Taken from CharlieOscarDelta.com, a Playstation 3 gamer compares the textures found in Call of Duty 4 between the Playstation 3 version that he bought to the Xbox 360 version that he borrowed.
seeem 2 me teh godbox360
the first 2 pics goto the 360(its look like wallpaper, but it gets the job done, no textures...middle not sure of(looks to me that the PS3 has better textures, but more jaggies)...last 2 goto the PS3 i think..in real time PS3 animation is better, while the 360's looks too, whats the word, um computer-e...just doesn't move real...looks like a robot...disagree how ever much u want..its just my opinion.. EDIT:then again this is the first time Infinty Ward's developed for the PS3.....it will only get better and better and better. you can't disagree on that..this game is still fu<kin awesome on either console....
I think they all go to the 360. The second to last image the text on the news paper is slightly more visible, the last one, textures on the head rest is allot better as well. The PS3 version has purple color banding(Too much compression, lower color depth) and generally does not have as much detail as the 360. I will admit, in motion most people would not be able to tell the difference.
again both games look really great no major difference..if you want to see really great textures look at uncharted for the ps3 it will blow ya mind away
PS3 more sharp especially on pic 3, 4, 5 (guns have more details ), Xbox360 looks upscaled with AA.
Nothing like another good old pointless next gen console comparison to stir up more flame wars. I couldnt see any real differences myself but I would of much perfered some real direct screen dumps rather than shody camera stills.
It is clear that the stated xbox pictures have a filter on the textures and the ps3 does not. Could these pictures been taken from a computer with different settings just to start a flame war? The screens for xbox360 seems to be taken with a higher texture setting than the ones labeld ps3. To the guys saying that the ps3 textures on these pictures are better is just plain wrong.
but i don't want to start a flame war
Thank you for making this post, I didn't want to be part of any of the flame posts. The pictures looks about the same, and the biggest difference between them all seem to be the gamma/brightness. I really don't think CoD4 is where you can tell which is better. With all the times people are spending discussing this, go drive to some store or log onto some website and buy the game, play it, and cherish it forever.
There is a clear difference on every single picture, i guess the 360 wins again.
To me all the PS3 shots look much better. But that's because they all look real. The 360 shots look fake and less detailed.
wow your blind..it seem like both even out..there is bad 360 and ps3 pictures..like i said before all mulitplatform games will look the same..
looks so damn close. there is no winner its a perfect tie. like im going to be playing COD and be like, man this game looks so bad for 360 it un playable! BS they are the freaking same.
love is blind,mate. all you ps devotees love ps3 too badly.
sonykids are not going to like this, but hey lets take a step back and be rational, if it takes us to zoom in just to see this, does it really matter when both of them looks superb to the natural eye. JOY
LMAO..as we all know the PS3 is the superior version in textures..nice try though xbot..!!
.....I dunno if this is fake or not but even with poor quality pics , anyone and I mean ANYONE can tell the Xbox360 looks better.... Still, I think the pics are a bit odd and poor of quality so I'll give the Ps3 the BotD.....
I spent most of today playing that game on my PS3..so I know for sure that the textures doesn't look like that when you zoom in on things...
i was wondering in my mind what could make the ops3 has better textures than 360 games as the 360 has the better gpu that produces these textures ?or do u thinkk the cell orblue ray is capable of this u doo know blue ray is a storage device dont u and has nothing to do with polygons.
are you schizophrenic..?? you asked me a question then answered it..by asking me another question...LOL.... ur such an idiot for bringing Blu-Ray into this btw...so if the 360 is so powerful how come it didn't blow the PS3 out the water considering it's been out for almost 2yrs and it's so easy to code for ..?? 1080p BTW...
I's hard to believe the amount of denial on this site. Let me sum it up - you show picture of a circle to a Ps fanboy, he looks at it and says " yep it's square, I knew it all along" :) hahaha
can't believe I haven't got this game yet
right? Those Ps3 pics look horrible, I dount it looks that bad...
Like all these 'screenshot comparisions'. THis one is another lame one. Some state ps3 looks better, and others state xbox 360 looks better. They are the exact same, got the exact same scores cross the board, and this is just another attempt at a flamewar.
The videos say they both look identically beautiful.Screw screen shot comparisons and screw haters.Just enjoy the game.I'm getting it after I pick up Uncharted.
Xbox 360 hands down. Enough said.
ohh no!! looks like infinity ward has just been added to the ps3 list of boycoted developers. ps3 owners arent gonna like this at all.
the proof is right there an you guys still dont wanna believe it!! so be it!! WE KNOW THE TRUTH AN YOU KNOW THE TRUTH!! its whether or not you care to believe it or not!! but like someone else stated!! if you have to comb through it like this to see a difference then maybe the difference is a non factor!! by the way if these pics were the other way around you sony boys would have a hard on from hell, screaming out I TOLD YOU XBOTS THE PS3 IS GOD, the end is near for these xbots an all that fanboy crap.you will learn one day. but ENJOY THIS GAME NON THE LESS!!
sad when you gotta revert to fighthing over textures. just shut up and enjoy the game.
You are missing the point , it's in the detail.
That's what started the 360/PS3 flame wars about COD4.. when gamedaily reported that the PS3 version had better textures... if these pictures are to be believed, then gamedaily has a screwed up opinion on what good textures are... HOWEVER, on the flipside... I think the gun looks better on some of the PS3 shots when gun is darkened, looks better that way IMO
lol... xbox 360 wins duhh... but shhhhhh... keep it down... we don't want Sony fanboys to know this... we've being getting AAA games on the xbox 360 and know what it's capable of doing... let the poor sony fanboys believe the PS3 version is better... if you paid $600 for a console waited this long to get a game like COD4 would you want to feel like a sucker for not buying a 360 instead? right then... let them win this one...
How long did xbots waited to get GoW?
Xbox has more contrast to say the least it was clear from the video many have seen more than one source of comparisons. I'v read in here somebody said "Some think the PS3 version looks better and some say the 360 version looks better" , the only people that think the PS3 version looks better are Sony fanboys. " But it looks better at home I'v been playing it all day" Obviously somebody went though a mad mans spell to zoom in and prove it once anf for all. " but it looks good! not like that at home" Hardly any games are perfect when zoomed in so obviously flaws will show doing a close up regardless of it looking normal when playing the game at home.
In the 5th pic, that 360 pic wasn't even captured as good as the PS3 pic abd you can still see the stitching on the back of the seat on the 360 verion. Speaking of the video I use my HDTV to look at the video(my PC is hooked up to my 42" LCD, and its clear you can see the differences. EDIT: LOL I get more dissagree's than the other people saying basicly the same thing. lol
some pics look better on PS3 and some of them look better on 360. ground textures look better on 360 and wallz textures look better on PS3.
lol... 2nd pic you can see more jaggies on the image on the right.
Of course the Xbox 360 version is going to have better textures and graphics, why is anyone surprised? the PS3 has to use lower quality textures because it only has 256mb of memory available while the 360 has 512mb of unified memory available
you lose at the internet...
Yes Zhuk, it's no surpise that the 360 has better textures again. History has already proven that the 360 is a much powerful console. What's funny is that Infinity Ward said that the ps3 was EASY to work for and they still couldn't get it at the level of the 360.
We have to assume the game was possible held back to match the console versions. Could be sweet talking fans knowing the fanatics would pic each version apart. Anybody play Naruto? man that game is doing magic aswell it may be artoonish but alot of sh*t is going on to make it one of the pretties artoon type game on the market.(has the best foliage physics I'v personally have seen in a game. I thought it was strange the 360 version of the game was hidden before the launch of the game(fanboys would have picked the game apart causing angry Sony fans not to buy the game.
to waste your money ! RED RINGGGGG !!!! YEAAAAAAAAAA !!!! RED POWERRRRR!!!!! Did you know that making games for PS3 is hard ? and Xbox 360 is out there for 2 years and PS3 only 1 year. So Devs are learning to work on PS3 and I'm sure PS3 will have PS1,PS2's result. ----- U PS3 fat kid Bubble me so I can talk better
It has 256mb ram and Xbox 360 has 512mb ram. So that is why Xbox 360 with 512mb ram cannot handle more rain drops because lack of having more memory. LOLLLLLL GOOD NITE PEOPLE
anyone else notice that on the second to last picture in the ps3 one the guys wearing gloves but the hand is bare in the 360 version
This is because Call of Duty 4 uses random NPCs, so the character models always look different. That explains the different helmet on the 360 v ps3 video of COD4 where they are on the helicopter.
Fine, then why is the hedrest texture in the car different on the last pic ? Or why can you see individual rocks on the stone texture in one image why they are filtered away on the other. The pictures are different, true, but the comments are subjective and don't mention these details. Its pretty clear, that both versions use different AA or texture filters. But that's about it.
I dont know but those pics look horrible, on both screens. I have the game it doesn't look THAT bad. Those screenshots make it look like it's a Playstation 1 game. But seriously anyone who zooms in that close to nitpick should just stop playing games like....right....NOW!
Both have no gloves the PS3 version is washed out. Has anybody noticed lots of multi platform game ads on TV for PS3? only.
Dude, are you really blind or dumb, or both? The guy in the PS3 screenshot is clearly seen wearing a glove which isn't there in 360 shot. Now if I were you, I would spin it around and say 360 doesn't have glove because they ran out of place on DVD, but I wouldn't say it, because I'm not that idiot
Personally I think PS3 version has far better mapping than X360 version also I think the PS3 version is either running on different resolution(TV) or needs a magical invention Anti-aliasing
these pictures are way to low qual the video comparison I saw they looked almost the same. Good news for all now if we could just get M$ and Sony to go multiplat we could sort this whole my box is better than your box thing the right way ;)
First it was: "Bwuahhwha PS3 cant do ports...Its Hardware sucks!!! lol.. developers will never develop good games for it...!!" Then.. "Bwuhauhwuaha 360 gets the better version since the ps3's hardware is so terrible. Xbox = better framerate and multiplayer..." Now its.. "Buwhahah take out a microscope and look at the different texture filters on both versions!!!" You guys are seriously blowing up images made from a snap shot off of some guys TV and this is evidence of what? Different shadow samples for the hardware? Xbot or no xbot, you have to understand that if people are JUST learning the ps3 and it already is equaling THE BEST LOOKING and PERFORMING GAME on the XBOX360, that its not time to celebrate, after all.. there is no learning curve for the 360 is there? It really is as if xbots cant let the ps3 go with having a good port. Ratchet comes out and it gets mocked as "meh, its for kids!!" Good thing IGN/Gamespot/Gamepro/GameDaily /Every other reviewer in the world, has tipped its hat and said the ps3 has an amazing multiplat. These devs did their homework, its good to see third party developers stepping up to the plate. ITs sad to see that this retarded flame war will continue to go on, I figured COD4 would put some flames away and gain some respect from the xbot base-camp, but I guess not... Not even equally reviewed AAA's on both systems can do that... you guys are really ZOOMING in on TV's to see the difference... next up.. lets look at the source code!! PS3fanboys have stood by the PS3's hardware, its been mocked and mocked to death by Xbots. COD4, as with Ratchet/Uncharted/Haze/Heavenl y Sword all show that the PS3's early months have been very good. At this point, you guys are just crazy zealots going after the ps3 in a personal sort of way...
lets see what we can go by..... ""Taken from CharlieOscarDelta.com, a Playstation 3 gamer compares "" A playstation 3 gamer took the time out of his day to put ps3, and 360 pics under a magnigying glass to find the difference, instead of just listening to the dev that says both versions are indentical, and the reviwers that said so and even some that said the ps3 version was .1% better..... Whos pathetic now? you say this...about xbots ""Now its.. "Buwhahah take out a microscope and look at the different texture filters on both versions!!!" "" yet.... ""Taken from CharlieOscarDelta.com, (((a Playstation 3 gamer compares)))"" so whos desperate now? Edit: good thing I ignored you long ago, but really nothing you can say can change the fact I just laid out, you complain about xbots saying look at the textures under a microscope yet it was an (((playstation 3 owner))) doing the comparison....hmmmmm
Look up the definition of desperation please. Yes, I can read the site. A ps3 owner took the images, so what? Gametrailers.com made a video? The point isn't who is taking the pictures, the situation is the responses to the pictures. Xbots on N4G/Gamespot are the Xbots I am talking about, Just watch as this thread turns into how much better the 360 version is, even though no review has stated it. The point, which you clearly missed... Is that the PS3 has a Equal Port of the game. Xbots wont give credit where credit is due. If you don't get that, then you are mildly retarded.
I missed that... a ps3 owner did the screenshots? and they are worse on ps3? god that must be a bitter pill to swallow.. one would think you'd be used to it, wil. ;P
yeah the guy on teh site admits he owns both systems and played both games but he purchased the ps3 game, and we dont know specifics or if its even true what the guy on COD.com. but we do know it was a playstation 3 owner who purchased teh ps3 version of the game that did the comparison.
Yes we are zooming in to shut people like you up. Mind you I don't think it's working because even thought there is pics and videos form a different sources that are showing the 360 version clearly superior, you guys act like a little kids plugging your ears and going "lalalalala". This title was developed simultaneously on both consoles - no more fuc**ing excuses, this was the final showdown and the X brand won, it's settled you can never argue about graphics again, case dismissed, good bye ! I'm not hating just pointing the obvious out !!
better yet... how do you know which picture belongs to what? how do we know? it could be a comparison between the PC version and the dreamcast version for all we know. people can swap labels, or do whatever to prove a point. i have the ps3 version. outside of driving around in the car, the game's zoomed in textures look even better than they appear in these screenshots; thats a fact, and thats all that really matters to me.
Even after IW said it was identical, and the constant barrage of video comparisons showing the SAME thing people refuse to let it go. Uh play the game instead of wondering which one looks better?
When would you people (from both sides) get sick and tired of this 'comparison crap'?!? Does anyone of you freakin' fanboys play your games with your eyes almost literally touching the screen of your HDTV sets? So what's next? Comparing how the game's 'virtual molecule atoms' are rendered perfectly by both consoles?
The ps3's game looks better in play and thats all that counts. Whoever sits and looks at shat screenshots are wasting everyones time. Go buy the game, play, and enjoy what infanty ward have given us. This is the best fps of 2007. Put Halo 3 screenshots upthere and see how many jaggies are present, yet many xbots never complained about them.
oh wow. why would you even bother with these images, have you not seen the gametrailers video comparasin? i take video comparasin over image comparasin any day.
Well if you paused the Game Trailer video at 1:46, and 1:54, if your not blind you can see the 360 version is doing better everything from character models, textures, to lightening. But you do have to look for it to see it, really no difference in motion.
And FOAD Power Of Green. Remember!! Everybody give negative feedback to Power Of Green, Mart, CHris gtr1 jokeonyou etc... they like negativity. Anyhoo, I picked this game up today and although very good, Warhawk is way better online game. BY A MILE. Better everything. COD4 best gfx yet? What a load of balls.
Then again I'm not even sure this pics illustrate two different versions of a game they might be the same version running on a different setup (TV, resolution, colour, contrast) who knows?
we do all know that both look more or less the same. this is stupid. =D its not like it even matters.
This discussion is seriously getting out of hand. I guess the Gametrailers HD comparison was'nt enough? No no no, one version has to be better than the other...it has too! I trust GT more than some PS3 fanboy with a lousy digital camera.
Heh I was kind of expecting the opposite when I first saw the headline. In any event does it really matter? Side by side when playing both games they look so identically that I never would have been able to tell the difference had it not been for the label on the screen. And while its niffty that you can press you nose against the TV and see a difference, in the end who cares as they are both fantastic games that look great.
I want real side by side screenshots not blown up pix that nobody will notice. Oh and how you guys isn't talking about how much better the PC version looks? I run mine at 1080p with 8X AA LOL!! My PC pwnz0r the weak console, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! KTHXBYE. Stupid fanboys and their pointless flame wars.
these are like youtube quality, so trying to judge them is pointless. get some HD screenshots, geez...the demo was flippin awesome tho! BTW I am sad to report UT3's gameplay is just simple run and shoot, like the typical fps, I just tried the demo...disappointing...amazing graphics...disappoining game play style, I expected it to be more like an advanced version Gears, (which graphically it is) but it ain't. And no I have not played the previous versions, so yes I'm an idiot (sorta).