DSOGaming writes: "Five new Dead Space 3 screenshots have been unveiled today that showcase a new type of enemy – called Feeders - for Visceral Games third-person action game."
If EA and Motive Studio plan on remaking all the main Dead Space entries, they have to change a lot of what made Dead Space 3 so divisive.
Simple, do not bother with a Dead Space 3 remake. Rather have a new entry for Dead Space.
Remaking 3 would need to be a reworked and somewhat changed remake as 3 was flawed in most peoples eyes and the worst entry.
WTMG's Kyle Nicol:
"Was Dead Space 3 really that bad?
Well, it’s a complicated question. Dead Space 3 is undeniably the weakest of the trilogy. It’s a game that deviates so far from the original formula, that it throws a lot of what made Dead Space special in the first place out of the window. Although, where it does make up for it is one of the best cooperative shooters on the market, even after all this time. Do I recommend playing this game ten years later? Hell yes. But make sure your expectations are in the right place. It has a lot of problems that bring it down."
With the upcoming Dead Space Remake, we replay and rank the original three games.
Dead Space
Dead Space 2
The Callisto Protocol
...
...uhm...
...
...Lost Planet 3?
They need to seriously continue this ip with a new entry. Even if it's just another movie I don't care I love everything about this game.
I think it looks good.
They don't resemble Necromorphs at all. These enemies look so generic...
Agreed. One of the strongest elements of Dead Space has always been its creature design. These new enemies actually look pretty boring to me.
They couldn't have possibly gone with a more generic route on monster design. It almost feels like the developers are uninspired and are only making the game on EA's whim.
What happened to stuff like this?:
EA just knows how to make a franchise turn from original to generic