
I wish they would go back to Far Cry style. We get it Crytek, you got the graphics.
Plagasx  +   672d ago
Go back to making huge sand box worlds like the first Crysis please..

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Wii U Premium console + Mario Kart 8 only £188.99

10m ago - Dealspwn: A Premium Wii U bundle with Mario Kart 8 is now available for £188.99. This a hell of a... | Wii U
20°

Mortal Kombat X Review | High-Def

12m ago - HD: After Midway’s bankruptcy in 2009, Warner Brothers acquired the 'Mortal Kombat' IP and rebra... | PC
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
40°

13 minutes of gameplay from Alan Wake 2 (unreleased)

13m ago - Polygon: It felt like Alan Wake 2 was coming. Remedy even created a functioning internal prototy... | PC
20°

Metal Gear REX statue price announced, showcased on new pictures

13m ago - The price for the half sized version of 3A's Metal Gear REX has been announced, alongside some ne... | Culture
30°

Smite Preview | 3rd-strike

14m ago - Veflow writes: "The MOBA-genre on Xbox One is still pretty much an open market with no games t... | PC