CCC Says: "With the release of Batman: Arkham Origins, we thought it would be cool to explore some other, more famous Batman stories that could be woven into the fabric of the Arkham series. Batman has become the face of the DC brand of games. He is the only one to have seemingly escaped the doldrums of lackluster titles and has come to the forefront with some of the best third-person games to date. With excellent graphics, combat, and stories, these games deserve a great continuation of titles that fit the tradition that has been established by the series."
Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League is almost here, but I can't revisit the best Arkhamverse game on PS5 without sacrificing quality.
Not a fan of Orgins. Blame it on the absence of Conroy & Hamill. Blame it on the lack of atmosphere compared to Asylm. Hell blame it the devs thst dicked over Wii U owners like me that purchased the game only for support be dropped as a thank you to me. It's better than Knight but that's not saying much. I don't care for that entry either.
Even though its not the best arkham game in the series, its still an enjoyable game in its own right. What it do really well at though, was the crime investigations scenes. Which imo, were the best of the franchise.
I don’t know about best game but it definitely has the best story and boss fights.
Never played it and recently I've finally tried it via cloud on psn. It's not the best for sure, but it ain't bad either.
Batman: Arkham Origins launched 10 years ago today, and sadly doesn't stand the test of time as well as its predecessors.
I fail to grasp why this title is worse compared to Arkham City (according to the article) as the author didn't provide any argument to explain why aside from that it felt the bigger map compared to Arkham Asylum made the experience less tight.
More importantly, the author seems like he never played Arkham City since he described the game as linear (alongside Asylum).
Despite certain flaws, Batman: Arkham Origins is a splendid entry in the legendary Arkham series and deserves better than being forsaken.
It's the worst of the three in my opinion, but still really enjoyable. Definitely underated and gets far more crap that it deserves.
Should be included with the other Arkham games in the bundle.
I'm honestly enjoying it alot, my first time playing since I just decided to get a Xbox 360 slim for 65$, I cop some other gems too tho, I went into Arkham origins not expecting better than Arkham city but it does deliver plus the guy who voices batman did a good job aiming for the young Bruce impression
slightly grey haired tired batman please :)
i don't want to see another arkham game after origins... i don't want to see any batman games... it's time to change hero...
How does it suck?
Keep em batman games coming , can we do without the arkham name in it tho?
Let's go nuts on the wish list of things we wanna see in a "next-gen" batman game!
I wanna see a Gotham fully recreated where we can drive the batmobile , pilot the batjet , be able to enter most if not all building by either the front door , blasting a whole in a wall , ventilation , balcony and etc.
i don't want to see anymore Batman games for a while, i think they should've ended with Arkham City.