60°

Talking Misogyny: Rescuing Lovers vs. Reclaiming Possessions

Do damsels in distress represent objectified possessions that must be won as Anita Sarkeesian suggests in her "Tropes vs Women in Video Games" series? Or is there an underlying aspect of love that makes these Rescue The Princess stories much less misogynistic than they may seem on the surface level? Always the lover, Gamers Association editor Luke Frazier argues for the latter.

Read Full Story >>
gamers-association.com
admiralvic4058d ago

Sigh~ I really hope this isn't the next big hot button topic that 20+ sites have to weigh in their opinion on. Please, give me more Simcity hate or even the ____ console is dead topics are better than this...

Anyway, this is one of the better articles I've read on N4G, which surprised me. With this being said, I've always thought of this trope as the lazy out of story telling. Ignoring all of the stories theme, depth, and details, it's commonly used simply because it doesn't require a lot of effort to do. You have 2 characters and the antagonist one is obviously the person that took something from you, from here you have the very simple motivation needed to justify the events of the story.

Sadly some people want to over think these things and imply negative connotations to them. * Let me start by saying, despite having posted my 2 cents in all of these topics so far, I've yet to watch said video and will continue to do so as to not support it. *The first problem with this is the fact of "ownership" the author mentions she talks about. Typically the hero is just a righteous character that is doing this out of DUTY, not greed / selfish desire or anything of the sort. I never got the impression that Mario, Link or any other character in this theme was fighting to reclaim what was THEIR property, it was just the right thing to do. Additionally we've seen some stories put a spin on this classic trope, like Sheik being Zelda in OoT. I wouldn't say Zelda really NEEDED Links help in that story (to be fair she probably helped him more than her...) and guess what, that's also among (if not the) most popular Zelda game to date.

As I've said in other articles, I can understand / respect she wants to make things "better", topics like DiD in stories is an overly generic and weak argument. Typically this wouldn't mean a lot, but when you attack a tired issue with one of the most tired arguments as your first step for change, it doesn't imply that the future installments will be that bright.

Wenis4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

Its interesting that we always hear how aweful it is when video games stereotype women, yet we never hear anything when the same is done to men.

Look at Duke Nukem, portraying men as being overly muscular studs who only think about killing things and sex. And look at Gears of War, the men are again portrayed as overly muscular bros who are all about killing. As a man I find this SO offensive. Actually I don't because I know its just a game so I don't get my panties in a bunch over it.

But when we get a zombie in a bikini.. SOUND THE ALARMS

Ravenor4058d ago

Hey that plastic gross looking torso was all about men objectifying women...and Bikini's...somehow.

Both genders get stereotyped and portrayed in often very inaccurate ways. Both genders "Objectify" in the sense that just as a man may desire a women, women generally have some male person in their lives that make them tingle.

The demonizing of male attention is not a healthy way to bring attention to silent victims of Sexual assault. For years what kept victims of these s silent was "Slut Shaming" the idea that a sexual assault was the victims fault, that issue was largely created and propagated by WOMEN (Not 100% but a large factor in it).

Oh is this article about Anita Sarkeesian and her ridiculous tropes argument? Does she ever bring up Samus Aran and how amazing that character is? Focusing in on the damsel in distress trope at a time when story telling in console games was incredibly basic just seems like cherry picking.

yog-sothot4058d ago

In my opinion, the "Duke Nukem cliché" is not the same stereotype applied to men, because being a muscular badass is mainly a male fantasy (even though it may offend you, it is clearly made to please men and not women), exactly as is the damsel in distress.

TopDudeMan4058d ago

Some might say that the woman in the video is reinforcing the same stereotypes by covering her face in make-up and wearing massive hoop earings.

Feminism is something I can never really come to terms with. How can you really say another race or sex has it better when you've never grown up and lived as the other half?

I agree with wenis. Stereotypes are everywhere. Everyone has to deal with them, Making a video whining about them is not going to defy them.

When I play a game, sure, it's refreshing to play as a female protagonist, but I, personally like to put myself in the game. Developers know that the majority of gamers are male, so that is why there are more male protagonists.

TopDudeMan4058d ago

Also, what this woman is saying is that if she's ever in need of rescuing- don't do it. It'll just offend her.

admiralvic4058d ago

Yup, though I would go a step further and point out that the DiD trope can be taken 2 ways...

1) As a sexist trope that only applies to women and is limited to women because of whatever reason.
2) Speaking in terms of story structure, the DiD story could apply to virtually any story that involves you fighting a villain to rescue something be it male or female. I suppose this is where I fail to understand the argument, since I look at it in terms of nuts and bolts.

Either way, I can vaguely understand where she's coming from, but in COMPLETE honesty, I would like to know how many people actually look at these things in the light she portrays them in. I suspect a lot of the "hate" and disagreements these "righteous" people face isn't due to hate, but simply not reading into things. Like I never thought about Mario saving Peach during Super Mario Bros., I just played the game. I suspect a lot of people feel more like me and in turn simply don't understand where she's coming from.

arbitor3654058d ago

i dont see the mario games like mario is "rescuing his object." if anything, he is getting the **** end of the stick. he is clearly getting friendzoned by peach. he saves her in every game and what does she do? she bakes him a cake.

ShaunCameron4058d ago

It figures. Peach is attracted to "bad boys". And Mario is a "nice guy". At least he managed to get a kiss from her once.

PeaSFor4058d ago

someone know if there's some sort of bug spray to keep Anita Sarkeesian away from gaming medias?

Megaton4058d ago (Edited 4058d ago )

Feminists give women a bad name. Like vegans and vegetables. Or hippies and weed.

NoPoint4058d ago

Again, why should we care what a feminist has to say? It's only a video game. It's not like video games don't stereotype men too. It goes both ways. I can't believe people are actually giving this chick attention.

Megaton4058d ago

Agreed. Had no idea who this person even was until N4G got its panties in a wad over her. They've delivered her a resounding victory on a platter by talking about her so much.

admiralvic4058d ago

Actually, I would say the N4G attention is quite negative and might give her views, but her goal isn't views, it's to resolve the problem, which everything I've read suggests that she's failing at.

According to what others have said, she blocked comments on her videos. While I will assume it's to not hear trolls / idiots complain about her, it also prevents her from taking feedback / knowing how things are being received and ultimately shows that you don't care about your message.

Additionally, a lot of people remember her from Kickstarter (something I learned when I first saw this video) where she asked for 6,000 to do this. Now truth be told, I don't exactly know what about this mission requires support, since I could see her at most needing a few hundred for a camcorder. Ultimately she got 150,000+ for her mission, so people are expecting a lot from her and it WILL be a big thing people use to discredit her, since some people put a lot of faith in her.

Finally, it seems none of the comments really take her side and even the positive ones just say they understand where she's coming from. So if she isn't getting people to change or even care about what she has to say, then she's ultimately failing.

rainslacker4057d ago

Not all feminist are like this. Some actually do work for positive change in the interest of equal rights for women.

Others ignore society as a whole and work towards special rights, which only segregates women more from society because they are counter-productive to the broader women's rights movement.

Using story tropes as a proof for underlying misogynistic views within the games industry serves no purpose. To effect real change you have to look at the actual industry and who it's made up of, how women are treated in the industry, and where to go from there. There are certainly more pressing issues to resolve than the DiD scenario, and it is the most shallow of ways to launch a real discussion on what is reportedly a real problem in the world...not just the game industry.

Coming across as accusatory, and making men the bad guy has historically been ineffective, and only serves to reinforce the bad feminist viewpoint.

Show all comments (26)
200°

Why Games, Politics and Podcasts Don't Mix

Boogie2988 recently appeared on the H3 Podcast, and before long the conversation turned to social issues and politics. Unfortunately for Boogie, the internet took exception and he once again found out that no good can come of this.

Read Full Story >>
dispatches.cheatcc.com
-Foxtrot2124d ago

I like how Twitter took a 13 second CUT of an answer which made him look bad yet everyone rolled with it.

coolbeans2124d ago (Edited 2124d ago )

I mean...let's not pretend those clips are just devoid of context. He's literally doubled down on his argument of gays should wait to receive equal rights under the law until the country was just more comfortable with it. And, even if in the abstract, trying to tie 'videogame feminism' of Sarkeesian to what some violent alt-righter did in Charlottesville by PLOWING into a group of peaceful protestors is straight-up loony. Who cares if the interviewers just rolled with it? Doesn't defeat how absurd he sounded in some of those highlights.

NewMonday2124d ago

His bad analogy doesn't erase the fact Anita Sarkeesian is part of the problem, her ridiculous positions and assaults on anyone who disagrees with here feeds the Alt-Right, many of them are famous because of her.

coolbeans2124d ago (Edited 2124d ago )

By this logic who isn't part of the problem that has some kind of a public platform? This implicates basically any "SJW" channels as well, just b/c certain figureheads of that movement constantly produce response videos to the worst ones. "Oh if certain people just stayed silent they wouldn't inflame this destructive, opposing ideology." Having a more milquetoast composure didn't do much for her when she simply announced the Tropes v. Women In Videogames series, so I'm not so sure how much would've changed had she stayed that course.

Friendly reminder: the optics of this aren't really in your favor. Still trying to parse blame on someone who's just been unfairly connected to the traumatic death of another person? It's true you acknowledge that boogie made bad analogy; however, hand-waving that part away and then subsequently going "but..." isn't the best approach. It's kinda despicable.

NewMonday2124d ago

"Oh if certain people just stayed silent they wouldn't inflame this destructive, opposing ideology"

see this is the problem, I didn't say anything like that, but you shove me into it as to put pressure on me. why would you do that? can we argue within the boundaries of our comments please.

"By this logic who isn't part of the problem that has some kind of a public platform?"

Anita Sarkeesian is consistently bad, Boogie is no Alt-right nut but she turned him into an antagonist because she attacked him for disagreeing with her, and her followers constantly target him since then.

respectable discourse is not much to ask and will help her cause and ignoring it hurts

Cueil2123d ago

no... he's saying you need to take this in steps... you don't convince people on your point of view by shoving it down their throats... Only a person who is to emotionally attach to the problem can't see that.

coolbeans2123d ago

@NewMonday

-What are you talking about? My "Oh if..." rebuttal is taking the inverse of what you just stated previously.

You: "her ridiculous positions and assaults on anyone who disagrees with here feeds the Alt-Right."

Therefore: "...if certain people [such as Sarkeesian] just stayed silent they wouldn't inflame this destructive, opposing ideology." Even if being condescending, that is not an unfair rebuttal to present against your first response, especially when taken in the context of that whole paragraph. Still within the boundaries, just to boundaries you're perhaps uncomfortable with.

-"Boogie is no Alt-right nut but she turned him into an antagonist because she attacked him for disagreeing with her, and her followers constantly target him since then."

I don't condone how she conducted herself after that discussion. But to my recollection: it seems like they had a short spat then things cooled off and they went their separate ways. I know nothing of what harassment and/or criticism he's received from her fans since then; however, considering how he recently made this Anita/Charlottesville connection (EVEN IF just to abstractly discuss the fears of political escalation) on a popular podcast I'd expect her fans to rage. Also, how much responsibility should she have for what her fans do--IF not directly commanded by her to target him? If we're going to go down that rabbit hole, then so too must you acknowledge every other anti-SJW/alt-right/etc. channel for its nastier fans targeting her as well. It's a two-way street in which neither side is sinless.

@Cueil

...you just restated what I said in a different way, and it's still an ignorant take of how equal rights have been historically pursued. Read up on the Stonewall Riots for example. Countless parades and gatherings have happened since then, which has resulted in changes to law. Whether a large cluster of people are still uncomfortable with it or not, it's the principle that should matter. The argument for incrementalism was also something MLK faced from fellow clergyman back then ('we support equal rights for blacks but perhaps you shouldn't rile people up'). I think you'd find his response to that rather enlightening.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2123d ago
DialgaMarine2124d ago

Games and politics definitely don’t mix. Just make good games. Stop trying to use entertainment as a front to push political agenda.

Omnisonne2124d ago

Agreed. I'm not against devs making whatever they wish though, they are free to create whatever. But if it has that peculiar scent of forced politics to it, I don't want a part of it.

fiveby92124d ago

I agree. Make what you like but don't be surprised that people don't purchase your product. I enjoy video games mostly for escapism. The last thing I am entertained by is some game director pushing their own moral code regardless of whether I agree with it or not. Sure they're free to make social commentary but don't be surprised when customers stay away.

kneon2124d ago

Since the dawn of man, entertainment in all it's forms has been used to push a political agenda, get over it.

RainbowBrite2124d ago

Wow that dude loss a lot of weight

DialgaMarine2124d ago

He’s still going too. It’s crazy to look at some of his older vids, and compare to even now.

Kabaneri2124d ago (Edited 2124d ago )

Yeah he had a stomach reduction surgery, good for him.

calactyte2124d ago

I love how the author of the article says that Boogie shouldn't talk about politics since he runs a youtube channel about video games, whilst simultaneously commenting on Boogie's political commentary on a website about video games. Hypocrisy at its best. Also, yikes, calm down before writing a rebuttal. It was really difficult to follow what he was actually trying to say. I had to read it twice and I still don't know. Also I'll never get those minutes back in my life again.

Show all comments (20)
100°

The evolution of women in video games continues at E3 2017

Feminist Frequency founder Anita Sarkeesian and managing editor Carolyn Petit break down the gender dynamics in all of the games revealed at E3 2017.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Cy2495d ago

Imagine not only having this much free time but actually getting idiots to *pay* you to write about crap like this.

ZombieGamerMan2495d ago

I really hope that big nosed cunt and that butt ugly tranny fuck off from games forever

GameBoyColor2495d ago

I'm not a girl gamer, and this is my story. -New article coming winter 2017.

Please be excited and don't forget to crowd fund it so I can pocket that cash right after!

DivineAssault 2495d ago

Poison to the gaming industry..

130°

Feminist Frequency paved the way for a playable female protagonist in Dishonored 2

"Arkane co-creative director Harvey Smith said that it was critic Anita Sarkeesian’s analysis of Dishonored, which she offered through her web series Feminist Frequency, which promoted the studio to re-evaluate how it portrayed women in the series."

Read Full Story >>
gamecrate.com
UCForce2499d ago (Edited 2499d ago )

This is something I will not agree with this. Anita started a gamergate in 2012 which was small, but until 2014 thing out of control fast when she completely succeeded created the conflict between both sides. I remember correctly she hate her dad because he voted who she hated the most (politics).

-Foxtrot2499d ago (Edited 2499d ago )

GamerGate wasn't created by Anita, it was started as a result for the shit Zoe Quinn had been doing which exposed the corrupt journalism and going ons within the industry. As people dug deeper they found new things out and when the heat was getting too hot the majority of game sites banded together and used Zoe Quinn as a victim to show how GamerGate was about abusing, attacking and mentally crippling women for no reason. Why? Because they didn't want any more snooping and would have rather made gamers in general look bad then accept any responsibility for what they did behind closed doors, they were afraid more things came to light if they dug any more. They thought making all gamers look like misogynistic, sexist, women hating pigs would be better then all their shady stuff coming to light and hurting their reputation, things which could cost them their jobs.

Then when things got going people like Brianna Wu and Anita latched onto it to promote their stuff. Anita to sell her kickstarter shit because she's a con artist and Wu because she probably got a lot of shit off people in her past being transgendered, possibly even being bullied as a child and decided she wanted to go on a mighty crusade to hurt all those evil Cis men.

UCForce2499d ago

Like I said, the whole gamergate have been out of control.

naruga2499d ago (Edited 2499d ago )

and who bought the dishonored 2 ??? with all these shoved to our throats diverse things inside ....i say nobody )i know it went bad in sales -and they blamed other games for it) .....the game proved to be completely forgettable and generic as hell...if you cannt develop a game ...is nt the lack of homosexuals or female protagonisst that hurt the game, is that you r by default incompetent ....also shoving things inside just because Anita says to , you make things worse

UCForce2499d ago (Edited 2499d ago )

Now people know why Dishonored 2 have female protagonist because of Anita Influence. I will say this again, she is the false feminist who doesn't belong to feminists community. She completely ruined their image and reputation.

annoyedgamer2499d ago

Anita is shadow developing alot of games, the new Uncharted and TLOU games come to mind. Something about an angry woman beating up a room full of men without getting so much as a scratch brings them joy. I would love to see their reactions if the genders were reversed.

Aenea2499d ago

Actually, of course that can bring one joy! Don't pretend you don't like the idea of kicking the shit out of people in games either, am sure you do! That's why we watch movies, read books and play games, don't we?

Gameseeker_Frampt2499d ago

and I bet you are all tears when playing as an angry man beating up a room full of men. "I'm sorry guys - this is hurting me more than it is you. This brings me no joy." sob, punch, sob, punch, punch....

-Foxtrot2499d ago

Yeah people like Nadine were a direct result of Neil loving Anita and wanting to please her

Adrian_v012498d ago

Because women can't beat up men?

meka26112498d ago

Not really, there are exceptions, but generally they are weaker than men. I remember seeing one time they had the world's strongest woman go to a bar to do some arm wrestling. She went up against average built guys and everyone of them beat her. It's just biology, and as I said, there are exceptions to the rule.

Adrian_v012498d ago (Edited 2498d ago )

@meka

I also remember the woman with world's biggest/heaviest boobs knocking a guy out while dancing on the dancefloor, with her boob. So that doesn't mean anything.

I'd pay to see average built guys fight female cage fighters. I'm really fascinated by the bubble some of u guys live in.

Noctis2498d ago (Edited 2498d ago )

Your username fits like the glass shoe fit Cinderella, just change "annoyed" to "annoying" Also, was your last sentence sarcasm because i'm pretty sure what you describe is really 99% of movies and games.

In my opinion I would like to see some roles reversed. Eg: Chris Redfield's gladiator skin in RE5 was total fanservice to those attracted to men, I would pay to see more DLC like this, a la Dead or Alive, but with men in skimpy outfits and big bulging pecs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2498d ago
Show all comments (20)