290°

Project CARS: Extended PS4 Comic-Con Gameplay Trailer Looks And Sounds Simply Amazing

Check out this stunning extended PlayStation 4 gameplay trailer of Project CARS from Comic-Con 2014.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
vric3561d ago

Hard to tell from this vid if it "Sounds Simply Amazing", it's a techno track over everything.

JackOfAllBlades3561d ago

Haha maybe they liked the music

ShinMaster3561d ago

I wouldn't even call it a trailer. It was just straight up gameplay, but with no sound lol

Clunkyd3561d ago

Yeah, that was really dumb of them.

BTW, that's not techno music, its Trance.

3561d ago Replies(1)
lets_go_gunners3561d ago

I remember earlier this year I was really excited about this game. Forza Horizon happened I guess. I'll still buy it just not day 1.

user74029313561d ago

shh! dont say that! a certain console group will feel threatened and they will begin to act like pc gamers and throw around 4k

lilbroRx3561d ago

I don't know which console group you are talking about, but I'm a PC gamer. I was doing over 1080p 60fps a decade ago before most people even knew what "HD" was.

I find the defensiveness of Sony fans to be so absurd sometimes. You praise specs like they are the most important thing except for when its not in your favor. You vindictively try to make everyone else out to be fanboys of other consoles in order to lord your PS4 over them in, but you don't like it when PC gamers respond to you in the same manner.

Such lush hypocrisy. If you are going to boast about the highest specs then know that it will always lie with the PC. Course, specs don't matter to me beyond what they can do for gameplay. I love my multiple controller and configuration option. And Mods <3 <3 <3 :)

Now hush this console war garbage.

OculusRift3561d ago

As a PC gamer, can I just kill this argument? The folks who claim to be "PC gamers" and are throwing up 4K as if it were something that's easily just a switch, are not gamers. 4K gaming demands some serious hardware to even run a game on respectable settings with 30-40 fps and that serious hardware demands some serious cash. And to make matters worse to really ever see the difference between 4K and 1080p you have to be sitting danger close to your display. (I'm talking 3-4 feet/1-2 meters), So if you're planning on picking up a 60 inch 4k TV.. don't do it.. save your money, unless you plan on sitting right under your display.

annus3561d ago

Damn, I was hoping for a cinematic experience.

FlyingFoxy3561d ago

I prefer PC but i'm not touching 4k and it's really not much to boast about.

Games run far too slow, and you need to spend quite a lot to get nice playable FPS in most newer games.. as in 2-3x 780's or r9 290's. Better off with 1080p for now or even better yet 1080p with 120hz or 1440p max with 144hz.

Pointless owning a good gaming rig only to spoil it with 4k, though for people who don't mind getting 30fps and lower then it shouldn't bother them.. speed and fluidity is better than having a sharper picture.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3561d ago
Future_20153561d ago

They never confirmed locked 60fps or anything just targetting 60fps

yarbie10003561d ago

hang on..let me go find my rave glow sticks

XtraTrstrL3561d ago

Looks choppy, like it's not keeping even a consistent 30fps. The background buildings and stuff are not scrolling smoothly at all. It seems there was barely enough room to add a rear view mirror also, the trees and buildings popping up and disappearing in it constantly makes it seem it'd be unpleasant to look through while driving. With how good racers look on last gen, this is simply not looking/performing impressively for a racing game on next-gen.

Show all comments (39)
110°

Why The Game Industry Needs In-Person Shows Despite The End Of E3

Skewed and Reviewed kick off 2024 with a look at the need for in-person game conventions with the End of E3 and compares the cost-cutting methods of Hollywood who still value in-person events.

gold_drake116d ago

so, this article didnt tell me why we NEED to have in-person shows like e3, other than the authors nostalgia and remembrance of covering one of these shows.

but it also doesnt mention everyone outside of america who have never had the chance to see it in person either haha
we had to watch the darn livestream, if they had it available, at 3am in the morning haha with lags amd crashes (not all the time)

while i think these shows are great and all, i dont really "need" to have them. people are busy, im busy. id rather watch a livestream than to book a flight, a hotel etc.

but theres still pax and all of that.

Garethvk116d ago (Edited 116d ago )

I did mention that you cannot have hands-on and meetings with key people and the excitement. Europe has Gamescom and had Paris Games Week and N.A
Needs an industry event again.

A Livestream does not even come close to what was lost. I much prefer seeing and playing the games in person and asking questions to developers and marketing people versus watching talking heads doing shtick on a scripted showcase with a carefully edited video.

gold_drake116d ago

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

Garethvk116d ago

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

ApocalypseShadow116d ago (Edited 116d ago )

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

EvertonFC115d ago

The ques for 1 game were 4 hours long for the most part, that's NOT fun.

S2Killinit115d ago

The problem with live shows was that it became all smoke and mirrors and a show of things not related to gaming. Therefore I would argue that it added a new layer of cost to the game developers and console holders that necessarily will need to made up for. Either we the consumer have to pay for that cost or the developer/manufacturer will have to bear the cost thereby taking away from profits leading to smaller studios dying out.

Remember xbox buying celebrities to make appearances? Thats a good example of unnecessary cost.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 115d ago
JackBNimble116d ago

You don't need to go to the movies either, you can sit on your ass and watch any number of streams but that doesn't make it any better then actually going out.

This generation has become so spoiled and lazy.

gold_drake116d ago

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Garethvk115d ago

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

EvertonFC115d ago (Edited 115d ago )

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.

TheColbertinator116d ago

I'd rather publishers send out closed betas to garner gamer concern and interest like how we had demos back in the day.

I don't miss E3 as much as I loved it at one point but that era is long gone.

Garethvk115d ago

There is a need but refinement was and is needed.

Zenzuu115d ago

Sad to see it go. It was a great event for gamers and developers all around the world getting together and celebrate gaming as a community.

The announcements of new games/hardware, hype, surprises and seeing live audience reactions, it's something only events like E3 are able to bring. It will be missed...

hombreacabado115d ago

if its going to be anything like the game awards where celebrities that dont even play games are there and its just full of fluff and commercial crap than no we dont need in person shows. we just end up watching the trailer montages the next day anyway.

Shiro173115d ago

To be honest E3 was one of my favorite times of the years when I was younger. I couldn't wait for all the big conferences and new announcements. It was hype even if nothing good was announced we had cringe moments to laugh at.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Talking Mortal Kombat 1 With Ed Boon And Thiago Gomes

During SDCC I spoke with Ed Boon and Thiago Gomes about Mortal Kombat 1 as part of a Roundtable.

60°

DC Heroes United and Borderlands Comes To SDCC

This sounds awesome. This afternoon, Genvid Entertainment announced two, all-new interactive streaming series at San Diego-Comic Con: DC Heroes United and Borderlands EchoVision Live.