800°

Let’s put Sony’s $100 million PS4 launch marketing budget in perspective

Sony only has to sell roughly 1.7 million PS4 games or about 286,000 PS4′s to cover their entire PS4 launch marketing budget.

Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II4469d ago

That 100m will be easily made back from launch sales

bangshi4469d ago

Made back maybe - but they'd still be $100m down.

The console isn't free to make.

Nor does Sony receive 100% of the revenue from game sales.

This article is very wide of the mark to say that they only need to sell 284,000 games to make their money back.

4469d ago
NeverEnding19894469d ago

PS4 price and marketing budget are unknown. Joke article.

I hope it isn't true. I don't want SONY losing half their fanbase AGAIN this gen due to poor marketing.

cayleee4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Well thats an additional 100M USD they will need figure out how to tax from their customer, nothing comes free.

bangshi4469d ago

@NeverEnding1989 personally I think they lost their fan base on price and availability - not marketing.

I don't think people said to themselves 'sod the PS3 I hate babies crying in adverts'.

It also isn't about how much you spend. For example - say they ran the same adverts again, but spent $1 trillion on making getting advert shown everywhere you turned.

If the advert is a dud, it wouldn't make much difference.

Just needs to be good advertising with a sensible budget.

fei-hung4469d ago

@bangshi

The math in the article is wrong and your theory on making the money back might also be flawed.

1) the $100mil budget is for advertising a product and all which comes with it. Meaning, if they can shift enough of this product and anything related to it (games, accessories, services, BR films) that lead to profit, the campaign is successful. However, the more they sell will reflect how affective and therefore successful the campaign had been.

2) if we assume Sony makes no money of the PS4 and only from games, services and accessories and they make $10 from each game and $5 from accessories, Sony will have to shift 10mil games or 20mil accessories or a mish mash of both.

3) however, the truth is far more complicated than that. What about factoring in freebies and other promotions around the globe? What about those people who buy more than one console and more than one game?

4) what about the snowball affect which will come as a response to people migrating to a new console not due to the campaign but because they want to game on what their friend or cousin is gaming on as a result of the campaign.

In other words, there is no sure way of calculating how many units Sony needs to shift if each or how much the cost of each is, but one thing is for sure, if it's successful, it will be a $100mil well spent as the fruits of their labour will keep coming for years to come.

JP13694469d ago

fei-hung

Yes, there is a way to calculate the number of units, games and accessories that need to be sold. Your "snowball effect" scenario is the basis of marketing and yet, each of those people will still be buying a console, game(s) and possibly some accessories, all of which will be accounted for in sales numbers. Nobody can predict what the exact numbers or proportions will be, but Sony can make an educated guess. This, in turn, will be a determining factor in how much money they are willing to spend on advertisement.

GameNameFame4469d ago

They spend 500 mil alone on Kinect launch marketing...

But higher quality of PS4 will make up for its smaller marketing budget

Freedomland4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@bangshi

1.7 million games, 286,000 ps4's.

ZombieNinjaPanda4469d ago

@bangshi

If advertising meant nothing, then the Halo titles wouldn't have needed those massive advertising sprees they went on. Advertising is key for any product. You really need to take a step into the real world if you think that's not true.

ps3_pwns4469d ago

I dont think you are very smart

HappyGaming4469d ago

They would be $100 million down if their $100 million marketing budget increased global sales by 0%.

You really think $100 million is a lot in a multi billion dollar industry? Are you from a communist country or something?

They wouldn't "invest" $100 million if they thought they wouldn't see a return on it.

ShabbaRanks4469d ago

@bangshi

Do you even know how much MS spends to advertise lol ?

sengoku4469d ago

i'm guessing the PS4 will do pretty well.
they wont be spending as much on adds as M$ does but that didn't hold the PS3 back.

FrigidDARKNESS4469d ago

This article is written by someone who doesnt know business retail at all.
First off the ps4 console has very low margin so not much money will be made on it. I agree with you on the software statement. They will make some money on that but most of it is paid out to developers and distributors and publishers.

Divine4468d ago

this guy just felt like making a ps4 article

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4468d ago
jcnba284469d ago

Sony are in serious debt buddy.

shoddy4469d ago

Yet they are still on full throttle.
Thank Sony

4468d ago
a_bro4469d ago

its not just how much they have to make back, but how they spend it.

Cocozero4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Only $100ml? If MS spent $500ml on an accessory for a 6 year old console expect a $1bl budget for the next xbox.

Sony better hope and pray it doesn't launch this year or it will likely be a waste of money for them.

@MariaHelFutura

And why the 360 outsold the PS3 :)

MariaHelFutura4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Which is why MSFT doesn't own many relevant development studios.

dcbronco4469d ago

Microsoft doesn't have as many studios because they were smart enough to see their studios were losing money and shut them down. Only a fool continues in a losing business. If people want a business to stay around they need to buy the products. Constant losses is a dumb business model for any company.

MariaHelFutura4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

That's one way to look at it. Or, you could look at it like they're to stupid and don't have enough of a creative vision to carry on successful 1st party studios like Nintendo and Sony have done for years. I can't deny from a business standpoint they're doing well. They're selling people a service that is free everywhere else and manipulated their way into the casual market by attracting hardcore gamers first, which has all worked out great for them. I hope for your and MS sake the 720 is Kinect only, cause in reality it (by your thinking) would be stupid not to be.

BABYLEG4469d ago

This guy just said microsoft doesn't have enough creative vision...

Robo replies anyone?

insomnium24469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@maria

"They're selling people a service that is free everywhere else and manipulated their way into the casual market by attracting hardcore gamers first,"

I agree 100% but why is it that when I say something similar I get debubbled and disagreed to hell and called a butthurt fanboy?

I find it exceedingly odd to see these users like dcbronco who think it's great to have studios closed down if they don't bring profits with every game they put out. I thought this was news for gamers, not news for investors.

Same reason is used defending MS by maniacmayhem who refuses to admit that having more games is better than less games.

"Do I think MS should come out with more original IP's?
Yes, but only ones that I might care about. PS3 may have more exclusives but most of them I don't care about personally. inFamous, God of War and Disgaea are the only games i am excited about for the PS3. Last of Us looks good but I would rather get Bioshock:Infinite. So just because you have more exclusives doesn't make your system better."

See MS gets off the hook cause of personal taste. Sony's PS3 is no better cause of personal taste too.

Mayniac also says he has been here since the gen started and he hasn't seen any bias or animosity against PS3. Go figure.

How about it Maniac? Is Maria a fanboy too. He says the same things "manipulated their way into the casual market by attracting hardcore gamers first" I say but he has 6 bubbles so how about it?

4468d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4468d ago
MariaHelFutura4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

But the 360 didn't outsell than the PS3. It sold the least of all 3 consoles. Imaginary aspirations don't count, sorry.

Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II4469d ago

@cocozero the 360 outsold nothing its sold the least this gen

Dee_914469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@jcnba28

Okay now hold those 360 numbers for about a year .Then compare it to ps3..

jony_dols4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

@jcnba28: In Europe the 360 had a 16 month head start in sales. That's nearly 1 & a half years, and what; it's around .5 million ahead in it's lifetime?

If the PS4 has a headstart like the 360 had over the PS3, then it will blow the 720 out-of-the-water at retail.

Snake Raiser4469d ago

@jcnba28
Numbers are inaccurate. Most likely just old and outdated.

BISHOP-BRASIL4469d ago

@jcnba28

Are those vgchartz numbers I see there?

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_w...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4469d ago
zeddy4469d ago

good point though, even if the next xbox is total garbage, microsoft still have got the means to advertise the crap out of it, just like they did with kinect, and even though we all knew it was a useless product people still bought it. if that 100 million budget is right then its definitely not going to be enough for sony.

majiebeast4469d ago

Big marketing budget isnt saving Windows 8 or Surface. They are still running ads for Windows 8 and the thing isnt selling, its in tv shows and everything and still it doesnt help. They need more then just a bunch of marketing.

StockpileTom4469d ago

The tablet competition for them is more heavily advertised than their console competition. They are competing with Apple right there among others.

sengoku4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

LOL tablet competition there the one's trying to get a piece of it, just spend more on advertisement that should help right?
or maybe there just a little to late?

by the way who is the competition on the PC Market, Windows 7??

chukamachine4469d ago

PS3 has already passed the 360.

Once numbers are given again, you'll know this.

As for advertising, hopefully the same gimps that bought the 360 won't buy the 720.

Gears - Little men, big suits.
Fable - blah
Forza 5
Halo - Fight till the end
Alan wakey wakey
Milo - Is he a real boy
Kinect - 100 titles of pure crap.

Snake Raiser4469d ago

Gears I have respect for as just a fun "Shoot-em-up". That's nice every now and again. Not saying that it convinces me to buy an xbox, but it can stand as a good game series (plot, not so much though).
Fable is a really sad story. The xbox lacks any really convincing exclusive RPG's now. Fable once held a lot of promise.
Forza 5- Not many people care about Forza any more, never really played it myself.
Halo- Used to be REALLY good. Haven't played the recent ones, but I can tell just from my friends that it is not as big as it once was.
Milo is eh.
Kinect is indeed 100 titles of pure crap.

Eyeco4469d ago

Although his one bubble does indicate a troll, he actually does have somewhat of a point, If microsoft can spend 500 million on some cr@ppy casual peripheral, then surely Sony can do better with the launch of the PS4 this is Sony's chance to reclaim the throne.

They could do better, what I never understood is that this company owns Columbia pictures one of the leading film companies in the world, Last year Skyfall was the second highest grossing movie of 2012, would product placement have hurt them (PS logo graffiti in the background)

Or what about their music division Sony Music is the second largest record label in the world and look whose signed to them, only the biggest the most popular lol "artists" in the world Adele, Chris Brown, One Direction (cringe), Jlo, Pitbull the list goes on don't get me wrong I think their music is the worst thing since aids but a bit of products placement in their crappy videos would do them good, look how much views they get on youtube, Sony isn't make that great use of their resources.

MysticStrummer4469d ago

360 outsold PS3? Not according to a little thing I like to call math. PS3 reached 70 million sold nearly a year faster than 360.

hellvaguy4469d ago

Funny thing bout statistics is that they can be manipulated (from ignorance, accident, or on purpose) to make them independent of math.

JP13694469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

How did the 360 outsell the PS3? It had a year head start in which it amassed a much larger lead than it currently has. You're really bad at math.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4468d ago
dedicatedtogamers4469d ago

Wait. Are people even complaining about this? Microsoft spent half a billion launching Kinect. Not a console launch. A peripheral launch. Are there really people upset that Sony is spending 1/5th that on a full-blown console launch?

Ezz20134469d ago

ps4 reveal have over 28 million view
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
and that's one video, not talking about sites ,forums etc
ps4 reveal already did all the marketing sony needs

this gen
MS did every thing with xbox360
tons of ads ,spent millions on timed exclusives/DLC etc
and yet they ended up being outsold by sony's ps3

MariaHelFutura4469d ago

I'm so excited and I just can't hide it. I want you.

sway_z4469d ago

haha Pointer Sisters...what a classic :)

Knight_Crawler4469d ago ShowReplies(2)
Gimmemorebubblez4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

The Ps3 had a huge 150 million dollar marketing budget. The PS3 launch campaign was AWFUL (demonic babies etc.) . If Sony wants success they must have really good simplistic adds that tell you what the PS4 about. MS will come hard with their ample billions so Sony must have a strong ad. campaign.

MariaHelFutura4469d ago

What do you have against demonic babies? They need love too.

SAE4469d ago (Edited 4469d ago )

Why advertise it?. They advertised vita a lot but did it get huge sales ?. No.. It's people them selfs that advertise what they like. I never bought something because i saw it in tv or on wall..etc I buy what's good and what my friends and family buy.

Note: They do the same too so don't tell me they saw it in tv..

Zhipp4469d ago

They advertised Vita!?

Tultras4469d ago

The vita had a 50$ million dollar budget.

For reference, the Xbox 360 both had $500 million dollar budgets.

SAE4469d ago

If the vita wasn't limited, had games like gta/gt5..etc , Cheaper games and memory's it would have sold really really , i mean it , realllllllllly well because we wouldn't need to think really hard to understand how the vita works. I swear when i knew about the vita limitation i almost changed my mind on buying it. I bought it because i needed it. If i didn't i would have waited until it hacked or fixed by sony. So advertising didn't made me buy it.

If your product is good and exciting it wouldn't need 1 ad . Even news channels would advertise it them selfs for free if it's that good.

KwietStorm_BLM4469d ago

Ok. Now explain the correlation between a dollar amount and a good ad that works.

Gimmemorebubblez4469d ago

Consumers what to see cool things that the console can do and the must have games it has, not what the console does to possesd dolls.

Monkeysmarts4468d ago (Edited 4468d ago )

Good ads aren't cheap and people tend to lean toward buying products that are more visible. Aside from unpredictable viral ad campaigns, successful marketing usually requires a high dollar value. That's just the reality, unfortunately. Warren Buffet said he would spend $2 billion on Geico ads if he could. In 2011, Geico spent $994 million on ads. Everyone knows the Geico Gecko and the Geico Caveman. Ads like that cost a lot of money to buy from an agency and get in the public view.

There is a direct correlation between dollar value and success in marketing.

Snake Raiser4469d ago

Exactly. What the advertising war will come down to will be whether Sony can put up quality ads that MS can't match, or will MS simply overwhelm Sony with numbers.
Sony can pull this off.
They need to do better than this gen though. That was just sad.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4468d ago
Show all comments (109)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted7d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast7d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay7d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted7d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34857d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK7d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor48d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7248d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7248d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

48d ago
S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7247d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 47d ago
drivxr48d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation48d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

48d ago
DarXyde48d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50147d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer46d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 46d ago
48d ago
48d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6948d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave48d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit48d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno48d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit48d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay48d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7248d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos48d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania48d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox48d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

48d ago
Bathyj48d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

48d ago
BeHunted48d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit48d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

48d ago
drivxr48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow148d ago (Edited 48d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania48d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox48d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

48d ago
S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Lightning7748d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts48d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango48d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7748d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts48d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit47d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7748d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 47d ago
Show all comments (46)