I prefer Xbox One controller as well, but that doesn't make any statement "true". Just true for me.
"Does the fact that he's a former Naughty Dog designer mean Naughty Dog found someone better"
No....it means designers with AAA games like TLOU on their resume are in high demand.
Sony, a multi-billion dollar corporation, cannot afford a game designer?
Think you forgot the "/s".
Hopefully we get to see what they are working on at E3. Praying for some mind-blowing new IP.
Correct. This comes at the annual meeting and in the last year Ubisoft fought off a takeover bid from Vivendi. It is natural to ask questions as to how Nintendo would deal with such a situation. That is exactly what happened here. Nothing more. Nothing less.
It has? How? Post link
The question was asked during a Q&A session at the financial briefing. This doesn't mean Nintendo is at risk for hostile takeover.
@Zeref
"Tencent, Apple, Amazon or Facebook might try"
Doubtful. Why do you think MS is so much smarter than these companies when it comes to this sort of thing? None of them are known for engaging in hostile takeovers anyway.
@WilliamSheridan
"Talk about a perfect match!"
I think Nintendo would suddenly go the route of Blizzard and be a shadow of its former self. That's what happen...
It had some great games.
Price, first and foremost. The memory cards were ridiculous, but there was a lot of unnecessary hardware such as the backside touch screen and the camera. Nintendo DS/3DS offered a larger variety of games at half the price. That and the fact that smart phones gave everyone gaming on the go made Vita redundant for casuals.
"So I'm a liar am I???"
Funny how you throw out accusations of lying so easy, but get so defensive when it is turned on you. Even more hilarious that you call me a hypocrite for holding you to the same lofty standards of truth that you pretend to hold CDPR to. So yes, absolutely you are a liar by your own statements since no where in that interview did CDPR say "there is no such thing as a game until it goes gold".
And now you ...
Just look at your simple petty insults. You are embarrassing yourself. And if you want to pump your chest out in superior morality then perhaps you shouldn't lie about what CDPR said. They never said a game wasn't a game until it is gold and you know it. So you lied. So your standards are for everyone except yourself, isn't that right?
And somehow not throwing out insults and not conducting a temper tantrum online every time a company does something wrong i...
"According to CDPR there is no such thing as a game until it goes gold so actually the game doesn't change throughout development. Atleast get on CDPR's level with your apologism scrub."
No.....according to CDPR, a trailer is not the game. And that is true. Should CPDR have been clearer about what their initial Witcher 3 showing was? Yes. I guess they learned their lesson when showing Cyberpunk 2077 and put disclaimers all over the video so people you ...
So that was when you first realized that games change throughout development?
So much for personal responsibility.
That's how this works now. Don't get your way? Fine.....jump on twitter and whine about it.
So they can make more money.
"We DO know. He is taking half of the blame."
LOL. Even if that were accurate, it would mean MS gets the other half.
You are confused. First you said PG said "nothing" at the time of the cancellation, which was false. Then you made it about the "insight" which was nothing new, but damn it, PG should have said it anyway?
Yeah, you are right. Discussing this with you was pointless.
That's a good point. Better off just using the Nintendo game pad.