400°

No Man's Sky gets a huge surge of users thanks to Starfield effect

Starfield's launch appears to be having a positive effect on No Man's Sky's own player numbers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
jznrpg232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

It’s a really good game now. A lot different when I played it at launch. It wasn’t bad at launch but they added a LOT to make it much better than I thought it could be. VR makes it even better

northpaws232d ago

Amazing game, the only problem is it crashes a lot during MP sessions :( hope that will get fixed soon

Snookies12232d ago

Is that issue on console only? I've played a decent amount of multi-player on PC and hadn't had any issues. Maybe I just lucked out?

northpaws232d ago

Yes, I was playing on console, and whenever me and my friends (a group of 4) trying to do those weekly Nexus missions, at least one of us crashes or have some of errors that prevent us from finishing it.

MrDead232d ago

If you're on PC turn off Windows Game Mode, I can't play NMS for more than 30mins without a crash if that setting is on.

Click start > Settings > Gaming > Game Mode.

MrNinosan232d ago

I played NMS since release, and since Multiplayer patch I've spent over 1500 hours across PS4 and PS5. Never had a crash as I can remember

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 232d ago
darthv72232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

..."now" being the key word.

If we are to treat games equally regardless of who makes them, then the same holds true for Starfield. Only it likely wont need as much added content to make it "a really good game" as it already is... now. It already ships with more content than NMS had at launch.

The improvements Bethesda will make over time will be minor quality of life improvements. Performance...maybe a new mission here or there but much like 76 (which also lacked at the start and was later redeemed with a flood of content), Starfield was built to last a long time and benefit those who put in the effort to really want to explore the stars.

It's definitely the type of game for those with a creative and explorative mind with time on their hands.

Christopher232d ago

***If we are to treat games equally regardless of who makes them***

"If we treat 4 people in 2016 the same as over 400 in 2023..."

IRetrouk232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

"It already ships with more content than NMS had at launch."

Like?

raWfodog232d ago

"...Starfield was built to last a long time and benefit those who put in the effort to really want to explore the stars.
It's definitely the type of game for those with a creative and explorative mind with time on their hands."

Ehhh, personally I think you lost me on that last part about 'explore the stars' and 'creative and explorative mind with time on their hands'. Not saying that you don't like exploring or that Starfield doesn't have exploration, but that somehow it's MORE of an exploration game that NMS.

NMS is built around space and planet exploration and I believe that is an objective statement that many people would agree on. With access to an ungodly amount of planets (18 Quintillion), all fully explorable, where you can fly anywhere and everywhere, you could play the game for the rest of your life and not visit 1% of the available locations. I believe that Starfield is a good game and definitely plan on playing it one day so I'm not trying to downplay it's enjoyment. I even think all of the very low scores that it has received may not be fully deserved, even though there are some fair criticisms of the game. I just think it's unfair that many people keep trying to pit the two games against each other because they are really two different types of games.

refocusedman232d ago

so youre saying indie developer hello games should be compared to bethesda/micro$oft. it really does matter who makes them because one company has basically unlimited resources and the other company doesn't.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 232d ago
Sonic1881232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

I actually like it better than Starfield. Especially the exploration part. Starfield has no sense of exploration
Very data characters, feels like a 10 year old game because of the game engine
Maps suck
Inventory sucks
I found the quests very boring and mediocre as well.
Oh and loading screen after loading screen. Now we know why Bethesda didn't give out review codes to everyone. Don't get me wrong it's a good game, but it's not great

fr0sty232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

Everyone wants to see what they're missing out on when they bought into the hype of a game that claimed to be NMS meets Skyrim, but failed to deliver.

crazyCoconuts232d ago

I'm playing it lately since the PSVR2 patch that just came out, nothing to do with Starfield.
It's quite a game in VR when it looks good, people have no idea

spoonard232d ago

I've spent hours in flat AND VR multiplayer and have had a flawless experience.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 232d ago
Terry_B232d ago

No wonder..they want to experience what they can't do in Starfield ;P

Abnor_Mal232d ago

With all the updates and expansions this game has gotten over the years how many gigabytes is the game now with everything.

I bought this game day one on PS5 but quickly stopped playing because I started off on a planet where the atmosphere was poisonous and my oxygen would run out fairly quickly, which kept me from really exploring because I always had to get back to the ship to replenish my oxygen reserves.

I also quickly learned I really did not like any kind of resource gathering and management kind of games.

Abnor_Mal232d ago

Thanks I might reinstall it on PS5 and try the game on PSVR2.

Markdn230d ago

That's what shows up most games is the fact with all the content it's only 15gb.NMS gives you what you want based on your level of involvement, I login sometimes land on a planet, put on the vr headset and just explore. Some days I'll hook up and do missions with friends, and then some days I'll feel restless and start a fight in space,. NMS should not be compared to Starfield.

execution17232d ago

🤷‍♂️ thats how I started off day 1 on ps4. Got a hot one on day1 ps5 and switch I got an ice planet

Abnor_Mal232d ago

Yea if I go back and play I’ll just restart a new game and hopefully get a better starting planet.

I couldn’t even go far to mine for minerals and stuff so I couldn’t even build anything to help my situation.

Snowb420232d ago (Edited 232d ago )

You'll always get a planet like that at the start.

Edit: It'll always be really hot, toxic, radioactive or cold.

Abnor_Mal232d ago

Oooooh, okay good to know. I guess if I can’t handle the starting planet then I wouldnt be able to handle space and alien planets

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 230d ago
Brazz232d ago

No Man's Sky's is better than Starfield.

sagapo232d ago

Maybe now (depending on personal preference to what you look for in these type of games) but definitely not compared with launch NMS,

aconnellan232d ago

They’re just different games that scratch different itches, it’s really bizarre that they’ve been pitted against each other

TriniOutsider232d ago

Not surprised, No Man's Sky is gonna pick up again for sure.

Show all comments (63)
80°

Latest No Man’s Sky update adds ship customisation, space station overhaul, and more

Orbital update drops today, also bringing with it engine improvements and UI refresh.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Zeke6831d ago

The game that keeps on giving 🦾🥳✌️

Christopher31d ago

The support they've given this game only makes me more interested in their next game.

Zeke6830d ago

Agree, curious what they are cooking up for that one?!

180°

The 10 PSVR 2 Games You Should Own

If you're looking for 'must have' PSVR 2 games then look no further. These are the 10 titles every PSVR 2 owner should have in their library.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
kevco3340d ago

If you're wanting more PSVR 2 support, you should probably buy all of these games.

Speak with your wallet!

Profchaos40d ago

Bit rich to have to buy games you don't want because you want Sony to support the expensive headset they sold us which cost as much as the console it runs on beyond paying third partys to support it.
Seriously in terms of first party we have horizon on day 1 and a gt 7 vr mode.

They seemingly have made little effort to support it beyond paying Capcom to make re games in VR or a second party studio to make firewall which was mismanaged.

I'm a day 1 psvr2 user and the only thing I'm excited for right now is PC support.

I commented recently this bespoke VR game development model we have right now clearly doesn't work

crazyCoconuts40d ago

On the one hand I feel like there's been plenty of smaller non-AAA games to play and occupy me as a supplement to my flat screen gaming.
But I agree that Sony has done nothing to elevate this beyond the niche it's in and into the mainstream where it would be economical to create AAA games for it.

Babadook740d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Most of these games are worth owning for most people; I own all but 2 of them in fact. So I agree with kevco33. I think you're crazy if you downplay this list quite frankly. Sony can't keep funding software if people don't buy any of it, the ball is squarely in OUR court.

Sony has spent a lot on 3rd party stuff this gen like RE.

phoenixwing40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Saving up for the headset is my first hurdle. Let alone buying games I don't want lol

mudakoshaka40d ago

People downvoting you for not having enough finances...what a world we live in, haha

phoenixwing40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

@mudako
They feel affronted at the very thought that I don't plunk down 500 immediately lol I have a little over 900 games in my backlog I've been buying games instead of hardware ever since I got my PC and ps5. I just don't know if vr is really for me honestly. Every time I have a couple hundred allocated to video games it makes more sense to buy a bunch of flat games instead of vr ones

mudakoshaka40d ago

I have 9 out of these 10 games. I try to buy all the VR games I like to support the advancement of VR!

TheEroica39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I spoke with my wallet after watching the first headset get weak support. Easy pass until Sony earns my money. Feel bad for those who parted with 500 bucks, falling for the hype that Sony was actually gonna support this thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 39d ago
Neonridr40d ago

I own 7 of these titles off the list, lol.

NotoriousWhiz40d ago

I'm trying to decide if it's worth holding onto my psvr 2. I enjoy what it has currently, but it seems unlikely to get anything else. Might be better off just waiting for something with more support if that ever comes.

Profchaos40d ago

As a fellow psvr2 owner the question seemingly comes down to do you own a PC.

I think I'm all in I have a habit to hold onto my systems anyhow I still have my psvr1 to hell I still have my NES.

But while it's still worth something yeah you could sell it and if Sony turns the ship around you should be able to buy another one for less than you soldmit for I feel like we won't see any fix for the headset for the next 2 years rumours show that Sony has no current first party VR games in active development after they closed London studios

The whole psvr2 situation has left me feeling a little burnt on PlayStation as a whole to be honest. The first psvr felt experimental but it was supported far more than this superior headset

MIDGETonSTILTS1740d ago

GT7 surprised me, because I hate racing games, but i poured 100 hours into it way too quickly.

I’m looking forward to the Metro VR game this year, and I hope that WW2 dogfighter game releases eventually.

talocaca40d ago

I have most of them 😅

Waiting for a sale on Synapse and Arizona Sunshine 2.....also Metro coming this year looks great.

Show all comments (31)
80°

Omega Update - No Man's Sky

HelloGames:

Omega: Introducing Update 4.5

The OMEGA update invites everybody to embark upon a new shared interstellar expedition entirely for free, whether they already own No Man’s Sky or not. Featuring a complete overhaul of expeditions, new on-planet missions, claimable pirate freighters, and much more!

From 14:00 GMT, Thursday 15th Feb to 18:00 GMT, Monday 19th Feb, the entire Omega expedition will be open to everyone, entirely for free, even if you don’t own No Man’s Sky!

This is the best time for players old and new to come together and explore the universe.

Read Full Story >>
nomanssky.com