470°

Microsoft Agressively Pursuing An Early Natal Release, Expecting To Sell 5M In 2010

Project Natal might be seeing the light of day sooner than many had thought. That is if Microsoft has its way.

Read Full Story >>
electronista.com
alaa5067d ago

That's impossible! Not even 2 million will be sold

ingiomar5067d ago

who are you to say that? unless you have total control over the whole world you never know.. cuz that what we said about Wii too ''THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE it wont even sell 2 consoles''.

movements5067d ago

Anything is possible. Never say never. Ever.

Hallmark Moment5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

He's actually an angry PS3 fanboy. He's been one of the worst ones that have been trolling Natal articles.

2 million Natals will be too small of a number for the pre-orders alone. There will be more than 2 million pre-orders just from gamers upgrading their cameras alone not to mention all the possible deals and bundles with games or possible 360 Slim bundles.

I'm sure! average games on the 360 sell 2 million. I don't see how a PS3 fanboy no matter how rabid thinks a device/platform that will have it's own games and will enhance older games and dashboard navigation can't sell 2 million. The logic is almost moronic, if it were not for the blatant trolling you would think this guy wasn't very smart.

LOL A console where multi player is huge will welcome Natal with it's microphone array. There will be dozens of reason why people will buy Natal.

-Alpha5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Agreed, it's not impossible, it all depends on price, method of selling, games, and appeal. We know none of that to say it's impossible.

I knew MS was going to be aggressive with Natal. They have a whole E3 dedicated to Natal on the 17th, so I expect to see a ton of information. Everybody was complaining about MS revealing nothing throughout the year but they never intended to: E3 is the perfect place for a media blowout and they know that. Hence, the Times Square feed and the whole day dedicated for a Natal conference. I'm pretty excited to see the games, hopefully we have some strong titles.

hardcorez5067d ago

Alaa is a flame commenter on stories submitted by gt, to create more coments.

Darkfocus5067d ago

just to have them available before the competition?

of all the company's out their Microsoft should know best that you should never sacrifice quality just to meet a deadline.

-Alpha5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

@Dark Focus

You are assuming the product isn't finished or that it has design flaws, which you do not know. If Natal is ready then why not release it early or first? It's a smart move to beat the competition to the punch.

If there is anybody who I trust will not F up their product anymore it's Microsoft. They are paying dearly for their mistake and they know it. I'm sure they've learned their lesson having to pay for hardware support.

Really, MS's strategy, in my opinion, was to get a decent marketshare this gen, and they did that by being the cheaper console and releasing first. I hope next gen they are confident enough in their reputation of the Xbox to put more care and effort into the console. Sony had that mentality: They trusted that the PlayStation brand would sustain by the name alone, and that kind of reputation is something MS needed to earn.

ingiomar5067d ago

@darkfocus

Who said they are sacrificing quality as far as we know natal is already finished

Fred-G-Sanford5067d ago

Wow, August would be awesome.

I'm looking forward to using it with my PC just as much as I am with my 360.

Anon19745067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Let's be realistic here. The hardcore that already own 360's love their Halo and Gears. They aren't going to buy Natal to leap around their living rooms instead of playing Modern Warfare.

The casuals have nothing at this point to entice them away from Nintendo. The bulk of Wii owners aren't big enough gamers to care what the Xbox is doing. They aren't switching. New casual gamers are going to look at the 360 with Natal, look at the cheaper, slimmer and more reliable Wii with Mario happily waving back at them and they're going to choose the Wii...every time. You just don't get more family friendly than Mario.

And informed gamers are going to look at the $300 Xbox/Natal price tag - look at the $300 PS3/Blu-Ray price tag and go for the PS3. At the same price point, the PS3 simply offers more reliability and more value at $300.

I'm willing to go out on a limb here and say there is no way that Natal will move 5 million units by the end of the year. It's a camera add-on. Although the tech is a bit more advanced, it still just a camera add-on.

Edit: Just out of curiosity, what are you disagreeing with? I feel my points are valid. I'd love to hear some counterarguments. Disagrees tell me nothing. These forums are for the free exchange of ideas. Exchange away!

derseb5067d ago

Microsoft pursuing an early release .... it all depends on price...

This reminds me of the 360 launch! Remember what you got M$ fanboys?

A faulty product!

Boy30005067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

I disagreed with simply because...imo you are completly wrong.

Just one example: MS sells around 9 million consoles a year and maybe something like 3 million in the last quarter with the fall rush etc.

If Natal is bundled, everything is pointing at a Natal+360 bundle, it will AUTOMATICALLY sell a bit less than 5 million...AUTOMATICALLY. Now add the couple of new buyers who are going to bite in the hype and there you have it, 5 million Natal sold almost without breaking a sweat.

2 minutes of thinking would have helped you see that your logic is completely flawed.

I mean everyone who wants a 360, whether he wants it or not will get it with Natal thanks to the bundles.

-Alpha5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

DarkRide, the hardcore could easily use Natal if it appeals to them. People play more than Gears and Halo, and just because they do doesn't mean they are all some meatheads who can't enjoy a different product. Mass Effect could work well with Natal in terms of some things, and many people play that. I can see Natal having good uses for hardcore games. Natal really isn't about just jumping around in your living room and I hate how that stereotype is being played. I've seen many fanboys jump on Natal articles resorting to demeaning tactics like that. We do not know how Natal will incorporate hardcore games, but we know studios like Bethesda, Criterion, etc are working on the integration. And I know that Fallout and Burnout doesn't require you to dance around the room. I wish people would stop with that stereotype. I get that it's funny and it's used to poke fun at Natal, but some people end up using it in arguments as if it has any basis. Again, depending on factors like price and appeal, we do not know for certain. I think it's unfair to paint Natal 1-dimensionally as the product that does only "red ball" games.

And I sincerely doubt casuals can't be enticed. One thing MS has that Nintendo doesn't is great online features that Natal can benefit from. Also, MS is billing it as a hands-free tool and I think that could very well interest casual gamers. Personally I think it's about pricing and appeal. MS can appeal to the casual gamer, they really can. We hardcore gamers see silly dancing in the red ball demo, casuals see a way to keep kids fit and active.

And when do casuals=Mario? I doubt casual users who use Wii are actual gamers in that sense. MS needs to price Natal at the sweet spot to gain casual acceptance. Whether it will sell 5 million in a year, I strongly doubt it, but I have little doubt it will be popular with regular office workers who see a source of entertainment, or mothers, children, etc. It's being advertised on the news, on non-gaming news websites, etc. MS really is pushing this as something that isn't about games to these audiences.

You say informed gamers will get the PS3, but the 360 still manages to sell right now at $300 in comparison to PS3 at $300. The PS3 sells better worldwide, but that doesn't mean the 360 doesn't sell well or sell at all. Clearly there are people that prefer the 360, and I don't doubt that will stop. On top of that with the rumors of a rebranding I can easily see MS drop the price of the Xbox models. We know the technology is cheaper for MS and I have zero doubt that if ever threatened they will drop the price.

"I'm willing to go out on a limb here and say there is no way that Natal will move 5 million units by the end of the year"

I definitely doubt that too, but I do expect it to nonetheless appeal. MS is going to push it hard. How hard and how effective it will be remains to be seen, but I don't want to count it out on the grounds that it's not appealing to hardcore gamers and that it's not good enough for casual gamers. I honestly want to know the price to better speculate.

If MS is aiming for 5 million and if they want to meet that goal then I suspect a price drop, pricing, games, and bundles to play a large role.

WildArmed5067d ago

I dont see it selling 5mil (at least this year).
In it's lifetime, i'm sure it'll mount to well over 5mil.
But assuming they are launching it near Christmas, 5mil is too optimistic.

Anon19745067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

It's nice to see people actually talk on these forums instead of just resorting to personal attacks and fanboy bashing.

@Boy3000. Bubbles for an intelligent answer (and I wish you had more just to keep the conversation going). You know, that's an excellent point. The estimate for 360 sales this year is 10.5 million, and a meaty chunk of that will come at year end, but you're not factoring in the price and the competition. Microsoft isn't going to sell only Natal bundles from here on in. If they bundle Natal with the Arcade it'll probably be about $300. Bundle it with an Elite and we're looking at $375-$400. Not only will the Natal bundles be competing with the PS3 and Wii, but they'll also be competing with other 360's for price. This is far from a sure thing.

@ Alpha-Male22. Always appreciate your comments. Bubbles.
But with nothing that we know of to offer the hardcore, which we both know make up the core 360 audience, why would you spend $150 on Natal when you could use that cash to buy Halo:Reach? Natal might have something to offer the hardcore, but as it is now, how many hardcore gamers spend their time rocking out Wii-Sports instead of MW:2? I just don't see this demographic being swayed in only a few months - not in the numbers Microsoft is talking.

As for casuals - they aren't going to be swayed because casuals don't purchase multiple game consoles. Most of them don't play their Wii much as is. That's why they're casuals. While Microsoft can attempt to rope in new casuals, they aren't going to touch current Wii owners because current Wii owners just don't care about owning multiple consoles.

And when I'm talking bout informed gamers picking the PS3 over the 360, bear in mind I'm talking about a theoretical future where a Natal bundle is the same price as a PS3. A 360 with Natal for the same price as a PS3 - the PS3 still has so much more going for it in terms of a complete package. While some will ultimately choose the 360, I think the bulk of people wouldn't pass up on a Blu-Ray player/free wi-fi/free online/reliable hardware, etc for the same price as a 360 and a camera attachment.

And with casuals and Mario - I was thinking more of families. You can't tell me a guy buying a game console for his little ones would pay more for Natal with Milo then he would for Wii with Mario. Just look at the sales for Super Mario Brothers. Have you seen the numbers for that game? It's getting near 14 million. The thing's a monster. Super Mario Galaxy 2 has moved almost 2 million in 2 weeks in NA and Japan alone. What chance does a virtual 10 year old and Ricochet have against that in the family living room?

It's not about Natal not being and interesting and marketable product, it's about what it's up against.

-Alpha5067d ago

Fair enough, it's all speculation right now, but I think after we know the price we can get a better understanding.

Also, regarding casuals, I think Nintendo has not only created a more casually appealing product but they also have the games like Wii Fit. I would think though, that MS would push products like this for the casual, and the idea of using your whole body may work well. As for casuals buying multiple consoles, good point, but how many casually-appealing products exist for these casual gamers anyway?

Casual gamers only have the Wii because the PS3 and Xbox aren't appealing to them. That's different with Natal because Natal WANTS to appeal to the casuals, so you never really know. Anyway, I agree that 5 million will be a hard sell but if MS is determined then I don't doubt that they can do it. Whether they are seriously trying to achieve this goal or seeing it as a possibility, I don't know, but if they are set on selling 5 million then I'm sure they'll do everything they can to try and meet that goal. +bubbles!

insomnium5067d ago

I serously doubt the 5 million. For that to happen MS would have to lower the prices so that in actuality people would get Natal for free (compared to the price today) when it's bundled.

Bought separately Natal cannot cost more than 60 dollars for it to even have a slight chance to get to 5 million sold at the end of this year.

Ripyealip5066d ago (Edited 5066d ago )

but you just said never twice?!

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 5066d ago
MisterNiwa5067d ago

Have a bubble my friend.

Everyone who disagrees has a small penis.

shoddy5067d ago

Agree if you have big penis
disagree if you don't.

deadreckoning6665067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

@alaa- Be careful with those assumptions of yours. For all we know, Natal may be only $49.99 or may come as standard with a $300 360 bundle. We know that Microsoft is gunning for the Wii's throne. Because of this, Natal may be supercheap. And with all the money they've gained from XBL Gold membership and overpriced perhiprials..they can certainly afford to make Natal extrememly affordable.

Microsoft wouldn't say 5 million if they didn't have something BIG up their sleeves.

Edit: I still don't know why a certain group on this site want so much for Natal to fail. If Natal is cheap..its a win for GAMERS. The people who are STILL on that red ball ricochet crap clearly aren't gamers. Any fool hass he ability to comprehend that ACTUALLY retail Natal games will be WAAAAY better than that. But, as always, PS3 fanboys only hear what they WANT to hear :)

jmare5067d ago

Keep telling yourself that, man. Because you say it, it must be true.

jerethdagryphon5067d ago

bear in mind the epic natal announcement, my guess is gears 3 has shoehorned natal support in agaisnt there better judgment

thing is if wii has the casuals there not gonna want to fork out another 300 for a new machine regardless of how better it is

people considering the wii might take one of the hd offerings instead if theey didnt want mario and his chums

Boy30005067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

If natal is bundled from now on for instance with the 360 it will easily sell 5 million thanks to the bundles alone. MS sells around 9 million 360's a year and we're only in June.

And if its around 50$ without even being bundled, 5 million isn't over the top if MS manage to convince the crowds at E3.

erathaol5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Remember when they pursued an early Xbox 360 release? They sold really well cause they were the first next gen console to hit the market and was marked at a reasonable price. The flip side of that victory was that the tech had issues because it was rushed out without proper testing. History could repeat itself here.

Cold 20005067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

I doubt MS are that dumb. If the average N4G user isnt that stupid then I dont see why they would be.

OneSneakyMofo5067d ago

How can they sell 5 million when the release date is November, 2010? Maybe if they release it with Halo: Reach. I don't see this taking off like the Wii though.

kfloydchicken5067d ago

NATAL will be cheap.
MS "leaked" the 150 price to "mind-condition" people.
So that when it comes out at $50
... people will think it's a steal.
(... of course there will be a lot of people who'll fall for it.)

NecrumSlavery5067d ago

To think it'll be under $100 is just setting yourself up for a disappointment. The MS network adapter is $100. What would you expect. Just be glad the NATAL isn't battery operated. We will let the games justify the price.

EVILDEAD3605067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Look at every Natal article since January and you will see the same Natal/360 detractors pushing the same smear agenda ad nauseum.

We get it..THEY are not going to buy one and the want everyone on N4G.com to subscribe to the same beliefs.

Unfortunately, for them it doesn't work like that when they log off.

If and that is a BIG 'IF' Microsoft delivers a truly compelling Natal reveal on Wednesday then there is absolutely no reason why those figures won't be realized.

The 360s best 4th quarter was 6 million sold..last year was considered their worst gaming year and it still did 5 million+ in the last quarter of 2009.

Again, if Micrsoft sells off it's inventory and pushes a bundled 360/Natal console which is pushed October through January of 2011 then there is no reason why it won't be in at least 4 million homes minimum. This includes the stand alone Natal/game bundle.

Nintendo's Wii proved one thing.build a compelling case for family gaming experience + have a great E3 showing and watch the figures pour in.

Microsoft's wise decision to market Natal out of the box on Nick at Nite and MTV aims directly at the target audience Natal wants to attract.

The hardcore fans of the Xbox 360 will push Halo Reach and Gears 3 to those monster numbers. But, Micrsoft is in a win-win situation if it can tap into a market that pushes games like Just dance to head scratching success.

This isn't about PS3 vs. the 360. Having 65 disagrees because you say something good about Natal or Move is like throwing pebbles at an ocean. At the end of the day, it's the millions of people who shop on Black Friday and the holiday season who will make or break these add-ons..

I for one can't wait to see how it all shakes out this week

Evil

Redgehammer5067d ago

this my favorite article of the week as far as intelligent discourse goes. Your comments and some of the comments above are nice examples of when intelletcualism and gaming converge and form islands of "verdant" conversation in the boundless sea of stupidity, which is fanboyism.

I am a FPScentric gamer, father, 360 owner and I can't wait to get natal in my house. I, for one, believe that Natal (and Move) are going to be the harbingers of a new ways to game, play, and interact.

PCnPS3Gamer5067d ago

i really hate ms and how they brainwash stupid fucks like the majority of so called h core gamers who are secretly casuals commenting on this article.

so far darkride is the only person that i see that deserves to be called a h core gamer.

alpha male your just a neutral bitch that would suck ms fanboys off if you could get a bubble out of it your just a phony a big fat phony....

natal sucks and the only reason sony hasny released move is cause they want to launch it with more games, isnt games more important then sales....i guess not ehh....all you guys need is that glitchy ball game tho its all good right ms. i can see it now project natal releases in august 2010 by xmas everyone is having frame rate issues with natal and its over heating gamers threaten to sue ms, ms adds 3 year warranty to natal, gamers pretend nothing happend, ps3 owners are like wtf is wrong with you morons....

i dont give a fuck how much natal sells, or when that glorified eye toy comes out, i like how ms says natal is not an eye toy then you believe them how come it looks like the glitchy lame eye toy then, but it has teh 2 cameras oh so now 2 people can play a glitchy lame game awesome. move is the better product and mark my fucking words it will have more games. hardcore and casual...plus move support for existing games via patch... plus 3D if you get a 3d tv or atleast a 120hz or 240hz tv....

Redgehammer5067d ago

I disagree with you completely, primarily due to your truncated sentences and inability to weave your thoughts into a cohesive argument that doesn't reek of standard fanboy vitriol. I think you are trying to say that Microsoft is the devil, and that you need some rattle snakes and holy water to protect yourself. Please correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I gathered from your anger filled diatribe.

PCnPS3Gamer5067d ago

im a fanboy becuz i think ms makes garbage tech. and all they do is heard you sheep like bitches.....if ms did what sony is doing id be saying ms is better i actually owned an xbox 1 instead of a ps2. then the 360 come out and it was crap.

i waited till sony released the ps3 because i knew itd be a better piece of tech got one on launch and best decision ever made may have been minority but i dont care i buy the best and if i cant i dont buy anything at all....

ms is all about talking outta theyre asses about all theyre products they say all these insane things that natal can do year later nothing but that stupid ball game has surfaced u say its because theyre saving it for e3 but i call bs on that i think they just cant do any of it without major lag and limited graphics quality ms bit off more then they can chew this time i dont even think ms advertising and pr can save natal....

Inside_out5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

If and this is a big IF, M$ offers it to the PC community as well as the 40+ million 360 community, they every chance to sell as many as they can make. Fable 2 was a 360 exclusive...Fable 3 will be available on 360 AND PC and is Natal compatible...the Natal camera is over qualified as a web cam BUT with voice activating/recognizing and Windows 7 functionality, it could very well change everything...

Even offering it to 40+ million 360 owners at a affordable price could cause a mad sales rush at Xmas...NOW, it's all about the apps...A few short hrs till Natal-day...

In regards to the question of consumers outside of North America...They haven't seen what Natal can do yet...nobody has???...wait for the presentation and then see peoples reaction to it...It's all up to M$ and the developers of applications for Natal now...

8thnightvolley5067d ago

all i am worried is that they should rush this out and some RROD type sort of crap will come and spoil it all, they better make sure it does what it says on the pack or rather the first trailer perfectly.. and not some half baked product

AAACE55067d ago

You know what's strange? You have a lot of Ps3 fanboys hating on Natal. Yet, these were the same people who hated on the Wii saying that the motion controller was a joke! Fast forward to now, and the Ps3 has what is essentially a Wiimote with a light ball on top, and now all of a sudden, motion control is great... but only if it's on the Ps3!

It's crazy how that works out isn't it?

blumatt5067d ago

Everyone knows MS will market the hell out of it. I'm still betting on the Move holding its own against it though. The Natal is not going to just come out and rape the Move sales-wise. It will be a close race since the Natal will most likely be more expensive. And don't give me any crap about the Move costing more because you've got to buy more than one etc. etc. I know all that, BUT the average mom or dad won't and will just see that one is cheaper and get it. Again, I don't know the Natal will be higher, but something tells me it will. Maybe it's the way MS prices everything else. lol Wifi: $80 120gb Harddrive: $100 lol What a joke.

Graey5066d ago

I understand that's your opinion, but I would have to disagree but only for the time being. I would say to all not to judge to harshly until after MS shows their hand. Personally if I was running it I wouldn't tip my hand, I'd keep everything close to the vest until E3. I applaud Sony, but If I could keep the secret I would because let's face it, if your a gamer 9/10 says your glued to every website, or any tv news having to do with E3.

Just like most are under the impression Sony is showing something really great if they pushed out all the high-profile games before E3. Think about it, there are so many levels to this, perhaps think of a circle surrounding the problem instead of a straight line to the "proposed" outcome.

No disrespect of course, as we all think the way we do.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5066d ago
zetsuei15067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

If natal SELLS anything near that it will be ONLY on America.Since Europe and Japan gave clearly signal that they don't give a shit about this accessory.

That may have to do with the fact that Microsoft knows this and it will be a better idea to push Natal real hard only at america where they the higher attach rate and installed base which wont be a Meaningless effort.

But without the support of 2/3 of the Video Game market could microsoft really comeout of this strategy successful?! The obvious answer: Probably not!

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Don't you know that US equals or is better than the whole World? /s.

Boy30005067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

"If natal SELLS anything near that it will be ONLY on America.Since Europe and Japan gave clearly signal that they don't give a shit about this accessory."

Where on planet Earth is the evidence for that...? What is that signal ? Where and how do you see that ?

"But without the support of 2/3 of the Video Game market could microsoft really comeout of this strategy successful?"
EU + Japan =/= 2/3 of the videogame market. I mean the UK alone, > Japan. http://www.mcvuk.com/news/3... Moreover the USA represents around 50% of the videogame market.

falviousuk5067d ago

you might not give a shit about it, but I do, as a gamer I do and Im from the UK. So dont try and talk for everyone in Europe.

more fanboy crap in a natal article.

then again that article is from a trash website that pursues flamebait article after flamebait article

Nike5067d ago

Honestly, does GamesThirst do nothing else but flamebait, news stealing and false rumours?

OneSneakyMofo5067d ago

I think they should rechange their name to fanboythirst.com

crapgamer5067d ago

Wont make Natal flop. Especially with a Slim 360 package for about $250 or so. They will sell like hotcakes. America is where it's at as far as gaming, consoles and games sell the best here. I am sure that is their target. I personally am getting 2 Natal systems launch date.

cool cole5067d ago

Boy are you sure the gaming guru -_-

xxLuckyStrike5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Envy Breeds Jealousy my man...and with so many disagrees its plain as day to see. Just embrace your worst fear... PS3 fanboys can offically bow to the man...drop to their knees and beg to be purified....Natal is the truth....lol!!!.... It is useless to resist....dont let yourself destroyed as Obi Wan.

kaos_fish II5067d ago

very apt name considering you're planning on getting 2 launch Natal.. better yet change your name to 'sadgamer'

Natal will go the same way as Microsoft Bob..

jdktech20105067d ago

There's no way to comment on this....they could have some killer stuff out there for casual and hardcore gamers alike that they will release at E3...wait until then to let your fanboyism show

Show all comments (101)
280°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 7h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle18h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic188115h ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio14h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning7710h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga17h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv723h ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

shinoff218316h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga15h ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan11h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit4h ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus2310h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv7210h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
purple10120h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos19h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-9h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac19h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple10118h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic16h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead9h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9h ago
Show all comments (39)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere2d ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN2d ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos1d 22h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN1d 15h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo1d 17h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies1d 13h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger2d ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic1d 11h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows901d 10h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

blacktiger7h ago

You own nothing snd be happy. I'm sure you heard that

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto2d ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos2d ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long1d 23h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator2d ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (23)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10113d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref12d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde12d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197212d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville12d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218312d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos12d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
isarai13d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref12d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan12d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197213d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

13d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197213d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

13d ago
12d ago
Zeref12d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde12d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197212d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier12d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto12d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218312d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto12d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 12d ago
Hofstaderman12d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts12d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)