110°
7.0

Dragon Age: The Veilguard Review – An Empty Throne | GB

Nearly 14 years later, Dragon Age is back in a more or less muted fashion. Find out what keeps the sequel from being truly great.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Armaggedon207d ago

Keep in mind they gave starfield a 9-10/10. Not starting a flame war, just showing how we cant take these reviews over the top serious as perspective is a heck of thing.

CrimsonIdol207d ago

oh NOW we can't take these reviews seriously hey? But the IGN, Kotaku and Polygon ones are all fine, right?

Armaggedon207d ago

I said, super seriously. People are legitimately allowing people to decide for them if they should buy the game or not, and are making judgments, soley off of reviews. The IgN reviews shouldn’t be taken super seriously either. Saying Im going to buy this game because they gave it a 9/10 is just as bad

CrimsonIdol207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

"People are legitimately allowing people to decide for them if they should buy the game or not, and are making judgments, soley off of reviews"

...yes? Or do you just mean solely off the score? If so I suppose that's fair, but these games cost a fortune these days man, I'm not just going to buy them all just on a whim. I'd genuinely like some review of it, even if just from a friend. Ideally from a reviewer whose tastes align with mine.

I'll watch some reviews and if the criticisms are of things that concern me I'll take them into account. If they're praising things that don't interest me or if they're talking about stuff that's not a big deal to me personally then I won't care. If they're giving it a flat 10/10 and not going to be critical AT ALL I'm going to be highly suss, no matter what game it is.

As such I don't place huge stock on overall consensus, unless it's particularly bad or extremely good. There's games fairly widely well received that I know I won't like. The Assassin's Creed series for example, regularly receives Metacritic scores higher than this game but I know it's not my personal cup.

This can all be solely based on reviews however. Outside of getting to play it yourself it's the best resource we have for how to spend our time and money.

Armaggedon207d ago

@crimsonidol

Yes, they are expensive. Looking at reviews is fine but, its very easy for perception to get skewed because they will typically only give a snapshot of certain aspects, and present them independently in short form. There are so many games that I have seen countless reviews, and playing the game was still a different experience for me when I got my hands on it, for better or worse. Black myth, starfield, Star wars outlaws, etc. But Im not here to tell people how they should do things, just offering insight to help make everybodies gaming experience better.

CrimsonIdol207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

I definitely appreciate that you have to try to gauge for yourself, and that scores and opinions never paint the full picture when it comes to something as subjective as "will I enjoy this game?". for all the things that can be looked at objectively this game looks very competent (graphics, performance, bugs etc). It's just very little of that affects one's enjoyment of a game unless they're particularly bad. It's all the subjective stuff. A score is completely reductive.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 207d ago
coolbeans207d ago

Keep in mind that was by a different critic.

Armaggedon207d ago (Edited 207d ago )

Thts not what was said in their 2023 top games of the year video. They said we and our top picks. And starfield was number 2. In other words, they came to a consensus. I am assuming the same thing here

coolbeans207d ago

@Armaggedon

You understand that even within those comprehensive end-of-year lists, not *everyone* uniformly holds the same opinion on the same game, right? You keep over-emphasizing this notion of a collective group-think ("they believe x or y") when that may not apply. Even if there's strong shared opinion, at least adding some extra context can help in how you approach your critique of them.

Kosander207d ago

So if they gave Starfield a 9 this must mean Veilguard is really a 5-6/10 game?

Armaggedon207d ago

Not necessarily. Thats just one persons word. Its different for everyone.

230°

Dragon Age: The Veilguard Star 'Absolutely Devastated' Over Backlash

Dragon Age star Alix Wilton Regan has given her personal response to the backlash faced by last year's Dragon Age: The Veilguard, and blamed the "mixed reactions" on people who "wanted to see the game fail, or wanted to see [BioWare] fail".

-Foxtrot1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

Blame everyone else...yeah...great stance

Gives off that "if you didn't like it then you are clearly one of those bigoted trolls" vibe

Lightning771d 1h ago

Who else's fault is it then? Let's talk about it.

-Foxtrot1d ago

There's not much to talk about, Bioware made a s****y Dragon Age game which was heavily dumbed down compared to their previous games.

Yes its true, some trolls were hating on it because of some silly reasons but the rest of people who actually had constructive criticism were lumped into those very same trolls to silence them.

Make anyone who actually has some valid things to say look like bad people so their criticism and opinions are automatically invalid. It's a PR move that has been going on for years, even Hollywood does it with films, it just causes fans to be at each others throats while the spotlight is taken off the games flaws and it becomes all about toxic fans. The developers then sit back, stir the pot while they get away with whatever they've done with their bad product.

OtterX14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

@-Foxtrot hit the nail on the head. For me, and many many others, it had nothing to do with transgender inclusion or whatever.... it was the dumbed down gameplay from previous titles that turned me off! It's cowardly to hide behind the social issue backlash and refuse to accept feedback on the actual game from the rest of us. We simply did not like the new gameplay.

So who's fault is it? Probably happened at the highest level, "let's make a dragon age dumbed down so that a larger audience will enjoy it, which will make us a lot more money!" Except... that backfired. Rpg gamers want deep rpg gameplay.Word got out that it wasn't.

joab7779h ago(Edited 9h ago)

The problem is that we’ve wanted a true successor to DA:Origins for years and never got it. Lorian literally learned from you and now makes your games better than you.
Don’t blame us for the fact that you know exactly what to make and choose not to every single time.
Be happy you sell what you do on name alone. BioWare was my favorite company for so long…

thorstein22h ago

Who do you blame when the hate comes before a game releases? (ie MindsEye)

mkis00714h ago

Exactly. People are hiding behind their real reasons bs...everyone knows this game was targeted before it could be properly judged..ie before it was even released people decided to trash it.

Lightning7720h ago(Edited 20h ago)

People originally hated the color pallette me included but I waited and wanted to look past the color scheme and what I played was solid. The characters aren't everyone's cup of tea ok I understand, but certain characters had a depth like identity struggle and navigating the world as their true self. Ok I like that character dynamic personally. I can go on but about what I liked in detail but anyway. People chose one thing to hate and ran with it and justified the reason each time leading up to release. DEI! Oh like mass effect dei same sex marriage? Where's the outrage for that all those years ago? Unwarranted amount of hate for stupid contradictory reasons. If you don't like for honest reasons ok cool respects but if it's bad faith then yeah not cool.

Now Minds Eye. I had to do some investigating. The studios biggest marketing promotion is from the creator of GTA Leslie Benzie already set themselves up for very high expectations. I know it's a way to get eyes on the game. You also have to deliver a experience that's at least on par maybe better with past GTA games. The pre orders went out with out gameplay or no real incentive to pre-order. So get your money now up front before we show anything. The "leak" and streamer showing "excitement" for the game. While comments are saying the game looks mid or at very least middling or skeptical comments. No deep dive gameplay just over a week away from Launch. They're already making road maps and promises already before the game even releases which also not a good sign. I dont hate for no reason if I see a game that looks weird I say something or I could be all wrong and the game could get a 80 meta after all. though I think it's gonna get a 57 meta personally.

PanicMechanic14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

There is literally dialogue of a character explaining how they need to pay reparations to another character in the form of doing push ups because they “misgendered” them. The dialogue in the game is hyper tolerant woke BS

It’s not the same as mass effect, not even close

mkis00713h ago

panic

sounds like an in game joke.

IAMRealHooman11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

@PanicMechanic Not how the scene played out. Isabela establishes that she made her crew do push ups if they fucked up, ( jobs, missions, anything,etc...) She misgenedered Taash and starts doing them on her own, Taash is confused until she explains it.

Now is Taash still badly written? Yes

neutralgamer19928h ago

It’s honestly frustrating to see what happened with Dragon Age: Veilguard. This is an established IP—fans knew what they wanted: a true sequel in spirit and tone to Dragon Age: Origins. Instead, Bioware overhauled the identity of the series so much that it barely resembles what made the earlier games great. Characters changing drastically, tone and gameplay shifting too far from the original formula—it just doesn’t land, and frankly, I’d argue Veilguard doesn’t even surpass Dragon Age 2.

If this had launched as a new IP, maybe expectations would’ve been different. But slapping the Dragon Age name on something that feels so disconnected only makes things worse. And once a game gets hit with that "agenda-driven" label—fairly or unfairly—it’s incredibly difficult to shake the stigma.

What makes it more frustrating is the tone from some developers. Telling fans, “This might not be for you” or “Don’t buy it if you don’t like it,” then turning around and painting criticism as toxic or bigoted when people don’t buy it—it’s not a good look. Open, respectful dialogue with the community is how the industry moves forward, not deflection or gaslighting.

Look at Black Myth: Wukong, or the excitement around Expedition 33. These games are succeeding on the merits of gameplay, world-building, and focus—not by leaning into polarizing narratives or identity marketing. Players just want well-made, fun, immersive games. It’s not that deep

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8h ago
lukasmain1d 4h ago

They never wanted to see it fail or the game fail, they wanted to see a good game with a good story that was in line with the original. They knew we weren't going to get this so they openly criticised everything about it. AND they were proven correct. The game sucked and failed in every way. Maybe you should have listened to the fans in the first place.

Blad3runner0014h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Perhaps people just wanted a proper Dragon Age game, not a Disney inspired Dragon Age, with awful writing.

MrDead13h ago

This game was changed from a live service to a single player game quite late in the development, I'm surprised it turned out as well as it did. The writing and the direction was screwed by EA marketing teams.

Then you had all the anti-woke psychos set loose by heavily politicised streamer grifters. How people take their directions from those nutters I will never know.

jambola9h ago

how are they grifters? are you just parroting what other people say or do you have proof

MrDead1h ago

Do you have proof that they're not?

I mean just look at Rumble who are funded by people like Peter Thiel and JD Vance or Turning Point USA training right-wing influencers and and paying troll farms to brigade and mass comment right-wing talking points on social media and streaming platforms and then you have the management group Today Is America that manage over 200 influencers and creators to spread right-wing sentiment to their young audience.

Like I said, grifters.

Please feel free to look up anything I've stated.

Star512h ago

wrong. it isn't a good dragon age game. as someone who's never played a dragon age game. I like it with no previous bias/ history. but I understand those who don't like the turn. But it's not a bad game (cheesy lines aside), it's fun to play

Show all comments (29)
130°

DLC Wouldn't Have Fixed Dragon Age: The Veilguard, But It Deserved Some Anyway

Dragon Age: The Veilguard was never going to be one of those games that gets "fixed" with updates, but DLC could've let the devs tell their own story.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
GhostScholar41d ago

I know everyone hates this game, but I have had a blast with it. I enjoyed the combat, characters (for the most part), and the story. Not to mention the environments are beautiful. I like this game more than dragon age 2 or inquisition.

raWfodog40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I’m still playing through Inquisition now but will hop into Veilguard after that. I was surprised when it was added to PS+ Essentials last month. I’ll see for myself if it deserves all the hate or not.

Lexreborn240d ago

The best thing about options and people is. Things are allowed to cater to others and they enjoy it, and it’s equally okay if you don’t individually vibe with something.

What’s not okay is over criticizing something due to your personal bias and agendas. Campaigning against harmless things that don’t truly dictate anything in your life. I’m not into dragon age games, but I never once made an agenda to tell people how “bad” each iteration is because it didn’t click for me.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
Rancegamerx40d ago

This game deserves nothing more than to be buried in the annals of history, only to resurface decades later as a cautionary tale of the astonishing foolishness that prevailed in 2024.

GhostScholar40d ago

You must have not played a truly bad game I’d you think this is a bad game.

Snookies1240d ago

This game was a mockery to the Dragon Age series. I lost all faith in the series thanks to this one.

GhostScholar40d ago

I can see not liking the change in combat but that’s about the only criticism I could give it and I actually had a blast as a veil jumper archer. To each his own I’m not saying it’s the greatest game ever but it’s my favorite dragon age game since origins

TheColbertinator40d ago

That's what people say about every new Dragon Age game. Many fans almost gave up on the series after Dragon Age 2. Even more stopped caring for Inquisition because despite the high reviews, fans of the original Bioware hated the gameplay. Some players never even left the first area "The Hinterlands".

Asterphoenix40d ago

Lots of the main Bioware team is gone from years ago. The site is silly if they want to fix it they would have to re-do everything.

They might as well make a new entry. They should take fan feedback rather than ignoring them to push an agenda.

Definitely didn't feel like a Dragon Age game.

GhostScholar40d ago

I just don’t get that critique. Graphics were great, characters were great, story was great, and I liked the combat as well. Like I said to each his own. It sucks for the people who didn’t like it, but I really enjoyed it.

PanicMechanic39d ago

Characters and story were sure as hell not great at all.

Rancegamerx39d ago

The characters were great? In what universe? They were thinly disguised activists shoehorned into a fantasy setting, prioritizing forced ideology over genuine storytelling. Calling them "great' is an insult to the art of character creation. They lacked depth, relatability, and purpose—a mess that even garbage would resent being compared to.

39d ago
dmonee39d ago

The DLC was supposed to feature a blond haired dude, with orange skin, that bans all woke nonsense from the game.

110°

BioWare Co-Founder Praises Dragon Age Veilguard, Says Long Gaps Between Games Raise Fan Expectations

Bioware co-founder Greg Zeshuck has praised Dragon Age: The Veilguard, saying that lengthy gaps between game releases raise fan expectations.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Redgrave92d ago

Long gaps to an extent, but too long and you enter into impossible expectations and loss of interest. The balance is hard to allow for adequate development time and avoid over inflation of the product, but such a thing aa too long is absolutely a thing.

Dragon Age Veilguard I think was too long, especially after what we ended up getting. Mass Effect 5, if not canceled, will likely suffer a similar fate.

NoDamage92d ago

No it does not. There were no expectations for this game since pretty much nothing was ever really shown to increase hype....the only hype for this game was self generated because of the love of the franchise. It was nothing extreme...and yet they still failed.

There was more hype for anthem then for this game.

goken92d ago

The Self delusion is strong with this one…

-Foxtrot92d ago

Who raised their expectations? People have been iffy with new BioWare games in general since they screwed up the ending of ME3 and they just got lower until Anthem really put us all on a downer

The fact it was so low and still got people disappointed showed you how bad this was.

I’m sorry but simply put he’s talking s***

TheColbertinator91d ago (Edited 91d ago )

The gap between Veilguard and Inquisition was an issue of course but the pressing problem was the lack of confidence towards Bioware after Andromeda and Anthem. These two games were to be pillars of Bioware's continued dominance in the RPG market. In the days since other RPG developers have come to take the center stage and push out Bioware. Obsidian, Bethesda, CDPR and Larian are among the many developers who have staked their claim since DA Inquisition launched.