510°

Why Only One Xbox 360 Exclusive vs Five PS3 Exclusive in 2013?

Microsoft might be of the opinion that an exclusivity deal with Activision and Rockstar Games for timed exclusive DLC content for next CoD and GTA V is enough to carry on the weight of Xbox 360 throughout 2013 and will make-up for lack of exclusive games for their home console.

This make shift arrangement looks perfect but only on papers and in imagination, no doubt gamers play CoD like anything, and keep Xbox Live active in high demand, however depending solely on third party games to keep Xbox 360 going in 2013 isn't a smart move.

A warning bell has already started for Microsoft as according to report (January 10, 2013) from International Data Corporation (IDC), lifetime sales figure of PS3 has surpassed Xbox 360.

dedicatedtogamers4140d ago

Sounds like an excuse to me.

However, people shouldn't count out the numerous XBLA games available each year. Yeah, yeah, they're not big-box, AAA, $60 "exclusive" retail releases, but a lot of downloadable games (whether on PC, PS3, or 360) have more gameplay value than most of the $60 retail releases these days.

JoySticksFTW4140d ago

Some people are going to say MS is saving exclusives for the next console, but that's not it.

MS has found this generation that they can do more with less. Between timed exclusives / dlc and a few of their exclusives being ultra insane sellers, MS seems to think that they don't need to invest in as many first / second party studios as their competition do to keep their core gamers happy.

We've even seen journalists repeatedly state that Sony should cut back their exclusives and focus on advertising (for less investment and larger gains), than put up significantly more money to develop numerous exclusive titles that don't sell like Halo.

While some may argue this makes sound business sense, it sounds vile to me and goes against every fiber of my gamer being.

Only in this crazy new age of gaming is more quality exclusives considered a bad thing.

And I'm not bashing the 360 console, which I own. But any 360 owner has to admit that the quantity and quality of exclusive titles for the core gamer now (and for the next console) compared to the first half of this generation is worrisome with MS' continued push towards Kinect and timed exclusives / dlc vs actual exclusives.

I got my 360 for Dead Rising, Crackdown, GeOW, Mass Effect, and the Mistwalker games. DR and ME went multi-plat, CD 2 sucked, what the heck happened to MW, and only GeOW maintained it's quality. I feel the earlier titles in those series were the best ones.

NeverEnding19894140d ago

I'm looking more at the 13 untitled, currently in development games from Microsoft's first party studios. http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Are these games coming in 2013? Are they hardcore or Kinect? Are they for the 720? We don't know.

Either way 2013 is looking to be a great year for Xbox 360 owners.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr34140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

I didn't hear this in 2012 nor see any articles like this lol. People were surly thirsty for 2013. Is the console wars still being fought, if so, then you folks are sad...

greenpowerz4140d ago Show
Skips4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

@NeverEnding1989

"Either way 2013 is looking to be a great year for Xbox 360 owners."

If you are talking about multiplats then yes. Exclusives? Hardly.

@greenpowerz

"PS3 fanboys were saying this at the end of 2011 yet in 2012 Sony had weaker offerings"

Difference is, compared to Xbox 360's 2013. PS3 had more than ONE exclusive for 2012.

TheGamerDood4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

It would have been more appropriate to raise this issue two and half years back but now. I feel for xbox users they deserved a lot more than GOW and Halo DLC.

DOMination-4140d ago

MS 21 first party studios working on next gen.

Sony 12 first party studios.

Im on phone so can't really link but its true. Lets reassess this situation in 2-3 years. I think people around here will be surprised.

darthv724140d ago

here is that there are plenty of "exclusive" games for each platform that are coming out. How they are received is another issue. Quality and appeal are the deciding factors of a game getting purchased or just sitting there.

We know that not ALL games appeal the same and as such the quality of those games is criticized differently. Some have a simplistic nature that may not appeal to a certain type of gamer but that does not change the fact that if the game is exclusive it should be omitted from a list of exclusive games to be released.

Lets be fair about this.

aquamala4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

the fanboys always only want to talk about the exclusives, but look at the games in 2012, Far Cry 3, Borderlands 2, Dishonored, AC3, etc etc. there's enough quality multi plat games to keep most console owners busy. 5 exclusives in 2013 really aren't that many compared to the number of multi plat games people want to play.

Enemy4140d ago

Next gen? What, are 343i going to develop all their games?

SilentNegotiator4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

@aquamala

Oh please. Don't pretend like 2012 was typical. They're clearly preparing their resources for the next gen. Any other year, you have unmissable exclusives.

starchild4140d ago

Microsoft do need to get serious on the exclusives front. If they don't step up there game in that regard then I won't be getting the next Xbox.

kupomogli4140d ago

@dedicatedtogamers

Sorry, but "almost" every good XBLA title comes out on either PC and sometimes PS3 as well. Even if it doesn't come out on PS3, the fact that it's on PC means it's not exclusive.

There are also "some" downloadable games that have better value than "some" retail releases. However, you get what you pay for and a lot of these digital games are just pure ass. That's why some of these games don't make their way to Steam because they're submitted and they're declined by Steam as something that doesn't seem like it would sell, meaning they probably thought it wasn't any good. Microsoft will let anything on their XBLA as long as you pay the fees.

EVILDEAD3604139d ago

Going into year 8 the 360 is the oldest console this gen and is still finishing extremely strong headed into E3.

Microsoft just released its most expensive title Xbox history in less than 2 months ago alongside a few other exclusives this holiday and it paid off huge.

Halo 4 is the fastest selling Halo ever and like every other Halo will chart in 2013. the 360 itself had another dominating Dec NPD and quarter.

At this point, We see what happens every year with articles like these. They pretend that MS somehow has to compete against Sony game speculation.

When we saw what happened last year, when there were sites declaring all Last of Us and games like Last Guardian were coming in 2012.

So at the end of the day, you basically have The God of War prequel vs. the Gears of War prequel in March.

And although Naughty is blesses us with 'Last' in May, MS isn't stupid enough to release an exclusive at the same time becuase Grand Theft Auto 5 will be dropping in May as well. (see Alan Wake vs. Red Dead for reference)

The rest of the supposed games are all coming after E3 and we all know this is an huge E3 for MS if it's going to be launching the 720.

The rest of the first half of 2013 is dominated by huge high profile multis many of which MS has been pushing hard like Tomb Raided, Metal Gear, and Bioshock: Infinite.

Again at the end of the console gen there is nothing to prove and I guarantee Sony will be just as careful next year when they are in the same position MS is in.

Evil

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4139d ago
scofios4140d ago ShowReplies(11)
otherZinc4140d ago ShowReplies(9)
LackTrue4K4140d ago

Sounds like they will announce the next system in some months, there just saving amo

evilunklebud4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

Over at MetaC the users voted 14 of the top 20 games multi plats (8 of the top 10) for 2012.... maybe exclusives are not as important as they were 5 years ago?

kneon4140d ago

That may be true, but perhaps multi-platform games get more votes because they are played by more people on more platforms. If someone games exclusively on one or two platforms they aren't going to vote on an platform exclusive on a platform they don't use.

So really the votes don't tell the whole story.

evilunklebud4140d ago

The scores are aggregated, so I'm not sure what your point is..... As far as "being played by more people on more platforms" that is kind of my point.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4140d ago ShowReplies(2)
UnholyLight4140d ago Show
fermcr4140d ago

"Why Only One Xbox 360 Exclusive vs Five PS3 Exclusive in 2013?"

This console generation is ending, and next gen is arriving... most likely in 2013.

As for exclusives, i prefer quality then quantity. If you take a look at PS3 exclusives in 2012, they were all average or below average. I personally didn't purchase any PS3 exclusive in 2012.... but i have to admit this year it looks much better for the PS3. Probably purchase 3 or 4 PS3 exclusives this year.

DOMination-4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

Starhawk was really good actually but certainly Twisted Metal, PSASBR and LBP Karting were all only average to decent

GrandMaxPain4140d ago

no it doesnt mean next gen at all. It only means that Microsoft cares about quality and sony about quantity.

ItsTrue4140d ago

Not necessarily. There is a possibility that Sony is pumping out many quality exclusives while Microsoft could be releasing a few 'not-so-good' games.
Remember though, it's a 'could' not 'are'.

MoonWheel4140d ago

I'm sorry, but releasing only sequels and prequels to shooter franchises doesn't sound like much quality. How is Sony releasing around 5 games about quantity? Sony at least releases new ip unlike Microsoft.

rainslacker4140d ago

Almost every PS1 1st party title is quality.

showtimefolks4140d ago

my hope is they are saving for next gen but my concern is they think they can be successful with same 3-4 games with timed exclusive dlc.

since launch of kinect MS have kind of given up on core market, which i believe will bite them in their behind come next gen.

gamers are a lot of things but stupid isn't one of those things.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4139d ago
Ezz20134140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

i know what xbox fan answer would be
"because MS is ready for nextbox"

if that even close to true
then that's a company that don't deserve any gamer respect
they drop support for the console before even show the new one ??!!
and don't tell xbox still getting MultiPlat games
that's not support...that's just what every other system have too
no one need to own xbox to play games you can find on other systems
and psn + already beat xbox live when it come to value

sony may show ps4 this year or next or never and the samething with MS
no one knows..i all just rumors
we should care about what we have right now

with sony ...ps3 fans get alot of support from 1st/2nd/3rd part dev's
and will still get that support even after few years in ps4 life
sony only care about money just like MS..yes i know that
but atleast sony doing it job with playstation owners

i know i will get downvoted and lose bubble
it's just my opinion though

saint_seya4140d ago

sry i had to bubble + for smart comment ;)

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

"i know what xbox fan answer would be
"because MS is ready for nextbox" "

2010s alam wake was the last new IP. And I got it on pc.

Xbox gamers don't care for new IP's or platform support for other than shooters. America sigh.. They just want who has the best commercial because the one with the best ad is the best to them.

tommygunzII4140d ago

I dont think that's necessarily true. I think they would play more games than shooters but that seems to be all they have, when it comes to exclusives. Thats why their few exclusives do sell more, there is less to choose from.

UnholyLight4140d ago

How is that disrespectful? Especially if none of these games will be backward compatible why would a dev release a game on the 360 at this point in time.

fermcr4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

"i know i will get downvoted and lose bubble it's just my opinion though"

... just like Sony dropped the support for the PSP. I got a PSP that's as good as a paperweight.

Maybe you should be more attentive before writing your "opinion".

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4140d ago
GribbleGrunger4140d ago

The Last Of Us
God Of War Ascention
Beyond
Ni-no-Kuni
Sly 3
Rain
Puppeteer
Until Dawn

I make that eight and I'm sure I've missed one.

Catoplepas4140d ago

Disgaea D2
Tales of Xillia
The Witch and the Hundred Cavalrymen
Yakuza 5

.....

Quite possibly others. I'm not entirely sure.

room4144140d ago

MLB 13:The Show
Dynasty Warriors 7 Empires
Dust 514
Hyperdimension Neptunia Victory
Dragons Crown

Not sure if that's all. There might be more.

Jag-T10004140d ago Show
Catoplepas4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

@Jag

Errr, congratulations?

I'll take a diverse choice of titles, over one that sells well any day of the week.

Enjoy your sales. I'll enjoy my games.

Rhythmattic4140d ago

Jag-T1000

I shall now refer your statement to the dictionary.

"Ridiculous"

MoonWheel4140d ago

@ Jag yea check your facts. Gears sells around 5 to 6 million units not even close to 10 million. Also I should inform you that the uncharted games were able to sell around that much.

tommygunzII4140d ago

@ Jag-T1000

That's because you have so few choices, it's either Gears or nothing when it comes down to it. Its that simple.

Multiplatform games are almost tied in America now in terms of weekly sales between PS3 / 360. According to VGC for what its worth.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4140d ago
pandaboy4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

There's actually not that many when you begin to resort to downloadable and no-name titles. Anyone could do that for the 360 too.

Zechs344140d ago

There's one game in those entire lists that these well informed individuals listed that is coming out on PSN and that's "Rain" I believe. Everything else on that is a retail disc title and more than half of them will be over 80 on Metacritic.

And as far as Jtag's jab toward sales, God of War alone can go toe toe with Gears.

Troll harder. Even your name is a disappointment over something illegal to do to you box to cheat and play games for free. Gtfo.

nukeitall4140d ago

If you narrow it down to a certain convenient games, but what about last year?

Many of these games were probably pushed out to this year due to being delayed. As far as I can remember, there was only one AAA exclusive game on PS3 last holiday. That fighting game that bombed.

Does it matter anyhow? I have so much games on the backlog, exclusives and multi-platform and I can't find time to play them. There is a huge library on all platforms, except Wii U due to being new. If you can't find games to play, you either have too much time on your hand or have a very narrow taste for games.

ILive4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

It actually does matter because of competition. Competition is suppose to bring quality and variety. Only Sony seems to understand this. I cannot blame Microsoft because it apparently doesn't matter and Mulitplats have done far better than exclusives this Gen when they are obviously sold across different platforms. I love use to love the Xbox, and I still like it. But I have to say that purchasing a Ps3 was one of the best thing I have ever done for myself this Gen. If only the 360 was more like the original Xbox. Men did I love that console. It had an amazing variety of games. It was just late to the party.

Sony is already making names for these exclusives come next Gen. They don't have to stress about new ips like microsoft. They just have come out with couple more to add to the list.

cloud 2794140d ago

to nukeitall,
PS3 in year 2012 had 7 Exclusives.
Little Big Planet Karting
PS All Star Battle Royale
Starhark
Ratchet and Clank Full Frontal Assault
Sorcery (This is a move game don't know if this should be counted or not)
Tokyo Jungle
Twisted Metal

Also they release the ratchet and clank, killzone, jak and daxter collections.
plus MLB the show, and move games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4140d ago
GribbleGrunger4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

Double Post.

InsaneGam3r4140d ago

No need for the 'fanboyism'.

Friendly comment passing through

Show all comments (156)
270°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic188120h ago(Edited 20h ago)

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus2310h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos1h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb3329m ago

i think you are really missing the point

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 29m ago
SonyStyled16h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

14h agoReplies(2)
ChasterMies4h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29m ago
jwillj2k420h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot19h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

RNTody19h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead9h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage2h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast18h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn197918h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel10h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

lodossrage2h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (49)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead2d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 20h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie1d 10h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 5h ago
Hereandthere1d 1h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 1h ago
Notellin1d 6h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 5h ago
Hereandthere1d 1h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow11h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 1h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow11h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX1d 23h ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney6h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno1d 22h ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 20h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 20h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 5h ago
fsfsxii1d 6h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 5h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)