330°

Dragon Age Has Ruined the Design of the Qunari

The Qunari on the right in the picture above is the embodiment of the iron-fisted, all-conquering, dogmatic, stoic giants we've learned about in games and lore. The Qunari on the left looks like a villain out of Shrek.

Read Full Story >>
comicbook.com
M3talDiamond271d ago

I dont know what they were thinking

Snookies12271d ago

Thinking? That might be giving them too much credit, lol.

bloop271d ago

I'm getting "modern audiences" vibes off this game.

SCW1982271d ago

Dragon Age has ruined the design of Dragon Age. The art style in this game is terrible. Uninspired Fortnite knock off trash.

TL24SS270d ago

Yeah, it's pretty f-ing bad how bad they messed up the art style of this game. Loved loved DA1 and it's been downhill since then. I honestly don't know wtf Bioware is doing....

Look at Blizzard, they learned their mistakes and D4 came out looking exactly how we wanted it, dark and moody as it should be. You'd think Bioware would have followed along but here they are, making a Fortnite Age.

GhostScholar270d ago

Diablo 4 had a lot of problems lol I don’t know what you’re talking about

GhostScholar270d ago

I’ll agree the art style is bad in the cinematic cutscenes, but in the gameplay segments it is ions better looking than any of the other games in my opinion. I know this is a strictly negative site, but gameplay wise it looks very good.

SCW1982269d ago

I strongly disagree but I am glad it works for you.

TheNamelessOne271d ago

Dragon Age 2 (which I still actually enjoy) ruined the design of the Darkspawn. Now the upcoming DA is trashing Qunari. Awesome.

The original Dragon Age really was the only true spectacular game in the series. The second game simplified things, and made it lesser of an experience overall, but I still found it good. Inquisition had some great elements, but had way too much nothing, filler content that made it feel more like farming in an MMO than an actual open-world, story-driven RPG. Veilguard? I literally have no faith in this one, and truly believe it's going to be an all around lame experience and, probably, the death of Bioware.

Christopher271d ago

I love that the Qunari from the first game were completely revamped but going back to look more like that is 'ruining' the design.

TylerFischer271d ago

“Look more like that”

So because it looks a LITTLE like the Origins design that justifies abandoning a superior design everyones loves?

Christopher271d ago

That's an opinion. Not a fact. And it looks way more like the Origins design than the others. Trying to act like it doesn't is just silly.

Fact: originally it looks way more like it does now
Fact: They redesigned it in DA2
Fact: They redesigned it even more in DA2
Fact: They went back to look like the more original in Veilguard

Opinions on what is better are just that, opinion. But even with that opinion, you have to understand that you can't say that the a design going back to the origin doesn't make sense when possibly the ones from DA2 and Inquisitor didn't make sense with the lore to begin with.

But, hey, people like to argue their opinions and what they think they should happen and then blame the developers of their own world/game ruined it when, just perhaps, they ruined it by changing it from what it was to begin with.

I find these criticisms amusing. People using opinion as fact and placing blame when there just isn't any blame to be placed for controlling one's world and its content.

TylerFischer271d ago

Of course, it is just an opinion. That goes without saying. But it is also the majority opinion. Besides, if they were aiming to be more true to the original, they would just recreate the original design, not go 30 percent the way there. If the intention was to go back to the original design fair enough, but the end product does not suggest that was the driving force behind the latest design.

Armaggedon271d ago

@Christopher

You are speaking facts? Here comes the downpour of downvotes. Looks like they got here before I did.lol

Daeloki271d ago

"Fans": We wan't it more like Origins!
*Bioware makes Qunari more like in Origins*
"Fans": >:(

TheNamelessOne270d ago

They're talking about game design. Not necessarily art design. The majority of fans actually liked the aesthetic changes made with DA2 (outside of the Darkspawn), but found most other things a step back. The Qunari in Origins really just looked like big, strong humans. In Veilguard, as for that image, they look like goofy cartoon characters.

porkChop271d ago

Yeah that's a fair point. I don't think people realize the Qunari designs have changed with each game. DA2 made them look monstrous which I do personally think fit them the best. Inquisition then dialed things back to be a little closer to DA:O. I think the problem with Veilguard is that while bringing them even closer to DA:O they've also added in a bizarre, almost Elven influence. It just doesn't look quite right.

Christopher271d ago

There is a theory that qunari are the result of elves mixing their blood with something else (Blight? Dragons? No one is sure).

8bitAssassin271d ago

I know that's a created Qunari Rook, but the Ashirok was the shit in 2. So here's hoping the actual npc Qunari look great.

Show all comments (48)
250°

Dragon Age: The Veilguard Star 'Absolutely Devastated' Over Backlash

Dragon Age star Alix Wilton Regan has given her personal response to the backlash faced by last year's Dragon Age: The Veilguard, and blamed the "mixed reactions" on people who "wanted to see the game fail, or wanted to see [BioWare] fail".

-Foxtrot4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Blame everyone else...yeah...great stance

Gives off that "if you didn't like it then you are clearly one of those bigoted trolls" vibe

Lightning774d ago

Who else's fault is it then? Let's talk about it.

-Foxtrot4d ago

There's not much to talk about, Bioware made a s****y Dragon Age game which was heavily dumbed down compared to their previous games.

Yes its true, some trolls were hating on it because of some silly reasons but the rest of people who actually had constructive criticism were lumped into those very same trolls to silence them.

Make anyone who actually has some valid things to say look like bad people so their criticism and opinions are automatically invalid. It's a PR move that has been going on for years, even Hollywood does it with films, it just causes fans to be at each others throats while the spotlight is taken off the games flaws and it becomes all about toxic fans. The developers then sit back, stir the pot while they get away with whatever they've done with their bad product.

OtterX4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@-Foxtrot hit the nail on the head. For me, and many many others, it had nothing to do with transgender inclusion or whatever.... it was the dumbed down gameplay from previous titles that turned me off! It's cowardly to hide behind the social issue backlash and refuse to accept feedback on the actual game from the rest of us. We simply did not like the new gameplay.

So who's fault is it? Probably happened at the highest level, "let's make a dragon age dumbed down so that a larger audience will enjoy it, which will make us a lot more money!" Except... that backfired. Rpg gamers want deep rpg gameplay.Word got out that it wasn't.

joab7774d ago (Edited 4d ago )

The problem is that we’ve wanted a true successor to DA:Origins for years and never got it. Lorian literally learned from you and now makes your games better than you.
Don’t blame us for the fact that you know exactly what to make and choose not to every single time.
Be happy you sell what you do on name alone. BioWare was my favorite company for so long…

Armaggedon3d ago

@Joab

“Makes your games better than you?” Really? Last I checked, Bioware hasnt released a crpg since origins, so Larian is not doing anything one to one better than a fundamentally different type of game. Bioware has changed their direction, and fans are so bound to their attachment to the old Bioware, that they are becoming resentful and hateful, and worst of all…blind. Its fng up your perception.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
thorstein4d ago

Who do you blame when the hate comes before a game releases? (ie MindsEye)

mkis0074d ago

Exactly. People are hiding behind their real reasons bs...everyone knows this game was targeted before it could be properly judged..ie before it was even released people decided to trash it.

coolbeans3d ago

You acting as though it's impossible to for anyone to gauge any potential red flags before a game's release, but that's not the case.

-Pre-release footage
-Title name changes
-In-house comparisons to Norse God of War
-An EA-published game that's been in development hell

I don't see the gotcha in your comment. Hell, bringing up MindsEye doesn't do you favors, given how selectively edited its trailers often are. The majority of 'hate' thrown towards MindsEye is justified skepticism.

thorstein3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

@coolbean

That's because there is no gotcha in my comment. It's a genuine question.

Using MindsEye as an example is apropos because it's timely and the latest game to be hated.

It hasn't released and the hate I'm referring to is people straight up lying that no gameplay footage was released.

Hating games before they release isn't new. And no one is saying don't be cautious with a new IP. But you knew that already.

Lightning774d ago (Edited 4d ago )

People originally hated the color pallette me included but I waited and wanted to look past the color scheme and what I played was solid. The characters aren't everyone's cup of tea ok I understand, but certain characters had a depth like identity struggle and navigating the world as their true self. Ok I like that character dynamic personally. I can go on but about what I liked in detail but anyway. People chose one thing to hate and ran with it and justified the reason each time leading up to release. DEI! Oh like mass effect dei same sex marriage? Where's the outrage for that all those years ago? Unwarranted amount of hate for stupid contradictory reasons. If you don't like for honest reasons ok cool respects but if it's bad faith then yeah not cool.

Now Minds Eye. I had to do some investigating. The studios biggest marketing promotion is from the creator of GTA Leslie Benzie already set themselves up for very high expectations. I know it's a way to get eyes on the game. You also have to deliver a experience that's at least on par maybe better with past GTA games. The pre orders went out with out gameplay or no real incentive to pre-order. So get your money now up front before we show anything. The "leak" and streamer showing "excitement" for the game. While comments are saying the game looks mid or at very least middling or skeptical comments. No deep dive gameplay just over a week away from Launch. They're already making road maps and promises already before the game even releases which also not a good sign. I dont hate for no reason if I see a game that looks weird I say something or I could be all wrong and the game could get a 80 meta after all. though I think it's gonna get a 57 meta personally.

PanicMechanic4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

There is literally dialogue of a character explaining how they need to pay reparations to another character in the form of doing push ups because they “misgendered” them. The dialogue in the game is hyper tolerant woke BS

It’s not the same as mass effect, not even close

mkis0074d ago

panic

sounds like an in game joke.

IAMRealHooman4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@PanicMechanic Not how the scene played out. Isabela establishes that she made her crew do push ups if they fucked up, ( jobs, missions, anything,etc...) She misgenedered Taash and starts doing them on her own, Taash is confused until she explains it.

Now is Taash still badly written? Yes

neutralgamer19923d ago

It’s honestly frustrating to see what happened with Dragon Age: Veilguard. This is an established IP—fans knew what they wanted: a true sequel in spirit and tone to Dragon Age: Origins. Instead, Bioware overhauled the identity of the series so much that it barely resembles what made the earlier games great. Characters changing drastically, tone and gameplay shifting too far from the original formula—it just doesn’t land, and frankly, I’d argue Veilguard doesn’t even surpass Dragon Age 2.

If this had launched as a new IP, maybe expectations would’ve been different. But slapping the Dragon Age name on something that feels so disconnected only makes things worse. And once a game gets hit with that "agenda-driven" label—fairly or unfairly—it’s incredibly difficult to shake the stigma.

What makes it more frustrating is the tone from some developers. Telling fans, “This might not be for you” or “Don’t buy it if you don’t like it,” then turning around and painting criticism as toxic or bigoted when people don’t buy it—it’s not a good look. Open, respectful dialogue with the community is how the industry moves forward, not deflection or gaslighting.

Look at Black Myth: Wukong, or the excitement around Expedition 33. These games are succeeding on the merits of gameplay, world-building, and focus—not by leaning into polarizing narratives or identity marketing. Players just want well-made, fun, immersive games. It’s not that deep

Armaggedon3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This is what people do in general, especially gamers. Gamers look at things as if the devs failed them, and never ask if they themselves are the cause of the dislike for the game.

@Foxtrot again

You calling it a s****y game is constructive huh? That is demolition, not construction. Lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
lukasmain4d ago

They never wanted to see it fail or the game fail, they wanted to see a good game with a good story that was in line with the original. They knew we weren't going to get this so they openly criticised everything about it. AND they were proven correct. The game sucked and failed in every way. Maybe you should have listened to the fans in the first place.

Blad3runner004d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Perhaps people just wanted a proper Dragon Age game, not a Disney inspired Dragon Age, with awful writing.

MrDead4d ago

This game was changed from a live service to a single player game quite late in the development, I'm surprised it turned out as well as it did. The writing and the direction was screwed by EA marketing teams.

Then you had all the anti-woke psychos set loose by heavily politicised streamer grifters. How people take their directions from those nutters I will never know.

jambola4d ago

how are they grifters? are you just parroting what other people say or do you have proof

MrDead3d ago

Do you have proof that they're not?

I mean just look at Rumble who are funded by people like Peter Thiel and JD Vance or Turning Point USA training right-wing influencers and and paying troll farms to brigade and mass comment right-wing talking points on social media and streaming platforms and then you have the management group Today Is America that manage over 200 influencers and creators to spread right-wing sentiment to their young audience.

Like I said, grifters.

Please feel free to look up anything I've stated.

jambola3d ago

"do you have proof that they're not"
that's not how things work bro
do you have any proof you didn't commit horrible crimes in secret?

MrDead2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You forgot to read the rest of the comment kid.

Like I said feel free to disprove anything I've stated.

https://www.splcenter.org/r...
https://nupoliticalreview.o...

jambola2d ago

that only applies to certain ones
doesn't apply to anyone specific

Star513d ago

wrong. it isn't a good dragon age game. as someone who's never played a dragon age game. I like it with no previous bias/ history. but I understand those who don't like the turn. But it's not a bad game (cheesy lines aside), it's fun to play

Armaggedon3d ago

Subjective. Something people now and days cannot seem to grasp.

Show all comments (42)
130°

DLC Wouldn't Have Fixed Dragon Age: The Veilguard, But It Deserved Some Anyway

Dragon Age: The Veilguard was never going to be one of those games that gets "fixed" with updates, but DLC could've let the devs tell their own story.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
GhostScholar44d ago

I know everyone hates this game, but I have had a blast with it. I enjoyed the combat, characters (for the most part), and the story. Not to mention the environments are beautiful. I like this game more than dragon age 2 or inquisition.

raWfodog44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

I’m still playing through Inquisition now but will hop into Veilguard after that. I was surprised when it was added to PS+ Essentials last month. I’ll see for myself if it deserves all the hate or not.

Lexreborn244d ago

The best thing about options and people is. Things are allowed to cater to others and they enjoy it, and it’s equally okay if you don’t individually vibe with something.

What’s not okay is over criticizing something due to your personal bias and agendas. Campaigning against harmless things that don’t truly dictate anything in your life. I’m not into dragon age games, but I never once made an agenda to tell people how “bad” each iteration is because it didn’t click for me.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 44d ago
Rancegamerx44d ago

This game deserves nothing more than to be buried in the annals of history, only to resurface decades later as a cautionary tale of the astonishing foolishness that prevailed in 2024.

GhostScholar44d ago

You must have not played a truly bad game I’d you think this is a bad game.

Snookies1244d ago

This game was a mockery to the Dragon Age series. I lost all faith in the series thanks to this one.

GhostScholar44d ago

I can see not liking the change in combat but that’s about the only criticism I could give it and I actually had a blast as a veil jumper archer. To each his own I’m not saying it’s the greatest game ever but it’s my favorite dragon age game since origins

TheColbertinator44d ago

That's what people say about every new Dragon Age game. Many fans almost gave up on the series after Dragon Age 2. Even more stopped caring for Inquisition because despite the high reviews, fans of the original Bioware hated the gameplay. Some players never even left the first area "The Hinterlands".

Asterphoenix44d ago

Lots of the main Bioware team is gone from years ago. The site is silly if they want to fix it they would have to re-do everything.

They might as well make a new entry. They should take fan feedback rather than ignoring them to push an agenda.

Definitely didn't feel like a Dragon Age game.

GhostScholar43d ago

I just don’t get that critique. Graphics were great, characters were great, story was great, and I liked the combat as well. Like I said to each his own. It sucks for the people who didn’t like it, but I really enjoyed it.

PanicMechanic43d ago

Characters and story were sure as hell not great at all.

Rancegamerx43d ago

The characters were great? In what universe? They were thinly disguised activists shoehorned into a fantasy setting, prioritizing forced ideology over genuine storytelling. Calling them "great' is an insult to the art of character creation. They lacked depth, relatability, and purpose—a mess that even garbage would resent being compared to.

43d ago
dmonee43d ago

The DLC was supposed to feature a blond haired dude, with orange skin, that bans all woke nonsense from the game.

110°

BioWare Co-Founder Praises Dragon Age Veilguard, Says Long Gaps Between Games Raise Fan Expectations

Bioware co-founder Greg Zeshuck has praised Dragon Age: The Veilguard, saying that lengthy gaps between game releases raise fan expectations.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Redgrave96d ago

Long gaps to an extent, but too long and you enter into impossible expectations and loss of interest. The balance is hard to allow for adequate development time and avoid over inflation of the product, but such a thing aa too long is absolutely a thing.

Dragon Age Veilguard I think was too long, especially after what we ended up getting. Mass Effect 5, if not canceled, will likely suffer a similar fate.

NoDamage96d ago

No it does not. There were no expectations for this game since pretty much nothing was ever really shown to increase hype....the only hype for this game was self generated because of the love of the franchise. It was nothing extreme...and yet they still failed.

There was more hype for anthem then for this game.

goken96d ago

The Self delusion is strong with this one…

-Foxtrot95d ago

Who raised their expectations? People have been iffy with new BioWare games in general since they screwed up the ending of ME3 and they just got lower until Anthem really put us all on a downer

The fact it was so low and still got people disappointed showed you how bad this was.

I’m sorry but simply put he’s talking s***

TheColbertinator95d ago (Edited 95d ago )

The gap between Veilguard and Inquisition was an issue of course but the pressing problem was the lack of confidence towards Bioware after Andromeda and Anthem. These two games were to be pillars of Bioware's continued dominance in the RPG market. In the days since other RPG developers have come to take the center stage and push out Bioware. Obsidian, Bethesda, CDPR and Larian are among the many developers who have staked their claim since DA Inquisition launched.