390°

It Took 20 Hours, But I Finally Started Liking Starfield

Starfield didn’t start off on the right foot for GL staff writer Shaz Mohsin. But 20 hours later, and he can’t seem to stop playing Bethesda’s new RPG.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Jin_Sakai597d ago

A good game doesn’t take 20 hours to enjoy it. That would be called a mediocre game.

Andrew336597d ago Show
Crows90597d ago Show
PhillyDonJawn597d ago

It's the size and scope of the game. The first 10 hours is just experiencing the basics of everything.

goldwyncq597d ago

FFXIV takes playing through the entire base game before it starts getting good.

neutralgamer1992597d ago (Edited 597d ago )

Why do you feel the need to tell us that? I guess good for you that it only took 20 hours

Jin

It depends man. We all like different things. This game isn’t a 9/10 but it’s also not a 5/10. It’s a good foundation that Bethesda can build from if they choose to ( I have my doubts about Bethesda since they barely fix their games with patches)

I feel like for me this is a game that I want to wait a while before playing. There are some major changes that are needed and I hope Bethesda works to fix those quickly. Just watching a lot of coverage these are some things I feel like Bethesda should focus on short term and long term wise

1- The options menu need overhaul. It’s kind of funny MS can’t get their UI right on Xbox and now Bethesda can’t get it right on starfield

2- please add some more hand crafted side content and less of AI generated quests

3- possibly unlock 60FPS on XSX

4- more freedom during exploration and instead of cut scenes let us fly and land our ships

Armaggedon597d ago

Some things take time. Its a big game.

wiz7191597d ago

@Jin I mean it’s a RPG , like any RPG the beginning is always a drag lol it’s once you develop your character and get access to more equipment does combat start to really open up more

KillBill596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

@Crows90 & @Jin_Sakai

You are missing the point. A huge difference between someone hating on the game and being on every post and someone that enjoys the game and being on every post. If you don't know the difference then you might be one of the problems here on N4G?

PapaBop596d ago

FF14 took about 40-50 hours in before it goes from being a decent game to one of the best FF games. I don't get the whole complaints on the early game in Starfield though. Maybe it depends on the route players go, I choose to go the Vanguard mission route as soon as it unlocked which was like 2 hours in and the story from them and distinctive Alien vibe I got from it carried me through the early game while I was learning the systems.

Reaper22_596d ago

You mad? Is it still burning? Don't worry that pain will subside sooner or later.

GamerRN596d ago

A good game takes a while to like when you have the wrong idea if what is supposed to be.

Took me a day or two to realize it's not a shooter, not NMS. It's Space Fallout.

fr0sty596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

A great RPG gets better with time... but it doesn't start off as crap. It starts off good, and ends up fantastic. This starts off crap, and ends up good.

Rude-ro596d ago

The topic is called “push impulse purchases” by continue to fluff the reality.
Not knocking those that love chore/loading screen games… but there is literally nothing to this game besides listening to lore, doing chores for monetary earnings, and crafting things.
Xbox fans made fun of death stranding… but that game evolved in two hours more than the entirety of starfield.

Tapani595d ago

Yeah that is 20hrs too long for me. And I'm patient.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
Jin_Sakai597d ago ShowReplies(7)
Abnor_Mal597d ago

I remember a time when people were upset with a game called Days Gone because it took less than twenty hours to really get into.

*Eats a Pepperidge Farms cookie*

BrainSyphoned597d ago

And Days Gone reviews correctly reflected its issues. Where as Starfield's shill/fanboy reviews ignore everything.

DarkZane597d ago

For some reasons, Bethesda games always get a pass even though they're the most buggiest games and the most broken games, yet Days Gone which weren't nearly as bad got shit on.

It's why the Bethesda fanbase is by far the worst. Bethesda keep giving them shit, yet they keep eating it with a smile and they ask for more.

Jin_Sakai597d ago

Days Gone wasn’t without issues and quirks but it was an amazing looking game and enjoyable most of the time.

Crows90597d ago

Well I'd say it was entirely unfairly reviewed. So is starfield.

Days gone minor issues were exaggerated. Starfields huge issues are swept aside.

SyntheticForm597d ago (Edited 597d ago )

Days Gone had an awful launch with character dialogue either non-audible or completely out of sync with the animation. Pure and utter game-crippling jank all around. That aside it was a pretty nice game with great visuals. The hordes were a ball and using the environment and your arsenal to take them down was a lot of fun, as was scavenging, sneaking around, and taking care of your bike. The bike was also fun to use.

Unfortunately the game received a load of unfair criticism due to the protagonist, Deacon, being a "gruff biker dude" (oh the horror) and the game just wasn't woke enough to make these lefty "journalists" happy.

crazyCoconuts597d ago

Hey, since we're on Day's Gone, do you think if you watched some PS4 Pro Day's Gone gameplay from years ago and looked at gameplay, character models, animation, dialog, and compared it to Starfield on XSX today, which would win?

badz149597d ago (Edited 597d ago )

@crazyCoconuts

Graphically, Days Gone looks better in almost evey way. And don't even start comparing the character models and animation. Compared to Days Gone, Bethesda's devs should be sent back to school or retire altogether! They clearly are too stubborn to leave the old days and move on with new tech. Starfield looks too dated out of the gate. I think everybody would agree that that archaic engine needs to go!

EvertonFC597d ago

Exactly, I knocked off 2 points for starfield for poor enemy AI, map design, no city map, constant load screens, inventory management.
So a good 8/10 for me, a 9 if they improve with updates on the above mentioned.

Ashunderfire86596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

IGN and Gamespot didn’t give Starfield a pass. IThey gave it a 7.

wiz7191596d ago

@Crows what’s the issues ??

JackBNimble596d ago

Yeah, they corrected days gone by not making another one... ever again

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 596d ago
EvertonFC597d ago

Exactly, I loved days gone and never understood the it takes 20 hours to get going .
1 minute we slag a game off then another minute give a game a free pass because of it's studio name.

596d ago
ChasterMies596d ago

Day’s Gone was fun from the start. It was really, really fun when you could take down a horde with a machine gun. Instead of end game content, that should have been the mechanic from the start.

Abnor_Mal596d ago

It really was/is a fun game. Thr hordes were fun and I did save them for the end game, but there were smaller hoarded you could come across a bit earlier in the game just not very large in numbers like five hundred strong.

But this is when new game plus comes into effect, as I replayed the game but used only less powerful guns or only hand guns and traps. There’s many ways to tackle the different enemies of the game. Imagine coming across a large horse and all you have are hand guns and limited ammo. Play with or without restrictions.

franwex596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

Omg. Can we just move on from Days Gone? This is the only website that praises that game and laments that people weren’t fair to it.

They were. It was janky, mediocre action game. It’s okay if you liked it, but one can seriously see why others didn’t (though if they can improve on a sequel-it would be potentially really good). What’s next, lamenting that people weren’t fair to Forspoken?

EvertonFC595d ago

"but one can seriously see why others didn’t"

Same could be said for starfield

franwex595d ago

@evertonFC

Right, they are saying it…hence the story we’re commenting on…took 20 hours to start liking it…?

RhinoGamer88596d ago

Agree, Days Gone was a hidden gem that after a few patches was stellar.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
Inverno597d ago

I don't think I can play a game for 20 hours to see whether or not it clicks. The only Bethesda game I played from beginning to end was Oblivion and that game had me lost in its world within the hour. Figuratively and literally cause those compass markers made no sense to me.

Crows90597d ago

Most Bethesda games start pretty good with some kind of hook. Unfortunately starfield does not

OMNlPOTENT596d ago

Except it actually does if you happen to.. play the game. It's actually a great game. Admittedly, it took me around 3-5 hours for the gameplay loop to click and it isn't a perfect game, but it's better than this website is giving it credit for. It's a solid 8/10 game, and most review scores reflect that.

wiz7191596d ago

@Crows I’m 6 hours in and pretty much enjoy the game .. I understand the exploration aspect , which it’s not an endless exploration game. Everything in game as a purpose to it and I can see the more you play the more things become available to you ,

RupeeHoarder597d ago

I would never play a game this long that I dislike lol.

Crows90597d ago (Edited 597d ago )

It's so damn unfortunate. I didn't lay a dime to play it but I still feel like if I don't I'm losing my money's worth.

Gotta keep going through the main story to see if we can get some kind of interesting plot going.

We're no nerevar or dovakin but hey it's space at least.

Show all comments (116)
90°

Fallout 4 on Switch 2 seems inevitable, but what about Starfield?

A Fallout 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port seems like an inevitability, but what about other Bethesda RPGs like Starfield.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer199220d ago

I think all games will end up on switch from Xbox. MS has embraced going to other platforms now if games aren't doing well on Nintendo MS may be more selective in the future

On playstation they have been quite successful

anast20d ago

I'm not sure too many people want to play Starfield.

Profchaos20d ago

Phils all but confirmed they are going in hard with the switch 2

TheColbertinator20d ago

All are welcome to Switch 2. Microsoft Games Studios is interested in long term profits and market value not petty fanboy thoughts.

18d ago
Show all comments (7)
260°

Tom Warren: Bethesda Have Been Working on PS5 Starfield "For a While"

Tom Warren, senior editor at The Verge, claims on The Xbox Two + 1 podcast that a PS5 port of Starfield "should be ready" this year.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
30d ago Replies(1)
gold_drake29d ago

i believe that 100%

but not cause its difficult to work the ps5, its cause the game itself is fundamentally broken asf

RaidenBlack29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Yea they need to fix it and I think they teased some major updates and patches this year. And as the norm we know even those won't be perfect and it'll take another year or two to reach a better state.
What Starfield also need is few more DLCs to fix the barrenness. .... and especially a substantial banger one with story and exploration to coincide with the PS5 launch and renew some interest.

dveio29d ago

"its cause the game itself is fundamentally broken asf"

Thanks.

I hate the rambling around pretty obvious things.

Such as, like you said, Starfield is just a big pile of broken code.

The latest news about Starfield's developmental environment just proved it.

badz14929d ago

If they release a PS5 version and it's still a loading screen simulator, they will just embarrass themselves.

Abear2129d ago

Corporate greed is the sole reason it’s coming to PS5. Expect the same game. This is M$ and Bethesda trying to recoup losses and capitalize on huge PS5 player base in an attempt to fund their next lame project.

neutralgamer199229d ago

Hopefully there is a huge major patch that gives the game a fresh chance

rudero29d ago

I believe it 100% because it was already being developed for PlayStation before they were acquired.

Not a rumor or a magical Microsoft push…
It was already in development.

-Foxtrot29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

They are going to have to do something to make you want the PS5 version

They can't escape all the negative coverage it's received since launch so they will need something to draw people in and honestly I can't think of anything.

It will sell, it just won't sell as well as they would have hoped for a Bethesda open world game now that they are launching late when opinions have already been made.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 29d ago
pwnmaster300029d ago

Hope it does pretty good, big fan of Bethesda.
But not gonna lie this game was fucking ass.

Probably my least favorite Bethesda style rpg ever.
Regretted paying to play it early.

moomoo31929d ago

It was so disappointing.. its not horrible but its a solid 7/10

UnbreakableAlex29d ago

Have fun with this ginormous bore fest!

Show all comments (28)
250°

Report: Starfield on PS5 Seems to Be Loaded in Backend According to Mods

The official PlayStation logo has been spotted in one of Starfield's mods on Bethesda's own creations site.

B5R45d ago

Just announce it already.

lukasmain44d ago

They should try to remove the stupid overabundance of ridiculous loading screens for the PS5 version. But I assume it's not possible because of their crap engine and/or their laziness to do anything about it. But it is possible in some instances as some modders have done so a few times for PC from what I have seen.

It will be super jarring and weird for PS5 players to see so many loading screens, I worry it will destroy any potential immersion. I don't think I could handle it honestly lol. Combining that with the uninspired gameplay, I expect it would tank my motivation to play and finish the game.

Profchaos44d ago

Yeah I feel like it was also the creation engine it was core to why I gave up on the game the forced tutorials I was still getting 4 hours in just annoyed me it did t help I had just played through tears of the kingdom st the time which had zero tutorials and being forced to stop for a guided tutorial every 20 minutes killed me I have up at 6 hours despite being a huge fallout fan

Armaggedon44d ago

If one doesnt like the screens, just dint olay the game. Just like if one doesnt not like being handcuffed, dont play a fromsoft souls game. They are integral to the games design.

BISHOP-BRASIL44d ago

Are you seriously trying to push loading screens as a voluntary design choice rather than a technical limitation in 2025? Good luck with that...

Armaggedon44d ago

I dont know… is me having input delay when I try to roll in elden ring a technical limitation?

Bathyj44d ago

Meh.
I just started Death stranding. I don't have time for that.

LoveSpuds44d ago

I am trying to wrap up my Elden Ring playthrough so I can get a replay of Death Stranding in ahead of the sequel. That new video last week has be really excited, I loved the first game, one of my fave platinum trophies.

Bathyj44d ago

This is my first playthrough.
I didn't really get it when it released.
But after that trailer I decided to give it another look.

After 5 hours, I've built my first bridge. While ïts to early to be 100% sure I think I'm hooked. I'll see how I go. It feels like a game that hard to sell to someone but if you know you know

There's just so much Kojima in the game.

LoveSpuds43d ago

Just wait until later in the game when you start building a network of zip lines. Journeys that used to take 20 mins are done on a couple of minutes, it feels so satisfying 😀

Hope it continues to resonate with you dude, enjoy!

Profchaos44d ago

If what never a matter of if but when

MaximusPrime_44d ago

I have zero interest in this game but there are people who like it. People have their personal preference.

Show all comments (30)