Okay, so voice recognition has been made a notable issue recently what with Bioware announcing voice support for Mass Effect 3 through the Xbox Kinect. This has raised some vocal concern among the PS3 and PC communities as well as an almost expected amount of taunting from the Xbox 360 camp since this specifically gives their valued system something no other will be able to do.
Now along comes this Joystiq article:
http://www.joystiq.com/2011...
which announces that Sega's new title Binary Domain will also feature voice recognition. That its squad based futuristic shooter will in fact heavily rely on the function. With many comments, including my own, reading the title and comprehending this as the multiplatform title being "Kinect-only." With much, much, fanboy gloating.
My own specific reaction concern that a publisher would be so openly bias as to sabotage their own product on a competing gaming platform, I - eventually - clicked on the article which turned out to be all of two small paragraphs. Discovered the statement "We plan on supporting Kinect," which was in response during a voice command demo of the game which played on a dev kit PS3 with a headset.
Let me repeat that: a dev kit PS3 with a headset.
Maybe there was some English to Japanese translation issue, that the game was being shown on a PS3, it voice feature being tested, is plainly stated. Maybe this could change, something on a contractual/compensation level, but until such happens it can be taken as fact that voice recognition is a utilizable feature on the PS3, the 360 and most certainly the PC of which current consoles are a closer if limited imitation.
Yes, as a mainly console gamer I bow to the superior PC gamer master race. Get over yourselves we all have bigger problems.
Ignoring the simple implication that Bioware is simply choosing not to support voice commands over other platforms – and really lets face facts, all its doing for ME3 is overlapping the game’s menu ring and other established prior controller based commands – there’s the more serious worry that in both cases that “Kinect-only” means just that for 360 owners. That Binary Domain, future games like it, will require the motion controller and its microphone to be played at its best. Will give reason to those with no interested in Kinect to get one. Even though a simpler and non-expensive software application could do the job just as well.
To sum things up: this is something we as gamers need to get to the bottom of and clear up. Could just be something that’s getting confused in the frenzy of uncovering and exploiting a new/old feature, or just plain exploitation. You want to stand fast and stay behind fanboy lines, go for it. The cost is going to be different for all of us.
Silent Hill 2 remake will be exclusive to the PS5 until October 8, 2025, so don't expect an Xbox port or announcement it expires.
why does it feel like we are living in the early 00's again? Sony paying for either full exclusivity or timed was the thing back in the day... and its been 'remastered' for this generation.
Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.
Good.
Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!
I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".
No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.
we know this, we have known this since last year.
this is not new or news.
"The Hamburg-based (Germany) indie games publisher Daedalic Entertainment and Rome-based (Italy) indie games developer ONE-O-ONE GAMES, are today super happy and excited to announce that their gripping narrative thriller "The Suicide of Rachel Foster", is now available for the PS5 via PSN." - Jonas Ek, TGG.
To me, it means backpedaling for series like Fable, ridiculous exclusive content like voice control that simply SHOULDN'T be exclusive to it, watching LucasArts use up resources on an on-rail Star Wars game (that ends up coming down to waggle-type gameplay), and watching in horror as doing the jig to move around (instead of pushing a control stick) gets called "innovative"
It's the type of thing fanboys love to hear, but they'll never want to hear the rest of it: that the exact same thing is possible on another system, but the developer simply CHOSE not to do so. It doesn't make their system superior- and in this case, it's costing a good deal extra for the feature. Damn shame.
you just cant have it both ways. Even if the ability is there, reasons behind decision are their choice. We can speculate all we want but it just comes down to you pick the one you want.
PS3 version of Batman AA had the joker levels and yet I bought the 360 version. My reason was actually based on getting the lego batman free with the purchase of the 360 one. I also bought dante inferno on the 360 because there wasnt a good hack/slash game like GoW on the 360 and I already had GoW3 on PS3. I like the game in spite of there being a better version on PS3.
Complaining over something the other guy got is no different than gloating about something you have the other person doesnt. It doesnt make either behavior right. You have to be able to stand by your own purchase decision in spite of everything else.
"Kinect only" is no different than only on ps3 or only on 360. We know that is a lie but you have to give them something they can at least call their own once in a while.
Thing is this isn't about DLC or graphics, this is about *YOU* having to buy a $150 add-on to use a feature you can already use thanks to the headset packed with most every other 360. At least I think they still include headsets.
I mean its one thing to make Kinect only games, and another to tie a feature to it for a regular game when they could otherwise not bother.
Seriously I feel like I'm trying to warn a neighbor who's being robbed or taken advantage of, but because we're on bad terms they aren't listening to me.
Edit@1c3Cr3am:
It can and does do the same thing with a headset. That's the whole point - SO CAN THE XBOX!
Can't the ps3 do the same thing with the Ps eye? There is a mic built in.