imt5583555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Well, here we go again.

CBOAT/Shinobi redeemed!

They said it is time exclusive!

EDIT :

But cross-gen in 2015 is ABSOLUTELY hilarious!!

NewMonday3555d ago

just count it as a game in the backlog, 2015 is loaded with games delayed from 2014 anyway.

Mikelarry3555d ago

exactly there are other bigger and some could argue better games coming out before then so i will just sit back, enjoy the ride and when it comes to ps4 get it then

TomShoe3555d ago

Great, it's timed.

I'm still not buying it, because it sets a bad precedent with SE greedily taking money to restrict their game.

Uncharted 4 for me.

DeadlyOreo3555d ago

I'm happy about this news, knowing that I won't be missing out on this game, I'm sure I'll have things to play between the gap. I guess now we know when Microsoft say "exclusive" most of the time that's pretty much going to be timed.

Ares84HU3555d ago

Timed, great. Will buy it for $39.99, not a penny more because of this.

SniperControl3555d ago

Didn't greenburg deny this when asked on twitter?

sonarus3555d ago

@TomShoe. I am not against playing great games, if the game is TRULY TRULY great i might buy it. But even the last tomb raider that has everyone giving the franchise hope again was just good to me. It was great relative to all the other crap tomb raiders that have released over the years.

However, lets pretend it will be best game ever, i still wouldn't buy an xbox for a game that i could just wait a few months for.

MRMagoo1233555d ago

There is gonna be a few embarrassed xbone fans when they wake up with their talk saying it's never coming to ps4 lmao , I still don't want it anyway.

NewMonday3555d ago

@TomShoe

just get it used

It's what I do with all Ubisoft games now.

LordMaim3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

@SniperControl: No, when Keighley said "exclusive on Xbox for holiday 2015" Greenburg replied by saying "That is not what we said" but did not clarify by saying it was a lifetime exclusive. Literally, all Greenburg said was that they didn't specify the length of the exclusivity.

https://twitter.com/aarongr...

Either way, Spencer's statement is pretty clear. As expected, within a year it will be on the PS4 as well.

@PraxxtorCruel: Your generalizations are pretty sweeping there. Maybe you could reign that in a little.

ZeroX98763555d ago

I wasn't really happy about the exclusivity deal, but now I can still look forward to playing this game on my platform of choice (PC or PS4).

GTgamer3555d ago

Idgaf if I buy it and that's a big "IF" you better believe it's gonna be Used Square wants to treat their fans like idiots okie dokie and no I ain't giving Phil credit because he could of said timed from the get go and this topic has being going on all morning yesterday and it took him this long to respond then you got greenburg on Twitter saying something different.Communication Level Below 9000

TomShoe3555d ago

@NewMonday

Yeah I suppose that's a good idea. I just don't want to support SE's practices.

garos823555d ago

companies who clearly shun the more powerful console in which to how off their latest offerings are certainly not worth my time. there is plenty of interesting titles to look forward to, TR needs to be something special to bring me back.

johndoe112113555d ago

Still not gonna buy it. This sh!t practice needs to stop.

Ezz20133555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Never change microsoft ....never change

as for Phill
i gotta say i didn't think he would play with words about Timed exclusives like who was in charge before him
and why did he need to do that only to confirm later that it's timed exclusive ?!...why he didn't say that in first place then ?!

as for SquareEnix ...they will never get my money on any game they make from now on

amiga-man3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I'm not surprised, it's how MS work everyone who has seen how MS operate always new this would be a timed exclusive.

morganfell3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

@Praxxtor,

No. And like 3 people I know personally I also cancelled my Temple of Osiris order. Had this been a new IP such as Evolve I could have cared less. But to sell the most units on PlayStation and then take this route has led me to exercise my rights as a gamer.

Microsoft miscalculated in another way. For every X1 this may sell there are 4 or 5 people that will now not buy an X1 out of spite.

I purchased a Wii U 2 days ago. A great buy. Do you think after owning 5 Xbox 360s I would consider an X1? No. And not because of this incident. This is just icing on the cake. No, because MS attempted to rob gamers of more rights in a single day than anyone in the history of gaming. MS changed their policies not because of a vision for gamers but because they were bludgeoned into submission. Is this a company I will support? No. Will I support their partners such as SE that betray the people in the PC and PS community that kept them afloat? Not in a hundred years.

Mr Pumblechook3555d ago

Phil Spencer had to admit it was timed because he could hear the backlash getting bigger and the anti-Xbox resentment growing.

Enemy3555d ago

Where's everyone who doubted me yesterday? Told you. :)

SilentNegotiator3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

@Lord Maim

We all know the Doritos Pope is Microsoft's puppet anyway. Him using legal-appropriate, PR-like wording and Microsoft's PR subsequently denying it is quite hilarious. It's like watching someone with two heads denying association with one of them.

head 1: "It's exclusive for Holiday 2015!"
head 2: "I didn't say that!"

bouzebbal3555d ago

now suck it Crystal Dynamics. they just claimed not more than yesterday that exclusive is total.
this means one thing: boycott!

GameNameFame3555d ago

I find some x1 fanboys reaction hilarious from this.

Look at MS history. This was so obvious. Fallout is just hilarious.

choujij3555d ago

@Morganfell

Amen. For me, two bridges were burned yesterday.

@Mr Pumblechook

Agreed. I said yesterday after the announcement that this would do more harm then good. These brands must be run by idiots. Given Xbox's history and current position in the market, it honestly boggles my mind how they could not foresee this blowing up in their faces.

"When people want me to say, can you tell us when or if it's coming to other platforms, it's not my job," Spencer told Eurogamer."

Dear Mr. Spencer, there is a fine line between doing your job and omitting industry terms (of which your company coined) in an attempt to deceive the masses into believing a game is exclusive to your platform, when in reality, you only fitted the bill for a timed exclusive.

nX3555d ago

Microsoft PR strikes again, did they really think they can get away with aquiring a big franchise without explaining it? Imagine if they would've said last year that Dead Rising 3, Ryse and PvZ are timed as well... Xbox One sales would look very different now.

AngelicIceDiamond3555d ago

Now Sony fans can take a chill pill now right? They can quit spreading hate all across the gaming boards?

Major_Glitch3555d ago

This is ONE of the reasons I believe that MICROSOFT IS A BLIGHT upon the gaming industry...fake "exclusives". In the old days(before MS), when a video game company said a game was exclusive to their console, it was actually exclusive to their console. It wasn't timed, and it also wasn't available on pc.

morganfell3555d ago

You are right Angelic. Microsoft and SEhad no part in this. Fans should not be able to voice their displeasure. The audacity of such people appalls me.

And you are also right all those angry comments from PC gamers I read were really PlayStation fans in disguise. The nerve of such people I tell ya.

You should be more careful, your bias is showing.

redwin3555d ago

I'm in the unique position of having all the consoles and with all the years I've been playing, I have never seen so much hate. Wow, how sad. We where happy back then about talking to people that gamed, if they had a different system was cool because we could get to play the other system and have different experiences. Wow, hate is killing the pride of calling myself a gamer.

badz1493555d ago Show
mechlord3555d ago

Im trying hard to find an angle where squeenix didnt shot themselves in the foot with this one but I cant. Can someone politely help me?

Why o why3555d ago

Lol @ morganfell's comment......

To be fair....angelic was telling the x1 petitioners to chill regarding destiny too. I've no issue with his preference even if it conflicts with my own.

starchild3555d ago

I figured it would be. I'm glad it is. Tomb Raider is one of my favorite game series. I'll be getting it on PC whenever that version comes out.

LonDonE3555d ago

I knew it was timed!
Either way i am going to buy it used when its cheap that way i get to play it and none of the money will go to the devs or publishers.
Even though i own all platforms its principal for me! giving the core tomb raider fan base on Playstation the middle finger in my books is taking the piss! and i wont be giving my money to them! simple as i urge every other pc/Playstation gamers to do the same.

Its Uncharted 4 for me all the way! uncharted is going to be light years better then this any how.

DragonKnight3554d ago

I hope all PC and PS4 users STRONGLY reconsider buying this game when it launches on either device. At least right away. Make SE sweat and beg for your dollars before buying it, or buy it used. They don't deserve our money for pulling this B.S.

You can't just piss off millions of people and think it's perfectly fine and dandy to do so. There has to be consequences. I really hope people will vote with their wallet.

Sheikh Yerbouti3554d ago

@Tom Shoe

It was Uncharted for you anyway. That's why it is not a big deal.

Dee_913554d ago

I can't really forgive neither MS or SE.I hate this business practice.MS paying to essentially delay the release on other platforms to make the illusion of an exclusive and SE actually going along with it shows that MS will still shaft gamers to make potential money ( even after all of the crap they put themselves through... I guess they will never change) and SE is a studio that can be bought at the price of shafting their fans.
Yea thanks for clearing this up, still doesn't change the fact that this move is complete BS... hell its even more BS now that its a timed exclusive..

rainslacker3554d ago

Honestly, if the whole statement had been left to MS, I think most people would have assumed it was timed exclusive. All the talk before the blog post was that it was likely timed. People were annoyed, but didn't see any real hate.

After the blog post started getting around though, people were really upset. It was really SE/CD that screwed up the PR with that blog post, as they said that it was exclusive, and gave some BS reasons why, and then insulted their customers further by pulling a Don Mattrick(As it's apparently become known on the blog comment section).

@Silent

I agree, MS needed to nip the negative PR in the bud. It was causing a lot of negative feedback towards MS, which is probably the exact opposite of what they wanted. Whether it will hurt them in the long run, as in if people swear off MS because of the crappy policy of buying exclusives like this, remains to be seen.

+ Show (36) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
NatureOfLogic_3555d ago

Respect to Phil Spencer for clarifying. Screw SquareEnix.

iamnsuperman3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Though it shouldn't really need clearing up in the first place. It should have been said there and then. I hope Microsoft learns a lesson from this like Sony did after this year's E3 (They were not clear at E3 and that annoyed people but change that at gamescom)

Dark113555d ago

Good on him for being clear about it.

bicfitness3555d ago

Respect? For what? Creating yet another media/PR-sh!tstorm? You don't get respect for telling the truth, that's expected.

Same Phil that drove the 1st party output into the ground for the last 4 years of the 360's life too. But let's glorify the man. Okay.

torchic3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

but why do Microsoft still have problems with communication? like cmon this mess should never have happened in the first place when will they ever learn!

also don't see why Phil Spencer deserves props Microsoft hierarchy were also parading the game as a full exclusive no?

SniperControl3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Phil Spencer is the only guy i respect at MS, always tells it how it is. no BS.

If anyone persuades me to buy an X1, it will be him.

DigitalHope3555d ago

Anyone notice there was still a little bit of Sony in Phil Spencer?

"and Beyond" he said and when he said it he had that, damnit look on his face.

But I'm glad this was cleared up, really we all knew it would be timed anyways.

christocolus3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

@bicfitness

Lol. Phil drove MS 1st party to the ground? Lmao. How did you come up with that? All the devs were so glad when he became head of xbox. Bungie even sent out an open letter congratulating him saying he was the best for the job..others said Phil was one of the few guys over at MS who kept their jobs safe and so you know in his former job role he had very little control over stuff even third party devs were happy about his new appointment. MS Devs seem to have their creative freedom back ,they seem relaxed and focused now.craig duncan said this about lionhead and phil harrison said same thing about rare now. joseph staten is back to MS from bungie too.
You should find out more before crucifying people.

Gazondaily3555d ago

@bicfitness

"Same Phil that drove the 1st party output into the ground for the last 4 years of the 360's life too. But let's glorify the man."

What a load of bull.

TheFallenAngel3555d ago

Yeah I gotta give him props for this. Aaron Greenberg lied about it yesterday and Phil came out to clarify. He deserves some respect. Screw Greenberg and major Nelson though.

LeCreuset3555d ago

I think Phil is smart. Let's be real, this deal was only worth something to MS so long as no one confirmed it was timed. That was the perception they meant to put out there to attract gamers to Xbox. Now that he sees this deal has done more to damage the Xbox rep, as opposed to being a system seller, he is trying to rehabilitate Phil has confirmed it is a timed exclusive.

Kayant3555d ago

"Respect to Phil Spencer for clarifying" - The same Phil that refused to do the same thing yesterday. Sorry but my respect for him on that is small there was time to do it yesterday and MS as a whole refused to clarify their deal until after the shitstorm.

I will give that he explained the deal well now but it don't change the fact clarification didn't happen on the day.

Both parties don't want to clarify. CD gave an equally shitty PR statement yesterday and Square where no where to be seen -

"we believe this will be a step to really forging the Tomb Raider brand as one of the biggest in gaming, with the help, belief and backing of a major partner like Microsoft" - Yh because because Square enix your parent company and owner some how doesn't exist.

Screw both of them.

MightyNoX3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

@Septic: post from Neogaf which puts Phil's reign as head 1st party in light.
----------
Sure you don't build a first party stable overnight, but in MS' case when they hell are they going to start?
Started Turn 10, who went on to make Forza, the one truly original IP from Microsoft to ever succeed.

Bought Bungie when Halo was months from release, had them port it to Xbox, cancelling a much hyped PC version which did later arrive, not to mention the Mac version Bungie had been promising.

Purchased FASA as part of another acquisition in 1999. After doing very little with the Shadowrun and MechWarrior IPs on the Xbox family of consoles closes FASA in 2007, licences out all their worthwhile IPs to small studios.

Bought Rare in 2002, since they have mined the Perfect Dark, Banjo, and Conker IPs with zero success, made one new mascot IP for Xbox 360's launch that never got a follow up despite being a pretty solid (kid friendly) game (Kameo, FYI). Have since been largely relegated to Kinect titles, weren't even the ones who made the Killer Instinct reboot.

Purchased Lionhead in 2006. Proceeded to have them make nothing but Fable games, including a crappy Kinect Fable game. Stopped making PC versions entirely, games progressively got further and further away from the original concept for Fable. A large number of staff has been laid off over the past two years, another large group up and left with Molyneaux, which if it was anything like his departure from Bullfrog to found Lionhead constituted his core staff he's had everywhere (i.e. the real talent in the studio). Making yet another Fable game that is even further removed from the original premise.

Started up 343 studios as a replacement for Bungie when Bungie wanted out as opposed to eternally making nothing but Halo. Now 343 makes nothing but Halo, only not as well as Bungie. The game they wouldn't let Bungie make, Destiny, is now the most pre-ordered game yet. Winning?

Disbanded Ensemble Studios, Aces Studio, MS Flight Team, MS Victoria Studio (never released anything) and Carbonated Games. Have in the last several years purchased BigPark (absorbed into MS Game Studios), Twisted Pixel (who's next game was a full blown stinker), Press Play (nothing of note, so basically shuffling deck chairs with this and closing Carbonated).

Also, Black Tusk isn't new. It's Microsoft Vancouver. They just cleaned house and renamed it after Vancouver went years without finishing anything. Black Tusk is doing an admirable job keeping that history alive.

This is just a quick sample of how MS has handled their first parties. Forza is the only new IP they've generated and maintained worth a shit in their entire time as a console first party. Everything else was bought, mismanaged, and typically shuttered.
Instead of this (which probably cost them $50M or better), Titanfall (which also likely cost them $50M or better) the stated NFL deal at $400M, and buying the Gears IP from Epic (likely a solid $50-$100M price tag) Microsoft could have funded over a half dozen of the biggest, most expensive AAA exclusives EVER. They gave the NFL more money for a fantasy football app than Take 2/Rockstar spent on Grand Theft Auto 5. Let that sink into your head when you excuse their lack of first party studios as "taking time".

Godmars2903555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

"Same Phil that drove the 1st party output into the ground for the last 4 years of the 360's life too. But let's glorify the man. Okay."

That's what I thought when the man was being heralded as a savior: the man's been involved with all of the bad choices as well. Publicly defended them. What real change is he really going to effect?

@torchic
"but why do Microsoft still have problems with communication? like cmon this mess should never have happened in the first place when will they ever learn!"

If they didn't lie, try to confuse the issue, then the whole effort would have been a wasted exercise. It wouldn't benefit them at all.

As is it will likely now be a damaging episode, would have been one regardless once it was all cleared up, but what the hey.

Mr Pumblechook3555d ago

What do you mean respect to Phil Spencer? He is the architect of this stupid deal. He is the man who wants to buy Xbone success, not earn it.

MysticStrummer3555d ago

"Respect to Phil Spencer for clarifying."

Indeed, and Greenburg's denial of timed exclusivity is now hilarious, though I guess he could have been denying the duration, not the timed nature of the deal.

http://n4g.com/news/1565694...

This news makes Sony's win yesterday even clearer. What is MS doing with all that money they have???

So many articles were written yesterday based on a false assumption, and so many PS fans were called delusional for saying the game wasn't truly exclusive.

trenso13555d ago

@bicfitness see this how they are getting them of course phil would be the one to say this and not anyone else. They want people to believe there is at least one person at MS that they can trust. Even though phil has been here since the 360 was on the decline, but lets all forget that.

k3rn3ll3555d ago

I'm still trying to figure out why people are mad at MS. SQUARE Enix signed the deal

k3rn3ll3555d ago

And Sony isn't parading No Man's Sky as an exclusive? Or even Destiny?

Hk85karlsson3555d ago

Is it though? Respect is given/recieved when you do something good. Phil felt the need (extreme need) to tell the truth so it wouldn't bite him in the ass the next day.

But..It's better then not do it. Like Mattrick would have.

Manic20143555d ago

@Kayant
This interview was done yesterday, Eurogamer posted it today.

badz1493555d ago

@k3rn3ll

trolling sat its finest! In No Man's Sky's case, Sony clearly said "exclusive platform debut" which means the game will come out on PS4 first in other word, "timed exclusive"! at least provide link/proof where Sony claimed NMS as "exclusive" or you're just saying BS!

and with Destiny, you are just spreading BS again! when has Sony EVER claimed Destiny as exclusive? what they do is market the exclusive DLC just like they did with ACIV and WD and their exclusive extra contents.

and for god sake MS even said in their Gamescom presentation that "Xbox One is the BEST platform to play Destiny". TROLL!

insomnium23555d ago

Holy hell Mightynox just piledrived everyone into oblivion. One HELL of a comment right there. This is how you earn a "well said" if I ever saw one.

Why o why3555d ago

k3rn3ll

Please Stop

Show me parading.

Why o why3555d ago

I know theres a 'well said' and an 'intelligent' button but theres no 'beat down' or 'dont hit em no more' button.......

MightyNox.......you bully you

Dee_913554d ago

Its still screw MS for me.They proved once again they care more about potential profit than gamers.

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
callahan093555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Like I said elsewhere, this is perfectly fine. Microsoft gets Tomb Raider exclusively at launch to compete against Uncharted 4, Square-Enix doesn't have to fend off Uncharted 4 when they try to sell this game to PS4 gamers, and eventually PS4 gamers will buy Tomb Raider when they're all finished with Uncharted 4. Works out for well for all parties involved. Everyone and their mother could guess that if Tomb Raider came out at the same time as Uncharted 4, on PS4, it wouldn't sell anything on PS4. Would be a waste of a release. Delaying the release makes sense to not compete with Uncharted, but NOT delaying on Xbox also makes all the sense in the world!

iamnsuperman3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

They won't be just competing with Uncharted. Uncharted sell isn't the fact it is Indian Jones style game. It is the story driven stuff. Tomb Raider and Uncharted are not just competing against each other but the rest of the games releasing at that time. It makes sense for Sony to put Uncharted there to push sales of the PS4 (before holiday releasing a big first party bundle). Tomb Raider is going to struggle to distinguish itself even if Microsoft bundles it. When is Halo 5 releasing? I assume the same time also. SE should have gone for an early 2016 release. Less competition.

Flamingweazel3555d ago

They will get destroyed by uncharted, MS is dilusiona to think otherwise.

LeCreuset3555d ago

Yeah, I noticed that cross-gen bit that was buried in there. That's a bit disappointing for a game releasing holiday 2015.

Clogmaster3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I don't remember Contra 3 or Turtles in Time releasing on the NES. What a waste of development time and money.

Edit:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

My eyes!

ArchangelMike3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Yeah, I think Phil came out and confirmed it because the deal was generating negative press both towards M$ and Squenix.

They should know by now that gamers are not stupid to fall for marketing shpeel anymore. Look at Sony's conference, they made it clear what was exclusive, and what was timed exclusive, and what would simply release first on Playstation. They had no need for spin.

LeCreuset3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

This is probably Phil's biggest PR misstep since taking the helm. I don't know what he was thinking, believing even the idea that permanent Tomb Raider exclusivity would move the needle on Xbox sales, but yesterday's announcement clearly did nothing more than to get people talking about MS in the way they did prior to Phil taking over.

Now he's in a lose-lose situation where he has to pretty much flush the money they money-hatted, by acknowledging it's a timed exclusive. It turns down the heat on MS, but it opens up a new can of worms where people are going to turn a critical eye toward all of these third party "exclusives" on the One that are proving to be timed, and they're going to realize that games take time to make, first party studios time to build, and a system that was focused on taking over the living room has to rely on these kinds of deals to establish its library because you can't just magically create exclusives that did not exist the moment you see the writing on the wall and switch the PR spin to "games, games, games."

XabiDaChosenOne3555d ago

I noticed that as well, good eye and good on Sony for being honest.

Manic20143555d ago

To be fair that was the one game in the conference which was not confirmed to be Timed. For every other game or feature they stated something like "Coming first to xbox one"

But i agree with TR, they should of been way clear at the start. .

Manic20143555d ago

To be fair, RoTR was the one game which was not confirmed Timed. The rest of the games were clarified if they were timed.

DLConspiracy3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I didn't like how it was spun but people forget how Sony has spun their exclusivity with Destiny and watch Dogs. Most people don't even know its on the other console.

Not glorifying this exclusivity wording by any means BTW. I just don't like when people act like Sony isn't fully capable of spinning exclusivity or doesn't commit to the same type of exclusivity deals. People seem to be OK with Sony's exclusivity stuff even if its a year long. Just not when MS does it. Both these companies and those pub/devs that support it are greedy for it.

In the end the pubs/devs cash the check for any exclusivity.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3555d ago
Mr-Dude3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I will buy it used then... If they can afford to piss of 75% of their fanbase (PS4 & PC), they can afford to lose money to the second hand market.

ruefrak3555d ago

Wait, does my PS3 stop working in 2015? Why can't new games come out for it as well?

Ezz20133555d ago

i want to know too
ps3 owners have every right to play new games as well

bigboirock3555d ago

I wanna play new games on my Super Nintendo but that won't happen ether

madjedi3554d ago

Because it along with the 360 are both relics that have been holding game development back and both gamers and developers want to move forward.

I am greedy i don't want my current gen games, continuously dumbed down because of a minority of last gen owners refuse to upgrade.

You'll likely still get some sports and lego type games on ps3 in 2015 and maybe the few jrpgs.

It's been 8 yrs, most of us feel the generation dragged too long as is, either you upgrade to current gen or your sol when devs switch strictly to ps4\xb1\pc development.

Not sure why you believe you have a right to or are entitled to new games on hardware that is well past it's prime.

The sooner cross gen development is dead and buried the better.

Cross gen in holiday 2015, that is the most hysterical thing about this whole shit storm.

headwing453555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I'm pretty sure everyone saw this coming, no company would be stupid enough to deny a 200% sales loss.

bleedsoe9mm3555d ago Show
mkis0073555d ago

@ bledsoe

That is being published by sony.

madjedi3554d ago

Isn't bloodborn basically supposed to be demons souls 2?

Malphite3555d ago

There we have it.

It's not a big deal then. Just the typical timed exclusive shenanigans that are all over the place nowadays.

Magicite3555d ago

I knew Square Enix wont upset their fans...at least not that much :)

mcarsehat3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Cue the people saying:

"yaay, it's not exclusive but i wasn't ever interested in the game anyway."

fermcr3555d ago

"yaay, it's not exclusive but I wasn't ever interested in the game anyway.""

^^
THIS. LOL.

Major_Glitch3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Yaay, it's not exclusive but I wasn't ever interested in the game anyway.

Actually. I was somewhat interested in the game, but now? No. I think I'm gonna pass. IMHO, this was a dumb move by Square, and I will show my displeasure with my wallet.
BTW: did anyone actually believe that this wasn't going to be a timed exclusive? It's Microsoft! They're the kings of timed/fake exclusives.

GW2123555d ago

Yay, it's not exclusive. Now we can move on. I was interested in this game and I still am. Now the choice will be whether I get it on my XB1 or PS4.

mcarsehat3555d ago

Major_Glitch

That decision makes you out to be worse than those people.

ziggurcat3555d ago

@mcarsehat

how is voting with your wallet worse than saying you were never interested in the game anyway? if he was interested in the game when it was announced at E3, then changed his mind because of the very poor decision to initially exclude the majority of the people who bought their first TR game (PS4 outsold the xbone version 2:1, just to remind you), i don't see how it's "worse" than downplaying the game for the sake of downplaying.

he's just exercising his rights as a consumer in deciding who gets his money.

quaneylfc3554d ago (Edited 3554d ago )

ziggurcat

How is Major_Glitch "deciding with his wallet" when he actually really really and i mean really said:
"Actually. I was somewhat interested in the game, but now? No."?

Isn't he doing exactly what mcarshat said he would do?

The best way to go against someone is to do what they say and say you're not doing it, people are just thick now.

ziggurcat3554d ago

@quan:

no.

he's saying he was interested in the game, and the money hatting changed his mind. so, rather than support those shady practices, he's saying, "no!" he's voting with his wallet by... wait for it... *not buying the game*.

for the record, i'm still interested in this game, and i'm most likely still going to buy it when it comes out because i enjoy playing games, and the last TR was such an amazing experience.

i could also tell by the way they kept phrasing it that it was only timed, so i wasn't too worried about whether it was still multiplatform.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
kenshiro1003555d ago

One has to wonder what the heck Microsoft is smoking these days.

I knew it was timed.

RevXM3555d ago

They they have been smoking the joint of pretend exclusives for a while and it is still oozing.

Hopefully Ms will be upfront and clear about "exclusives" from now on, covering shit up to try make more money by decieving us is why people get upset. I suspected this as this sort of thing have been regular practice for MS, but if it were actually exclusive like MS paraded I wouldn't have a problem with them but now I'm sort of pissed at all ends of this; SE, CD and Ms covering up and lie about this dirty deal.

MS need more exclusives so it could have been a good thing hadn't it been a lie. Lies hurt, but exclusives move units. This is all bad, its hurting them all.

ajax173555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

I'm just going to write this off as a delay to polish the PS4 version, which will most likely run a lot smoother.

esemce3555d ago

I also said it would be timed, do I get a cookie ?

It's the same old MS bullsh1t, basically they have paid Crystal Dynamics to delay the games release for other platforms in the hope that people will be desperate to play the new tombraider and buy an Xbone.

I was tempted to get one for HAlo collection and Forza but now I'm like forget it same with the tombraider game.

gemini23555d ago

seriously cboat is fraud give it a rest already...who cares if timed probaly like 6 mths so i can play it first on XB1 while everyone waits good for multi console owners bad for ps4 only owners it's business is sony had secured it you all would be praising em listen ur not entitled to anything smh

colonel1793555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

That's something I wrote yesterday. The same thing happened with Bioshock, Mass Effect and Ninja Gaiden 2. With Microsoft, the word EXCLUSIVE never means exclusive. They use that word, but they seem to never know what that means, and they only deceive people.

However, I don't get why they are doing this game cross-gen. That has to be part of the negotiation with Microsoft. They might have asked Crystal Dynamics/SE to also bring it to the 360. What a shame if it is indeed cross gen.

jetlian3554d ago

Not really,maybe they have clauses which makes it hard to classify.

Those 3 series plus TF all sold 1-2 million. Which MS wasn't willing to hold onto.

Gears sold 3 million plus opening week and they never lost it.

sonic9893555d ago

personally i think the only person who is classy here is phil spencer true class , he knew gamers were mad at microsoft so he gave people a reason to own an xbox and to calm down the others by stating that the game will come to their system later on .
i respect this guy even though i dont like the xbox brand and i HATE microsoft .

mediate-this3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Anybody could guess it was a timed exclusive, a 3rd party game like that, plus shunnning the ps fans is not cool, squeenix will make their money then it will release to the ten plus mill ps4's, i personally think bloodborne over shadowed tombraider, not sure the hype for tomb raider.

AceBlazer133555d ago

If it's gonna cost anything more than $40 I ain't getting it. Definitely not gonna drop $60 on a game another console got months before me.

Whose with me? Time to get rid of this timed bs.

Aceman183555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

It was fairly obvious to me that it's timed. It's the reason I wasn't bothered by this news yesterday lol.

Liked I said yesterday I'm a patient person, and you know when it launches it will have everything and probably some extra to appease the few who were upset.

FanboyKilla3555d ago

Lmfao you guys are f n sour. I will be a man and tell you, if the system i did not own had this exclusive timed or not, i would be broken hearted. I know how you really feel. Its in our nature, when hurt, we get angry, and want to hurt back. Lol you aint fooling me with your downplay, and fake hype about a game available to you. Its f n tomb raider. Iconic, legendary, returned to its throne with its last installment.

Instead of a hand shake, and a good game bro. You crying like a BIAITCH. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and keep it moving. Have some respect for yourself and stop giving it all to some f n company or machine. SMFH

Did your cosole of choice not give you anything better to talk about, or be excited for?Obviously not. You talking about what you wont be playing. You got better issues to focus your attention on. Like, what is this company that i defend, and wave their flag, actually doing for me? Taking your frustrations out on the wrong people PLAYSTATION NATION.

Jonny5isalive3554d ago

third party companies today are sad sad creatures. Devs and publishers from all sides turning their backs in some form on large parts of the fanbase left and right for lumps of money because they are scared they cant sell their game. Then they wonder why their game doesnt sell 10 million when they piss off half or more of the fanbase.

TheSaint3554d ago

Timed exclusive for the loss.

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
iamnsuperman3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Well that clears things up. Just a matter of when now.

Edit: I can only assume until/after holiday 2015 is over as that is the line everyone involved has been using.

Volkama3555d ago

I will probably wait however long it takes, plus an extra 8-12 months, and then pick up the PC version for a tenner. The previous game did a good job of taking advantage of the extra power so I am hoping for more of that!

Hopefully we can all move on and talk about some of the other stuff going on at the event.

SniperControl3555d ago

Same here, i picked TR up in a Steam sale for a fiver about 6 months ago, rise will be the same.

Manic20143555d ago

Seems to me MS helped with financials of Crystal and SE and in return asked for timed exclusivity.

Manic20143555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Not saying it was a good thing. "Seems to me MS helped with financials of Crystal and SE"

That was me being delicate.

tgunzz3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Both MS/Sony are lobbying for here first/here only content. Sony has landed some timed exclusives as well (with one partial full exclusive in japan which is destiny). Are we to believe that they are not cashing in heavily for this, and other things?? Money is at the end of all investments, and both are in full motion with this. But responding the way we are: sending hate mail, crucifying companies over video games, showing disdain for fellow gamers, etc, etc is gamings bad practice. This is horrible...

Catoplepas3555d ago

Only the terminally stupid didn't see this coming.

JoGam3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

Then it must be a lot of stupid people out there. They were everywhere yesterday.

Catoplepas3555d ago

Precisely my point, though I contend that most of that was just fanboy posturing. Most people blessed with an iota of rationality knew that the exclusivity would be ephemeral at best.

MightyNoX3555d ago (Edited 3555d ago )

You really can't blame them with the clown car consisting of Aaron Greenberg and Larry touting "100% exclusive, positively ONLY on XBAWKS" on Twitter.

Big_Game_Hunters3554d ago

dont forget all the Fanboys crying and moaning about it being exclusive, and how they were betrayed and whatnot.

DashArrivals3555d ago

That's just plain false. There were many articles and industry gaming media claiming it was legit. No one is a fool for believing a boat load of misinformation and peculiarly worded sentence puzzles with hidden meanings.

Catoplepas3555d ago

Not if the people in question have a modicum of retrospection. The 3rd party exclusive has been oft touted by MS, but seldom do they stay that way.

rainslacker3554d ago

SE blog did most of that honestly. They said it was only coming to the Xbox line. Until that blog, most people were assuming it was timed. I saw the Greenburg tweet, and thought people had maybe misinterpreted it, never saw the Larry Hybb post though...must have gotten lost in the fray.

I knew it would come out eventually on other systems. But there are timed exclusives which take years to show up on other systems, Like BioShock or Mass Effect.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3554d ago
lonelyplayer3555d ago

This guy is a decent person. That's something hard to find at Microsoft.

Mr-Dude3555d ago

Well, Spencer is the only one there who tries to be honest to every gamer including the PS ones. It's that douche Greenberg & Nelson who stur the pot the most

TheFallenAngel3555d ago

If I get a xbone in the near future it would be because of him. He comes out and is straight with people. Greenberg lied about it yesterday. I really don't like major Nelson. But Phil seems to be the only guy at xbox that is not afraid of saying the truth. Respect Mr Spencer.

Benjammin253555d ago

If he was a decent person, he would have told the truth from the beginning.

DigitalRaptor3555d ago

Phil Spencer. What a guy.

Truly Microsoft Xbox's one redeeming factor. This should have been clarified at their conference, because NOW, the rest of their lineup was overshadowed by the controversy. Very dishonest.

I told people Aaron Greenberg isn't to be trusted, and this proves it.

Silly gameAr3555d ago

Isn't Spencer the one that made this deal in the first place?

BLow3554d ago

Thank you. I know people like this guy but if you think be wasn't part of this then your in denial. He didn't realize this was going to be said during the conference? He found this out when we did? Come on people wake up. Now he's the hero...classic

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3554d ago
Show all comments (337)
340°

2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer

Xbox has been lagging behind PlayStation in terms of 1st party content, but 2024 offers the platform and Phil Spencer a chance at redemption.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
isarai32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Nah, that time has passed for many, and with their words on future plans, i really don't see it ever happening.

shinoff218332d ago

It's a wrap. Now is the time they are slowly going to move on as to not to kill the base as is. Titles will slowly drip onto ps and Nintendo consoles, etc. Those 4 already had to of been in development for awhile already cause two of them released really soon after the announcement

VenomUK31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

There is no ‘last chance redemption’ for Phil Spencer - he’s going straight to hell for tanking the Xbox console platform.

_SilverHawk_31d ago

"2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer"

I thought that was supposed to be a decade ago

Ironmike31d ago

U do rel7se ps5 is at thr moment only getting g those titles that were mentioned nothing else as of yet

Obscure_Observer31d ago

"Nah, that time has passed for many, and with their words on future plans, i really don't see it ever happening."

Xbox has PLENTY of first party games this year while Playstation has none!

There´s more first party games from Xbox Games Studios on PS5 this year than Playstation Studios own games.

Those are the *facts* and if those facts is not something to Sony be ashamed of, they can´t feel shame at all.

VersusDMC31d ago

Granblue Fantasy versus, FF7REBIRTH, Helldivers 2, Rise of the Ronin and Stellar Blade will have launched on PS5 and not on Xbox by the time Hellblade 2 launches.

This only first party games count is cope.

And as a bonus meme...Microsoft will have published 3 first party games on PS5 (Hifi rush, Grounded and sea of thieves) before their first for the year on Xbox(hellblade 2). Glad they have their priorities straight...

lodossrage31d ago

It's funny when people like to say xbox has more games coming to playstation this year than sony does.

YET, they leave out the context that Microsoft literally bought the biggest (Activision) third party publisher and Bethesday (another big one). So congrats on having to buy giants in order to compete?

On topic, wasn't Starfield the "last chance" for redemption?

Am I to assume that if the games they have coming this year don't get positive, feedback then 2025 will be the year of redemption?

Obscure_Observer31d ago

@VersusDMC

"Granblue Fantasy versus, FF7REBIRTH, Helldivers 2, Rise of the Ronin and Stellar Blade will have launched on PS5 and not on Xbox by the time Hellblade 2 launches."

None of the games you mentioned are first party. None. There´re more Xbox first party games on PS5 this year then Playstation´s own first party games, undeniable fact!

The real bonus meme is Sea of Thieves a game which PS fanboys used to sh!t on

"And as a bonus meme...Microsoft will have published 3 first party games on PS5 (Hifi rush, Grounded and sea of thieves) before their first for the year on Xbox(hellblade 2). Glad they have their priorities straight..."

Imo, the real meme is Sea of Thieves, a 6 year Xbox first party game which diehard fanboys used to mock and sh!t on, making to the top of the most pre-ordered game at PS Store in a year where Playstation has zero first party games.

https://twitter.com/BenjiSa...

Markusb3331d ago

and all will end up on playstation, and nintendo, if xbox was doing amazing they would not need ps or nintendo, if gp was amazing they wouldnt need pc. PS has multiple first party games in development that we dont know about. Look at how halo was treated, look at redfall, and look at starfield. Its fine to be loyal and prefer one platoform but to be wilfully ignorant about it just ridiculas.

badz14931d ago

LOL se we are moving from "exclusives" to "console exclusives" to now only "1st party exclusives" matters just after MS has bought 2 publishers for $77B??

Moving goalpost to always favor MS i. Your argument is getting tiring! Exclusives are exclusives! 1st or 3rd party, they are still exclusives. You do remember the PS2 literally killed the Dreamcast, Gamecube and the first xbox due to mostly 3rd party exclusives, right?

InUrFoxHole31d ago

Observe is actually correct. Sony paid to play. But we don't mention when they do it. When they do it we're totally cool with it. N4G 4lyfe!

Skuletor31d ago

Are they still counted as first party though?

fr0sty31d ago

“This notion that Xbox can only be this one device that plugs into a television isn’t something we see in the Gen Z research. Because nothing else is like that for them.

Some of them will have an iPhone, some will have an Android, but all the games and everything is the same. I can still get to TikTok on both of them, at least for now." - Phil Spencer

Read it and weep... all Xbox games are coming to as many platforms as they can put them on, and this is the first step towards them getting out of hardware entirely, just like Sega did.

Xbox has been Dreamcast out of the industry. You can deny it all you like, but it's happening.

northpaws31d ago

@Obscure_Observer

You certainly have more faith in Xbox than Phil Spencer does, I will give you that.

rpvenom31d ago

It's actually quite impressive watching you defend xbox. I respect the loyalty

wiz719131d ago

@VersusDMC here yall Sony fans go moving the goalpost again lol now this only first party things is a cope when yall was the one who started that crap in the first place. When Sony had all the first party games and Xbox was relying on third party , yall was shouting they had no first party games. Now the tables turn and suddenly it’s a cope. lol

wiz719131d ago

@lodossrage and so it’s also funny that the majority of Xbox first party games this year aren’t coming from any of those big studios lol except for Indy .. the biggest one this year is coming from a studio that Sony left and almost let that studio die after releasing two big exclusives on their console first. Now MS swoop in and saved them , then here they are with the best looking game this generation. Now that’s ironic , but you mention buying studios like Sony biggest studios weren’t BOUGHT my brother.

Yall need to be more worried about Sony closing studio after studio , the PSVR 2 dying , Sony losing billions , and the fact that yall biggest game this year as in Stellar Blade was once being developed as a multi platform game until Sony paid for them to be a second party studio. lol but you want to mention things being bought , your delusional

Crows9031d ago

Shame in the competitor buying up tons of dev teams in order to make that a reality? Yeah...there's no shame in that on the PlayStation side....

andy8531d ago

So now you're shifting the goal posts so only first party exclusives count. Amazing 😂

Profchaos31d ago

There's probably tons of games exclusive to Xbox that won't be on PS because of their early access clause.

However list the games that count helldivers 2 I'd argue has done more for gaming this year than any other title will.
It could be their only game and it would still be a great year because it was that unexpectedly good even haters of love service games are playing it

TheTony31631d ago

Still at it? Doesn't matter at this point. The games will eventually launch on PS5.

mkis00731d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I see you ignored his" only first party games count" line as if preordained. Is it on xbox? No...then it is ammunition. Meanwhile sony gets to passively soak up 30% of all ms game studios sales.

1Victor31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

@obscured: “There´s more first party games from Xbox Games Studios on PS5 this year than Playstation Studios own games.

Those are the *facts* and if those facts is not something to Sony be ashamed of, they can´t feel shame at all.”
That says more about Xbox than PlayStation that they have to release games on rival consoles to stay afloat, Microsoft and YOU SHOULD NOT BE ASHAMED OF THAT FACT.

Edit After thought: it took Microsoft 6 years to finally fix their sea of bugs just in time to release it on PlayStation 🤷🏿

S2Killinit31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

On topic:
MS’s last chance was Starfield…
How many last chances are there?

@Osbscure
You’re moving the goal posts into places that have no basis in reality anymore.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
darthv7231d ago

Life is too short to hold onto grudges. Grudges against a console, game or company is just petty.

isarai31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Has nothing to do with a grudge. Ive been waiting 12yrs for them to get back to their greatness, im done waiting and have moved onto just watching that ship sink as i play on literally every other platform

darthv7231d ago

^^... I still play on it, as well as the other platforms. Which is why I am not someone who dwells on the negativity like others do. there is always something for me to enjoy in this hobby.

isarai31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

@darth

Again, not dwelling on negativity, they legit haven't made anything i want to play since like gears 3 and halo reach. I did play Crackdown 3 and gears 5 cause i had hope given i was a huge fan of the older games, but that was a dud on both cases.

You're thinking it's way deeper than it is 🤣 make something worth playing and ill play it, i was hoping starfield would be that but again, dud.

darthv7231d ago

^^...I never said YOU were doing that... but its obvious others (here) do. Its all they seem to do is dwell on negativity, especially if its XB related. all im saying is there is more to enjoy than there is to complain about. And this is exactly why I play all the platforms instead of just one. You say you do the same... so just enjoy it.

neomahi31d ago

It's fanbots making their last stand in an attempt to save the Xbox, what more can one expect that the most optimism they've ever had. Xbox can't get a lock in Japan, still, and Europe is about to abandon it as well. What're you gonna do? And what happens IF Japanese generates interest? They'll see Europe losing interest and decide it's not worth it either. And it's not just Xbox, Microsoft as a whole is losing their footing. They've backed on subscriptions with everything they have to offer and it's tanking. Xbox needs to port to PlayStation and Nintendo while they can stay relevant and try to stay relevant, the longer they delay, we could see a complete Microsoft nose dive

S2Killinit31d ago (Edited 30d ago )

And you think MS fans are just dandy? Besides, is it a grudge if MS continues to give reasons for people to despise them?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
Markusb3331d ago

when you cant make enough from your own platform and pc and you have to go to ps and nintendo you know its a slow transition to 3rd party publishing, and that is fine. Xb never had the thurst or ambition after the 360

JackBNimble31d ago

The second they decided to put exclusives on the ps5 they blew any chance of redemption

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
-Foxtrot32d ago

Even if they managed to get a win this year it dosent overthrow 10 years of mostly disappointments from Phil’s leadership.

RaidenBlack31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Then this way, no company can redeem themselves. The very concept of redemption arc becomes impossible if the past is refused to be forgiven, even if the company manages to better themselves.
Then the now popular redemption arc of No Mans Sky or Phantom Liberty wouldn't exist in the gaming community if the same logic is also applied there.
Not defending anyone here but I want gaming to improve, companies to better themselves and most importantly competition to exist so that we get offered the best products to enjoy.
(I know in typical N4G fashion, this comment will be downvoted to oblivion, but I want good games offered from every studios irrespective of publishers.)

staticall31d ago

@RaidenBlack
IMO, what @-Foxtrot means, one years doesn't mean much. It's a start, yes, but they need more, much more.

Look at your own example, No Mans Sky - they didn't just release one patch and everyone started praising them, no. They've been doing this consistently. If Microsoft will start releasing good games consistently, that'll be great, no ifs and/or buts! But hyping them up in advance (no worthy releases yet is what i mean) - dunno, i might be wrong, but i don't think it's healthy or helps anyone.

rippermcrip31d ago

Your analogies are terrible. A company releasing a single game that failed to meet expectations.

Isn't the same as Phil Spencer making mistake after mistake after mistake after mistake, telling lie after lie after lie after lie for 10+ years.

isarai31d ago

Your whole comparison makes no sense. It literally took years for both of those to "redeem" themselves in the container of a single game. MS has been lacking for 12yrs starting with the halo/gears/forza criticism begining in the latter half of the 360. So even by YOUR logic, he's right, it's gonna take a lot more than one game to be redeemed ESPECIALLY after fumbling what many were already holding as their chance at redemption with starfield

Chevalier31d ago

It's not Playstation or Nintendos fault that Xbox poses no competition. They've had more support and more money behind them than Playstation and Nintendo combined!

You say you aren't defending Xbox, but, you kind of are. Xbox has been completely mediocre for decades. The last time Xbox was competitive was the 360 era. My 360 collection absolutely demolishes my Xbox One collection and so far Series X hasn't had much reason for me to jump to a purchase.

Can you honestly say Xbox is 'competitive'?! I would say not even close.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Silly Mammo31d ago

With the gaming media, Xbox is always just one game away from redemption and success. It's willful ignorance that they think there's a 'magic bullet' that will somehow erase all the moves by Phil & the gang of the last 2 console generations.

"Well there's always next year!" Should be the official Xbox slogan

Chocoburger30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

100% this Mammo!

They've been screwing up for over a decade! Even if they release a game that's of the highest quality, that's nothing in the grand scheme things.

It also doesn't un-do Kinect (with lies based advertising).

Or Kinect 2 (forcing people to spend $100 extra for something they didn't even want!).

Or releasing two consoles with nothing noteworthy twice in a row (One X, Series S|X).

Or releasing unpolished games such as Re:Core, Sea of Thieves, Halo: MCC, Halo Infinite, Redfall, and Starfield.

Let's not forget canceling games as well such as Scalebound,Project Spark, and the Phantom Dust remake.

Finally let's remember the broken promises of vaporware games, languishing in development Hell, such as Perfect Dark, Fable, Everwild, what else am I forgetting?

Redemption is far far FAR AWAY for Microsoft. It'll take a full decade of only making smart pro-consumer decisions and releasing plenty of amazing games in order to make up for it all.

2024? It ain't gonna do squat on its own.

Rols31d ago

It was the same old story in 2020, 2021,2022 and 2023. XBox has never delivered this gen.

Brazz31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Xbox360, the last time they delivered the goods, over 10 years Ago.

Skuletor31d ago

This headline just reminds me of the "wait 'til E3" comments we'd hear every year, before it was cancelled.

LG_Fox_Brazil31d ago

I wonder if the 2025's version of this article is already written, probably I would say

lodossrage31d ago

That's the same point I was trying to convey when I replied to Obscure

Hofstaderman31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

#wait till e3 2024

Aloymetal31d ago

''2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer''
We've been hearing and reading the same crap since the xbone launch, these shills/journos need to come up with something new. Good thing is most gamers know this is all BS, they all read ''"Step right up folks and hold out your money or sub to our service. You don't know what you are going to get, but like always, take our word for it" Signed Lord Phil.

Show all comments (88)
580°

Phil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes.

Spencer said publicly traded companies have to show constant growth or else nobody will give them money. "I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business"

LG_Fox_Brazil36d ago

I don't know Phil... You've being running, and some will say ruining, the Xbox brand for 10 years now, you know?

Profchaos36d ago

I'd say he'sade the best out of a tremendous cluster fk of a situation he was thrown into after Don tanked the Xbox brand from Kinect to the launch of the X1.

The only reason Xbox isn't in the Ms graveyard right now is because of Phil.

So I don't agree with everything he's done but I can see why these drastic pivots and moves have been made

VenomUK36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

You don’t hear Nintendo CEO Shuntaro Furukawa blame capitalism for the phenomenal success of the Switch.

You don’t hear now-departed PlayStation CEO Jim Ryan blame capitalism for the roaring success of the PS5.

Cockney36d ago

He was head of games back in don mattricks day so he should be held accountable for his involvement, the back half of the 360 gen and start of xbone lack of games was all him

Rynxie36d ago

The reason Xbox is not in the Ms graveyard is because of the money they are throwing around to keep the brand alive. Don was just a yes man, the stupidity of the Xbox one was MS doing.

romulus2336d ago

We are well past Don Mattrick at this point, people need to stop using that tired excsue. The issues with xbox for nearly the last ten years have been solely on Phil.

Plague-Doctor2736d ago

The PS3 tanked Sony and they recovered during the same generation. The Wii U tanked Nintendo and they delivered a record setting console only a few years later. At the launch of X1 it was keeping pace with the PS4 and in the US was occasionally beating it.

jwillj2k436d ago (Edited 36d ago )

All he had to do was say “the way forward is to make great games.”, drop the mic and make it happen by any means necessary. If you listen to the interview he gave after redfall came out, you’ll hear him say he thought the game was good to go and the internal team rated the game 85 out of 100. 85!! This shows how out of touch he is. He’s literally an empty vessel just collecting his check, running the division off of data-driven analytics, he doesn’t care about xbox and now pulls a Trump, blaming the clouds for his failures.

Cacabunga35d ago

Says the biggest capitalist company.. this moron should stop talking

sinspirit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

No.. Phil was in charge of European studios and Kinect implementation since 2008. Those European studios he was in charge of were then full time Kinect developers as he was now in charge of all XBox game studios in 2010. This is why game quality has sucked ever since he was in charge and directly why the legendary Lionhead and the actual Rare devs are not there anymore. Phil is actually more to blame than anyone for the bad game quality and the Kinect push. And especially for the terrible XBox One launch.

He was the spearhead implemented employee for Kinect and Microsoft's new vision. The others were the talking heads appointed by XBox. And, honestly watching some of those old interviews it seemed like those XBox employees were possibly maliciously complient by telling exactly what Microsoft's new agenda was with Kinect and always online without dressing it up.

And directly on topic. No, Phil. Capitalism is voting with your wallet. XBox doing bad financially is in fact because of bad products, disappointments, failed deadlines, and especially lying, misleading, and broken promises for products. If you just released really good games and tried to innovate then you'd had a lot of sales.. oh and GamePass is losing out on a ton of sales which can not be recovered from a few microtransaction purchases, monthly sub costs, or even whales. The math is simple when you could have sold a $70 game 5 million times but instead maybe sold 1 million tops and now have to recoup a quarter billion of revenue from lost sales potential of the one title alone. But now you also don't want to release a lot of first party titles because of the direct loss in sales revenue from day 1 GamePass, and you don't want them to release really good games that take a little more time and money to make because you want them to be cost effective for GamePass release. So you intentionally plan to release a lot of AAA shortcomings at this point because the AAA badge is needed but you can't do it too well or GamePass will never actually profit. Even though they had said GamePass is profitable, it is absolutely not by much and never will be. And, they said that Zune was profitable a long time ago but they combined it with an entire category of products when Zune itself was bleeding money. They lose far too many direct sales that even the most generous math can not see how they could be making much money if any at all to make up for this business practice. This is what happens when marketing and trend chasing fool a business into pursuing the wrong thing to stay relevant when the clear answer all along was that they always did good when they just supported developers making genuinely full and good games.

Babadook735d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I kind of agree with you, but Phil is partly to blame.

I blame Peter Moore (for leaving). Everything went to pot soon after.

PapaBop35d ago

How many years ago was this now? I'll give him some credit for what he inherited but lets be honest, he hasn't exactly done anything praise worthy and has done a terrible job managing the studios Microsoft owns.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
Eonjay36d ago

I thought he said it was Gen Z. I can't keep up.

Hofstaderman36d ago

Its Gen Z who are extremely capitilist. Lol, Phil is a clown of note.

36d ago
fr0sty36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

He's kinda right, shareholders expect constant growth, which is unsustainable, but it is what they expect nonetheless. That's why, even though the games industry is healthy as it has ever been, because it isn't growing, everyone in the industry is panicking. Even though we're still selling just as many consoles as ever, they expect each generation to just keep on growing and growing, and when that doesn't happen, they start to freak out.

This is true of any industry, and it's why anytime a company goes public, their products usually end up going to shit. The shareholders expect more and more and more growth, cuz they want that stock price to keep climbing, and so eventually corners start getting cut, wages start getting cut, employees start getting cut, they start cutting away everywhere they can to try to squeeze a little bit more money out of the product, until they ruin it, and then they move on to the next product.

buffig35d ago

Yeah, but everyone knows how capitalism works. This part didn't need explaining. The problem is that they bought massive plublishers for a gazillion dollars, to the detriment of the industry and now he's acting like he has no choice but to fire thousands of people because he just found out about nasty capitalism

TheEnigma31335d ago

Why I'm glad companies like Valve stayed private.

SyntheticForm35d ago

He'd never blame himself, so he's trying to score points with the kids by blaming capitalism. One of the biggest capitalists is blaming capitalism for his and Xbox's failure.

fr0sty35d ago

I agree with you, which is why I said he's "kinda" right... he's right in the fact that capitalism is behind a lot of investors freaking out that the games industry, while still healthy, is not continually growing unsustainably, but he's also being hypocritical in the same breath after buying half the industry and then laying off thousands of them, and using his own business practices as an excuse to cover for his failures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
mandf36d ago

It won't be until halo and gears are on playstation that xbox fans see phil for who he is. A snake fighting only for himself. The video game industry means nothing to him just his paycheck to those who believe phil is passionate and loves video games you are part of the problem. You never hold ms accountable.

Minute Man 72136d ago

Halo and Gears only when Microsoft drops outta the console market

-Foxtrot36d ago

They don't need to drop out of the market for that to happen

They will always have some kind of console going forward but Halo and Gears could only be a few years away at this rate.

Next gen might look completely different

Tacoboto36d ago

I'd actually hope for Halo to come to PS and Nintendo at this point.

The community rejected a mictotransaction option so MCC is no longer maintained - no new revenue streams and Microsoft listened. Infinite is on Content Updates now instead of Seasons - dwindling playerbase and less excitement. If MS wants the franchise to thrive, that's free money and the same could essentially be said for Gears bringing them abroad.

FinalFantasyFanatic36d ago

@Tacoboto,
To be fair, Halo Infinite had a rocky start to begin with, I think they improved for a while, but fell behind again.

shinoff218336d ago

The writings on the all in huge fking letters. Just read it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
phoenixwing36d ago

I don't blame Phil for that in the slightest. If you were offered to be an executive of a company 9 out of 10 ppl would take the job for the salary and give little crap about how they feel about any given product they sell. He's not wrong that capitalism drives greedy companies but you have to take the good with the bad.

staticall36d ago

@phoenixwing
But the person is doing a bad job and the company (including customers) are suffering because of that, how can you not blame him? The reason for high paying is the decisions you make and the responsibility you take for your actions steering the company in the right direction (if company is doing bad, it's your fault; if company is doing good, it's because of your decisions).

It reminds me of that South Park Bill Owens parody ("Follow that egg" episode), a governor who wants all the money and recognition/respect, but doesn't want to take any responsibility, how backwards is that?!

Petebloodyonion35d ago

@Staticall
Agree but what are your metrics for doing a bad job?
Is Microsoft's share value tanking due to its decision?
Is brand awareness worse than in 2016?

As someone who works in investment, this is how I see it and why Spencer's still around.
1) Grow the Xbox brand awareness by including PC and Gamepass making it a stronger brand by name versus 2015.
2) Showed a plan to evolve profitability by having multiple sources of recurrent income with Gamepass, PC gaming, streaming, and now other platforms
3) made new market integration possible via PC and cloud.
4) Can make hard decisions for the good of the company like cutting jobs.

staticall35d ago

@Petebloodyonion
I would say, we shouldn't look at Microsoft themselves, they have a ton of revenue streams - Windows sales, hardware sales, Office sales, Azure, government contracts, certification programs, etc. We need to look at Xbox - hardware sales are in decline (Xbox 360 > Xbox One > Xbox Series S + X combined). GamePass subscribers aren't growing enough and, according to the Microsoft docs, are at plateau. Games sales are abysmal (both physical and digital, thanks to "Day one on GamePass"). Xbox exclusives doesn't exist anymore (every game is coming to PC). And it didn't start yesterday, this was happening for a long-long time.

In my eyes, brand recognition doesn't mean much, if it doesn't translate to console sales, because Phil took away every reason to buy Xbox console for a regular customer (i used to own Xbox 360 and saw 0 reasons to own Xbox One or Xbox Series).

I would also argue that he didn't make any hard decisions, at least when it comes to games: Crackdown 3, Redfall, Halo Infinite - he was saying that those games are looking fine only to be laughed at on presentation/release. But i would consider that a low blow, because he did cut some jobs. But not from top management (who are responsible for the decisions).

In my eyes, as a console owner/gamer, doing good job as a platform holder = supporting your console with high quality exclusive games (like Nintendo and Sony are doing). I'm fine with releasing the games afterwards on PC, but not right away (otherwise, what's the point of a console?!). Extra services are fine (like PS+ or GamePass, or cloud stuff), but they wouldn't be a reason to buy a console for me. Phil is overfocusing on extra services, not on games. And it doesn't work out and haven't worked out for what, 10 years already? Sorry, i feel like i'm rambling at this point.

Nooderus36d ago

He's a Microsoft executive. Duh

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Agree except I think the real snake is MS itself. They are a terrible company. This clown is just the hired man for the job.

phoenixwing36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Thats basically what I'm trying to say and if you really want to get down to it. It's the board of directors for the company who makes this stuff happen.

jznrpg35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

@Phoenixeing it’s his job as the head of the division to tell those people I think you are wrong and for success we need to this - that’s literally his job. MS motto is a big problem and Phil going a long with it is also his fault. He’s the one guy who can say something.

Abear2136d ago

Agreed they are the problem.

M$ doesn’t care about the quality of the game, they care about the profitability of the game.

When you work for a Co. like M$ you know this. It’s all about money—not the “art” or what’s healthy in the industry for devs and/or the consumers.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
M3talDiamond36d ago

First its Gen Z now its capitalism but we can all agree that it definitely isn't Phil

JackBNimble35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

If it wasn't for capitalism there would be no xbox or Microsoft for that matter. But as the head of xbox division it is his responsibility no matter good or bad .... that's what it means to be the boss. If that's to much for him, then he needs to resign.

-Foxtrot36d ago

Kind of funny because when it comes to capitalism Microsoft is one of those great big American companies that just screams it.

They spent billions on Minecraft, Zenimax and Activision yet couldn't afford to save all those jobs they cut. With the money they make within a year they could have, someway.

PhillyDonJawn36d ago ShowReplies(3)
FinalFantasyFanatic36d ago

They've been swallowing up a lot of AI companies too and spending big on that area.

S2Killinit36d ago

If MS gets into AI they will cause the end of humanity the way they are causing the end of console gaming.

FinalFantasyFanatic35d ago

@S2Killinit,

It's between Microsoft and Google, the chances are one of those two will take the AI crown considering the amount of cash they're throwing at that sector. I suppose Microsoft might be the worst out of the two, but Google hasn't been exactly great compared to the old days when they threw around their old adage of "do no evil".

Silly Mammo36d ago

MS is making millions of dollars annually with the Xbox brand. Unfortunately, they're spending billions on acquisitions too

8bitAssassin35d ago

Game Pass games are not free.

Christopher35d ago

He also blames his bank account balance on capitalism.

PhillyDonJawn35d ago

I don't think it work like that. MS is the parent company. The branch has its own budget to maintain.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
thorstein36d ago

Making millions, taking million dollar salaries and bonuses but it's the dev in the chair that's preventing profit?

Yeah okay, Phil.

Show all comments (146)
320°

Phil Spencer, long cast as Xbox's saviour, may be remembered as the man who killed it

Nathan Brown: "Phil Spencer spoke to the press at GDC last week, offering some context/spin on Microsoft’s recent manoeuvres, while dropping a few now-customary hints about the Xbox division’s future plans. I take one issue with this: I am no longer sure Xbox has much of a future to speak of. Moreover: I think Phil Spencer, for so long cast as Xbox’s saviour, may ultimately be remembered as the man who killed it."

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
38d ago
gold_drake38d ago

his decisions over the years were definitely questionable at best.

but MS let him be the head of xbox for this long, so they either dont have anyone else for the job or .. we'll i dont rly know any other reason haha.

-Foxtrot38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Basically when we had that awful Xbox One reveal in 2013 and Don Mattrick was thrown under the bus as the companies scape goat Phil was pretty much the only one they had who wasn't a typical looking "corporate suit".

Despite the fact him being the head of Microsoft Game Studios and gladly going along with the lack of games nearing the end of the Xbox 360 life where it was basically Kinect, Sports, TV along with the same 3-4 IPs like Halo or Gears he was the best person they had for the job.

They didn't have anyone else basically and from that day onward he was seen as good guy Phil turning the studio around when all he was doing was reversing the silly decisions made and going along with whatever the higher ups or the board wanted for Xbox. Didn't make a difference in the end because everything they "reversed" with the awful Xbox One reveal ended up being implemented in small different ways surgically in recent years with Gamepass.

The guy apparently is such a huge gamer yet played Crackdown 3 and Redfall, thought they were good and released them anyway in those states.

PapaBop38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Not a typical looking corporate suit? The guy straight up looks like a used car salesman lol. To be fair, after Mattrick, I think anyone with half a brain could succeed him and look semi decent, whenever I think of his name, I immediately remember that "this is how to share your games" video from Sony.

S2Killinit38d ago

when I look at him, its cringe. The guy dresses casually to fool people. But he is as corporate as it gets.

fr0sty37d ago

His cocky smirk I've always found to be incredibly annoying...

MrDead38d ago

I would say his "why bother making games when others are already" decision is what has lead them here. MS does this, but they just buy companies that they want to do a thing then asset strip it and dump it, you can't do that in gaming.

Tody_ZA37d ago

He's the head of Xbox because Microsoft isn't a gaming company and they haven't done anything for gaming in more than a decade. They're a parent company looking to buy more kids to raise as investments. They will profit off ownership, off their games releasing on other platforms, because they can't create anything themselves. Slowly they'll make Xbox as a console completely irrelevant under the mantra of play anywhere. That's why Phil is still there. He shares their corporate vision of making bucks and doing nothing for the gaming industry.

SubtilizZer38d ago

“If they don’t have a story these days they’ll make one”
Drake.

RhinoGamer8838d ago

Phil's top skill is keeping his job, growing his net worth to over $25million, all while underperforming...

SeTTriP38d ago

Gotta respect it, he went from a gaming studio head to making 70billion dollar deals...he is the main character I gotta admit.he looks fun to hang around too.

MrDead38d ago

...why do I feel like I need a shower after reading that? One of the grossest thing I've heard, S tier blowing bubbles grovelling.

jznrpg37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I don’t respect moves that make gaming worse long term

XBManiac37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

(Phil 'wait for next year' Spencer)
Microsoft made the 71,933 millions deal because it was already started and, with Microsoft, it is not possible to go back and stop it. Does anybody think that deal would be an option in 2023 or 2024, with the nowadays sitiation of the industry? And in 2022? No, nobody would pay that money for Activision-blizzard-king... because it would not be recovered in more than 20 years of really hard and good work. Everybody are selling for less, not buying for more (Embracer, Tencent...). But bad decisions in a company like Microsoft are impossible to fix. It is like a very big Ministery, where if something starts, it can't be stopped. It happened before and Microsoft will do the same again, as they have enough money to burn... well... I hope, because if Microsoft dies... it will be the end of our known world. What could substitute it?

_Decadent_Descent38d ago

I mean, that does take a certain skill. lol

FinalFantasyFanatic37d ago

I guess he has skill as a salesman, look how long he managed to get people to wait on Xbox.

Show all comments (54)