160°

PlayStation Plus influences Microsoft's Games with Gold for Xbox One

"Microsoft, like its two competitors, finally realized that giving back to loyal subscribers is not such a bad idea, and is now following in the footsteps of its competitors by enhancing Xbox Live Gold for the Xbox One with added benefits similar to Sony’s PlayStation Plus program and Nintendo’s Reward System." - Tamika REDinFamy Moultrie

Read Full Story >>
gamerfitnation.com
Corpser3828d ago

Competition is good for everyone

Redinfamy3828d ago

Yes it is I would never beg to disagree, it forces companies to always think more or better than their competitor. I was waiting on MS to do this years ago. They had the set up there.

xSHADOWx3828d ago

LOL!
Copy copy copy!
This makes me sick.

Deal with it, you're going down Micro$oft.

Please get your own feature set, and stop playing catch-up.

WeAreLegion3828d ago

I'm gonna need you to calm down there, chief.

Wikkid6663828d ago

Xbox Live copies one thing from PSN+...
PSN copies everything else from Xbox Live...

Wikkid6663827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

@Jiminip

Console that comes with network adapter
Match making
In game voice chat
Cross game chat
Friends list
text/voice messaging
Game marketplace
Pay to play gaming model
And I'm sure many more things.... so etc etc

TheSaint3826d ago

The 360 never had a network adapter that was a payable extra, unlike PS3.

Matchmaking has been around since the dawn of onine gaming, so not MS.

In game voice chat has been around since the dawn of online gaming, so not MS.

Cross game - fair enough.

Friends list isn't a MS or Sony invention.

Text and voice messaging was introduced with phones, so not MS.

Game marketplace was steam.

Pay to play isn't something to be proud of inventing.

TheSaint3825d ago

You can throw in a random disagree all you like, you know I'm right.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3825d ago
jgrigs093828d ago

Someone is angry! Microsoft is not going down :).

falviousuk3828d ago

They let 4 year olds comment on here ?

Redinfamy3828d ago

I mean all the companies copy each other all the time. At least us gamers and consumers can get what we want out of all of them. But when innovation comes about we just have to support it, which doesn't happen a lot, thus the copying flourishes.

Nocando3828d ago (Edited 3828d ago )

Wow, I would venture to say that PS3 and 4 would barely have half of their features if not for MS.

3828d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3825d ago
ziggurcat3828d ago

did they make it permanent, and not just leading up to the release of the xbone?

and if they're going to compete with PS+, they *really* gotta give out games that are a little newer than 5 - 7 years...

ziggurcat3828d ago

that's cool. i'm excited to see what they'll have in store for gold members.

Wikkid6663828d ago

Best part is they can't give us old games on One.

falviousuk3828d ago

The promotion is apparenly coming to xbox one as well sometime next year.

corvusmd3828d ago

Nice, but technically MS announced this idea first. Also keep in mind that XBl is actually investing more on actually upgrading their network service where as PSN has made no such upgrades yet

xSHADOWx3828d ago

How on earth can you say that?
Very ignorant.

Man_Son3828d ago

Yes the PSN is still terrible. I have a PS4 & it took a whole day for me to get online

falviousuk3828d ago

Probably due to the sheer amount of people trying to jump online at the same time. BUt yes PSN has always lagged behind Live

captain_slow823828d ago

party chat
streaming via ustream/twitch
play while downloading

im sure ive missed more upgrades (not got my ps4 yet :( 29th :D)

upcoming take control of friends games via streaming and then theres gaikai all of witch are network based.

so have they upgraded there network? i think we can both agree they have lol

ps+ is an awesome service how they can offers all the great games and all the upgrades to the network for the little they charge is beyond me :D

Redinfamy3828d ago

When did they announce this idea first ? Also PS+ was around before needed the money to upgrade servers. Club Nintendo on the other hand has a reward system without any of what MS or Sony has for up keeping.

MasterCornholio3828d ago

"Nice, but technically MS announced this idea first."

Nope Sony did.

PlayStation plus announcement E3 2010: http://www.gametrailers.com...

"Also keep in mind that XBl is actually investing more on actually upgrading their network service where as PSN has made no such upgrades yet"

False

"Recently, Sony explained the PlayStation Plus requirement for PS4 online multiplayer, saying it has ploughed a lot of resources into the online service to make it more valuable to gamers.

“The main pillar for the PS4 will be online play,” said Yoshida. “We’re developing many new ways to play and connect which requires a large investment of resources.”
Read more at http://www.trustedreviews.c...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3828d ago
TrueJerseyDevil3828d ago

To bad the games Microsoft gives you are complete trash so far, and i highly doubt they will get any better

H0RSE3828d ago

In hindsight, I see the games for gold feature better than PS+, and here's why:

PS+ may give players access to newer AAA titles to play, but it is essentially a rental service, like Gamefly. You can play them all you want, as long as you subscribe. Once you stop paying, you stop playing.

Game for Gold may offer older or lesser known titles, but they are yours to keep, regardless if you cancel your Gold subscription afterwards or not. The newest game I got from them, "Iron Brigade," was actually a game I was thinking of buying - now I don't have to, and the game is really fun.

Redinfamy3828d ago

I see where you are coming from and you make a good point. Then I hope for Xbox One they have it that the games are newer. As far as Sony i see why in the beginning they have it as a "rental" type of infrastructure. It was so it would not be abused at such a low price. Now since PS+ is needed it subliminally the rental feel is their but instead of a want, the service is now a need with perks.

captain_slow823828d ago (Edited 3828d ago )

in hindsight do any of us gamers plan on dropping ps+ or xbl memberships anytime soon?

on xbox everything becomes useless without xbl gold (bar playing single player) on ps4 2 things become useless multiplayer and AAA titles that come with ps+

bottom line is we are all going to keep are memberships up so in my eyes ps+ offers way better value for money.

H0RSE3828d ago

But we are not talking about the services as a whole - the discussion and the article, is about the free games aspect. Although you bring up valid points, you are trying to shift the argument to your favor.

Hicken3828d ago

It's hardly anything to brag about when the games they give you are like $5.

Besides, what rental service allows you essentially unlimited simultaneous rentals as long as you subscribe?

Frankly, I'd rather have the "rental" of a dozen $50-60 games for as long as I'm part of the service- and, really, why wouldn't I be?- over a dozen $5-10 games that I've probably already played years ago, but get to keep.

Brix903828d ago

I guess Netflix, YouTube and other apps on Live are rental services from Xbox considering you can't use them without XBL.

Didn't like any of the game personally that they gave for Gold.

TrueJerseyDevil3827d ago

you need PS+ to play online for most games so why would you want to cancel your membership?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3827d ago
JohnnyTower3828d ago (Edited 3828d ago )

I actually didn't mind dead rising 2 or assassins creed 2 for free. They had a halo in there somewhere as well for free.

H0RSE3828d ago (Edited 3828d ago )

@Hicken

You are using the cost and/or the age of the games to justify the quality of them? Really?...

You are also using your personal experience to form your opinion of the service overall. The fact that you "probably" already played the games offered by the GFG program, doesn't mean everyone else has. There are several games I have gotten that I haven't played yet, Rainbow Six Vegas and AC2 being two of them.

"Besides, what rental service allows you essentially unlimited simultaneous rentals as long as you subscribe?"

- Sorry. It's not like Gamefly, it's like a glorified Gamefly...that being said, Gamefly offers Unlimited PC Play for subscribers, allowing them to download and play PC games for free.

Hicken3828d ago

No, not the quality of them, but the value of the service, purely based on the games and their worth at the time they're "given" to you. The games gifted to you on Plus are generally valued at 4 times that of the games you're given through GWG.

The games they're choosing are, generally, rather popular games, or at least from popular franchises. Meaning the odds of someone having played them years before they got to GWG are considerably higher, than obscure titles. And the obscure titles they do give away cost pennies on the dollar.

Gamefly doesn't offer unlimited simultaneous rentals for consoles, does it? And that's what we're talking about, aren't we? GWG on Xbox versus Plus on PS. So why would you compare the PC aspect of Gamefly?

(As a sidenote, it seems to happen frequently that when Xbox fans runs out of points they failed to make in a console versus console debate, they resort to bringing in PC. I don't know why you all think it's relevant, but it is not, and never will be. Because, you know, CONSOLE DEBATE.)

H0RSE3827d ago

I don't see why you continue to debate this topic, as if you can win. It is an unwinnable and unloseable debate - it based around preference. No amount of sarcasm or clever debating tactics, can factual prove one service is better than other.

Perhaps during in your holier than thou mindset, when you were more concentrating on treating this argument like a contest and belittling xbox fans, you could've realized this. I gave my points as to why I find on service better than the other, and you gave yours. We obviously aren't going to see eye to eye, so we should just agree to disagree. Although I can see the merit in points, nothing you or anyone else says will convince me that PS+ is the better service, at least when speaking from the free games aspect.

Show all comments (45)
130°

Microsoft's Absurd Antics Have Me Scared For Dishonored And Arkane Lyon's Future

With Arkane Austin no more and Lyon living for who knows how long, the superb Dishonored is in serious danger; Microsoft cannot be trusted.

Relientk771d 1h ago

I love the Dishonored series so much and really want Dishonored 3. Microsoft better not screw this up.

JEECE22h ago

I mean, I think the fans will probably kill Arkane Lyon by cooking up reasons to hate whatever they do next without playing it. I've never seen a game so artificially disliked as Deathloop.

thesoftware73021h ago

Lol, why don't we just say, we are worried about all studios owned by MS now. They will keep closing studios until they have none left ...🙄

Skuletor18h ago

Just merge them all into a single studio, have it churn out a single Call of Duty every year and call it a day, lol.

Barlos18h ago

Don't be scared, you'll be fine.

Skuletor18h ago

It's exputer, fine is one word I would not associate with them.

Profchaos18h ago

I think it's becoming clear based on matt bootys comments there's no future for any IP that can't sell above 10 million within the launch window. But is also a small game that gives them prestige

/S it's beyond a joke right now

Show all comments (10)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18813d ago (Edited 3d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus232d ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos2d ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb332d ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC1d 20h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 20h ago
SonyStyled2d ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

2d ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies2d ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear212d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 20h ago
jwillj2k43d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot3d ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC1d 20h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615862d ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k42d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k42d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody3d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead2d ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage2d ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast3d ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19792d ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19792d ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage2d ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead4d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)