It’s called denial, making a logical argument for an illogical reaction.
He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.
It’s quite funny.
But did Sony really spend this money? It started 8 years ago? Buying bungee was weird. Because the way you use them is to make them build a good multiplayer FPS but with a campaign like Halo.
It’s like when Microsoft bought rare. And you got Viva Piñata, grabbed by the ghoulies and Nuts ‘n’ Bolts.
6 is not an awful mark in edge. They use the whole scale.
This is the worst generation in terms of first party games so far. Both consoles. So few new IPs and so few games at all. spider-man, god of war and Horizon sequels felt so close to the last generation in terms of play experience, despite their quality.
Sony gave up on PSVR2 after one year, I held back on buying because they had one game and no games for the future. They looked at that and said nobody’s buying it. If they released three games in the first the market would g...
What are the correct squeals to make?
The hideous art style in the sims has always been a barrier
Clap hanz made the later Everybody’s Golf. I love those games but the studio was not owned by Sony ever. They are open to working with them. I am sad because I want a VR golf sequel, but the studio is fine.
Team Ico made Shadow of Colossus.
Sony Japan made Gravity Rush. Siren.
Imagine if they published some games for it too again.
Sony made one new major game for it basically and did not incentivise support from third parties effectively. I held off from buying because Sony did not show a future or even support backwards compatibility on their previous games like Astrobot or Blood and Truth.
Driveclub was genuinely a good game with a poor launch. Alpha Protocol is superb, just a few archaic design choices for the time.
By free to play standards I find this company makes good games (although often with inconsistent writing), sadly they would simply be better if you remove any the elements that support the f2p model.
I don’t like exclusivity in this sense. It is infuriating. I don’t have an Xbox but just invest this money in game development
I think they’ve done a good job. All the models have lost the stylised look of the PS2 game, which was cool but would look bizarre in a more detailed environment with decent facial animation. The model looks appropriate for the back story and age, you can see they considered that in the redesign. The jawline is large on both if that is the complaint.
Is this not just an advert?
Is this article written by AI?
Just give some completely new games. This generation has had some good titles but nothing to truly define it as distinctive to the last
Not even Retroman?
Legally you say?
No need to attack people over such trivial things. Derek.
Maybe they think this group gets too much crap by people overreacting online. Maybe they are making a point of including them.
You are correct may come at the expense of other options. I am fine with the imaginary scars and fine with people making imaginary breasts in games. If people are arguing over this, there really is not enough going on in gaming.