150°

GameStop President Tony Bartel Talks PS4 Pre-Orders, Price Point And Used Games Impact (Q&A)

Forbes - Sony is still riding a wave of publicity – both positive and negative – since it officially announced its PlayStation 4 console will be available this holiday. The PS4 has renewed the next gen debate not only around what Microsoft might offer with its rumored Xbox 720, codenamed Durango, which is expected to launch this holiday as well; but also around the used games business. The next generation console wars are expected to begin this fall.

GameStop stands to both profit from, and potentially face new obstacles from, the PS4 and its streaming game service, as well as any type of third-party game verification that would impact the retailer’s thriving used games business. Tony Bartel, president of GameStop, expects huge demand for PS4 this Christmas. He talks about the PS4 and discusses a range of topics, including when he expects pre-orders to begin and how he expects streaming and potential third-party game verification to impact used game sales, in this exclusive interview.

jagiii4068d ago

Looks like E3 will bring a price point and pre-orders for PS4...

2pacalypsenow4068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

That's what idiots don't get, e3 is where all the info will be shown including price and the console itself. I read a comment someone saying im not getting it cuz they want me to pre order something i don't even know what it looks like or how much its gonna cost...

MasterCornholio4068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

"me to pre order something i don't even know what it looks like or how much its gonna cost"

Well thats pretty dumb because at least in Spain preordering a console only costs a euro and you can cancel the preorder whenever you want.

As soon as i an i will preorder the PS4 and if the price turns out to be too high or theres some feature that breaks the purchase for me then i will cancel it.

Im amazed on how stupid people can be especially those who claimed that the whole PS4 conference was fabricated with games running on a super computer.

@yourinmyway86

"The whole reason it's not back compatible is to lower the price so Sony doesn't have a horrible launch like with the ps3"

Its like people forgot that one of the reasons that the PS3 was so expensive at launch was because the console had an emotion engine chip in it (PS2 cpu/Gpu).

Maybe people claim that the PS4 should rely on software emulation but that isnt possible due to how complicated the PS3s cell architecture is.

hazelamy4068d ago

except the eu ps3, which was, i beleive, more expensive than anywhere else, late, and without the emotion engine chip.
go figure. o_O

and the ps2 graphics chip was called the graphics synthesiser wasn't it?

Rainstorm814068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

No it was Emotion Engine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Can't wait til E3.... I will be preordering mine....I stood outside in line the past two generations.(ps2, Xbox, xbox360, ps3)...not this time

YoureINMYWay854068d ago

The whole reason it's not back compatible is to lower the price so Sony doesn't have a horrible launch like with the ps3

caseh4068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

Along with killing the idea that people could play the games they already own on the PS4 and resell those games via whatever iteration of the PSN store the PS4 has.

Sony could have re-introduced BC on the PS3 a long time ago seeing as manufacturing costs are far lower 7 years into its cycle. Instead they simply introduce revised models with bigger HDDs, HDDs that cost next to nothing these days yet the cost of the console increases if anything.

Its business at the end of the day, I get that. But for those with their eyes open its easy to see other factors behind not including BC that don't come under cost.

Rainstorm814068d ago

Why re-introduce BC after it was axed, just to please a small percent of gamers that still wish to play PS2 games?

Fact is you can get a PS2 for less than a new game at GameStop (49.99)....if you are dying to play your PS2 collection that's the best bet. BC isn't a big deal for me as long as I have the old systems

caseh4067d ago

Because most people want kit that does it all, no one wants a PS1,2,3 and 4 under their TV when the latest iteration is no doubt capable of doing at least 2 of the 3 previous consoles via software emulation or whaterver.

Personally i'm not bothered, once I shift to a new console I never go back to any older games with the exception of old arcade emulators or SNES/Megadrive games.

The fact remains that its more profitable for Sony to resell digital copies and not include BC as they don't see any money from someone buying pre-owned games from the previous gen.

moparful994067d ago (Edited 4067d ago )

Backwards compatibility has no influence on my decision to buy a console.. I think gamers have developed a sense of entitlement and BC is one of those instances.. Sony has to protect it's bottom line and if that means removing BC to combat used game sales then so be it.. I never buy used games nor do I sell my games to companies like Gamestop.. I'll be more than happy to use Gaikai and PS+ to feed my ps3/ps2 needs..

KrisK4068d ago

I wonder how the downloadable model will impact gamespot over time.

Sam Fisher4068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

Well i used to work for them, and let me say this, its not easy to sell games, they are on your ass about reserves and pre orders, now since digital is the new thing and if sony and ms does it right ( like game share and etc) then good bye gamestop, its a pawnshop before electric store, 70% profit on used items, 20 to 30% new. I recall they were making a new franchise called my tronics or something.

moparful994067d ago

Which is precisely why I don't buy used games nor do I sell my games to them.. Alot of people rationalize it by claiming it helps them buy and enjoy more games but it's just a way for people to be frugal.. I make less than 20k a year but manage to buy and play any game I want without buying and selling used games.. I simply preorder, and pay off overtime so I don't have to incur a large financial hit every time I want a game.. It's evident that Gamestop rakes in gobs of money from used games just look at their promotions.. I'm a PowerUp Pro memeber and have been for years but despite buying thousands of dollars in games and hardware I have roughly 20k points.. But a buddy of mine that buys mostly used games and sells them back after he's done has 70k in less than half the time.. Kind of telling..

gamerlive4067d ago

You can also always rent games for a few bucks, beat them, and then move on...

isa_scout4067d ago (Edited 4067d ago )

@mopartful99
I sell my used games to gamestop when I want a new game, and I wouldn't consider it frugal at all. I make right around 20k a year, have a wife, two small children, and bills to pay. If I didn't sell the games I've already played I would only be able to afford maybe 2 or 3 games a year. With the price of games so high I think a lot of the people trading in games are like me(broke all the time) so that's the only way for us to get new games. I really don't see what the problem is with buying and selling used games. If you don't want to do it that's fine I respect that, but for a lot of people Gamestop is the only way we can enjoy new games.

I see the game business like the car industry; I just traded in my car for a new SUV, does the car industry have the right to tell me what I'm "allowed" to do with my used car? No, because I bought it, payed for the license, and the insurance, and did what I wanted with it. The industry is actually better off because there is the used game market. New games sell millions more because people are able to buy new games with used games. For instance EVERY game I trade in goes toward a pre-order. I just traded in Aliens:Colonial Marines for Tomb Raider(quite a good investment by the way) that's one more sell for Tomb Raider that wouldn't have happened without me having the ability to trade in games.

Also, I don't like the idea of no used games because some developers don't deserve the sales they get at all. I'd rather someone buy my $20.00 used copy of the shitty Aliens game than get burned and pay full price like myself. Developers would be able to say, "F!@# it, they can't get rid of it once they buy it so the fact it's not amazing wont really hurt us in the end. We'll still see cash flow." It's all about the money with Gamestop yes i would agree, but that's all a lot of developers think about also. Screw making quality products, we'll make more if we just keep on the same beaten path(COD), and here is my response to them. Ok, I'll buy your game,used, and you wont see a penny.

wsoutlaw874067d ago

Why get ripped off buy game stop when you could sell it to people on ebay or amazon

isa_scout4067d ago

I guess just because it's quicker and there's not as much hassle. I live about an hour away from the nearest Gamestop,target, walmart so when I go to trade/buy a game it's nice knowing I can do it all at once without the hassle of shipping and handling. Also, I've used Ebay several times before and I got burned. Sam Fisher in the comments above called Gamestop a pawnshop, I disagree. I see gamestop as a specialty store. For the people that don't like to go to specialty stores or "Gamestop" that's fine, but whether you're seling them on ebay or to Gamestop the fact still remains you're trading them, and they in turn become used games. I see NO problem in trading the games YOU OWN in to Gamestop or wherever because they're your games to do with as you please. There are plenty different avenues to trading in your old games but the principle is still the same.

140°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers20h ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken6h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g16h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing15h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H916h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola12h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66915h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle14h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg1d 8h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos1d 7h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola1d 2h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies21d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken21d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga21d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken21d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6421d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long21d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197221d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
DivineHand12521d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91321d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer21d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91320d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit20d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
Christopher21d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6920d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit20d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher21d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken21d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197221d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2321d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218321d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder21d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts21d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)