60°

Sony to Debut 3D Gaming in Japan

After years of planning and absorbing the high cost of making PS3 3D-ready, Sony’s plans for 3D gaming are finally coming into fruition. But unfortunately for us, Japan will be the first to experience 3D games, which will be made available overseas on June 10th. The list of debut titles is small, but promising.

Read Full Story >>
consolepress.com
Alcon Caper5076d ago

To check out the 3D TVs on display. Although I thought it was an amazing technology, I just couldn't get over wearing those glasses. I felt that if my head was tilted a certain way while I was watching, it would get fuzzy. It looked fine, however when my head was level. Also, the new glasses were really bulky. And after a while of watching Monsters vs Aliens (the only true 3D movie out right now), the bridge of my nose was a little tender. I was watching Samsung only, so I don't know if the Sony brand would make a difference (probably not).

As opposed to seeing Avatar or Alice in Wonderland in a 3D IMax, I did feel that the 60 inch screen that I was watching the movie on was a bit confining. Yes it popped out at you, but only within the small confine of the television. So although the depth was impressive, the frame surrounding the screen was very confining.

Obviously these are problems that should be resolved in a couple of years and perhaps when they are resolved, Sony's take on gaming would have a solid enough foundation to make a difference. 3D TVs are still very very expensive and the glasses are also expensive. Perhaps the price point is what kept the pollsters from quickly agreeing to its incorporation into the gaming world.

However, if the opportunity presented itself, I'd choose glasses-less 3D any day of the week. It'll be interesting to see what Nintendo brings with the 3DS.

USEYOURFIST5075d ago

glassless is predicted for 2015

as for the glasses i havent had them on long enough to witness any heavyness, but the flickering anoyed me a bit im waiting for sony tvs to come in and see what there like. but once killzone 3d hits i wont be able to resist and hopefully glasses are improved.

Alcon Caper5075d ago

Congrats for having $8,000.00 to sink into a new TV...

USEYOURFIST5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

@alcon

in the uk sonys cheapest 3D tv is releasing at £1500 this month so by the time killzone 3 comes out should be even cheaper then that not exactly $8000. by any chance do you not have a ps3 o yea they are $4000 where u live so i guess not

morganfell5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

Sorry but no one HAS to sink 8K into a TV. It's a privledge not a forced demand.

What it sounds like you are saying is, "I think it's ridiculous you can spend that money and I am rife with envy."

I think I read about a case like this once...

http://badghill.pair.com/ci...

As regards the article why is it unfortunate 3D gaming will premiere in Japan on the 10th? There isn't a real venue for a display in the west before E3 and it isn't as if it is being delayed in the west. It is ready and the first opportunity is coming in Japan. If anything we should be happy we don't have to wait another week until E3.

Alcon Caper5075d ago

ever seen a 3D tv before? unless you have at least a 50 inch, it's not worth watching. instead of quoting prices, go to the store and check one out for yourself and realize that 3D on a 20 inch flatscreen is as wasteful as watching a 1080p movie on your cell phone...

DaTruth5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

If you guys aren't interested, how come you can't bypass even one article about it. "Oh, teh glasses, teh glasses"! They literally weigh less than a pound. Anybody with any objectivity doesn't even notice them on their face. Are you telling me you stood in Best Buy with the things on your face for two hours, or are you trying to convince us you were terribly annoyed after five minutes of wearing them?

Glasses are so terrible, yet after several hundred years of using them, for some reason the human race isn't annoyed enough with them to make something else.

Do us a favour and stick to articles about HDless 360 games!

PirateThom5075d ago

I was annoyed withing 5 minutes of watching Alice in Wonderland in 3D.

I don't wear glasses normally, not even sunglasses, and the weight on my nose was very, very noticable and I had to take them off for a few moments about 4 times through the movie.

I couldn't enjoy any movie when wearing them. I'd rather wait for glassesless tech.

M-Easy5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

@Alcon
Yet your excited about a 3 inch 3DS? Troll much?

RedDevils5075d ago

I think he forgotten the code to bypass it, what a shame :P

Baka-akaB5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

and who said anything about watching it on a small screen ? Regarless your price tag is just ridiculous .

If you've actually seen such price them blame the greedy stores ...
And that's coming from a guy living in an area where any new ps3/360 game cost 120-130 dollars , among many other expensive things

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5075d ago
DJ5075d ago

100-inch, 4K resolution TVs should probably do the trick. As for the price though, what do you expect? It's brand new technology. It's supposed to make your pockets empty.

Rainstorm815075d ago

This comment seems weel thought out, but everything beneath this made you seem like a troll, 3D wont be perfect out of the gate but niether was HD so thats just what you deal with when it comes to new technology

snp5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

Thinking the same. Starts with a (faux?) 'sincere' approach, and then with a minor challenge, starts inflating prices by 400% or more to regress to outright fud.

A 50" Samsung 3d Plasma, with 5 years warranty and atm 4 sets of glasses and a 3d Bluray player and 3d version of Monsters vs Aliens included can be had for ~$2k Australian.

http://www.digitalcentre.co...

I haven't taken much notice of the US, but i'm sure with little effort a 50" could be found for well under $2K US.

I'm not completely sold on 3d at this point either btw (at least versions of televisions with glasses), but lets keep the prices we quote (and facts regarding it) to something like the real world. Otherwise it just makes it seem more like someone less 'clinically considering the merits of 3d' and more about spreading fud for what are probably fanboy reasons (given the conflicting levels of interest Sony/Microsoft has shown in it to this point).

xTruthx5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

lol alcon, 3d tv's wont be near 8grand unless its like a 65 inch tv or more and its brand new.

beardpapa5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

Samsung 55 inch 3dtv for $3300. Not $8k. Rather expensive, but much more cheaper than when plasma screens first came into the market. And for $3300 and 3D, it's cheaper than a high end bravia set. Or the cheaper 46 inch one for $2600. Pick your poison.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5075d ago
sikbeta5075d ago (Edited 5075d ago )

It's Already Began....

DJ5075d ago

I don't plan on investing until we get 3D TVs that DON'T require glasses. I already wear glasses, and putting 3D goggles on is a pain, as I learned with Avatar.

s0ph1atr0n5075d ago

I agree with you, DJ. I wear glasses, so I would definitely NOT want to be wearing two pairs of glasses at once.

shoddy5075d ago

and take another 2 years to adapt due to price just like bluray and 3dtv right now. you'll be waiting until the PS4.

Like 3d or not it is the logical step to the future and I wish I could afford it.

damn $300 glasses.

beardpapa5075d ago

$150 for one. But hey. $300. It's a premium for the "hey look at me i'm the cool kid of the block" feeling.

hoops5075d ago

The whole 3D console setup istoo costly right now. This will take off for consoles next generation

Show all comments (27)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers1d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken10h ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g20h ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing19h ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H920h ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola16h ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66919h ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle18h ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg1d 12h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos1d 11h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola1d 7h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies21d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken21d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga21d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken21d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6421d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long21d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197221d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
DivineHand12521d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91321d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer21d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91320d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit20d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
Christopher21d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6920d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit20d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher21d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken21d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197221d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic21d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2321d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218321d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder21d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts21d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)