Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by jonlynch 1665d ago | opinion piece

Gamers Want Uncharted on Xbox 360 and an End to Exclusives

Gameplay Today explains why exclusives only hurt gamers and breaks down the walls that separate those who own only one system by showing that it all boils down to us loving games, not systems. (Gears of War 2, Halo 3, PS3, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, Wii, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 3 4 5 »
VG_Releaser  +   1665d ago | Well said
i agree that it would be nice to have these games available to everyone, but then where is the competition? multiplatform games feel watered down.
marinelife9  +   1665d ago | Well said
Then they shouldn't "exclusively" own only an xbox.
RankFTW  +   1665d ago
Well said, console exclusives are a great way of pushing a single console to its limits not like multiplats, ofc a few exceptions exist like Crysis 2 and from the look of it Rage.
zootang  +   1665d ago | Well said
First thing, it can't be done on an Xbox360 because of storage limitations.
Washington-Capitals  +   1665d ago
Im not going to sit here and argue with fanboys. PS3 exclusives are great, but dont start with the "multiplatform games are water downed" bullshit. I only own a ps3 and although MGS4 is the best game i have ever played. Some of my other all time favourites include Red Dead Redemption, Fallout 3 and Call of Duty 4. All of those games are NOT water downed products. Exclusives might have graphical edge but thats not what i look for in a game, its gameplay and GOOD gameplay is NOT exclusive to any console.
#1.1.3 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(55) | Disagree(96) | Report
ilikestuff  +   1665d ago
agreed marinelife9

there needs to be exclusives not just for competition but they let their consoles shine in a way that a multiplatform game could never be able to.
Active Reload  +   1665d ago
"Gamers Want Uncharted on Xbox 360 and an End to Exclusives"

That's news to me. I've never heard anyone I know say that. In fact, it's my first time seeing such a statement on the web. With the Gears 3 beta going on UC3 being on the 360 is the furthest thing from most people's mind who only have a 360. This is definitely someone elses fantasy and quite frankly sounds made up.
Acquiescence  +   1665d ago | Well said
That's right...
I wanted Uncharted 2, so I went out and got myself a PS3, regardless of the fact that I already had a 360 for two years. Killer-apps for consoles exist, and if the guy who wrote this article doesn't realize that then his gaming hobby sucks/suffers all the more for it.
blackbeld  +   1665d ago
Exclusives is what we need today. Multiplat games makes you own a specific console for what?

Without competition then there would be only same games from EA!! No please no!
heroicjanitor  +   1665d ago

That might be true but Uncharted actually requires a hard-drive, so 360 can't even have it watered down without some 360 owners being unable to play it, which would cause a fuss.
malamdra  +   1665d ago | Well said
ok, let's do it

but since the PS3 has a lot more exclusives, the easiest way is to bring the few exclusives the 360 has to the PS3 thus making it the only console
DOMination  +   1665d ago
I don't want critically panned gears wannabes on 360 thanks.
milohighclub  +   1665d ago
I'm sorry but ps3 multiplats are shit due to lazy developers. I'm so glad that's things are the way are. If u don't like it buy a ps3. simple as. I'm sure you'd ra ther pay out a bit more than play a ported version of uncharted.
DigitalAnalog  +   1665d ago
Exclusives can utilize ALL of it's resources on a single-platform. From a business perspective, it can really sell with potential given the right advertisement. Extra resources can be poured on graphics/bugs/QA without having to check on multiple platforms. Otherwise exclusives can simply be because the "other" platform refuses to publish it (like Haze).

-End statement
Theonetheonly  +   1665d ago
While your at it You should have Universal Studios and Disney land merge so you don't have to buy 2 tickets to different theme parks.

DualConsoleOwner  +   1665d ago
Xbox simply cannont handle
superior graphics of PS3 exclusives....

Being on Xbox 360 means, the graphics would have to be downgraded.
Pikajew  +   1665d ago
What if they cant afford another console?
Darkfocus  +   1665d ago
"While your at it You should have Universal Studios and Disney land merge so you don't have to buy 2 tickets to different theme parks.


you honestly don't think that would be a good thing?sure it'll never happen(probably) but it would be great if it did...
sikbeta  +   1665d ago
Seriously this is really stupid, if there is some people who still don't understand that exclusives are the key to competition between different brands in the gaming industry, they better quit gaming...
artynerd  +   1665d ago
Exclusives always look best on their respective consoles because the developers aren't wasting time making sure it works on both sets of hardware.
Dee_91  +   1665d ago
a Majority of muliplat games are watered down .. not all

Then they should shut up and make due with what they got
#1.1.19 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
Rageanitus  +   1665d ago

sorry but your argument is flawed look at how many games are dumbed down on consoles vs PC only games.... then compare it to multiplatform games found accross the board..
Sono421  +   1665d ago
well sikbeta it seems like Microsoft doesn't understand this :D
DAS692  +   1665d ago
Everyone doesn't have the money to afford 2 systems! Especially when they cost 300-400 bucks each... that being said... I still don't think I'd buy another 360 for the simple fact that the first 2 I got RRODed
DAS692  +   1665d ago
Exclusives are a great way for a game developer to concentrate on one system. Making multiplatform games isn't easy, and requires a much bigger team or a team with a lot of passion, because depending on how the game was made, they can't always "port" it over to the other systems. Not to mention that exclusives usually have a higher rate of quality... Like Uncharted 2, and Killzone 3.
Veneno  +   1665d ago
@ Washington Capitals

Looking at your comment we can tell you really aren't qualified to speak on this subject because while yes there is the side of games being "all about fun" there is also a technical side involving hardware and software which overrides everything.

If multiplatforms arent' watered down, then why aren't your favorite games like MGS 4 and Read Dead on the Wii ?

YOu need to go out there and educate your self on technical aspects of videogames if you expect anyone to listen to you on a serious level.
I_find_it_funny  +   1665d ago
NO to 3rd party exclusives.

games made by SONY and MS are exclusive and you can't whine about it
MaxXAttaxX  +   1664d ago
Uncharted is not a third-party exclusive
It's a Sony game. It will never be multiplatform.
It's that simple.
morganfell  +   1664d ago

Then they should have made a better choice in the beginning and picked the console with the multiplats AND the best exclusives. They should have also examined the cost of the console over 4 years rather than utilizing the "what is cheap right now" method of purchasing.

When a console doesn't use last generation technology then that console might work as the sole console. Otherwise we are limiting developers. One console would mean competition among developers instead of among hardware manufacturers.

It is a fallacy that one console would prevent innovation. Sony was easily ahead last generation, not even looking back at the other two yet they continued to push the PS2 in software and hardware. The idea that a sole console would prevent or inhibit innovation is one of the biggest misconceptions and outright lies in the forecast of the gaming future.
ct03  +   1664d ago
Answer me this then:

Why are there no exclusive Blu-ray movies that only work on Sony players but not other brands?
Why are there no exclusive TV channels that only work on Sony TVs but not other brands?
Why are there no exclusive music albums that only work on Sony CD players but not other brands?

There is NO reason for gaming to be different.
Solid_Snake-  +   1664d ago
vice versa for ps3 owners.
pixelsword  +   1664d ago
If you can afford XBL since 2005, then you can afford a PS3, as you spent enough to have a PS3 by now.

and if you can't afford a PS3, the don't by five games and use that money on a PS3.

Problem solved.
#1.1.30 (Edited 1664d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
jonlynch  +   1665d ago
I would like to see an end to 3rd party exclusives, but 1st party like (Naughty Dog, Turn 10, Nintendo, and so) will keep the competition fresh.
jony_dols  +   1665d ago
Long live 1st party exclusives!
sobekflakmonkey  +   1665d ago
oh god, if there weren't any 1st party exclusives on PS3 all Sony would have would be shitty ports, cause lets be honest, that's usually all the PS3 gets when it comes to Multi-plat games, which is why its good that Sony has so many 1st party developers, so many that you don't even need the Multi-plat games..
Saint-Revlot  +   1665d ago
Sucker Punch is the exception.
kyl277  +   1665d ago
What about 2nd party exclusives?
sikbeta  +   1665d ago
First Party Exclusives Games are the REASON of WHY you buy a respective Brand, without them, there would be no point in having different brands competing for your money....
mastiffchild  +   1665d ago
Meh, without exclusives there would only BE one system and if you couldn't afford THAT you'd be screwed and would give a monopoly to someone and they're GREAT for everyone/sarc.
Tony-Red-Grave  +   1665d ago
WTF do people want a 1st party exclusive on 360? im not going to read this article when it states something pretty freggin obvious not to mention just the heading is completely off
Scyrus  +   1665d ago | Well said
duh xbox gamers want our uncharted, They dont want to own the ps3 but they want our ps3 games, riiiiight.

i mean considering all they have this year is gears 3 and kinect games its understandable. Oh and to the disagree-ers please tell me one exclusive other than gears 3, because i'd like to turn my xbox on more than once this year
sin151   1665d ago | Spam
M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L  +   1665d ago
sin151: Such as...?
#1.5.2 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(18) | Disagree(3) | Report
PRHB HYBRiiD  +   1665d ago
@marshow im going to answer that question for him ...such has the awesome kinect titles :D fun for the whole family and grandma too

Related image(s)
Scary69  +   1665d ago
I agree I always thought games should not have an exclusive on specific system. If anything maybe release it a week early on a system then a week later on the rest of the consoles.
PRHB HYBRiiD  +   1665d ago
Really?? well i would like mass effect on p... oh wait o.o ok then i would like gears on ps3! (:
M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L  +   1665d ago
Wow...this is hilarious. Exclusives is what shows off the strength of consoles. Going by their logic, Gears and Halo should be multiplat too.
HolyOrangeCows  +   1665d ago
"Gamers Want Uncharted on Xbox 360 and an End to Exclusives"

LOL! Maybe the mainstream gamers reminiscent of the most sensation-driven voters, but not gamers who understand that systems need to be utilized to the best, and competition is highly necessary.
skrug  +   1665d ago
I think they mean

[360 Fanboys] "Want Uncharted on Xbox 360 and an End to Exclusives"
#1.9.1 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(4) | Report
cannon8800  +   1665d ago
Yeah like seriously, what would be the point in having different consoles and all have the same games?
NoobJobz  +   1665d ago
There wouldn't be a point.
skrug  +   1665d ago
buy the better, less hardware failure system?
cannon8800  +   1665d ago
Exactly Tompeeper there wouldn't be one.
fr0sty  +   1665d ago
Making exclusive games allows developers to take advantage of that particular piece of hardware. When they make a game multi-platform, it means they have to cater to the lowest common denominator when it comes to system specs. If one system can't do it, neither version will get to use that feature. Only in isolated cases will the developer take the time to code a feature for one system and not the other as well. That adds to the production budget for a feature that will only increase sales on a portion of the overall market the game is appealing to.

Uncharted wouldn't be Uncharted if it were not exclusive. It wouldn't be the game we know today. It would be a game built around the weaknesses of each system it is playable on.
madpuppy  +   1665d ago
It's not going to happen, there is no benefit to the console maker not to have exclusives.

Maybe in the land of the mushroom king under the root beer waterfall where everybody shares and there is no thought of such things as profit margins and competition you will find what you are looking for.
ZippyZapper  +   1665d ago
Xbox owners can play Tomb Raider or Gears if they want Uncharted
theEnemy  +   1665d ago
"Well said, console exclusives are a great way of pushing a single console to its limits not like multiplats, ofc a few exceptions exist like Crysis 2 and from the look of it Rage. "

Crysis 2 ?

Have you played Crysis 2 on consoles ?

That game is a trainwreck.

Poor resolution, blurry textures, enemies have like super vision and auto-aim, enemies are hard to see as well.

I'm not buying another Crytek game.

PS3 version btw.
otherZinc  +   1665d ago

If Halo, Gears, wouldnt have campaign co-op!

Thats important!

Killzone 3, Resistance 3, no co-op, explain that?
Uncharted 3 same thing, where the hell is co-op when there's an AI running with you the entire game?
PRHB HYBRiiD  +   1664d ago
#1.15.1 (Edited 1664d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
macky301  +   1665d ago
Gamers,.. I would personally be ashamed to waste my money om MS console,..

Makes no fuc**** sense,.. Gears2,3 and english Vesparia(asian version might be translated)? It is a joke of a system,..
#1.16 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
GunofthePatriots  +   1665d ago
They want it on 360 because xbox doesnt have good exclusives anymore.
#1.17 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
50Terabytespersec  +   1665d ago
I SAY Apple and Sony or Sega Get in and develop a Super computing System and have Sony Develop all the tech for it and So these three put an end to all this BS that MS and Nintendo has been fooling us into believe is next gen!! BS!!!
Wii is 2 Gamecubes strap together.
360 is budget PC off shelf pc shovel ware low res crap!
We need Apple and Sony to do something and do it now!! End this crap build some Super graphics game machine that will last !! 10 years!!
Give me Raid SSD and Give my 64 cores!!! and massive 500GB ??DVD fast streaming
#1.18 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
starchild  +   1665d ago
Multiplatform games do not feel watered down. Many of the finest games of all time are multiplatform games.

Exclusives are not necessary in order for there to be competition, there is natural competition between every game ever made. They all compete for your dollars and your attention.

Consider the world of movies. We don't have to buy 5 different DVD players just to watch all the movies we love. Yet the diversity of different types of movies is even greater than that of videogames.

Someday there may be one standard in videogames and perhaps the only difference that might exist between different "platforms" will be the different services and peripheral features unique to those platforms.

Sadly, many fanboys want the practice of exclusives to continue so that they can continue bitching at each other. That, more than anything, is their motivation. They like this fanboy war crap.

Exclusives are good for the platform holders, but they aren't good for consumers. Getting slightly better optimization in some exclusives isn't a worthy trade off for the gamer. Getting to play any game that is made simply by owning one videogame device would be a much bigger benefit.

Next generation its going to get even worse. There will be more videogame platforms than ever before and the only way to play all the exclusives will be to spend ungodly amounts of money buying all the platforms. It's a bad state of affairs.
#1.19 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
morkendo23  +   1664d ago
and an End to Exclusives

ARE THEY SERIOUS?? END OF EXCLUSIVES??? no more bickering what game is better on what console
NAHHHH! its the N4G way.

disagrees highly welcome if u must.
it is what it is
#1.20 (Edited 1664d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Vherostar  +   1664d ago
If there was no exclusives people would just buy the cheapest machine end of! You can bang on about features but people buy consoles for games first and foremost. The reason the 360 does better than the ps3 in some places is the price. It would be pointless having more than 1 console on the market if there was no exclusives. Though I would prefer a Sony/MS console that would be truly amazing and they could destroy Nintendo and make a fortune doing so. Imagine Playstation with Xbox live network and MS financial backing? It would take the world by storm.
TBM  +   1664d ago
The reason I buy consoles is for the exclusives as those games aren't on the other consoles. With that said the only reason I still own my 360 is for Gears, and the surprisingly awesome AW.

I am hoping beyond hope that Microsoft broaden its portfolio of 1st party from the traditional halo, fable, and forza. Please Microsoft create some different games in different genres.

As people have said exclusives show what each console is about and what they can do so I wouldn't want all games being shared on all consoles it would defeat the purpose of owning them. I would kill for Nintendo to start creating some new IPs besides releasing the same damn franchises year in, and year out.
#1.22 (Edited 1664d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
S_C  +   1664d ago
I suppose the competition would then come down to who has made the best console, e.g how many GB the console has what sort of features are on the console, the cost of the console and what sort of features they are going to bring to the system. What social features they got on their console. etc
kikizoo  +   1664d ago

"storage limitation" and CPU !
DeadlyFire  +   1664d ago
This is likely Xbox fans wanting PS exclusives from first party Sony studios. Buy a Playstation. Problem solved.
Bowzabub  +   1665d ago
Yeah, and I want the Zelda IP in HD on my PS3. After all, we need an end to these exclusives, right?
Yangus  +   1665d ago
I think,Zelda much better(GAME)Uncharted....

Uncharted awesome visuals,but......
Bowzabub  +   1665d ago
I prefer both, which is why I have both. I love both for their respective reasons. Win-win situation. Btw, I didn't disagree with you, though It would appear you have with me.. Why I don't know. I never said Uncharted was better than Zelda. I see, you didn't like the idea of a Nintendo exclusive coming over to the PS3. Hmmmmm....
#2.1.1 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(2) | Report
Rageanitus  +   1665d ago
I guess we have to compare gt5 to super mario brothers since they are sooo alike
vgn24  +   1665d ago | Well said
Of course they want Uncharted. It's one of the greatest franchises this generation and easily one of the best in the last few generations of hardware.
xPhearR3dx  +   1665d ago
Having played both Uncharted 1 and 2, I could easily live without it if I only owned a 360. I didn't care too much for either games. Personally, if I was asked which PS3 exclusive I could have on 360, it would be LittleBigPlanet or Heavy Rain. Love both those games.
Kalowest  +   1665d ago
"Gamers Want Uncharted on Xbox 360 and an End to Exclusives"
LMFAO just buy all the consoles, so you wont have to cry about Exclusives.
ShyGuy13  +   1665d ago
Ricco-Warrior  +   1665d ago
goes to school,food,rent, and hookers
undercovrr  +   1665d ago
A ps3 right now is the price of a few games. Just don't buy every game you think you want and save up for a ps3.
jonlynch  +   1665d ago
If you're buying, sure. T_T
Kalowest  +   1665d ago
I was able to get my consoles on Xmas and my Birthday.
I brought most(if not all) of my 106 games by myself.
jonlynch  +   1665d ago
"I brought most(if not all) of my 106 games by myself. "

Where did you bring them?
Kalowest  +   1665d ago
"Where did you buy them?"
GameStop (pay 2 used get 1 free helped alot) and Amazon(they always have low prices).
annus  +   1665d ago
@Kalowest He said bring on purpose, because you said the word brought. Brought = bring. Bought = buy.
Tired  +   1664d ago
So were all 106 second hand games? Have you not fed a penny back to industry?

Shame on you! The only second hand games I own are activision.
NYC_Gamer  +   1665d ago
they could always wait for the PS3 to drop in price if money is the issue
v0rt3x  +   1665d ago
You'll get uncharted on Xbox if I get Halo and Gears of War on PS3 :-P
#6 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(24) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
cr33ping_death  +   1665d ago
mmmmm.. maybe just Gears... loved Gears 1 Gears 2 a bit of a let down... i sold my 360 back in Jan of 2010, and im waiting for a price drop at E3, so i can play Gears 3.... so all you beta testers better complain about any and every glitch you find.
theonlylolking  +   1665d ago
There is this glitch where if the party chat you are in lags out when you spawn, you dont carry a weapon.
cr33ping_death  +   1665d ago
@ theonlylolking.... i remember that would happen alot in Gears 2.... where one would spawn without a annoying yet funny.... if my friends or i would start without a gun then that person would be designated the decoy lol... but i really hope Gears 3 turns out awesome.
Crystallis  +   1665d ago
they can keep Halo..I wouldnt mind seeing Gears on ps3 though.
SuicideShaun  +   1665d ago
Halo is awesome. So why can they keep it? I love halo but I don't like gears at all.
mastiffchild  +   1665d ago
SuicideShaun-I think you will find quite a lot of PS3 only gamers feel a similar way to Crystallis. It's mot that Halo is poor(it's great series) but it's certainly less of an everyman's game in the way Gears is because it's so synonymous witrh it's platform by this stage whereas Gears has only one gen of Xbox heritage. what ths has meant, in my experience, is the gamers who WANT and LOVE Halo have nearly, to a man, BOUGHT a 360 ALREADY purely for Halo3,ODST or Reach. Point being I doubt there's that many Halo fans left who don't own a 360 making those left on other consoles pretty unlikely to be massive Halo fans and , anyway, it's always been a love it or hate it type of game among me and my mates.

I like Halo, and the 360 just fine(just prefer my PS3 overall)but I DO think Halo's fanbase is firmly, already in the camp of owning a 360 making PS3 only gamers way more likely to envy Gears than Bungies creation at this point in time.

On fact my only personal issue with Halo is that I'd like the SP to feel as important as the MP does these days. Not a biggie and I can't moan about them going where I think more fans wanted them to and making the MP the most feature heavy thing out there. Gears, though, like Uncharted on the other console seems to be THAT game that people just like regardless of platform and therefore they will want it more in threads like this.
Cajun Chicken  +   1665d ago
PS3 is the key to all that greatness, sorry, simple facts, the decent exclusives and franchises clearly outnumber that of the 360.
AdmiralSnake  +   1665d ago
Well people can dream if they want I guess, however they all need to wake up to reality and realize this will never happen.
#8 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
--------  +   1665d ago
I just clicked Disagree by accident, my bad. Damn motor skills.

However, I do agree. Plus everything Microsoft touches turns to sh*t and dies - R.I.P Skype.
#8.1 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
jacksonmichael  +   1665d ago
And Rare.
perfectCarbonara  +   1665d ago
Gamers want Uncharted, players already have it.
Optical_Matrix  +   1665d ago
Exclusives define a system. Without them, we may as well only have one console. And personally I like variety and choice among my hardware.
Thoreau  +   1665d ago
nope, i love exclusive games. why don't those gamers buy a ps3 and why don't ps3 gamers that want gears3 buy a 360.
LiquidSnack  +   1665d ago
Exclusives hurt gamers? Every game should be multiplatform?

You have no clue what you're talking about, do you bro?
milohighclub  +   1665d ago
Dude chill, he's blatently high.
jacksonmichael  +   1665d ago
Drug users do not equal communists.
nolifeking  +   1665d ago
I'm always high and find his retarded.
milohighclub  +   1664d ago
LOL. dude me 2 but obvously it make some a little crazy.
Rageanitus  +   1665d ago
multiplatform games hurt gamers.... the developers are forced to sacrifice features to accomodate all platforms.... im sure final fantasy could have been better had it just been ps3
newhumanbreed  +   1665d ago
Which gamers actually want this? I've never heard of anyone who wanted Uncharted for 360..
Burning_Finger  +   1665d ago
Microsoft needs to buy out Sony in order for that to happen. LMAO
jonlynch  +   1665d ago
Maybe if their stock keeps plummenting, it'll happen. Then we can have XBL security on PS3.
--------  +   1665d ago
And then they can butcher our game library, replace it with a plastic peripheral to play dance games on, put a self destruct timer in our consoles, bloat our operating system, put ads everywhere, fire all of our studios and make us pay a ridiculous price just to get online too! YAY! /s

I'm just playing around guys. Obviously no company would ever do that to their customers and products. ;)
#14.1.1 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(39) | Disagree(5) | Report
milohighclub  +   1665d ago
@ jmorgan. dude if there was a bubble for been a genius...
user2285916   1665d ago | Spam
get2sammyb  +   1665d ago
Exclusives are about defining the ethos of platform. Stuff like Super Mario defines Nintendo's goal for quality, polished, accessible content. Similarly, Sony's emphasis on games like Wipeout in the early days of PlayStation separated the PSone from the "cute, kiddy, toy" image that Nintendo and SEGA carved out for the industry in the 16-bit days.

Without exclusives, what would be the point in different consoles? You'd essentially own a set-top box. You wouldn't own a PlayStation or an XBOX, you'd own a "Sony Games Console" or a "Microsoft Games Console".

Exclusives carve out a personality for their respective consoles, and while it might sound ideal to have every game available on one system, in reality it's a very bad idea and I hope it never happens.
#16 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Nac  +   1665d ago
No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No end to exclusive. I like my Halo on my Xbox and my Uncharted on my PS3.
Excalibur  +   1665d ago
I own both so it doesn't matter to me. :)
yewles1  +   1665d ago
This got approved?...
#19 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Bowzabub  +   1665d ago
anubis56   1665d ago | Spam
maverick40  +   1665d ago
Buy a ps3 so, simple as that. Anyone who doesnt own all 3 consoles by now is missing out big time.
Greek God  +   1665d ago
Im happy with just my DS PSP PS3 i dont need Xbox or Wii because im not interested in Gears or Halo
and Wii ...? LOL
maverick40  +   1665d ago
I am a Sony fanatic but I do have an xbox and wii for the fantastic exclusives they have. More so the wii, that console has some awesome exclusives....mario kart, galaxy 1 and 2, sin and punishment, little king story and soo much more! Anyone who thinks the wii has "teh crap games" is a blatant fanboy.
NoobJobz  +   1665d ago
Well, I don't know about that. I wouldn't say you're missing out on much if you don't own a Wii. You should own a 360 and PS3 though. Forget that 3rd console nonsense.
dragon82  +   1665d ago
The Wii has plenty of great games to justify owning one. Anyone who can't see that is a blind fanboy.
NoobJobz  +   1665d ago
I like Nintendo just fine. N64 may be my favorite console of all time. Plus I can't even fathom how many hours I've put into a DS/ Gameboy for Pokemon games. I just don't like the Wii. I wouldn't call myself a fanboy. I will gladly give the next console a shot.
Raven_Nomad  +   1665d ago
I own all the consoles, always have. I think I prefer exclusives to remain exclusives however. It eliminates fanboys really.

Nothing is ever exclusive to me. However that being said I also feel like exclusives as being a reason to own one console over another is kind of a thing of the past. This year is the perfect example of that with Multiplatform games like Dragon Age 2, Rage, BulletStorm, Portal 2, Mortal Kombat, Marvel Vs Capcom 3, Batman Arkham City, Homefront, Battlefield 3, Crysis 2, Skyrim and a ton of other quality multiplatform games.
#21 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(19) | Report | Reply
BlackTar187  +   1665d ago
yea and what about the exclusives?.
Raven_Nomad  +   1665d ago
In all honesty there is never an abundance of them that I am actually interested in.

I like Gears and Halo, I like Uncharted and God Of War. It's not like if Microsoft or Sony or Nintendo has 100 exclusives each per year that I would like or buy all of them simply because they are exclusive.

I like a wide range of games, mostly games with a solid online aspect.
Kahvipannu  +   1665d ago

True, 90% of games are multip on consoles, on PC it's different case, but they really don't matter that much. Ofcourse Lost Odyssey is reason enough to get X0, or UC is to get PS3, but in the end, exclusives are fishes in the sea.
nolifeking  +   1665d ago
With all the games you listed, wouldn't owning one console be more fiscally responsible than owning more than one?
b_one  +   1665d ago
exclusives gives quality, its only way to keep it
Treyb3yond  +   1665d ago
I don't want no exclusive games, I want 360 to have it's own games so it gives me a reason to switch it in again!

No exclusives, no competition.
BushLitter  +   1665d ago
no competition. shitty games
Harelgur  +   1665d ago
I dont
Longsama  +   1665d ago
Not possible, too much use of the cell processors for uncharted to be on any other platform
clintos59  +   1665d ago
Exclusives is what keeps us gamers excited especially when they are proven exclusives. Kinda like how I cant wait to see starhawk. Its going to be awesome.
Esena  +   1665d ago
Yeah, I don't know what this article is talking about... no exclusives means death to the industry. It isn't just this way, it is this way in all of business.
Acquiescence  +   1665d ago
F**k that noise...
It was due to exclusive titles that led me to purchase a PS3 two years after a 360, and it was the greatest gaming decision I had made in a long time. I wouldn't have Uncharted on anything else other than a Sony console.
radphil  +   1665d ago
"Gameplay Today explains why exclusives only hurt gamers and breaks down the walls that separate those who own only one system by showing that it all boils down to us loving games, not systems."

The irony of it all is THAT is how the gaming industry grew up to be in the first place.

The only major difference is that devs aren't using console powers to their full capabilities, and just focus on quantity instead of quality.
#29 (Edited 1665d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
laz1973   1665d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
« 1 2 3 4 5 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Stop Bitchin’ About Nintendo’s Badge Arcade

1h ago - Yes, Nintendo wants your money. Are you surprised? | Culture

PS Vita Exclusive JRPG Atelier Shallie Plus Gets First Trailer Showing Ayesha, Logy and More

2h ago - Gust just released the first trailer of the recetly announced PS Vita exclusive Atelier Shallie P... | PS Vita

See what games are coming out in 2016

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2016. | Promoted post

Xenoblade Chronicles X review - Trusted Reviews

2h ago - Trusted Reviews: If you want to get into the Wii U’s biggest RPG, then you need to be sure that y... | Wii U

Blade & Soul – Live stage musical is now available on YouTube

3h ago - On 13 November, NCsoft held the finals of its Blade & Soul World Championship. On the same day, a... | PC

TalesWeaver – Overlord invades Japan server of classic online game

3h ago - MMOculture: I believe this is the first time Overlord, the extremely popular anime which finished... | PC