140°

Bungie: Destiny's engine will last us 10 years, scales to next gen consoles

OXM UK: "Bungie has spent the past four years building a "state of the art" engine for its new shooter Destiny, senior engineers have revealed, and the developer expects that engine to last it an entire decade."

nrvalleytime4232d ago (Edited 4232d ago )

"The world builder is designed for maximum efficiency, Chen explained, allowing artists to effect changes in a fraction of the time it would have taken them using older tech."

That's fantastic to hear. Updates and content will be far easier to maintain with that kind of system, meaning that we benefit from efficient workers who enjoy creating for us.

I really cannot wait for this game.

user39158004231d ago

I guess PS4 AND 720 NO PC OR WIIU.

kevnb4231d ago

im pretty sure we will see a pc version.

dirigiblebill4232d ago

Nice to know that the engine's efficient to build with, and that they've tucked back all the online features nicely, but it sure doesn't look all that spectacular in the footage they've released.

Gazondaily4231d ago

Yeah the visuals did leave a lot to be desired but if the game can accomdate huge vistas PLUS loads of on-screen characters/vehicles then I'm happy with it.

The art style is brilliant though. My current screen saver is the Traveller orb hovering over Earth and you notice subtle details like the clouds being pushed away due to the gravitational field of the Traveller etc.

dirigiblebill4231d ago

Oh, I agree that the art style is brilliant. Love the whole "space barbarian" 70s sci-fi thing.

nukeitall4231d ago

There hasn't been much footage to see any spectacularity with.

Most MMO's don't have great graphics and focus on open worldness, interaction, and gameplay mechanics.

From what I can tell, it's not a corridor shooter where all the RAM and processing power is focused on making said game look good for the short distance you see down the hall.

If anything, Bungie has shown that great games aren't just graphics focused, but game play and story focused i.e. the entire experience.

I'm excited about this game, because the art style and what Bungie describes is something fresh and new. I will judge the game when more is shown, and until then I'm excited!

ShugaCane4231d ago

They sure know how to use words efficiently, but the only thing concrete they showed so far was a 4 min making-of with a few seconds of in-game footage. That's pretty weak for somehting they've been developping for such a long time now. Show us more before making such statements.

Gazondaily4231d ago

Well, I have a feeling that they will unveil more on E3. This was just a glimpse into what Destiny is about and how ambitious it is. To be honest it worked; the hype meter for this is already over 9000.

talisker4231d ago

Bungie's got a very efficient engine for X360. I expect even better for the next gen.

Show all comments (26)
40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast18d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

18d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris18d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

18d ago
anast17d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole17d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

17d ago
anast17d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17d ago
Profchaos18d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_17d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince198117d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension14017d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy8517d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj17d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake17d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn17d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg17d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot0717d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

ZoboomafooFan17d ago

Microsoft has succeeded in spite of the Xbox brand, not because of it

Knightofelemia17d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 17d ago
Chevalier17d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom17d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac17d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake17d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark17d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde17d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand12517d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)
190°

Top Director at Bungie Was Fired After Misconduct Investigation

Chris Barrett, one of the top executives at one of the video game industry’s leading studios, was fired this spring after he was accused by several female employees of inappropriate behaviour, according to people familiar with the matter.

Starting at Bungie Inc. in 1999, Barrett rose through the ranks as an artist and then a director on the popular Halo and Destiny franchises and served on Bungie’s board before the company was bought by Sony Group Corp. for $3.6 billion in 2022. Until last summer he was also the director of Marathon, which the studio is hoping will become its next big game franchise. But in late March, he suddenly left the company.

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com.
Jin_Sakai23d ago

“The investigation found that Barrett called lower-level female employees attractive, asked them to play truth-or-dare and made references to his wealth and power within the studio, suggesting that he could help advance their careers, according to two people familiar with the case.“

🤦‍♂️

DivineHand12523d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Not a good look for Bungie and I don't know why he tried pulling something like this. What will come of Marathon after this. This is the me too era and most men in high positions should know they need to be turtling up in the workplace and not even make those types of comments to other employees.

phoenixwing23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

It's not even worth doing if it wasn't the me too era. Promising advancement for doing romantic or sexual things is wrong no matter what era it is. It's just plain scummy.

Also they must have had some damning evidence because most execs get away with it if it's just someone's word against the other.

DivineHand12522d ago

That comment was said for the guys who can't help themselves. Of course it shouldn't be done regardless of what era. It's just that he should be smart enough to see the time of day and know to not do those underhanded things.

Extermin8or3_22d ago

8 people all reporting similar things with the texts to back it up....

jznrpg23d ago

Yeah that will get you fired 100% of the time if it can be corroborated.

Inverno23d ago

Now let's fire the genius buying cars and firing developers.

Show all comments (19)