Mark of Corrupted Cartridge writes "In the past few days I’ve read a lot of new news about the multiplayer portion of the next Batman game that’s due to be released next month. When this mode was first announced I wasn’t sure how the developer Splash Damage, who are in charge of the multiplayer part of the next game, would make a multiplayer mode that was actually worth playing. As more and more information was released I became more and more intrigued by the whole concept of the mode and now believe that Splash Damage have created a winning formula and a mode that’s sure to please everyone."
Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League is almost here, but I can't revisit the best Arkhamverse game on PS5 without sacrificing quality.
Not a fan of Orgins. Blame it on the absence of Conroy & Hamill. Blame it on the lack of atmosphere compared to Asylm. Hell blame it the devs thst dicked over Wii U owners like me that purchased the game only for support be dropped as a thank you to me. It's better than Knight but that's not saying much. I don't care for that entry either.
Even though its not the best arkham game in the series, its still an enjoyable game in its own right. What it do really well at though, was the crime investigations scenes. Which imo, were the best of the franchise.
I don’t know about best game but it definitely has the best story and boss fights.
Never played it and recently I've finally tried it via cloud on psn. It's not the best for sure, but it ain't bad either.
Batman: Arkham Origins launched 10 years ago today, and sadly doesn't stand the test of time as well as its predecessors.
I fail to grasp why this title is worse compared to Arkham City (according to the article) as the author didn't provide any argument to explain why aside from that it felt the bigger map compared to Arkham Asylum made the experience less tight.
More importantly, the author seems like he never played Arkham City since he described the game as linear (alongside Asylum).
Despite certain flaws, Batman: Arkham Origins is a splendid entry in the legendary Arkham series and deserves better than being forsaken.
It's the worst of the three in my opinion, but still really enjoyable. Definitely underated and gets far more crap that it deserves.
Should be included with the other Arkham games in the bundle.
I'm honestly enjoying it alot, my first time playing since I just decided to get a Xbox 360 slim for 65$, I cop some other gems too tho, I went into Arkham origins not expecting better than Arkham city but it does deliver plus the guy who voices batman did a good job aiming for the young Bruce impression
was in the beta, all I can say is that the controls and lag were pretty bad
Tacked on extra
Origins is just a quick cash in game most likely re using a crap load of reskinned assets from Arkham City because WB want to get one last Arkham game out before next gen.
Tacked on extra. The other games in the series didn't have or need the feature. I feel this time is no different.
this game just doesnt feel as special at all compared to the first two for some reason
Wish they put more money into the campaign and not into an unneeded MP portion. Who the hell wants to play Batman for Multiplayer and not single player campaign. Wtf.