Um, plenty of PC gamers use the DualShock 4. I get that you're just trying to stir up trouble, but don't lie about stuff.
OT: That was a MASSIVE day! I remember it had that PS2 excitement about it. Everything felt right and fell into place. Then E3 2013 happened, that $399 price tag was revealed, and the rest is history!
Let's see...
Team Silent? No more.
Silent Hills? Canned.
Metal Gear without Kojima? No thanks.
Sorry, Konami, it's going to take something massive for me to have faith in you again.
Yup, they do.
It isn't. Ever. Capcom made that clear a number of times already.
OT: Interesting little tidbit.
Hint: It ins't. This same question was asked towards the end of last generation, as well. We see how that turned out.
Agreed.
I, nor anyone else, made up defintions. Let it go.
Like I said, report away. You aren't putting fear in anyone for having a civil discussion with you, as well as, presenting facts. I trust in N4G's Moderation System to see that.
The only lie being told is the one you continue to repeat to yourself. You tell people to "get over it", yet, have a hard time with them calling the Switch a portable, in addition to, a home console (both facts). Calling it a "hybrid" doesn't prove either of those descriptions wrong.
You can report him as many times as you want. The Switch can be used as both a handheld and a home console. That is a fact. A home console, "that you can take with you" (essentially, use on the go), is still a portable gaming device.
Then you won't have any issues with other companies keeping 3rd Party franchises exclusive to their platforms.
I didn't just focus on Japan. I told you that it did better, overall, on the PS3 than the 360, and thus, omitting the former wouldn't have been a wise business move (only stating that it did better in Japan on the PS3 week 1 - as a means to further my point). Regardless of where it "ran better". In this regard, that's irrelevant to commercial performance.
VGC (though that's about as good as we have), put the sales of the first game as highest on the PS3 (with it selling 45k in Japan on the 360 Day 1 vs the PS3's 93k - as reported by The Sixth Axis).
So keeping it 360 exclusive would have been a mistake.
Yes, BC is padding a fall, but it’s not enough. They need to do more.
While I agree that competition is good, the response to it needs to be measured carefully. Backwards compatibility is nice, but not making a dent in Sony's lead, Game Pass has yet to really show what it will do, and the better hardware doesn't seem to be swaying many buyers to Xbox (certainly not enough to pull many people from their PS4's and Switch's).
The PS3 began to catch up to the 360 because the competition was showing what kind of impact it can have ...
Looks like you spoke too soon. :P
OT: As usual, PS4 continues to dominate!
You weren't stating a fact, because plenty of Sony franchises and games have solid gameplay. If you were to say that Sony doesn't focus on multiplayer games, well, I'd agree. It's also one of the reasons the PS4 spanks the Xbox One the way it does, because they offer far mar variety than them (also why Nintendo handily outsells Xbox weekly, as well).
Your viewpoint is your viewpoint, but you didn't state a fact at all.
Um, GT Sport has been out for just under 4 months, Forza Horizon 3 for over a year. Sport will eventually go on to sell more. That much isn't up for debate. In fact, I don't get what you're arguing. The Forza that released in 2017, a month after GT:S, hasn't even crossed the 500K barrier. Yet you'd rather discuss the game that game out in 2016 (which will also be outsold by Sport when all is said and done).
So, again, what exactly is your argument?
Seems I'm the only one who got what you were saying. And yes, those things were hysterical! :P