Approvals 12/3 ▼
TrevorPhillips (3) - 5409d ago Cancel
Omega4 (2) - 5409d ago Cancel
kevco33 (3) - 5409d ago Cancel
Jellzy (1) - 5409d ago Cancel
portablegaming (2) - 5409d ago Cancel
Prcko (1) - 5409d ago Cancel
180°

Best Kinect Games Still 2 Years Away

Microsoft’s ambitious new motion device – Kinect – will be out this autumn, but don’t expect to see the best games for it until 2012.
That’s according to Gamesbrief founder and analyst Nicholas Lovell and Yoostar CEO Greg Fischbach, who say that developers need time to get to grips with Microsoft’s new controller-less platform.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5409d ago
GuruStarr785409d ago

thats funny, because by then, we should be getting ready for the next-gen systems.

thereapersson5409d ago

Microsoft should have waited to release this thing with the next XBOX. By then they could have perfected the technology, and what might be expensive today would be affordable two or 3 years from now.

Baka-akaB5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

i dont see what would be the point of waiting . If there is a chance of actual good "core" gaming , by only releasing it with the next console , it would only delay it and the crap .

Basically it means that instead of great launch kinect games , we'd be fed kinectimals 720 and co .

And that hardware perfection you speak of , most likely would mean less cost for them , and still a high price tag for avid casuals .

It's not like microsoft can't afford a failure ... w all know that if need be , a kinect 2.0 would appear on "720" .

NecrumSlavery5409d ago

@ thereapearsson

True, but MS still sells their Wifi adapters for $100, so I don't think they'd make Kinect a $50 periphrial.

MariaHelFutura5409d ago

I don`t understand why the don`t just show something (for real this time). The Move showed Sorcery, which is pretty cool but it more just showed you can make actually games with it. Kinect hasn`t shown anything and it almost ready to launch.

Narutone665409d ago

is: "Are the core gamers willing to wait that long?"

hennessey865409d ago

im pretty confident it will be compatible with thenext gen xbox ill put my car on it

TheLeprachaun5409d ago

Yeh but I'm sure Microsoft will incorporate a built in updated version of kinect into the next xbox.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5409d ago
reload445409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

best parody i've ever seen
sorry Scary Movie

TrevorPhillips5409d ago

World is not going to end in 2012 lol

And still have a few years till the next generation systems to be released.

MariaHelFutura5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

Who said end? Change. Isn`t that what Barack was promoting? Remember. Change can mean the end of the current, you`ll see. Have you ever heard of the ages? Things change all the time since the beginning of time it`s just hard to remember that while living in the present. Even if we all die, the planet won`t. It`s happened before and few times actually. If you pay close attention to mass media, you`ll see what their conditioning you to.

table5409d ago

lol, i hope you're not serious...

Omega45409d ago

It really does look MS won't be releasing a new console till 10yrs are up, since Kinect will be treated like a new console for devs. As time passes they will keep finding better ways to utilize it.

When the next gen starts and the 720 has Kinect 2 built in, all xbox games will likely get exclusive Kinect features since dev will find it so easy to implement.

5409d ago
Nicaragua5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

Having it built into the system dosnt make it easier to implement than it being plugged in via a cable. Move isnt built into a PS3 but the big name devs (GG, Capcom, Zipper, EA etc) are finding it incredibly easy to implement into their current titles.

The reason dev's arent implementing Kinect is simply because its utter shite.

Folezicle5409d ago

The reason why the PS3 Move has more developers working with it, is that in the past three years very similar technology was used on the Wii.. Before people bite at me, I'm not making assumptions saying the Move is bad, or copying the Wii.

Whilst with Kinect developers have less experience with, and those developers who worked with the EyeToy are likely to still be signed with Sony..

This is a simplified version of what the article is saying.. Honestly how do you know stuff will succeed or fail when you haven't demoed the console. Also Sony could of approached some of the developers to make some of these games, thats a commonly done with publishers.

Actually Nacaragu I want you to find a legit article on someone hating Kinect (after playing a demo) because of its hardware (not because they didn't enjoy the game), then you have the right to say stuff. Label me a fan-boy because I'm trying to teach you kids to not judge something you haven't even had a go at and that you can't predict the future. 360 owners who do the same the same thing above with Move, grow up to.

IdleLeeSiuLung5409d ago

Fact is the people I saw at MS Store enjoyed it with a big smile and everyone else I seen on amateur videos also have a big smile when playing Kinect so I hardly believe it is "utter shite".

Seeing how you are praising PS Move, yet it is just another Wii HD made and priced by Sony tells me you like Sony much?

Fact of the matter is Wii type motion control has been done for the last 4-years. Tacking that onto a current game doesn't take long....

Nicaragua5409d ago

@Folezicle - if you want reviews of people hating on the Kinect hardware then try just about any gamingwebsite who reported noticeable lag. That right there is a limitation of the hardware.

And im not going to label you a fanboy but i will label you as a knob. My response to Omega has nothing who seems to think that building a webcam into a console will make for better implementation into software - it wont. Try being less of a patronising twat educating "us kids" and instead try and comprehend the things you are commenting on.

IdleLeeSiuLung - Im not prasing Move, Im simply stating that it is being implemented easier into more games than Kinect - am i wrong ? Nope.

Folezicle5409d ago

@Nicaragu Give me a link.. The lag I've noticed, but I've also heard that it isn't noticeable when your actually playing the game.

Also I'm not talking about the web cam response it is the last line of your message "The reason dev's arent implementing Kinect is simply because its utter shite." I ask you has the lag on Kinect given it reviews saying its "Utter shite." You have little evidence to base any of your theories.

Nicaragua5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

Your right, allow me to re-phrase.

In my opinion based on what i have seen of kinect i have decided to describe it as utter shite. I am basing this opinion (which is my own) on the lag which is clearly visible in every demonstration and also the utter failure of Microsoft to incorporate the device into any of their flagship titles, although i do take into account that this is based off my definition of flagship titles. This is in direct contrast to their main rival (sony) who have indeed shwon their motion control hardware working across a wide variety of genres and in what i would deem flagship titles (this however should not be taken as an endorsement of the rival product, it is merely an observation).

So to summarise i shall stand by my comment that Kinect is indeed utter shite.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5409d ago
sikbeta5409d ago

@Omega4

The WAY you spin these things Amaze pal, it's Unbelievable, 10 years? Why? cos of an ADD-ON that TAKE resources of the console...

IdleLeeSiuLung5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

Because the PS2 could have a 10-year lifespan even though it was "inferior" to the original Xbox. Lifespan has little to do with raw proccessing power buddy.

It has everything to do with customer support!

Do you think PS2 would have a 10-year life cycle if people stopped buying it after 7 years?

sikbeta5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

You're talking about customer support, right? now, look at the title again, IF the Best kinect games are 2 years away, how you can get customer support if you don't have the games to cater the people?

This is simple when you talk about Consoles, a console NEEDS games to get customer support, More and better Games bring more customers and so on....

In this specific case we're talking about an ADD-ON which MS is trying to make it as important as the console itself, they're gambling with the casual market and think about a remote possibility of the device selling well and then they can cater other audiences or their core user-base with games suited for them

There wasn't any peripheral that helped to extend the life cycle of any console and never will cos that not their function and they are seen more like gimmicks, people will not consider add-ons as something Really important and Needed in order to play with their consoles

Motion-Control Gaming is gimmicky, but Nintendo was smart, they put every wii-mote in every box and by that making it "important" and having those family-fun games to cater every costumer since day one, that's the big difference here...

I said this from the beginning, Motion-control gaming worked for the wii cos N have those Family-fun/oriented games and known character like Mario and so on, Sony can't go completely for the casuals cos that goes against the PlayStation Brand which is a Platform for all kind of Genres, Games that Grow with Gamers and don't get stuck in the same franchises all the time, MS created a Hardcore Shooter platform, being Master-Chief to MS what Mario is to N with the addition of M-Phoenix this Gen, if MS want to go to the casual route that's a complete 180° turn and at the same time they didn't/don't build the characters and franchises suited for this new "trend"

green5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

IMO, Kinect on the 360 is a like xbox live on the 1st xbox. You paid $50 a year for a barebones service that had mostly crap online games but a few gems like Halo 2 but was built from the ground up to be an integral part of the 360 to deliver a great online service from the beginning with room for improvements.

I think thats how Kinect will be.Even if Kinect sells well, it will only have a few break out or must have games for the core audience but expect the next xbox console to be built around a much more advanced and improved Kinect to deliver a much better service next time around.

@ Chaostar: Well that's business.

Chaostar5409d ago

Probably right there but if it doesn't sell too well then MS will drop it and run, like feeding a T-Rex.

Show all comments (49)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1075d ago
300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1197d ago
Knightofelemia1198d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1197d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161197d ago (Edited 1197d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1197d ago
CrimsonWing691197d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1197d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791197d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1197d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1197d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1197d ago (Edited 1197d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1197d ago (Edited 1197d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1197d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1196d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1196d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1196d ago (Edited 1196d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1196d ago
Aloymetal1197d ago (Edited 1197d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1196d ago (Edited 1196d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101197d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1197d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101197d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1197d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101197d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721197d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1197d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1197d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1197d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1197d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1374d ago
darthv721374d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1374d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1374d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901374d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1374d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1374d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1374d ago
TheEnigma3131374d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1374d ago (Edited 1374d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1374d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1374d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1374d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771374d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1374d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901374d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1374d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901373d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1373d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)