Killzone 3 outdoes KZ2 by a half point and earns that Gold medal. While the environments are horrible at time and the graphics could be better, the gameplay really shines even if it could use a few more tweaks and a bit more development time. If you love Killzone, you’ll love it, if you like FPS, you’ll most likely find something you like here.
As PlayStation celebrates its 30th anniversary, let's explore the best PlayStation games Sony has to offer.
There's too many games to choose from
No Metal geat solid 1,2,3,4?
No Resident evil?
No Silent hill?
No Midnight club 3?
No NfS Underground 2?
No Final Fantasy?
No Burnout 3?
No Dragon quest 8?
No Days gone?
No Ace combat?
No Tekken/Soul calibur?......
just from the top of my head
PS1 era was full of great RPGs, PS2 was racing generation i would pick top 200 and even that would be just a fraction.
The Amsterdam-based studio reflects on its humble beginnings, beloved franchises, and growth through the years.
Up there with the top tier in the industry. Love Guerrilla Games - Horizon Burning Shores is simply STUNNING.
32.7M sales in the Horizon franchise! With 8.4M coming from Forbidden West alone! Truly a hugely successful game and franchise as a whole. Looking forward to Horizon III
Yooo, when I first saw that Killzone 1 footage at E3, my friends my brothers and I were like, Holy shit! When it came out, it didn't look exactly like it, but we sunk so many hours into 1 & 2.
I even liked Killzone: SF, it was a spectacle to look at, and even today it looks good. I hope they make a new one. Can you imagine how that will look, and they can get some modern FPS pointers from Bungie.
Such a wonderful studio. They deserve all their success.
The Decima Engine is absolute 🔥 I'm just mad they have abandoned Killzone.
DSOGaming writes: "While Sony does not plan to release Killzone 3 on the PC, Yahfz shared a video that gives us a glimpse at what such a PC version could look like."
PC almost always ends up the best place to play games, even if it takes a while.
What would you rather play decades down the line? A game at a fixed resolution and frame, considering you have a working disc, and the hardware?
Or run it on an emulator that can update the experience all around, and let you use whatever control input you prefer?
If you insist on the former, it's really only for the sake of nostalgia.
The RPCS3 devs are doing great work. And Kami works nicely with it too it seems.
Very neat.
A bit whiney of a review for a 9/10.
When I read that the environments are horrible just like the textures, with graphics worse than killzone 2, I just stopped reading:-)
Trolling for site hits with harsh comments, without the nuts to actually give it a low score?, I think so.
I'm starting to despair at these too-numerous-to-count gaming news/blog site reviews.
It seems some of these sites choose a purposely provocative line to sell - 'horrible environments', 'graphics could be better' - and then turn out a score that is fair but completely bizarre given the irritated/condescending tone of the reviews.
Sure, Killzone 3 is a 8 or 9 out of 10 game (given my impression from the betas and demo) and most people agree that the shooting and action gameplay is great - it is, after all, an action game. But I find it annoying when reviewers make a meal out of such subjective issues as 'story', 'length' and here, even 'graphics'.
The game has a story. It has a narrative structure. Whether it's your cup of tea. Whether it works for you or not. Well, that's subjective. I still meet plenty of people who just don't care for the original Star Wars (I'm not making a comparison directly here), but it's because they're not fans of the genre, and they wouldn't be stupid enough to state categorically that it had a 'bad story'.
More and more, I'm getting the sense that gaming websites are run by hobbyists who never learned a principle lesson of critical writing. You have to present your personal response to the material,sure, but its worth can't be decided by your personal taste. Rather, it must be held up against the wider context of the art-form (medium) it represents.
For example, in Killzone 3s case, from what I've seen, one might argue that its plot is not original, as it is just another war story (not unlike many other shooters - COD et al), and that it is clichéd, given that it is ultimately a tale of super-weapons and evil villains. But one would also have to come to the conclusion that it presents these elements well, and that the voice talent alone make the show worth the price of admission.
And what annoyed me in the first place about this review: saying this game has poor graphics because you are not a fan of the art-style is utterly foolish. The graphical prowess of Killzone 3 is obvious in terms of its numerous post-process effects and level of detail. If it's too dark or rusty for your tastes then that has nothing to do with it. Please stop writing and start paying more attention to your games in general.