PlayStation Vita hasn’t had an easy go of it in its first year on the market. For as promising as the handheld appeared to be before its release, it’s failed to light the sales charts on fire both in its native Japan and in the west. As a result, questions about Vita’s future have already arisen in earnest as Sony continues to stand by its machine, seemingly unaware (or simply unwilling to admit) that anything has gone wrong.
A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.
I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.
I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons
I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.
Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.
At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath
I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.
Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.
Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.
This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.
cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me
Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.
Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.
I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.
Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.
How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.
I guess they should. At the same time, if Orbis winds up connecting to VITA to the enth degree and there arrives to be a super affordable VITA+Orbis bundle at launch than we will see why it was SCEA way of marketing was not true to the tech and the ecosystem.
Seriously, it would make all the sense in the world for a VITA and PS4 (aka Orbis) bundle to be there at launch for, say, $400 and than all PS4 games, media, etc can be streamed to the VITA's display (with Remote Play 2.0).
If that's not the case, holy crap. Something went wrong.
Of course, I also look forward to actual VITA base games like "Soul Sacrifice", "TearAway" and (hopefully) "Gravity Rush 2" in the future.
post edit: Before any one says $400 is far too low for a VITA+PS4 budle, let's keep in mind VITA does not cost a lot to manufacture and it could be re-designed in a bundle to be cheaper than what one mind find right now at retail. Also, it is heavily rumored PS4 will not use Cell; which is what cost Sony to eat hundreds per each launch PS3 sold.
It wont be a huge risk if Sony even eat just $70 to $150 per VITA+PS4 bundle if they make such a thing a limited, secondary SKU at launch.
In my opinion, i think the Vita was built to have some sort of partnership with the Ps4.
Vita needs free or a cheap yearly price like $70 4G and one amazing exclusive single player game like san andreas stories and one amazing online game that will draw everyone in.
Vita clearly doesn't have support from third party developpers. Sony cannot afford developping games for Vita forever. This machine has a potential, but it's still very far from seducing the crowd.
I showed the Vita last week to a guy i know and he tried uncharted on it for a couple of minutes. He was blown away and he never could imagine Vita being capable of such level of performance and he definitely wants one.
The problem is, on top of no support from 3rd party, is a crual lack of INFORMATIVE ads!!!
Got my vita and it has given me countless hours of fun, uncharted golden abyss gets heavy playing time, PS all stars, ragnorak odyssey, little big planet vita, assassin's creed. I am also usually in a cross game cross party chat room with up to 8 friends while gaming listening to music looking at photos, taking pictures, downloading, watching YouTube videos, watching Netflix or whatever else. This thing is a beast and the ultimate multitasker. I see these articles and laugh to myself because I remember all the same articles when PS3 launched before it was even a year in its time the web deemed it as being doomed. Silly rabbits.