100°

PlayStation TV Review: You’ve Probably Never Heard of It | B-TEN

A narrative piece, which explores the question, "Who was the PlayStation TV intended for?".

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Remove PS4 tag.
LtSkittles3476d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Site name in the title for reviews.
LtSkittles3476d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3475d ago
Changed: title
CurrentDigital3476d ago
Protagonist3476d ago

I will never get why Netflix and Hulu Plus are Important basic apps. (also I really dont like Netflix, I´d prefere HBO)

For me PlayStation TV is Intended for the gamers and for casuals who want a cheap console, cause that is what it is, a cheap console which can play PSP, PS Vita stream PS2, PS3, and PS4 if you choose to.

mixelon3475d ago

They're important because millions of people use a streaming box solely for them (and primeTV) - Spotify would be a bonus too.

Only reason I'd pick PSTV up is for remote play and vita games on TV, for normal media box funtionality it's outperformed by pretty much everything on the market. Until it gets netflix/Hulu/prime/Plex it's not ticking many boxes.

People complain about the ps4's lack of dlna - a good streaming box has always outperformed the PS consoles for stuff like that. It makes sense for a lot of people to have stb's as a side to their main consoles. The PSTV could've fit that niche but they didn't really come through on the promise yet. :/

Protagonist3475d ago (Edited 3475d ago )

Sure it is important to millions of people and they probably also have the so-called important apps on dusin other devices.

If one wants a normal media box, that is all great and dandy but it ain´t a console, just like a mobile ain´t console even though they both play games.

And dont worry, it´s going to tick boxes, also netflix/Hulu will eventually be available for the Playstation TV.

Ju3475d ago

Those apps are one of the main reason I'm getting one - besides the fact I can stream from the PS4.

But the deals might be tricky since this is a direct competition to GoogleTV and FireTV. Netflix and Amazon Prime must be on it eventually...or so I hope.

3475d ago Replies(2)
qwerty6763476d ago

i've heard of it

just have no interest what so ever for it.

Protagonist3475d ago

Well that is the thing with everything, is it not?

I mean I´ve head of the Xbox One, I just have no interest what so ever for it.

HatsuneMikuDes3475d ago (Edited 3475d ago )

If he doesn't understand the concept, why even bother reviewing it? Seriously...

CurrentDigital3475d ago

If you read the article (or even the description for that matter), you would know that I don't understand WHO this product is intended for. Sure, it's for people like me who want to play Vita games on their television, but that's an incredibly niche market and certainly won't garner a profit. Sony's a business, right? Why would they release a product that won't earn money? That's the question I attempt, but ultimately fail at, answering in this review.

I failed because there is no answer, not because I don't "understand the concept". I get the concept. It's just poorly executed. A Vita for your TV that DOESN'T play Uncharted, LittleBigPlanet, Gravity Rush, WipEout 2048, or Tearaway? A multimedia streaming device without Netflix and Hulu, the world's most popular subscription-based streaming services? Ouch.

-Gabe

alwayzbusi13475d ago

The PsTv could, should, and probably will do all of those things in the future, but I don't think that's Sony's goal at the moment. I think that they mostly wanted to offer a lower price point into their video game business.

When I see PsTv I see myself as a kid getting my mom to rent games from blockbuster because we couldn't afford to buy $50 game as much as I'd like. Gamers and especially kids don't give a damn how they get to play that next cool game they look for the cheapest way.

PsTv is less about media features for now and more about a complete games console for $139. Sony is combining three magic words "new, cheap, PlayStation" which combined with Ps Now offer a very low point of entry to some great games. The rest can be addressed in future updates.

HatsuneMikuDes3474d ago

@B-TENdotcom

Well, since you don't understand why Sony made the product, or who it's for, I'd argue that you don't understand the concept.

If you still believe that "there is no answer", then please read what 'alwayzbusi1' wrote.

clewis943475d ago (Edited 3475d ago )

I Travel a lot so this console is perfect for me. When i go up i can take this with me and play some games on a tv while I'm not at home.

Plus it has some decent vita games i have never played and everyone loves classics. The console is not for everyone, if you don't travel and have a next gen console it's almost pointless but for me it's a great buy.

Protagonist3475d ago (Edited 3475d ago )

Yet you seem to love the Wii U failure... what was your point again?

Show all comments (25)
70°

Twitch App launches on PS Vita in Europe

The Twitch app has arrived on the PlayStation store for both the PS Vita and the PlayStation TV, due to hardware restrictions you will be unable to broadcast from the device however the app enables Vita and PlayStation TV owners to watch streams without having to use the browser. The app itself is 16.7MB and requires a Vita Memory card

Read Full Story >>
rectifygaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2849d ago
Razzer2849d ago (Edited 2849d ago )

but.....vita is dead.

/s

140°

Sony discontinues PlayStation TV in US and Europe

If you’ve been holding off on buying a PlayStation TV but were planning on picking one up eventually, you better get moving.

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2976d ago
Forn2976d ago

If I could play EVERY PS 1/2 game along with PSP and Vita games I would have bought one.

miyamoto2976d ago

If only they put an A/V out cable on the PS Vita like they did with PSP.............. instant micro console for my 46" HD TV. Save Sony multi millions of dollars.

I told Shuhei Yoshida that was the way to go but they wouldn't listen.

KentBenMei2975d ago

It can play most and it is cheap. I hear you but it's a sweet deal, it gets hate for not being perfect which is unfair.

NarooN2976d ago

Why introduce it and then discontinue it like two seconds later? Lol wow.

XanderZane2976d ago

Because no one was really buying it. They even cut the price in 1/2 and PSTV's were just collecting dust on retail shelves from what I've heard. I wonder what they will do with all that overstock in their inventory? Well the Atari 2600 ET games have been all dugged up, so they can now bury this waste of hardware in it's spot. Oh well. Glad I didn't waste money on it.

TheColbertinator2976d ago

Too much hardware on the market. Sony needs to avoid Sega's mistake back in the 90s.

If Sony intends to compete with a focus,trimming out unprofitable hardware and features is quite efficient.

rezzah2976d ago

Plus casuals wouldn't understand what this is. this is more geared towards core gamers who wish to play older games, but it doesn't contain all the games they wish to play.

ZeekQuattro2976d ago

Surprised it lasted this long. Not even a name change made a difference.

The_Truth_24_72976d ago (Edited 2976d ago )

Sony really dropped the ball on this one. It couldn't even do Netflix and they killed the YouTube app.
Got one on day 1 and I've only used it a handful of times. Freedom Wars is what's keeping it from collecting dust recently.

Kribwalker2976d ago

Not to mention I can't get mine to stream the ps4 well in a room 20feet away......I bought one so my kids could play the ps4 in the other room, but it doesn't stream well

Show all comments (23)
100°

Why Did We All Tune Out of PlayStation TV?

Push Square: "When the PlayStation TV was announced, this author was on holiday. It was poor editorial director Damien McFerran that was left to man the fort during an explosive Tokyo Game Show press conference, which also played host to the reveal of the PlayStation Vita Slim. It was big, big news at the time, with the microconsole in particular drawing plenty of plaudits."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2977d ago
ArchangelMike2977d ago

This is the problem with Sony Playstation, fingers in too many pies. Just focus on games and supporting the platform you already have out there. They are letting the PSVita die a slow and painful death, and instead of investing in it, went to come up with PlaystationTV? Surprise, surprise! Sony didn't support that either!
When will they learn that gamers just want to play good games?

get2sammyb2977d ago

I agree that sometimes it feels like they're spinning too many plates. I do think this was an experiment, though, so you can't really blame them.

Junebug2977d ago Show
FamilyGuy2977d ago (Edited 2977d ago )

wtf are you talking about? The Playstation TV was a console version of the vita. It didn't need its own support when it just played vita games. I'm not a handheld sort of gamer so its release was a welcome edition to me. A mini hmdi out port on the vita would've been nice but the PS TV was a cheaper option. It gave me the opportunity to play some of those monster hunter-like games that the vita was getting that weren't showing up on the PS3 or PS4.

Seems like you have no idea what the system even was

Seraphim2977d ago

I don't think that's the problem at all. I see it twofold. One being necessity and the other being confusion. Necessity in that who needs it for Remote Play, to play Vita games on their tv, and so on. Confusion being exactly that. What is it? What does it do? And so on. Guess there could be some other issues. Price. Marketing. Price wasn't terrible but back to necessity. Do I really to spend that much for this and is it really useful to me. Lack of marketing. I bet a vast majority have no idea this product is available and if you were to ask gamers what PSTV was they'd think it's some video service offered by PS they never heard of.

I think it's a great concept. Back when I was a kid this would have been fantastic. With the price drops I have considered picking one up for $40-50. My problem is I really have no use for one. I don't have a spare tv anymore and even when I did I never really had any desire to game on it. I have my setup. Secondly most Vita games I enjoy playing on the Vita. Though some it would be cool to play on the big screen so I might have just talked myself into buying one.

rainslacker2976d ago

They brought out PSTV before they abandoned the Vita. The PSTV by it's very nature could have bolstered the Vita install base, thus making it get more support.

While I agree, Sony did fumble support for VIta in general in the West, it wasn't because they happen to bring out a different version of the Vita...which only expanded the market base for the system.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2976d ago
2977d ago
isarai2977d ago

Well many reasons, a hefty chunk of vita games are incompatible, memory cards are still pricey as hell, doesn't come with a controller which is required, doesn't stream netflix even thou standard vita does, and most of all people really aren't that interested in playing handheld visuals on a big screen. Especially now that every vita game is also getting a ps4 release, sony is really just slowly but steadily turning the knife they stabbed it withat this point

gangsta_red2977d ago

It was a great idea, just executed very poorly. Hardly any exposure and not enough support.

Just another peripheral in a long list from Sony that has been unsupported and eventually dropped. This is why people should be cautious about PSVR.

u4one2977d ago (Edited 2977d ago )

it was a solution for a problem that didn't really exist. if you own a ps4 (or a sony smart tv), you already have the best features of the pstv anyway. if you own a vita, then you have vita games, and they can be streamed via ps4. as a media streamer, it was a joke and could in no realistic way compete with Roku, Apple, Google, Amazon etc.

as for psvr - i really hope it succeeds, but you're right. a product needs a reason to exist and people need a reason to want it. same thing kinda happened with kinect as well.

donwel2977d ago

Vita games can be streamed via PS4?
PS4 games can be streamed to Vita through remote play but I've never heard it the other way round.

ziggurcat2977d ago

it also didn't help that not all vita games were compatible. I bought one thinking I would just play my vita titles on my TV, but I honestly haven't used it at all - it's my own fault for not really researching it thoroughly enough!

rainslacker2976d ago

I think it's execution was fine, just it didn't get much exposure in terms of marketing. I mean, even when the price dropped to a point only a hater could argue it wasn't worth it, the thing barely sold.

I think some people found it redundant. Some found it less capable than the handheld.

Mostly though, I think Sony had a great idea, and then didn't bother to make it into a better device as time went by. All their efforts went to PS4, and new compelling features...although probably redundant on a game console, never made their way to the device to entice the more mainstream casual customer to choose it over something like Roku or AmazonTV. Rather silly really, as much of the success of the PS1 and PS2 was due to how they made it more appealing than other devices which did the same thing...except the PS1 and PS2 could also play games.

user66660472977d ago

I'd take one of these for 3DS games.

2977d ago
Show all comments (32)