right...it's fair to make the assumption that it's awesome from the 480p livestream, but it's wrong to say it doesn't' look that good.
completely hypocritical. look at the agrees vs disagrees. you people are such overt fanboys. I've never seen a group of people so desperate to believe "their system" is the best.
quotes because you people had NOTHING to do with the system's creation. you just want to spend money on it, but somehow your life would have less meaning if it turned out a sony exclusive really wasn't that great.
How many times will the guy in Ryse shove his sword through peoples' neck in this game?
I watched him take down like 3 guys and he killed atleast 2 of them with the same neck thrust. Hell the same finisher was used when Conan Obrien was interviewing the devs too.
OK I continued watching the vid and AGAIN the same finisher kept repeating over and over. Ummmmm...is it THAT cool?
@Ksar To be honest, that was off screen footage which still looks amazing even for a washed off screen reveal. I wanna see a proper gameplay reveal trailer.
Ryse sucks or rocks... You must admit that Ryse looked WAY better than the recent deep down footage... I know it hurts to admit, I feel for you! and no need to compare them because deep down might come to Xbox One!
IGN hasn't shown favoritism this time around compared to this gen and 360.
And if people say "Well they like Titanfall better than Killzone." "Therefor they are biased." there's other outlets that marvel over Titan over most of the shooters now.
I've seen articles where IGN promotes and hypes PS4 like they did with 360 back in the day. But aren't writing articles that are talking down to X1 in any form other than concerns for the console.
IGN used to be pro Xbox. Same as Gamespot and Gametrailers back then.
There's no "100's of enemies", most are just the same ones used over and over, it's basically copy pasted over the screen. Graphically with particles and direct feed footage, Deep Down is miles better than Ryse.
Copy and pasted enemies are FAR better than just one dragon.
But seriously man, why did they heavily downgraded it from the first footage, was the first footage target render or something? (but the developer said that it was running in real time on PS4), I'm really disappointed from the recent footage from the graphical standpoint.
@dobgamers... you could never compare dynasty warriors gangs with the titans os SotC. Those screens are terrible to compare. And saying copy and posted enemies are better than one.... come one that's just a negative attitude you are showing developers
You're comparing a high quality direct feed gameplay video to a low quality off screen one, even crysis 3 on Max settings would look much worse in comparison
Well ryse is almost done and deep down is still in early stages maybe alpha or pre alpha and what we saw was online!
Excuses are for loser! What wrong with DD looking better than ryse? Obviously DD is been develop for a higher end technology machine the PS4 it's normal that it looks better plus is been made by good devs that have talent and make good games in the ither hand we have crytek zzZZzzZz who are well you know average at best.
@ssj27 capcom is also at times a terrible developer also. And crytek has created some amazing games with farcry and crysis with 2&3 being pretty good games
It didnt look as good as the CGI trailer, maybe. However the gameplay shown sure as hell did look way better than Ryse, everything about it looked spectacular, even the soundtrack kicked ass lol
really? i wonder what would be your opinion if this was a MS exclusive. The gameplay looks spectacular? Man I know Ryse gameplay is nothing to brag about but please saying the gameplay for DD was spectacular is bull. All I saw was a knight walking down a very narrow hall fighting 1 monster at a time in almost a slow motion. I that is your definition of spectacular... im speechless.
Those giant monsters in Ryse look great. :-). Ryse looks pretty but does little outside of it. Animation looks off, particles look weak and short lived, fire looks poor, environments look tight and it all moves slowly. I think MS just wanted a graphical showcase at any cost. Deep Down looks like a game that happens to be good looking.
I'm going to be honest, I really don't like Ryse nor their Developer.
Crytek is one of those guys who put graphics over gameplay. Seriously, they put out a great looking game, but It sucks once you get your hands on it. I love TimeSplitters though.
I'm really pissed at Capcom this gen but Deep Down has impressed me.
So you criticize the developers of Ryse for concentrating too much on graphics and then you go outright and say Deep Down, which had nothing but graphics going for it? Interesting...
Anyone who says ryse really need to find the door.
Because honestly if u were to show just that dragon part anyone with proper vision would say deep down.
Deep down def looks a lot better.
And for those using the ryse excuse that it has more going on ask yourself how long has ryse gameplay been shown? And how long has deep down been shown? We basically know nothing about deep down still.
Deep Down :)
Ryse : http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Deep Down : https://www.youtube.com/wat...
I made my choice :)
PS4 All the way!
diep onder(english deep down)