more of this crap. .
There will be more games that will sport the same resolution and frame rates on both consoles
as SDKs get better..
You better get use to it, otherwise you'll need plenty of tissue.
How do you know that the games are on par?
Is it 'cause the resolution and frame-rates are the same?
You should remember that, the last creed game had to be patched on PS4 to get 'full hd'.
That was a cross-gen game.
Unity has been in-development for 4 years. . Exclusive to current gen systems and PC.
Why would they 'downgrade' one version of the game for the other?
I know you'...
The order isn't 1080p either. I don't know if much has changed but as far as I know, it also has black bars plus it's running at 30frame.
It is a linear game. Not an open world game with lots of npcs like Assasins creed.
Where are the articles questioning the order?
Ready at dawn also made the 'cinematic' statement.
The dev said that, 30 Frames is perfect for an action adventure game. . . Also, they could make the game look better at that frame count. As opposed to a twitch FPS that'd benefit from 60 frames.
For example, fast paced Call of Duty multi-player.
It really does depend on the genre.
With games like quantum break
2015 is set.
I'm not going to watch any more footage. The last I saw was the gamescon stage demo.
Resolution isn't graphics though..
This is the type of ignorance that plagued gamers ^_^.
What is 'next-gen gameplay'?
Last gen, a lot of games barely made 720p which is HD. .
Now we actually have more games running at 1080p than ever on consoles.
These numbers have become a tool..
I want it, only because I'd like to play some of my Vita games on the big screen.
Insomniac helped me start off my PS3 with Resistance fall of man.
Now they'll help me start off my XO with Sunset Overdrive.
White XO SO Bundle. :D
“We’ve spent four years building the best game we could imagine,”
“Why would we ever do anything to hold it back?”
. . There's no convincing these clowns. They seem know better than actual developers. .
What do you know about games development?
Efforts to 'punish' them will be futile.
Surely, a man knows this.
We need to let it go..
I guess being on the "most powerful console" with great graphics and 1080p didn't help.
If only it were really that simple.
Blame Microsoft for PS4's shortcomings. SMH.
Yes. . if I'm able to tweak settings like PCs, sure. I can switch back and forth to see the difference.
On a console, I'd need to have the two games, two Tvs and two different consoles running the game side by side to notice, otherwise =>
No.
Playstation exclusives are only comparable to XO ones when:
It's backed up by 10/10 reviews across the board, and dubbed greatest game of all time, also the majority online think it's a better game.
otherwise, "click-bait article", "different types of games" and finally "apples and oranges".
Would it put your mind at ease if I told you that, the PS4 is probably still running the game better than XO? Despite being the same resolution and frames.
The issue here isn't that fact that the game couldn't hit 1080p on PS4. The problem is, the resolution and frames rates is the same as XO.
In the minds of many, the PS4 has unlimited resources.
How does one expect flawless performance from €399 hardware?
is this not the first Creed game built solely for the current consoles?
at the expense of frame rates and resolution, you get better A.I and increased NPC count on screen plus the best looking Assassins Creed yet.
Versus
1080p and 60frames, last-gen visuals, Stupid A.I, reduces NPC count... blurry textures.
and so forth.
*sigh*
If Sony and Microsoft had opted for 1080p & 60 frames standard capable hardware. You'd have to pay more for the consoles.
Then, people would complain that the console cost 600 bucks.
Price-performance ratio.
Also, Halo 2 Anniversary is running 2 engines at once. . so that players can switch between classic and modern GFX on the fly. Something has to give for that to be possible.
I'm glad I waited
'nd still waiting.
Why buy a console, if it doesn't have the games you want to play yet?
Sony should have kept multiplayer free on their console. . considering their network is subpar compared to the competition.
I would trade the "free games" for a more reliable service.