830°

God of War III Remastered for PS4 Gets New Screenshots in Shiny 1080p

Today Sony Computer Entertainment Japan and Asia sent a press release announcing the Japanese release of God of War III Remastered (which will hit the local shelves two days after North America, on June 16th), and besides the first batch of screenshots included in the initial announcement, it had two new ones.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
ArchangelMike3301d ago

It still amazes me that SSM were able to make this game look so awesome on last gen PS3. I look at that screenshot and I'm like... it doesn't really look that much better than it did already. Which is a testament to how awesome the game already looked on PS3 to start with.

On a slightly different note, this is another remaster that I'm not sure about right now - especially as we haven't seen anything God of War IV related yet. Show us gameplay footage of God of War IV, then give us an incentive to revisit the God of War III story. That's how I see it anyway.

Army_of_Darkness3301d ago

I didn't need a GOW4 announcement to convince me to replay gow3 on the ps4 in 1080p @60fps :-) I last played this baby the first day it came out on ps3, so I'd happily replay it with all the visual /frame rate improvements.

bouzebbal3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

i wish they add 3D filter to it. Ghost of Sparta looked stellar in 3D!!!
that addition alone would make me buy it.

mikeslemonade3301d ago

I never thought the game looked that great. The Hades battle was the only one where I was impressed.

And no the gamers don't want a remaster. We want Santa Monica to make new their next new AAA game.

freshslicepizza3301d ago

this remaster is baffling because it looked so good already on the ps3. remasters i think are better served on games that had performance issues due to hardware limitations that the newer systems can do justice.

badz1493301d ago

I can't believe that it has been 5 years since it was released. time flies. but the thing is, it still looks gorgeous in its original form. one of the finest looking games last gen for sure.

nX3301d ago

Same here, this is a must-have masterpiece in every gaming collection. I'm just not sure whether I'll get it day1 or later.

Eonjay3301d ago

This is probably the game that I beat the most on PS3. Loved everything. The story, the brutal combat. The puzzles and the bosses... oh the bosses.

thekhurg3301d ago

Only see 1 screenshot even though title hints and more than one. Do they have some sort of anti-adblock thing stopping the page from fully loading or is my browser just going bonkers?

BeefCurtains3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

This game is another great reason to get a PS4. I need to make more money.

Oculus Rift (hopefully 2015), new GPU, PS4 all in 2015 = very happy bank and credit card company.

_-EDMIX-_3301d ago

"remasters i think are better served on games" nope and nope.

They are ports from last gen to make more money. No "remaster" is done for a reason other then money. Could have been the best looking game last gen, "remaster" could have been the worst looking "remaster" could have sold the best (GTAV, The Last Of Us) remaster and remaster.

Their is no reason to "remaster" other then making more money. Its a business decision, they don't just choose that based on technical design. Its being being done because it "needed" to, its being done because it makes money.

I'm really not sure why some gamers have no clue about business and legit think its being done for a reason other then money.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3301d ago
iiorestesii3301d ago

This game was awesome. $20 with a new mode is the term for my re visit. Not too hopeful, though. This should be a PS+.

jhoward5853301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

Man, I said something similar(a few days ago) to what you said on your post and some people on here said I was trolling hard. From all the agree you have goes to show how bias/hypocritical some gamers can be.

Anyways, what you said is spot on.

JWiLL5523301d ago

As good as it looked on PS3, the game never stood up to it's screenshots. They always looked quite a bit more crisp and higher resolution than in game. "Bullshots" might not be fair, but they had to be supersampled.

If this version holds up to that quality and is 60 FPS it could be pretty spectacular.

mattdillahunty3301d ago

"It still amazes me that SSM were able to make this game look so awesome on last gen PS3."

art design goes a long way in covering up technical limitations. and i mean that as extremely high praise for the SSM team, not as a diss to the PS3.

Gwiz3301d ago

I totally agree,maybe great for people that never played it yet another game that is no incentive for me to buy it.

I have never seen any generation going backwards this badly before.

_-EDMIX-_3301d ago

"Show us gameplay footage of God of War IV, then give us an incentive to revisit the God of War III" ?? Why?

E3 is coming out, this port is legit not taking them that long to crank out and no need to announce it out of E3 just because.

They are doing it correct and waiting til E3 makes sense before showing GOW IV.

and not every one getting GOW III on PS4 played the PS3 version. It may be a revisit for you, it won't be for many that likely pick it up.

Godz Kastro3301d ago

@archangelmike

Either they did a great job on PS3 version or just polished it up for ps4.

xtremeimport3301d ago

Damn. It does look good...but shit this game looked amazing back when it was released.

ps. Never noticed how massive Kratos hands are...damn dude.

3300d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3300d ago
miyamoto3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

While playing GOWIII a few weeks before the remaster announcement, I noticed the fine quality of the graphics SSM studio has poured into this game. As a huge ND fan I realized the graphics oF GOWIII is so underrated compared to Uncharted 2 or TLOU.

GOW III looked amazing at 720p 30fps how much more at 1080p 60fps!

The gameplay is so fun and satisfying I might add.
This game was off limits to my nephews for so many years but when I let them play it oh my word they were GLUED to Kratos!

Players new to GOW III are gonna crap themselves on PS4.

garos823301d ago

Wasn't GOW3 already at 60fps?

it was definitely buttery smooth but correct me if im wrong

sourav933301d ago

No, it's was 30fps. But a rock solid 30fps at that.

MasterCornholio3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

@sourav

Actually the framerate was variable. But it always stayed around 40-50FPS.

Edit: Yeah what Tontus said.

Tontus3301d ago

It had a variable framerate on the PS3 actually.

It could be anywhere from 30-60fps, it mostly ran between 40-50fps which is amazing given how incredible it looked on the PS3 & the fact it had great AA & no screen-tearing.

funkybudda3301d ago

@miyamoto,

I think this remaster is Sony's hope that capture those new to the playstation side that never played GoW become future buyer of the GoW 4.

For me this remaster is a no brainer, must buy because I know the quality will be there.

mkis0073301d ago

God of War is still on my instabuy list...They haven't Assasins Creeded it enough to change me.

Jalva3301d ago ShowReplies(1)
oasdada3301d ago

God of war 3 was the best looking game for me last gen.. both technically and conceptually.. and Tbh it still doest look anything short of amazing.. people who missed this last gen are in for a treat

Agent_hitman3301d ago

Why don't they include the Ascension in the package and remaster it as well? We won't pay another 60 dollars for a fvcking remaster sh!t game that has been played a million times already.

RosweeSon3301d ago

A million?! I've played it once so yeah I'll be grabbing again at some point.

Insomnia_843301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

Wow you played that game a lot of times I see.

A million times
60 dollars

Smh 😒

Aloren3301d ago

I agree...including ascension as well was the least they could do. I mean 40 bucks for a 5 years old remaster is too expensive. I don't really like that trend (not as bad as selling a remaster of a psp game for 50 bucks but well...)

A complete GOW collection with all 6 episodes would have been awesome.

Deadlead3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

Agreed man, I'm glad if newcomers want this and it's easy money for SSM but as a big GOW fan I still think this may be the most dismal remaster effort by any dev this gen. Just one game?(wouldn't newcomers want to start at the beginning?)... Not even a texture bump(Tomb Raider, TLoU, Halo:MCC worthy remasters, this just feels like a blatant money grab)... It's dissapointing, however still looking forward to GOW 4 or whatever else SSM is cooking up.

Eonjay3301d ago

Except, its not $60... sigh.

spicelicka3301d ago

$40 is still ridiculous for ONE last-gen game. I reallyy don't understand why people defend this shit. No one's attacking the game here, no one's saying it's not an amazing game, no one's saying it's not worth playing on PS4.

But it's clearly overpriced! If you can't see that then the industry is going straight to shit.

JWiLL5523301d ago

@spicelicka

$40 is ridiculous for a hamburger, not a video game.

It's amazing how much the gaming community whines about having to pay for it's hobby.

3300d ago
Bobertt3301d ago

It hasn't been long enough for an Ascension remaster and it has multiplayer so they would have to get new servers so they probably won't do that. Remastering Gow 1 and 2 would be good but since they already did that for ps3 they probably don't think it would look significantly better to spend money and time on.

Aloren3301d ago

How long is long enough ? Two years is more than what it took to get GTA V or the last of us remastered... 2 years is what it took to get halo 4 remastered + 1 2 3 and ODST, all remastered.... so I see no reason why we should only get GOW 3 for 40 bucks.

hkgamer3301d ago (Edited 3301d ago )

so the last of us and gta can sell at whatever price but gow3 can't?

doesnt matter about the number of years its been released. the priginal was a high budget game, the remaster probably had the same amount spent on it as the last of us?

ok halo collection was a bargain, but that doesnt mean that others cant charge what they think the game is worth.

how much did cinemas charge for jurassic park3d? or how much did the blurays cost?

theatres show the same stuff for years, should it get cheaper after every show?

gamers who have played this doesnt need to play it again if they dont want to. others that havent played it you can either play this? or maybe other brand new game that could be worse than this game. dont like it at full price then wait for 2nd hand or for price to drop.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3300d ago
Show all comments (85)
30°

Video Chums Top 10 Remasters on PlayStation Plus

"There are new PlayStation Plus tiers and I've been enjoying many remasters after subscribing to Premium so here are my 10 favourites." - A.J. Maciejewski from Video Chums

Read Full Story >>
videochums.com
170°

PlayStation Store Games Under $15 Sale: Over 400 Games Under $15

Daily Video Game writes: "PlayStation Store has just launched another new digital game sale that has over 400 games under $15, including many AAA games titled "Games Under $15 Sale" for PlayStation 5 and PlayStation 4 gamers right now!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com
anast703d ago (Edited 703d ago )

Dragon's Dogma and XCOM 2 are the best deals. The rest of the games are still overpriced. I would say 8.99 is good for AC: Origins, but you need to put $10 more into MTs to avoid the grind that slows down the story. So, the game is actually 18.99.

It's not on this list, but Pathfinder: Kingmaker is only $9.99. This is a deal if you have a current gen. consoles, as it runs poorly on prev. gen.

hangdang702d ago

I beat AC origins without grinding or spending any money on MTX?

anast702d ago

I had to grind for side missions. So, did many other people.

HeliosHex702d ago

Has anyone been able to login in to the ps store on ps5 I haven't been able to in days and my network is good.

RedDevils702d ago

Reset or shutdown your PS5. I always can go login to PS5, in fact just a moment ago.

HeliosHex702d ago

Hey thanks again. Although the shutdown/reset didn't work i found that resetting the mdm and hub did the trick. I use a Lan network instead of wifi. In case anyone has a similar setup and problem.

RedDevils701d ago

I forgot to mention about the router reset, that usually do the trick when it come to network problems happen with iphone/android. btw np

940°

God of War Will Run up to 60FPS With Performance Mode on PS5

Santa Monica have confirmed that God of War (PS4) will run up to 60FPS on PS5 with the performance mode selected. Additionally save transfer for both God of War (PS4) and God of War 3 Remastered will be supported.

Read Full Story >>
mobile.twitter.com
NeoGamer2321293d ago (Edited 1293d ago )

For sure this is awesome. God of War is my favorite Sony franchise! Played every God of War game to date including the remasters and on PSP! Can;t wait for the new game in 2021!

potatoseal1293d ago

God Of War: Ragnarok - 2021

It's enough to make you shed a tear

bouzebbal1293d ago

I'm proud for platinuming every single one of them..
60fps is worth a try.. Can't wait

Skuletor1293d ago

Even God of War: Betrayal?

NeoGamer2321293d ago

@SickSinceSix
OK, not God of War Betrayal. lol.

@bouzebbal
I am not that great at the genre so I have not platinumed any of the games, but I enjoy them nonetheless. I remember chains of olympus as the first game when i purchased a PSP on a 9.5 hour flight to Italy from North America. I still think that PSP was the best portable gaming device I have ever owned.

Army_of_Darkness1292d ago

That's not really impressive considering how the pro can sometimes hit 60fps on performance mode... I want to see 4k mode at 60fps. The ps5 should be more than capable of that.

NealGamby1292d ago

I’ve never played GOW. Maybe I should try it out.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1292d ago
GamerRN1293d ago (Edited 1293d ago )

I want 60fps in Resolution mode though! That's what I'm holding out for. I want 4k 60 with the graphics cranked up!

I've been waiting to go back and finish this game... I just got past the part where you see the frozen giant and do all that stuff... I want to finish the story!

cell9891293d ago

Whoa easy there let’s wait for the final details on resolution

1292d ago
1nsomniac1292d ago (Edited 1292d ago )

Love this site. Last gen game only manages to hit up to 60fps on new gen console if run in performance mode.

If it’s an Xbox game it gets ripped apart. If it’s a Sony game it gets gushed over.

I agree with GamerRN I’m not interested in performance mode. This is next gen it should be 60fps in resolution mode!

smashman981292d ago

60 fps was already hit in performance mode on ps4 pro some I'm hoping the same thing.

1nsomniac1292d ago

After a little reading it appears they’re not patching it at all, it’s just running as is. Therefore the games frame rates are capped so it’ll only reach what the engine lets it.

So not sure how this was even news in the first place!

Teflon021292d ago

1n
Not really, I see alot more of the opposite now. Pretty sure it could easily run 60 in performance if it was capped at 60. They'd just have to make sure it has a mode that carried performance mode features and caps 60fps. If the game is updated for PS5 features and such and only runs 1080p60 you'll see ppl complaining. The details on resolution hasn't been out so the assumption is it'll run a good rest if it's updated

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1292d ago
SamTheGamer1293d ago

So basically they said game will on backward compatibility mode and no next gen patch yet.

dlocsta1293d ago ShowReplies(8)
darthv721293d ago

Performance mode is a must have nowadays. Since getting the enhanced systems... I cant play any other way (on games that support it)

I_am_Batman1293d ago

The game already had that on PS4 Pro though. It doesn't sound like it'll take advantage of the increased processing power of the PS5 for now.

Nitrowolf21293d ago

only it will be stable rather than jumping between 40to60

I_am_Batman1293d ago

Hopefully. But "Up to 60 FPS" doesn't sound very stable to me. We'll see.

JEECE1293d ago

If it has an unlocked framerate, it should.
I don't like the "up to 60 fps" language either, but I get the impression it is them covering themselves so that no one can take footage of it dropping to 57 in one very specific instance and then do the whole "Sony lied" thing online. Remember the idiotic, "only 100 games will be backward compatible" nonsense, and how long it took for that to die?

FanboySpotter1293d ago

The wording is bothering me. "Up to" ig that's fair since it's not ps5 optimized and only bc.

JEECE1293d ago

Feels like insurance against twitter trolls to me. Because if they say it plays at 60 fps locked, even if that's true 99.99 percent of the time, some nub will record it dropping slightly once, then make a big deal about it.

I_am_Batman1292d ago (Edited 1292d ago )

If it's 99.99% running at 60fps, that's for all intends and purposes as good as locked 60fps. That's generally accepted and I can't remember an example where framedrops this rare ever caused any backlash. I don't think they are worried about a vocal minority of console warriors making a fool of themselves, by claiming otherwise.

I think it's much more likely that they have to lower clocks to guarantee compatibility, which causes it to perform similarly to the PS4 Pro. Another possibility I can think of is that it runs at 60fps boosted most of the time, but some big enough chunks of the game experience framedrops due to some very specific low-level optimisation that is harder for the PS5 hardware to emulate.

It's all speculation though and hopefully we'll find out before launch when the embargo for backwards compatibility lifts.

RonsonPL1293d ago (Edited 1293d ago )

Don't be worried. Be certain
that there's no stable 60fps mode :( if they use words like this. This means it wobbles and is 60fps at times and it's not at times. If we talk about a PS4 game, this is absolutely horrible news.
There's 0,00001% chance it means 60fps 99,9999% and a drop for half a second once per game walkthrough, but first, it's so unlikely I'd say it's impossible, and secondly, if it means drops even in certain rare scenarios like some alpha effects in exlosions (I know, it's God of War. Just using an example) and stable 60fps otherwise, it's still a very bad news, cause it means either the devs are stupid or PS5 doesn't have the power to even run PS4 games at doubled framerate. The stupid dev scenario would require them to go for locked 1440p res or something significantly higher than PS4pro in performance mode, possibly with some unnecesary additional details or quality settings. PS5 should be able to maintain rock solid 60fps in GoW at 1440p. Now I'm scared it's too slow for that.
Backward compatibility mode doesn't matter much as it's like playing the PC game on a faster PC with a different CPU architecture. In the end, you either have the power needed, or you don't.

This also means there will be no rock solid 60fps mode for God Of War 2 or the GoW 2 won't be designed with PS5 in mind. If it's designed around PS4's limits, then it's not totally impossible but uncertain at least.

RonsonPL1293d ago (Edited 1293d ago )

About the performance:
There's a question of how fast the train goes vs. how many waggons it can pull. PS5 optimizations might help adding some stuff but not necessarily allow to process the same amount of objects faster. Even x360 -> Xone meant easy 60fps ports of pastgen games with significant improvements. Now it's not clear by now if we'll even get the same between PS4->PS5 and PS4->Xbox X generation jump.
Whatever the GoW 3 on PS5 will be, I don't think there are any chances for rock solid 60fps mode in that either, especially when raytracing will leave gaps if turned on, if there are not assets prepared for non-Rt lighting. GoW 3 will be PS5 only.
This is a very stupid and it's yet another step in wrong direction in my opinion as I preferred Gow 1-3 60fps and action focused gameplay rather than all that cinematic and narrative stuff which meant a regression in terms of gameplay. Simply put, GoW PS4 is less fun to play than PS2 and PS3 games were for me. By far. It was a Slasher. First they changed it into a TPP game, then poisoned the gameplay even more by abandoning 60fps gameplay (to be fair, I was already disappointed with drops in GoW 3 on PS3, but at least that was default (and only) mode and the game kept 60fps in many places allowing at least to get the feeling and "wow" factor coming with 60fps. And of course the gameplay mechanics were designed around it too, allowing for more variety and more enjoyable gameplay mechanics and visuals.

Sad to see the once great game series ending up like this. I'm sick and tired of "narrative is the only thing that matters!" approach. I wasn't a fan of ND, Insomiac, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, back in PS2 era because I cared about the stories. I was yelling "those guys are the best!" whenever I played their games because they were super fun to play, with gameplay being the priority, a game made by gamers for gamers. Not by some people who'd rather be in Hollywood, telling stories and who think movies and stories are a higher culture than gaming, who think they are so much better when they make cinematic experiences. And about the last part, "for gamers", it's probably why this comment will get 100 disagree score, but modern gamers often are not aware of what a gameplay oriented game can be, if done by one of those "best of the best" studios. It's because there are almost no such games nowadays. Even my peers tend to forget. PS2 was released 20 years ago.
Just look how many people were surprised how fun DMC 5 is to play.
But you won't get the praise on Twatter if you're just that guy who makes games (you know, that entertainment for nerds). You will get it if your game is reviewed like a movie. What is the character development, what's the story, what quality the narrative and screenplay is. Then you are above that silly gaming stuff. Now you are a serious artist. You are above. You are among those Hollywood hot shots.

Sadly many gamers love movies so much they don't even realize when they're getting robbed from gameplay. Then you see all the high scores for mediocre gameplay games, and 10/10 for GoW even despite the fact its gameplay is not even at 80% of what it could be if the game was focused on it. Yes. I dare to say it: GoW gameplay score is 7/10 or even lower. Same goes for TloU 2, Detroit: Become Human and many others.
None of those games hit that top level of quality for gameplay and fun factor. And just look how it looked back in PS2 era.
ALL of the "god tier" devs delivered gameplay for 9/10 and 10/10. ALL of them.
Now none.
60fps on PS2 vs 30fps on PS4/5 accidentally overlaps with these differences.

MrNinosan1293d ago

Que?
This must’ve been the most silly trollpost I’ve seen on n4g, and that is on a site filled with trolls.

Write a diary about something you like instead man. That might help you get sane.

RonsonPL1293d ago (Edited 1293d ago )

@MrNinosan

OK, Let's take the situation apart.

1. Who presented arguments and an subjective opinion everyone is entitled to?
2. Who wrote a pointless comment just to insult and express disagreement as if the downvote button was not named "disagree"?

Now. Tell me, but honestly. Who's the troll here?

I'm too old for this, seriously. Give me an argument or buzz off.

Harryvok1293d ago

Performance mode in the original had frame rates up to 60fps (that was the cap), but generally hovered around 45fps. 4K mode was locked at a 30fps cap, although it did dip of course. This game isn't getting a patch that changes the modes or resolutions, it's just running in BC mode with the performance mode going up to 60fps and 4K LOCKED to 30fps cap, just as in the original game. It isn't a reflection on the performance of the PS5 at all. It's just running the game as it always way in BC mode with the extra power pushing the performance mode up to its 60fps cap.

Also 'up to' makes sense. It will undoubtedly drop a couple frames here and there. Xbox 360 and Xbox One games with a 60fps cap are still dropping frames here and there in BC mode on the Series X. You're not going to notice a few frames here and there at 60fps.

RonsonPL1292d ago (Edited 1292d ago )

@Harryvok

""Also 'up to' makes sense.""

PS4pro was around 40fps as you mentioned. That's just +50% more raw power required. I understand what you're saying about the compatibility mode, but I disagree. it's not a full emulation, where you could actually make a very valid point that improving the performance by 50% might actually require much more because of the fact you're emulating things.
PS4 had x86 CPU cores and Radeon GCN architecture. PS5 has x86 CPU and a Radeon.
We'll disagree on what you can extrapolate from this, and I cannot be certain either as there's not enough information available yet, but I understand

next

""You're not going to notice a few frames here and there at 60fps.""

That's both 100% true and 100% false. Objectively this is both.

Depends on which display type you're using for gaming and then up to what are your priorities. If you can endure the horrible flicker but you simply are not interested in playing games with broken motion reproduction, then you'll not only notice instantly even drops to 57fps, but the the experience of playing the game will be significantly degraded. It's not possible to explain this without actually showing the game in properly working motion-friendly mode, so maybe this changes your mind and if not, at least makes you willing to allow other points of view as equal and valid: If the flicker is so bad in 60Hz mode, imagine how awesome are the benefits if some people are willing to suffer playing with it.
(and I suffered it gladly while playing God of War on PS2)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1292d ago
SmokinAces1292d ago

I think people are taking the wording out of context, it just means its select-able up to that number. I'll give you an analogy to hopefully help it make better sense. Say you get in an elevator of a sixty story building, you can choose to go to the thirtieth floor or you can go to the sixtieth floor, if you choose to go "UP TO" the sixtieth floor it doesn't mean you're going to go to the fifty fifth floor and then back down to the fiftieth and then up to the fifty eighth and so on. I dont believe the term implies fluctuation it just represents the highest choice you can go "UP TO". That's just my two cents hope it makes sense, guess we'll just have to wait and see though if that's the case.

UnHoly_One1292d ago

What???

That's a bunch of crap.

It means it runs at 60, but not all the time. That is the ONLY reason to add those words in.

Now it could be that it might hit 59 a couple rare instances, or it could mean that it is mostly 45, but peaks at 60 occasionally, or anywhere in between.

The core of the phrase is that it is absolutely not perfectly locked at 60 at all times.

RonsonPL1292d ago

No. When the game runs at 60, it runs at 60.
When it struggles more often than rare and occasional stuff, like explosions or one boss fight per 20 hour gameplay, then it's called up to 60

Historically, looking at PS4 generation, up to means anything between "almost never" to "a bit" through "half of the time or a bit more than half".

Examples of up to 60fps which were totally NOT 60fps: Tomb Raider (the first new one on PS4). It was up to, but was nowhere near the experience you get from stable 60.
I never ever saw anyone complaining for calling it 60fps when you get a drop once per 5 hours. I call PS2 God Of War game 60fps. This one had some rare drops as well.
Up to means NOT stable 60. Period.

SmokinAces1292d ago

@UnHoly_One

I appreciate your opinion and point of view, I dont appreciate the "bunch of crap" comment, I have no issue with a counter point but it would be nice if it didn't require the hostility. We dont know if that's the only reason for those words, we truly won't know it until an official analysis is done and in the end you might be right but it could very well be a stable and locked 60fps experience as well and that's what I believe it will be and I was just trying to give an analogy as to why I felt that way.

Happy gaming friend.

Show all comments (104)