250°

Microsoft Working on AAA Free to Play Game Based on Established and Successful IP

Microsoft Game Studios recently posted a career opportunity ad that sheds some light on a project that definitely sounds interesting, describing an AAA Free to Play Game Based on an Established and Successful IP.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Kingthrash3603826d ago (Edited 3826d ago )

awwww man like they did ki?
i mean ki is awsome but imo would be better as a full priced game...with f2p most games will be jago vs. jago.

Abriael3826d ago

It seems pretty much like that, yes.

ShinMaster3826d ago

"Based on Established and Successful IP"

They only have 1.
Halo F2P game confirmed.

MidnytRain3826d ago

And they said they were bringing more "exclusives" to PC. Hmm...

Red3826d ago

Free to play-lo........no? I'll see myself out.

Fireseed3826d ago

And if you want another character just pick one up...

Kingthrash3603826d ago

i would but many wont so online will be full of jago's is my point..just wish it was a full priced game it should have been. its a very iconic game.

malokevi3826d ago

Who cares? Lol. I'll be spending 20 bucks on day 1, and so will many others.

Can't for the life of me understand why this matters so much to some people.

Fireseed3826d ago

@Kingthrash360

So what if others don't? If you buy yourself the characters, you'll have others to choose from. Not like you had any influence over what others played against you before. Besides what's the difference between releasing the 8 done characters now, and waiting until more are done and releasing them then?

Revolt133826d ago

Isn't there only 8 characters anyway? Free to play is fine for me

mydyingparadiselost3826d ago

8 characters now, 8 more later.

mhunterjr3826d ago

I doubt it. If people like the game, they'll pay the 20 bucks and get the other characters.

OT: the game isn't free to play. There's a demo with just Jago Or you can buy characters. If you choose to buy characters separately, the moment you spend $20, the rest of the cast unlocks.

Also, the demo character changes every few weeks. To start its Jago, but a few weeks later it will be someone else...

ma1asiah3826d ago

@ Kingthrash360

I can't speak for anybody else, but I am getting the full package day one, so no I personally will not be rolling with Jargo.....though once Spinal is released well more than likely I'll stick with him majority of the time.

I don't think FTP is a bad thing it just depends on how they roll it out...Look at Project Spark or World of Tanks.

Kingthrash3603826d ago

yeah true most would pay the $20 for the game...i wonder tho...if it was 59.99 dollas would there be more characters...i say they should have went all out on ki had a 20 ch roster at launch. it woulda had more hype and excitement that way.

UnHoly_One3826d ago

I agree with you. I hate free 2 play.

Look at it this way, though. You'll get really good at fighting against Jago. lol

Mystogan3826d ago

KI is not F2P. They said so themselves. Its more like a really awesome demo.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3826d ago
nyobzoo3826d ago

yea, this was my guess also

darren_poolies3826d ago

I would actually buy an Xbox One for that. The original Crackdown was absolutely brilliant.

BlackTar1873826d ago

But #2 was one of the worst games made last gen.

I believe it was made by a different studio.

darren_poolies3825d ago

@BlackTar187

Hence why I said the original Crackdown :P

JasonKCK3826d ago

Crackdown seems likely, hope it comes to PC.

ATiElite3826d ago (Edited 3826d ago )

@ Sarobi

Wow you have the very Best guess!

Too bad Microsoft is NOT as smart as you LOL!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3825d ago
DCfan3826d ago

Would still need to pay for gold to play the game lol

ma1asiah3826d ago

That depends Project Spark for one does not require a Gold subscription.

The people behind World of Tanks are also still in discussions with MS in respect of their game not requiring GOLD, I am sure Bethesda with Elders Scrolls Online though not an FTP is also trying to get MS to drop Gold being a requirement as well.

So at this stage it is more or less a wait and see.

FAT MAN GO BOOM3826d ago

Wow this just means there are going to take a good series and turn it into a Sh*T Pay to Win cash cow...

ripping off gamers as much as possible by paying 3 or 4 times the for items that would be in a base 60 dollar game....

Thanks MS for wrecking another game... Killer instincts was not enough eh

Gazondaily3826d ago

Because Killer Instinct was wrecked right? /s

Fireseed3826d ago

Guessing you're one of those people who claims KI has been ruined yet hasn't played it yet... Cause no one I know of has put their hands on it has been able to whole heartedly say it's bad.

Plus if they follow a similar suit to League of Legends what's to hate?

FAT MAN GO BOOM3826d ago

When you get only One Character and shave to pay 5 bucks for each other character and for different looks and outfits and different weapons...

YES KI is Broken before it is even released. why because for 60 bucks everyone would have been on an even keel.

Instead o f getting to unlock and work at getting better at the game to gain access to all these unlocks..

the majority of the will be behind a pay wall... that will add up way way way more then 60 bucks....

Only ass hats think this is a good model for what was an excellent game.

Now if Halo goes down this path.. WOW... Well the young kiddies like free to play...

Only reason they are taking an established series to make a game is because most gamers hate F2P or pay to win. And new IP in F2P has very little chance of success sure one or two may be a hit but for the most part f2p games are not worth anything and fail as games...

Fireseed3826d ago

Your logic is severely flawed my friend. What significant advantage is gained from waiting till they developed enough characters for a 60$ package as compared to releasing the 8 characters now for 20$? Hint, their is none.

Not only that but this game is most assuredly not "pay to win" If I'm good with Glacius, and I buy Glacius and ONLY Glacius I will still destroy you even if you bought the entire cast. The costume and "weapon" (cosmetic only) unlocks cost in game money that can only be earned by playing the game and winning fights.

Sure over the time the game may in total cost over 60$ but if we keep getting more content for that money, then who could honestly complain? 20$ for 8 characters in S1, 20$ for 8 characters in S2, etc, etc. Sure it'll add up... but I'd rather my money go towards giving me more of something I love than trying to find a new game with that money.

Show all comments (55)
100°

No Man's Sky Is Easily One Of Gaming's Greatest Comeback Stories

Despite No Man Sky's rocky launch, Hello Games managed to turn it into one of the best space exploration RPGs out there.

-Foxtrot2h ago

I hate the whole concept of "comeback story" because at the end of the day it doesn't remove the core issue we had in the first place, that we were lied to, it was disappointing and it launched with bare content to what was promised for years.

Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch but for me if you launch in a terrible state then you had your chance. I can applaud you for what you've done after but at the end of the day there's not much of a choice since most gamers would blank your next product if you ditched your last game so fast, it's not about repairing the game but spending your time repairing gamers trust before you launch your next product otherwise it would be dead on arrival.

With these stories and the games being updated, the only way is up most of the time so of course it's going to improve the game and feel better over all, getting better and better as time passes. No Mans Sky, Sea of Thieves, Fallout 76 etc but then you have games like Anthem, Suicide Squad, Redfall and The Avengers where the devs just clearly moved on, now if they have another product people won't be as exited for it, I mean hell Guardians of the Galaxy was a great game but because of the Avengers it didn't help its sales since people were obviously still sour at that point.

I still think despite the improvements to games like No Mans Sky and Cyberpunk along with being better now overall the games are still not up there to what was promised and hyped as for years.

If we keep celebrating these “comeback stories” then unfortunately it only strongly supports the concept that these studios / publishers can continue to push half arsed broken products out for the sake of quick sales instead of waiting until they are fully finished. We need to condemn this awful behaviour or sadly we lose all voice and power as consumers.

Sonic188155m ago(Edited 50m ago)

I feel the same way about Cyberpunk 2077. I'm glad you mentioned that. I'm not a fan of comeback stories as well. But No man sky developer was a small indie team compared to CDPR. It's worse when it's coming from a AAA developer

Nacho_Z48m ago

"Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch"

You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal.

The reason NMS and HG are held in such high esteem and calling them liars is a weak stance is the amount of work they've put into it, for free. They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted.

-Foxtrot5m ago(Edited 4m ago)

They are liars though...

We are not revising history here, I'm sorry but we're not

They built this game up for years and they launched it knowing full well it wasn't up to scratch to what they originally showed off or hyped it up to be.

"They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted"

And like I said above most of that comes from the fact that if they had just moved on straight away nobody would have supported their next game. They've washed most of that sour taste away after support No Mans Sky so now they are doing a new game which more people feel like they can support and get excited for.

Anyway how can you say "You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not" and then make the point that "Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone"

This means that if a small team like this can turn a game around then big AAA games like Suicide Squad, Redfall, Anthem and the like should have been able to do it no problem, oh but that's right they didn't want to put the time or effort into it. They can do it but some people just decide not to.

thorstein1h ago

I really enjoyed it at launch and had every trophy by August 2016.

The experience I had is no longer in the game: It was just me and my ship. It was a survival game and the feeling of loneliness in the universe was pervasive. There was no way to ruin too far from your ship and, in an emergency, you grenaded a hole in the ground to survive.

I miss that aspect, but since then, I love what they've done.

Hugodastrevas1m ago

I'd say it's THE definitive comeback story

90°

The Holy Gosh Darn: Ozan Drøsdal Talks Dialogue Skipping Mechanics And Why He Hates The Word Quirky

Ozan Drøsdal tells TheGamer about The Holy Gosh Darn, the final part of the Tuesday Trilogy.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
70°

Hollow Knight: Silksong's Follow-Up to Grubs is a Logical Progression

Hollow Knight: Silksong’s new collectible that succeeds the popular Grubs has the potential to deepen the mysteries of the new world.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com