Today Sony Computer Entertainment Europe released the first screenshots of Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection.
"Too bad PC won't ever see this game, and PS4 will never see games in 4K. Maybe PS5/6 will have another remaster..." Pc's are capable of so much more power than a ps4 but the ps4 has the best looking game graphically with the order 1886 and driveclub. Ps4 isnt capable of 4k resolution but it has graphically some of the best looking games and a lot more are on the way. Nothing on the pc looks as good as uncharted 4 or horizon atm imo but the the pc can run shoddy ports like batman in 4k resolution. Let the spinning begin, ive got my glass slippers . I cant wait for the uncharted nathan drake collection and then uncharted 4. I know killzone shadow fall surpassed crysis 3 but uncharted 4 destroys everything graphically with inferior specs. Ps4 k best-solution over 4k resolution
Replied to the wrong comment :)
when will it be released ?
Agreed, even tho PC's are more powerful PS4 has better looking games, like Driveclub which is the best looking racer ever and no other racer or pc game come close to it
lol not so awesome ..they say its HD and the AK47 lacks the moving bolt which was present in original U2 ...they need to sow attention to such details as they r improving the gun action
GTA with icenchancer mod destroy your stupid your graphic console .....
i game on both, the graphics can be much better on pc if you have the right hardware... but the ps4 is often more user friendly and can play batman properly.
Ps4 has the specs but talented de vs aren't devoted to it to take full advantage. That's why you have these stellar games coming out on consoles while the pc master race just make noise because of they're powerful specs.
Look up Star Citizen. One reason its on on consoles is because they don't want downgrade it. Crysis 3 on PC still looks better then most console games and thats a last gen game. The fact you got 50 likes on such a childish post tells me alot about the community.
Well I would expect UC4 to be the best looking game its very scripted compared to BF and star citizen. Horizon looks decent but nowhere even close to UC4, it'll be lucky to even be compared to Halo 5 graphically.
If you think nothing on PC looks better than uncharted, you need to do some more research. There are games from almost 10 years ago that look better than what PS4 is pushing out of their tiny AMD sphincter.
It doesn't look great at all. A lot of the visual effects are missing as was said in a previous preview of the game (which will make it into the final build). Confused as to why they would show the game in such a state. Isn't the point of remasters solely the visual upgrade?
@Doodleburger "if you think nothing on PC looks better than uncharted, you need to do some more research. There are games from almost 10 years ago that look better than what PS4 is pushing out of their tiny AMD sphincter." My friend we all know PCs are more powerful but power alone is not the be all and end all. Take for example a Bugatti Super sport at 1200hp and earth shuttering torque and pit it against a 700hp F1 car...yeah you can see this where its going... The car with half the power will absolutely demolish the other in any scenario due to one utmost important factor >> OPTIMIZATION. Look I have nothing to lose if I admit if there's anything better looking(not better performing, there's a difference) than U4 or DC on PC, but there isn't, at the moment. Lets not be blind. And to those who use the mod excuse please stop comparing modded games against bare bone stock ones, its really stupid.
*cough* -Star Citizen -Vanishing of Ethan Carter -Witcher 3 (yes, PC version blows console away even after being downgraded) -Crysis 3 (even last gen PC version is untouched by anything released on PS4 http://static.giantbomb.com... ) The only way any PS4 games can even get somewhat close in graphics quality is when they are super linear interactive-QTE type games with pre-baked effects and heavily scripted events that look/play exactly the same every play-through. You've clearly never played these games on PC and your even mentioning of Killzone Shadowfall proves it. Anyone who thinks KZSF with it's 960x1080 resolution can even remotely compare to the games I mentioned is so ignorant of the facts that there is just no helping you.
I'm not sure how interested I am in replaying the first 3 uncharted games, but that uncharted 4 beta might be enough of an enticement to go through them all over again. that is, unless the beta is just for MP like it typically is... (edit) in which case, i might have to pass on it completely. so it really all hinges on the beta. @andrewLB "... You've clearly never played these games on PC and your even mentioning of Killzone Shadowfall proves it. Anyone who thinks KZSF with it's 960x1080 resolution can even remotely compare to the games I mentioned is so ignorant of the facts that there is just no helping you." first of all, killzone's resolution isn't 960 x 1080. SP is 1080p. secondly, MP is 960 x 1080 *PER FRAME*, so it's actually a full 1920 x 1080, just closer to 1080i in terms of resolution rather than 1080p. they're also not upscaling the resolution to 1920 x 1080 from 960 x 1080... so you're wrong.
I mean... just run Witcher 3 on a PC with medium to high settings and nothing in PS4 comes close. I own a PS4 and i LOVE it. But I am not delusional about it´s capabilities.
Dude 4k is so 2014, didn't you hear its 8k now your PC has already been made obsolete.
Game looks f'n awesome, especially the 3rd screen, although objectively it doesn't 'destroy everything graphically'... I mean it doesn't even have anti-aliasing, there's other problems, but that's the most obvious. I suppose Cindy-rella would say that though: "All multiplatform titles are superior on ps4" "Ps4 is the best platform for gaming" "Id prefer 60fps or more" "Ps4 is the future and the future is ps4." "I expect the NX to be weaker than a ps4" "Driveclub is the best looking driving game ever made" "these developers prove that you dont need something that can match the level of a 980ti ... Playstation devs have surpassed the best ive seen on pc" "Every multiplatform game performs better on ps4 or looks better." "why do i have a ps4 if i have a powerful pc." "A lot of pc ports are just shoddy console version of games" "Most games are made for consoles" "Ive been a pc gamer for a while and any educated pc gamer would know that majority of gamers prefer the plug and play ease of use that consoles provides." "Project morpeus will be the first proper VR device brought to mass market" "Visuals are very important first and foremost" "Imagine the witcher 3 with graphics and tech all around like the order 1886." It goes on and on, but my favourite: "Fanatics are silly"
Don't know why people throw out star citizen all the time as being great looking. I have the game and don't think it looks impressive all... Many better looking games out there. It isn't fun either and I regret helping fund it.
Marcooo Marcooo C'mon Chloe say it! Marcooo Polooo *trophy Pops up I found this hilarious the first time I played Uncharted 2.
I loved that part as well. I tried every way I could think of to get her in the pool. Pushing, grenades, etc.. No luck.
First that popped into my head when I saw the pool! :D
Fish out of water!
Isn't there a trophy for petting the yak in the Nepal village or something?
Chloe's ass made it freakin hard to focus on the game.
I also liked this one. "How can you sit on that thing?" LOL
Why didn't they show Uncharted 1? That's the graphical upgrade people really wanna see..
Don't expect too much for that. I actually am much more interested if they modernized the controls...that's the part that aged the most.
I thought they were going to add skin shaders to Drakes Fortune...
They all play mostly the same and are the most conventional and easy to grasp third person shooter controls I have ever used. What's to modernize?
@kraenk12 The controls didn't really change at all between the three games and they definitely haven't "aged". They all have contemporary TPS controls.
The combat improved Drastically from 1 to 2. 2 got it right and 3 didn't need to improve much. 1: In Uncharted 1 you could shoot throuh the corners of walls 2: Hit detection was terrible Try playing it again you'll see.
I wouldn't say awesome. Awesome is what they showed at E3 2015. This is nice, but no longer 'awesome'.
Too bad I won't get re-masters because I feel the devs should make new games on these consoles not games I#ve played and paid in some cases here in the UK LESS money yearss ago to pay!
Ultimately remaster money gets invested in new games (at least most of it), and making a remaster normally involves only a small team. They're more healthy for the industry than many think.
Naughty dog aren't making this tho?
God these misinformed people... ND isn't even making this remaster.
Not misinformed just trolls
Was The Last OF US remaster done by ND or also outsourced..? That game looked amazing on PS4 edit..Did some googling and yeah it was a small ND team that did that.. hmmm I hope the new collection will be on pair with TLU..
@aco I think nd did tlou because they were talking about how they learned a lot about the ps4 from doing that which helped with their development of uc4. No source, sorry :(
misinformed or just stupid?
But ND now has less incentive to push out new games. We will probably see one fewer ND game this gen.
"I feel the devs should make new games" I feel you should actually read and learn about the game industry before posting bud.... Naughty Dog isn't doing this game, it was outsourced to a team to make and this isn't even "making" its PORTING OVER! That isn't even near the same as real game development, those teams specialize in porting titles. They didn't just remake the whole series..... Thats nice that you played it bud.... Others didn't and it existing wouldn't have you get Uncharted 4 any faster as ND isn't making the game. Mind you, look at Blue Point game's history, they mostly PORT GAMES! https://en.wikipedia.org/wi... Sony owns the IP, the team only ports, Sony is paying them to PORT not make a new game of any sort as the team has a history of porting, not making brand new ground up games.... Whats sad, is this re-master hate is fueled by pure ingnorance as many gamers are crying, whining about something they don't even fully get... Some of those ports have like 10 folks involved....it really doesn't take that much to actually port a title, 6 months, 10 staff and about 1 million is what it generally takes to port a game.... You where not getting Uncharted 5 with 10 team members, with $1 million in funding in 6 months.... Learn what development is, learn what porting is, learn who makes what and you'll realize how silly that statement is.
Yeah because after Bluepoint made God of war collectiond HD, ICO collection HD and metal gear collection HD you thought they were going to start work on a new IP right? Or maybe that just what this dev does and it's actually ensuring they get to make games rather than stopping anyone from making them. Uncharted collections existence has no bearing on how quick uncharted 4 comes out. I swear people have so many misinformed notions in their heads and complain about them just because they heard someone who was misinformed complaining about it.
Remasters can actually help the development of new IPs. Creating a new IP is very time consuming and expensive, having the additional cash flow from remasters can really help out for studios that may be underfunded. Though this doesn't necessarily apply to ND as I expect they get all the funding they need. And these porting studios that are technically competent but may be creatively challenged are much better off doing ports of good games rather than trying to do a mediocre new IP.
You do realize that remasters, most of the time, are outsourced to different developers. That means they get work....which is a good thing, the remasters bring in money for them and ND...which is good, and ND gets to work on Uncharted 4 (new game like you want) and whatever their second team is working on (presumably Last of Us 2, also new game) like you want...which is good. While I agree there are too many unneeded remasters and backward compatibility should be a automatic feature, I can't argue that remasters do help the industry and give us great games to play while we wait for the new ones (because remasters are a quick turn over while the new games you want need 3+ years to be made)
I can't wait to go through all three again! I will probably try and re-Platinum them all. On hard mode, where every bullet you shoot and take matters so much more, Uncharted has some of the Best Action Game Play of a time. https://www.youtube.com/wat...
I too think that these games are worth double-platinuming. I'll probably pick this up, though I'm still disappointed that a Golden Abyss port is not a part of the package.
Yes, Golden Abyss would have been perfect on the Dualshock 4's touch pad! Missed chance to show of the Vita too. Shame. Non the less a great game for new comers and Uncharted Vets.
It's getting a demo...megaton!!!
where did u read this. what r ur resources of this demo
How about everyone else ask this question before disagreeing?! It's on the ps blog
Looks pretty much the same deal as TLOU ps4 version to PS3 judging from those pictures. Just resolution bump but the games were already beautiful already on PS3 so no complaint there. I am still mad MP is not included in this set. I would have line up day one to get it. $60 just not worth it to me when MP of Uncharted 2 was one of my most played online game on PS3 and ND and Sony decided to drop it. :( . I'll get it still during the holiday sales because it is one of my favorite series of all time. Newcomers and people not bother with the omission of mp should not be hesitant in getting it as it has 3 of the best games ever made on PS3. I am just speaking for myself. @ Sora_1994 below, You said everything I'd just said. LoL The fact that mp is missing is a deal breaker for me @$60. I'll wait till it go on sales a bit before getting adding it to my PS4 collection. Bit like I said, it is just me and I am sure many PS4 owners will get it at launch which they should as it is a great trilogy of games for them to play in this coming holidays. I respect that.
Resolution bump,textures,lighting,gamepla y tweaks,along with a uncharted 4beta...stop(add to the fact the last of us was one game and it still looked mighty good on ps4)
Did... Did you play The Last of Us on PS4? It's freaking gorgeous! It's like a moving painting.
TLoU looks incredible even compared to most of the games on the ps4, heck it's a way better remaster compared to GTA V yet GTA V gets praised despite it not even hitting 60 fps and not even looking very good.
I don't understand how people grip over removing MP from the collection, and using that as a reason to not get the game. But these same people praise a remaster of a game from a trilogy that is not including two games of the trilogy, and claiming day one purchase. And to make it clear I am talking about Gears of War UE, because the same people praising that game find a way to bash this one. So removing a game mode from a trilogy is a dealbreaker, but removing two games from a trilogy is acceptable... Great logic. Is it not enough that people that buy the uncharted trilogy can experience the whole trilogy? Remasters are primarily for people who have not played the game. You would think missing 2/3 of a story would be kind of a big deal. Personally I think both Gears UE and uncharted trilogy are good deals ($40 for a remaster and $60 for a trilogy), my gripe is when people try and bash one for "something missing" and overlook that fact for the other.
Those are also the same people who will tell you that the Halo MCC was a great game worthy of high praise even without the mp when it was broken. Somehow it's fine to want to replay those Halo campaigns when it's the only thing that works, but when a package like the UC collection comes out w/o the mp portion, it's somehow wrong for people to be excited to play through the campaigns of a game that was specifically built for sp vs. a title that made its bread & butter off of mp. Whatever, people can talk any trash they want, I'm excited to have any kind of reason to play through my favorite trilogy of all time, and nothing anyone says can take anything from me in regards to my enjoyment I will have with this collection when it drops.
simple: One is adding stuff, the other is removing stuff Let see Gears: - complete facelift for the graphics (like Metro reddux) - add the missing pc chapter to the game - made some new cut scene for this game - Mp will be cross compatible with pc user Uncharted - went In the CFG file - Change the cfg to max fps = 30 to 60 - change resolution to 1080 X 1920P - remove MP. In the end When you compare gears of Wars Ultimate edition to Gears of wars on the 360 there's more When you compare Uncharted the Drake collection to Uncharted Trilogy on ps3 (or Uncharted super pack) there's less. As for my opinions on remasters: I still believe I have purchase a Next gen console to play Next gen experience and not to relive the past generation with a cleaner finish. So in my case both games aren't worth 60$
The problem with your statement is that they were never making a Gears trilogy. There was a lot of guessing and speculation but Rod said they just didn't have the resources to make one so they went with remaking the 1st Gears Added 60 fps Remade the cutscenes Added graphic affects Added chapters from the PC version
Let's think about the purpose of remastering a game. It's for people that didn't have a chance to play them last gen, say a PS3 only owner that migrated to Xbox One this gen. So now they can play the game this gen, with current gen fidelity. In the case of Gears UE, what would be the incentive of someone who never played the series to buy the game day one, if they are only going to get 1/3 of the story (since there has been no announcement of other Gears remastered). Granted, I understand they didn't announce it as a trilogy, but that's my point, IT IS a trilogy and they are leaving out 2/3 of it. Why release only the first game of the trilogy as a remaster for people that are new to the franchise? Unless they intend to release them separately at $40 a piece, which would make the trilogy cost $120. Which is it? Will MS leave newcomers in the dark regarding the whole Gears story, or do they intend to, essentially, charge $120 for the complete story (or $100 if they release the next one as a $60 bundle). Back to my original point, how can anyone say the above scenario is acceptable, and at the same time label the uncharted trilogy for $60 unacceptable?
Collection with all 3 games campaign for $60 gow 3 remastered failed for $40, can't wait for my uncharted!
Looks great, seems like there is an improvement on the textures and lighting from the gameplay video that was posted in the articles comment section. Looking forward to see some comparison screenshots. Definately looking forward to replaying one of my favourite games from last gen
Woa!! I don't remember that pool in Nepal looking that stunning on PS3..
Playing through the original three now. Still looks incredible.
I must. Have this i still have all 3 games on ps3 IDGAD still buying i just wish they gave uncharted 2 muktiplayer beefed up.
Uncharted 2 looks amazing 0_0
Now this is the way to play Uncharted.