120°
7.5

Ryse: Son of Rome Review | EGM

"For those who enjoy a simple hack-n-slash game, Ryse: Son of Rome fits the bill. This is no deep adventure, but rather a chance to burn your aggression by chopping your way through hundreds of barbarians, slowing only to enjoy the carnage during the brutal executions. Still, the stunning visuals and compelling setting will keep some gamers engaged throughout, making Ryse a flawed-but-interesting addition to the Xbox One launch lineup."

JokesOnYou3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

Some varied opinions, as expected still Ryse definitely falls short overall but some like it.

lastofgen3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

so it isn't denial when a game like knack gets reviewed poorly yet almost all of the comments say to screw the reviews because they think it's a good game?

and by the way, his comment didn't read like someone in denial. He was just stating how the reviews are panning out.

Hellsvacancy3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

Denial, how did you get that from his comment, I don't like alot of what he has to say but saying he's in denial is just plain stupid after he said

"as expected still Ryse definitely falls short overall but some like it" some will like it

XB1_PS43809d ago

By definition. That's not denial. More like acceptance.

dantesparda3809d ago

He doesnt say the same thing when PS4 games rate similarly. Nope he (and you's to) just jump to fanboyism

LeCreuset3809d ago

I think the "denial" was in reference to JOY saying that the opinions are varied, as in the reviews have been pretty consistent in rating the game low.

@lastofgen

I agree with "screw the reviews." One reason is that I am capable of using my own brain to think. I didn't need a review to tell me I wouldn't like Ryse.

Another reason is that too many in the gaming industry are simply biased. Take egmnow. They gave Knack a 4.5 and Ryse a 7.5. Even more important than that, let's look at how they put a positive spin on Ryse's simplicity and mediocrity in the article excerpt above, versus what they had to say about Knack's simplicity:

"Knack is a by-the-numbers mediocre platformer that amounts to little more than a PlayStation 4 tech demo that, somehow, for some reason, someone at Sony thought should be elevated to “full game” status.

"It should not have been"

XB1_PS43809d ago

Lecreu, the opinions are varied, there have been 4-8's, if that's not varied I don't know what is..

Also, just because a reviewer likes an adult roman beat em up more than a family platform beat em up doesn't mean they're biased. That's just their opinion. The biased card is basically n4g's equivalent of the race card. Something you don't think is ideal for your opinion. It is undoubtedly biased. If anyone would be in denial I think it may be you.

LeCreuset3809d ago

@XB1_PS4

Don't ever bring that race card crap up to me again. We don't usually talk about those issues here, but for whatever reason you brought it up, so I'm telling you what I'm telling you. Take it somewhere else. The history of race relations is not some game, though some of you that go around talking about "race cards" may have the luxury of believing that it is.

OT: I didn't say I agreed with jriquelme. I haven't sat there and counted up reviews, but most do seem to be low. A few outliers of an 8 do not constitute mixed.

The bias is in how the reviews are written up. The same flaw in both games is spun in different directions. I challenge anyone to go through both reviews and compare them. I will warn you that the Knack one contains spoilers, because the review was so unprofessional and disrespectful as to include them. You can play the Pee Wee Herman "I know you are but what am I" game all you want, but I actually took the time to explain why I found something biased, and broke it down, rather than just declaring it so as you did.

XB1_PS43809d ago

@Lecreu

I just took a read through both their Knack Review, and their Ryse one. First off, they're reviewed by different people. Second, they describe Knack's world as forgettable and underwhelming while saying Ryse's world is compelling. Also, they talk about the simplicity in controls in knack as being almost insulting to an adult gamer.

To be clear here, I don't agree with the scores. They should have been closer. From reading their review on Ryse I would have called a 6.5/10 before looking at the score. Also, these reviews are not my opinion. I'm simply pulling things out, since I haven't played either.

OT: I never said anyone used the race card, I just said they have the same purpose in certain situations. I'm native american, and having no racial discrimination is important to me; although bringing up race in situations that benefit ones self, while knowing that race is not actually related is what i'm referring to. There is a convenience in being able to dismiss something, without question, as a race issue.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3809d ago
christocolus3809d ago

@jokes

Yeah it seems so..im kind of eager to still try it out..many of my friends have it preordered and my brother too..will check it out first before making a final deceision.

3809d ago
VENOMACR12273809d ago

I didn't think this game was going to score 8's or 9's. I figured it would be between 5-7.

tigertom533809d ago

I thought it was going to get 7s

mrpsychoticstalker3809d ago

I love this game. Who cares about reviews. Play it urself and decide.

NoLongerHereCBA3809d ago

Haha at all the fanboys downvoting you :) Sad times.

mrpsychoticstalker3808d ago

This game plays very similar to the first assassins creed years ago. It actually got really bad reviews back then. Look at assassins creed now! I'm sure Ryse will evolve to become one of the greatest blockbusters of this generation.

Ezz20133809d ago

i didn't downvote you
but you already own xbox one ?!

Ezz20133809d ago

ok, that's cool
enjoy man :)

Show all comments (24)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil369d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz369d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused369d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X624d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts624d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12624d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90624d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty624d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts624d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89623d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 623d ago
CrimsonWing69624d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer624d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804624d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889624d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer624d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad624d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72624d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play624d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90624d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad624d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast630d ago (Edited 630d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad630d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715629d ago (Edited 629d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast629d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.