270°

Is Call of Duty’s Time Up?

Is it time for Call of Duty to move on?

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
OtterX155d ago (Edited 155d ago )

Commiting to XBox while a majority of players play on Playstation, then immediately releasing the worst rated Call of Duty of all time is certainly not going to grow numbers.

Funny, we've always been looking for the next "Halo Killer" or the next "Call of Duty Killer", turns put it was right under our nose this whole time. It's Microsoft.

Sonyslave3155d ago

Everyone Reviewed Modern Warfare 3 Too Soon

https://insider-gaming.com/...
Something Doesn’t Add Up
In a recent release from Sledgehammer, three key points were revealed:

Players have spent more hours overall at this point playing MW3 than they did MW2 or MW.
Modern Warfare’s Zombies mode is the ‘most engaging third mode’ in Modern Warfare history.
Campaign players are putting in more time per player in MW3 than in MW2 or MW.
It’s still a best-selling title, it’s still topping charts around the world, and it’s still dominating social and streaming platforms. There’s still a packed esports season lined up with the Call of Duty League, and the world’s best COD players are busy getting neck-deep into the competitive world of their game once again.

Xbox Tax is real

fr0sty153d ago (Edited 153d ago )

But the sales are down dramatically, which is why Activision isn't talking about them, at all...

Instead of saying "we have the most players ever playing this than any other game in the new trilogy", they're saying "more hours PER PLAYER", cherry picking using stats that only they have direct access to, so they can easily lie about them. That is an act of desperation. They can't lie about sales, as third parties can track those and call out their lie, but they can lie about usage stats that only they have access to.

"Most engaging third mode" doesn't actually say anything at all... The mode engages what more than any other? What kind of PR doublespeak is this supposed to be? Not "most played", but a carefully crafted term that can literally mean anything... "most engaging". Most engaged would kinda imply that it gets played more than other modes in the past, but engaging is a present tense, so they can make that out to be whatever they want. "We made what we believe is the most engaging third mode in the trilogy!" Not to mention, "third mode" isn't specified to mean "zombie mode", they can make that out to be anything they want by being so vague.

Another carefully crafted "campaign players putting in more time per player" statement... where again, they only have the direct access to the actual number of hours played, and "per player" can be an easily skewed statement...

What isn't adding up is you just got sold a bunch of carefully crafted marketing speak that a company uses when trying to justify a failing product, and you believed it.

There's a reason the game is currently on sale...

FinalFantasyFanatic154d ago

We should start calling Xbox the "slayer".

mrcatastropheAF154d ago (Edited 154d ago )

So what should we call Sony for running Bungie/Destiny into the ground since we're using goofy logic to score easy points on N4G

Abear21154d ago

Yeah they bought every game studio that’s played out and made amazing games like 20 years ago.

fr0sty153d ago

Destiny had been run into the dirt long before Sony. Nice try, though.

FinalFantasyFanatic153d ago (Edited 153d ago )

@mrcatastropheAF,

Not even on the same level, Bungie/Destiny was a mess long before Playstation acquired them, I can't even give you an A for effort with that goofy logic (I also don't care about the upvotes/downvotes, you can tell by my comment history).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 153d ago
mrcatastropheAF154d ago

looking forward to the obligatory "COD is dead" comments next release and the following release after that.

You can't fix stupid

154d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic153d ago

Xbox has a history of ruining developers/games, but this year's release of COD was atrocious anyway.

Garethvk155d ago

Game has had more engagement than recent Modern Games per Activision stars. Free maps coming the first week of December, and more stable and playable than the majority of the Battlefield games. It also sells a ton. So aside from online venom; what part shows people are not buying and playing it?

Newmanator154d ago

Well I’ve bought every COD since COD 4 and am not buying this one. I know others doing the same.

154d ago
Garethvk154d ago

Its your choice but sales are still going to be strong regardless.

sadraiden154d ago

People said that about Black Ops 3, was one of the highest selling entries of the entire franchise at the time.

Neonridr155d ago

CoD isn't going anywhere, and people will continue to play it.

154d ago
155d ago
155d ago
Show all comments (41)
200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy099d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto8d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga8d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo8d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb19818d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan7d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut858d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra30307d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii16d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons15d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac15d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2314d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.