350°

Crytek: "It's getting increasingly more difficult to really wow people," Ryse won't support Mantle

DSOGaming writes: "A couple of days ago, we had the pleasure of interviewing Crytek’s Principal Rendering Engineer at Crytek, Nicolas Schulz, who clarified about the rumored Mantle support for Ryse and talked a bit about Crytek’s future plans."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Canthar3924d ago

I really want more gameplay than graphics. Show me some innovation there.

MRMagoo1233924d ago

Yeh was gonna say , most people are happy with the graphics of games now all tho they can get better, but the actual gameplay in games has stagnated imo, we need better more interactive A.I in games, there is so much more that can be done to make games better than graphics alone.

nX3923d ago

This quote actually made me laugh coming from Crytek. Crysis wowed me for like 5 minutes, after that the graphics became secondary to my enjoyment. Games like Journey, Mario Galaxy or Demon's Souls wowed me from start to finish though ...get your priorities straight, Crytek.

SniperControl3923d ago

@Bloodborn

But Journey was a bloody gorgeous game as well.

uth113923d ago

They have a point though. I see many games dismissed by people as "looking last gen" or like sh** even when they have beautiful visuals. The bar has gotten ridiculously high now. It seems like there are quite a large number of people always expecting to be wowwed with graphics, or they may not even try the game

pedrof933923d ago

Well DC wowed (now its a verb) me recently with those draw distances.

denawayne3923d ago

"Who needs graphics?"

Sincerely,
Minecraft

DeadMansHand3923d ago

Bingo. Look at the nemesis system in Shadow of Mordor. The game is pretty but not like Crysis was or Ryse. That said, the nemesis is so damn engaging and totally brings a new and fresh approach to how we deal with enemies.

Give me more of that and I'll gladly sacrifice photorealism.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3923d ago
Kivespussi3923d ago

Exactly this - late last gen graphics looked good already, this gen they haven't had the similar upgrade as the jump from PS2 era. Today things like Shadow Of Mordor's Nemesis system will impress people, not how good the game looks.

lelo2play3923d ago (Edited 3923d ago )

Yep. Gameplay is always more important then graphics. A interesting story is more important then graphics. Crytek fail to understand that...

UltraNova3923d ago

Everyone can understand that. However, not everyone can deliver that. Its far easier to utilize the hardware and pump out some visuals than is to innovate in the gameplay department cause that's were real talent and the balls to do something radically new is needed but rarely found.

purpleblau3923d ago

Crytek, you can wow people with graphics, but the game is just a piece of beautiful art without a soul.

ABizzel13923d ago

@Canthar

It's coming soon enough, like I've been saying for the longest we've reached a point where everything with start to look "good" so developers are going to have to sell us on story, world, immersion, and gameplay.

It's good and bad, because it raises the bar for AAA quality to a never before seen high and forces developers to make worlds gamers want to keep coming back to. But those who fail to nail those are likely going to end up the way of THQ (which only has the benefit of starting small indies).

Canthar3923d ago

It is a turning point for the industry for sure. I do think there is still room for traditional games, just very polished and done well. The dev's who innovate and take the risk to move forward will lead the change for others to follow. Need to balance the risk vs. reward.

assdan3923d ago

I usually hate responses like this because it implies that graphics somehow hinders gameplay. But with Crytek, this a completely accurate thing to say. They have all graphics and no substance. Crytek finds it hard to innovate? That's because they don't try new ideas. If crytek doesn't want to go under in the next 2 years, they need a new game director and some good writers. Why do people love inFamous second son? Because it's gorgeous AND the gameplay is fun as hell.

StrawberryDiesel4203923d ago

I bought and sold Infamous Second Son, it looked really good but bored the hell out of me. Now Last of Us remastered looked amazing and plays amazing.

3-4-53923d ago

Wow us with gameplay not graphics....duh!

Tzuno3923d ago

the problem with today games absolutely 0 re-playability after finishing the game, at least in 90% of cases

mochachino3923d ago

Gameplay mechanics are actually becoming really refined.

solar3923d ago

problem is console gamers argue more about graphics then they do gameplay.

FastRedPonyCar3923d ago

We will most likely never see that from Crytek. Don't worry though, CD Projekt Red's got our back.

Sly-Lupin3923d ago

I've been waiting to see AI reach the next level since MS-DOS. Still waiting. Waiting. Waiting....

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3923d ago
Godmars2903924d ago

How do you wow people with a realistic base Roman combat game? Especially when God of War is looking at you from another game system trying not to laugh.

jc485733924d ago

I was never really wowed by any of their games.

ironfist923923d ago

Except for the first Crysis

NukaCola3923d ago

Crysis 1 Mods were what wow people, not the actual game

BitbyDeath3924d ago

Try making a new Timesplitters game.

ArtificiallyYours3923d ago

Graphics Whores are an important part of our "humble" gaming "communities".

Show all comments (51)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw801d ago (Edited 801d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil800d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz800d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused800d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X1055d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts1055d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies121055d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows901055d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac1055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty1055d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts1055d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage891054d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1054d ago
CrimsonWing691055d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade1055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer1055d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer78041055d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty18891055d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer1055d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv721055d ago (Edited 1055d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad1055d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv721055d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play1055d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows901055d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad1055d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast1061d ago (Edited 1061d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad1061d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast1060d ago (Edited 1060d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion07151060d ago (Edited 1060d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast1060d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.