There are three simple rules, in order of importance.
1. Correct spelling
2. Good grammar
3. Fairness
A journalist doesn't need to be totally unbiased. I don't mind if he prefers one system over the other. You probably don't, either. He should be able to say that an exclusive is good, even if it's on the "wrong" system.
All the fairness in the world means bunk if the author doesn't have enough respect for his readers to A...
I'd like to see how Sucker Punch retcons the Infamous story to make 3 possible without a significant suspension of disbelief.
Uh-huh. And that's why I brought it up.
#8 Damn near every shooter ever - the AK-47
Just try to find a weapon more ubiquitous than this Soviet made assault rifle. It's in almost every modern 1st and 3rd person shooter ever made. Uncharted, CoD, Grand Theft Auto, Saints Row, the list goes on.
There's also the 9mm pistol, but it's a POS.
Edit: corrected a spelling error. Darn old Android keyboard.
Hm. I didn't find the chocobo breeding frustrating. It was a challenge, but I don't remember being frustrated.
Getting busted in gta was kind of a pain, but it doesn't merit the top of this list.
WhatCulture is really bad about putting top ten lists on ten pages.
I can relate. I'm not much good at this either. Based on positions I've reached on the Tetris weekly leaderboards, I'm average, bordering on decent.
See? Someone was dumb enough to disagree with the fact that people disagree with facts.
I was browsing this site a while back and I found an article containing lists of the best games on the PS3, 360, Wii and PC. Red Dead Redemption was on three lists.
Rubbish, I say. I propose an alternative.
One list for PS3 exclusives: Heavy Rain, LBP, Infamous, etc.
one for 360 exclusives: Fable, Alan Wake, Forza, Gears, yada yada.
One for Wii exclusives: Mario, Zelda, Metroid, etc.
One for PC exclusives: um... not really familiar...
Of course people will disagree with your opinion. Disagreeing with facts is just stupid.
Doesn't change the fact that people do it.
That scene where Liam Neeson's son gets snatched must have been cut from that Star Wars movie he was in.
Just joking, don't hit me!
You're right, though. Franchises tend to go downhill after the second or third installment.
OMG!! Sony released a KID'S GAME! WTF were they thinking?!?!?!?! Now the PS3 is DOOMED!!!!
Asshole loudmouth or not, he probably still got quite a few atomic wedgies.
And now he makes more than all of those guys who stuffed him in his locker.... combined.
It's a nerd's world.
"...big fat hippo geek" with enough money to buy a small European country.
Fixed.
I don't remember any naval battles in brot- oh wait. The naval cannon.
At first, when the company's founded, the founder has a vision and a passion for the product the company produces.
Then the founder retires (or dies) and the company is taken over by green eyed monsters. It's not about the vision anymore, it's about the money.
Kotick didn't build Activision with his own two hands. And look at what's happened to MS after Gates left, or WalMart after Sam Walton died.
Addendum: Nothing personal against Activis...
Lol. Payback for all those annoying phone calls to "go see some TITTIES!!"
AC:Brotherhood has a huge castle. Fun to climb, and fun to parachute off the flag pole.
You had to be 'evil' to get one more den defense?
I got four at once after killing the Jannisary Captain.
Where is that dad who emptied his 45 into his daughter's laptop then made her pay for the bullets?
If that were true, he never would have played Black Ops.
Edit: I can tell you why I'm not a CoDaholic. I'm just not into first person shooters. The only one I've played this generation was Portal 2. Before that, I played Doom. That's it. Dunno whether it's because I don't care for the perspective or because I'm just not that good, maybe both.