60°

Examining Why Sony Won Big at E3 and Not Why Microsoft Lost

Matt Randisi writes There have been many assumptions concerning the reasons the console war during E3 went down the way it did. Regardless of what type of gamer you are it is difficult to dispute that Sony landed crushing blow after crushing blow to Microsoft’s hopes to come out smelling like an expensive bouquet of freshly cut roses. Objectively looking back at both press conferences it is also hard to convincingly say that Microsoft had a poor showing however, the situation simply was Sony had a better showcase because they bested their adversaries match point in just about every aspect. The only arguable exception to this may be the Xbox One’s sheer amount of exclusives, including the well-received Titanfall. I would agree with the idea that Microsoft never really stood a chance however, but the reasons may be more complicated than one may think.

Read Full Story >>
gamesabyss.com
Mikelarry3965d ago

it all comes down to two things

used games

DRM

i think if the xbox one didnt have those E3 would have been a really tough to tell who won

zeee3965d ago

Hard to tell. Here are my thoughts.

Sony matched Xbox One games when it comes to sheer number of games and exclusive titles. With all first party studios working on PS4, they are going to have a lot more exclusives down the road.

That and not to mention that there is a VERY good chance that the 3rd party X1 exclusive titles will come over to PS4 over time (TitalFall anyone?). PS4 will probably outpace X1 when it comes to exclusive software.

It was not just Sony's policies, it was also their price. The price plays a HUGE factor of course.

Still, I hope X1 puts up a good fight. I for one don't want to see MS completely annihilated. I'd love to see all three gaming companies making a nice profit. We need Sony, MS and Nintendo competing for our dollars!

Mikelarry3965d ago

i have just seen a post on here that states xbox 1 surpassed the ps4 on pre-orders so it seems to me some people are not worried about the price

http://n4g.com/news/1284459...

NewMonday3964d ago

@Mikelarry

this is one XB1 bundle vs multiple spread of PS4 bundles

aceitman3964d ago

@ mikelarry ps4 1st day is sold out in its 1st 3 days http://www.forbes.com/sites...

Ezz20133964d ago

it come down to 3 things:
1.much more powerful console
2.cheaper
3.No restrictions

GodGinrai3964d ago (Edited 3964d ago )

used games

DRM

and lower price point

I never mentioned specs because to be honest XBone games looked in my opinion. Forza5, Titanfall, killer instinct,project spark etc. made me WANT the machine ( key factor).

E3 was MSs to lose..and that they did, but not because the games were not up to scratch. they most certainly were, as long as your not wearing fanboy goggles.

But by keepings things simple sony doing the opposite of MS sony won a day one purchase from me. Ill have both before the new year. So in that sense neither company`s E3 has made me pledge allegiance soley to them. my only dilema is which platform do I play destiny, elder scrolls online, the division etc, on. My friends will affect that choice. not console specs.

AngelicIceDiamond3964d ago

@Mike

"i think if the xbox one didnt have those E3 would have been a really tough to tell who won"

Lol not really.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3964d ago
AngryOcelots3965d ago

With or without the strict policies on Microsoft's hardware, Sony spotlighted more quality titles whether they are exclusives or not.

bacano3964d ago

*DISCLAIMER: I own both a PS3 and a 360, so I'm NOT a MS or SOny fan, and have a lot of criticism about certain policies from both companies.

Now, I find it absurd - and boring- to start arguing to persuade people and yourself that you must take <THIS> side, especially when you can't play neither PS4 nor XB1 yet. Why don't you just wait to be amazed without thinking "Oh, it's a <INSERT COMPANY> product, I can't look at it..."

I watched some PS4 gameplay at last E3 (The Division) and it was impressive... I watched the new Killer Instinct for XB1 and again it was impressive... (who would not be happy about a new KI!). But some of you were just making a list of cons from rival console ¬¬ (why?)

TongkatAli3964d ago

Too many gamers love hating.

AngryOcelots3964d ago

I don't think people are necessarily not focusing on the games themselves, but we're at a crossroads in terms of how we will be playing them a year from now, something we haven't had to worry too much about for quite some time. Plus many of us will end up only having one of these systems for at least a year or 2, so it's important to make sure we buy the one that is right for us as individuals. Sony just happens to have appealed to all the right demographics: gamers and people who like money, lol.

MWong3964d ago (Edited 3964d ago )

@ bacano

I think a lot of gamers are upset with the way M$ is handling their loyal fanbase. Like you I bought an XB360 love it, I get my GoW and 360 exclusives which are practically none now. I bought a launch PS3 (died) and a slim PS3 which is my primary gaming console.

I honestly was interested in getting both consoles this new generation again. But I am sadly disappointed with M$. So for this generation I am soley PS4. Why??

1. always connected ... if I don't like it oh well use my 360
2. used games & DRM
3. price (more expensive than the 360 @ launch)
4. lacking loyalty
5. proprietary hdd again (meaning I can't switch it out with a laptop hdd)
6. shadey answers & explanations
7. it looks like a desktop pc

Only thing that really seemed to interest me was Titanfall and Project Spark. The XBone itself is not interesting at all to me. I guess we'll see when launch comes what's what.

@ tongkatali

You mean to tell me you're happy with all the restrictions M$ is announcing and paying $500 for the console?

headblackman3964d ago

they most certainly didn't win because they had the best games line up :-/ they won because of word play. Sony aren't being 100% clear on the DRM feature and what it means for the for their ps4 console,the ps4 adopters,amend who has the power to implement this feature. DRM is a feature that's incorporated in both xboc one and ps4, but its not up to Sony or Microsoft to say what game or games will use this feature. its 100% up to every games developer. so of course Microsoft could've came out and used the same bs, but for some odd reasoning they decided to take it on the chin (which still baffpes the hell out of me). the only way to avoid this backlash is for Microsoft to redirect the backlash to where it truly belongs, but then that would create the same problems with the people and the developers which would in turn cause problems for all consoles which would also create w wedge between Microsoft and the games developers. not good.

iceman063964d ago

I understand the stance on DRM and both consoles having some form of it. However, when it comes to the way that DRM will be implemented, MS has made it much easier to make the point because of the console infrastructure supporting it. Let's be honest. Publishers have forced the hand of both companies. They want more control over their games. MS has provided a console with DRM features. Sony has simply conceded to the fact that DRM is an unfortunate part of doing business. All that MS really has to do to please their "angry" fans is to get rid of the 24 hr check and allow offline single player gaming. That would go a LONG way to healing some wounds.

jaredhart3964d ago

Sony one simply because they embraced gamers and came across as more genuine.

It is definitely true Microsoft had many missteps, but many of the missteps are part of their longterm plan. They really didn't expect the reaction they got.

Show all comments (18)
140°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers17h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken4h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g13h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing13h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H913h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola9h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66912h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle12h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere1d 4h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN1d 2h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos23h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN16h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo18h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies14h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger1d 2h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic12h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows9011h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto1d 3h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos1d 3h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel1d 2h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator1d 2h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg1d 5h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos1d 4h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion1d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola1d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)