Aside from the occasional cheap enemy, shoddy frame rate and a camera that actually became worse; the game is great. If you don't mind firing off curses in rapid succession and find enjoyment in being humiliated by a game then this is a definite purchase.
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 debuted in 2009; ahead of Wo Long: Fallen Dynasty's launch, it's time to look back at one of Tecmo Koei's best titles.
With the release of games now slowing on the PlayStation 3, Twinfinite take a look at the 10 hardest platinum trophies on Sony's older system.
I almost got the Lost Planet 2 one, but that get no One in the Leaderboards was effed up.
Many of those trophies are just time consuming, if we are going to talk some seriously hard platinum trophies, put MGS4 in there.
I will never forget the day i got that Big Boss Emblem.
Complete the game in less than 5 hours
Use no continues
Use no health items
Kill no enemies
No alert phases
No special items
Complete the game on The Boss Extreme
One of my proudest trophies :)
I'm only one Trophy away from getting the Platinum in MGS4, but unfortunately it has to be that damn Songs of the Battlefield one that requires me to get all the emblems. It's such an eyesore to be so close only to be set up against such a daunting task
Mortal Kombat 9
Star Ocean: The Last Hope International
Lost Planet 2
Far Cry 2
Wipe Out HD
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2
Super Street Fighter 4
Persona 4: arena
Raiden IV
NBA 2K16
"Perhaps extreme difficulties are still here, just presented in different ways. Multiplayer focused shooting games (for the most part), have average (to-below) difficulty within their campaigns. However, jumping online and playing competitively can produce a welcomed contest." KJ of Play Legit Writes
The industry doesn't use the word easy but "accessible" so yes games are easy.
I find the souls games a bit too hard personally but I think Bloodborne has perfectly balanced difficulty.
Too hard, actually. Well, not "hard" but complicated, with long boring tutorials, and unbalanced sections and they try your patience with collectathons, bulls*** missions and try to make up for it with half hearted multiplayey and/or bitchy trophies.
I prefer more indies these days. AAA can still be the best around but most are boring rehashes and DLC fests.
The whole thing is just one big complaint. The author never goes into specifics; he just writes how horrible it is, then gives it an 8.9 and calls it a good game.
Here are a few examples of how badly written this article is:
"The combat is brutal and almost has no equal, but some of the cheap enemies just leave you gobsmacked and you walk away feeling like you were just c*ckslapped by the developers."
"Graphically it’s a little better looking than Sigma, but the game does not run as smoothly. I’m not even trying to start a console war discussion, but Sigma’s frame rate wasn’t this terrible, but outside of that the visual appeal is great."
"One time upon the complete annihilation of a boss I thrusted my middle finger at the screen with the intensity of a Phoenix Wright objection."
How can you guys be approving this piece of trash?