260°

EU Boss Comments On Microsoft-Activision Deal And PlayStation Outselling Xbox 4:1

The European Union has approved Microsoft's blockbuster $68.7 billion buyout of Activision Blizzard, and one of the key people involved in the decision, Margrethe Vestager, has now shed more light on the decision.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
Magog338d ago

If that's a reason to approve she doesn't get it. This isn't a move to dominate console sales it's a move to monopolize the streaming era a decade from now.

Chevalier338d ago

Absolutely idiotic reasoning. The ratios in sales were earned by Playstation. 10 years is not enough to necessarily launch real competition though. Case in point Xbox has had over 20 years on the market? Have they become competitent or competitive in that time?! NOPE.

Sitdown338d ago

I'm pretty sure they became competitive with the 360, and then hit a big misstep with the One. So, it would be a YES; it's enough time with competent leadership.

BehindTheRows338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

@Sitdown

They got lucky during the 360 years that Sony fumbled, giving them an opening. They have yet to prove they can go toe-to-toe with PlayStation when it's steamrollin' ahead (PS2/4/5).

sagapo338d ago

@Behind: it was both imo. Sony took a risk with Cell but MS had a great exclusive game line up as well.

In the end, the X360/PS3 era remains the best era for me gamewise. Both were awesome.

343_Guilty_Spark338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

Sony got Gaikai and Onlive and did what what with them?

Nothing.

How Sony bought, and squandered, the future of gaming
PlayStation Now had the keys to the cloud gaming kingdom, but Sony barely stuck a toe in the door

https://www.theverge.com/20...

I can say the same about MS squandering its own internal talent and not properly managing them for over the decade but I can’t blame MSFT for investing in their core strength.

Mobile streaming is an Uber-niche market even smaller than VR. And no ABK never had any major plans to release all its games on a streaming platform.

Chevalier338d ago

"How Sony bought, and squandered, the future of gaming
PlayStation Now had the keys to the cloud gaming kingdom, but Sony barely stuck a toe in the door"

Even Google worth 6-7 times Sony couldn't get streaming to work. Whereas Sony working to their strengths broke back to back industry sales records, game sales record with 1.5 billion games sold, best all times quarterly console sales and are on track to break the industry record again for like a 3rd time. So yeah I think they'll survive.

Want to talk about squandered? Xbox 20+ years and still selling like trash.

Extermin8or3_338d ago

Not trying thry used the tech to setup ps now and to improve remote play considerably. Unfortunately cloud infastructure pvroved too coatly for anyone but the largest tech companies

343_Guilty_Spark338d ago

@Chevalier

They gave up on Stadia. Barely any advertising, no high profile games, nothing.

And what you’re basically saying is no one can possibly hope to establish a cloud platform. Which is a lie.

Amazon has stuck with Luna.
Nvidia has stuck with GeForce
Microsoft has stuck with XCloud

Even tiny Boosteroid is sticking with Cloud.

Interesting that Nvidia did. Amazon did.

derek338d ago

@343, cloud gaming may be a nascent market but cloud infrastructure is dominated by only a hand full of competitors including Microsoft. That's the concern that Microsoft uses it cloud infrastructure, monopoly in computer operating systems and a potential stranglehold on content to kill off any chance for a competitor to establish themselves in a future cloud gaming market. Remember good guy Phil bragged about Nintendo/ Sony being "out of position " when comes to the future of gaming because of this. Don't take issue with the CMA taking good guy Phil and big mouth Microsoft executives at their word.

fr0sty338d ago

Cloud gaming isn't quite ready for prime time... still too much input lag. It's a cool concept, but I wouldn't ever play a fighter, or FPS, or anything else that requires split second decision making.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 338d ago
rlow1338d ago

Lol, probably you should have offered your services to the EU. Set them straight by showing them the errors of their ways.

-Foxtrot338d ago

Well that's exactly what they aren't getting

They are looking at what's happening now, not what is possible or could potentially happen in the future.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 338d ago
MrDead338d ago

"She went on to say that the EU had concerns that Microsoft might make Activision Blizzard games exclusive to its own cloud gaming service. However, Vestager said Microsoft's 10-year deals with other cloud streaming providers outside of Microsoft's helped the EU get on board and approve the deal."

I think I know what got the EU on board:

Reuters
"The tech lobbying focuses on two key pieces of legislation. The Digital Markets' Act lists do's and don'ts for tech giants, and the Digital Services Act requires companies to do more to police content on their platforms.

The study warned about the industry's access to the European Commission, with lobbyists involved in three-quarters of the 270 meetings Commission officials had on the two draft laws.

It also cited the role played by trade and business associations, think tanks and even political parties in promoting the tech industry's narrative."

MS lobbied to neuter the The Digital Markets Act.

338d ago Replies(2)
gold_drake338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

shes right that sony has a bigger foot in the gaming console world, HOWEVER, MS has had every chance to turn it around, and didnt.

this alone would not suffice to buy out one of the biggest publishers in the world, since MS already is a 2 TRILLION dollar company

Chevalier338d ago

Exactly 💯. Shouldn't reward incompetence which is exactly what would happen if this sales goes through. The whole boohoo Playstation and Nintendo have far better exclusives entitles us to buy a huge publisher to even the odds is a sham.

It's like they are allowed to assume these great franchises weren't built up and just fell in their lap. No they actually had to work for that MS/Xbox so GTFO with this bullshit excuses.

thornintheside338d ago

I think the EU would look at what things look like now, not how good/poorly you did in the past

gold_drake338d ago

that is literally not the point.

jznrpg338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

MS fault for ditching consoles for PC day 1 and not making games good enough to get console sales

Show all comments (34)
120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218310h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies126h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC9h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21838h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic8h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix5h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing699h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

290°

Steam’s Refund Policy Change Won’t Affect You Unless You’re A Lowlife

Steam is changing its refund policy, but you probably won’t be affected

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
thorstein2d ago

Should have happened a long time ago. People wanting refunds after 50 hours in game.

fsfsxii2d ago

Pc gamers will take this as an excuse to pirate things

KyRo2d ago

I'm not sure why you're getting disgrees. Whilst not all PC gamers are petty, an awful lot of them are lol

Crows902d ago

Entirely untrue. Not any more petty than console gamers. The only large difference is console gamers don't have much of a choice.

Michiel19892d ago

Not sure why you're getting agrees. an awful lot of console gamers are overemotional twinks ready to go to war over a plastic box, I'll take being a pc gamer then.

Speaking about overgeneralizing much.

Nooderus1d 23h ago

"X" type of gamer conversations are cringe

qalpha2d ago

Daily reminder that 'TheGamer' is a corporate-generated, anti-gamer, anti-consumer, clickbait web site. They are mostly A.I. generated articles that villainize gamers. They provide nothing positive and actively try to provoke and divide the community through extreme view points and politics. Do not give them any clicks.

Inverno2d ago

Only scumbags? As if people don't play their games on console put in the most amount of hours and return it to GameStop and trade it in for another game. But also how many people are actually do this? And what games have been allowed to be refunded?

DustMan2d ago

You can refund any game you've purchased as long as it hasn't been longer than two weeks, and you've played less than 2 hours. I wish they would change it to 3 hours because some RPG's have so much exposition that you may only get an hour total of complete gameplay. That's my only knock on it. I've refunded plenty of stuff I was just curious to try. I typically stay away from Early Access titles which are the only ones affected by this policy change.

Inverno2d ago

Apparently early access doesn't count, only complete games with a play early preorder bonus.

Gaming4Life19812d ago

I definitely know if I want a refund in 2 hours.

SegaSaturn6692d ago

I never liked refunding anything. Even if a film is bad, i dont want my money back. Sometimes things just aren't for me, and it's not the creator's fault necessarily.

Gaming4Life19812d ago

I feel you and i have never walked out on a bad movie cause I payed my money. I also don't refund games cause I'm a gamer and I know what to buy lol. I think having a digital refund is great.

Show all comments (15)
110°

Outriders Dev's Next Game Has Been Canceled After Publishing Agreement With Take-Two Fell Through

Outriders developer People Can Fly's next game has been canceled after its publishing agreement with Take-Two Interactive fell through.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto4d ago

"the capital group of PCF Group S.A."

If you're getting funding from a group that needs two different ways of Acronyming itself, things will not go the way you want them to.

banger884d ago

If it was more online-only crap then good riddance.

jjb19813d ago

Outriders was crap. They slapped that game together and threw in a loot system to get players' attention. This game was absolutely jank and the always online nonsense made it stutter like crazy. People Can't Optimize.

thorstein3d ago

I liked Outriders but I could see where the artistic vision was compromised. The way the industry is now, it wouldn't surprise me that upper management would scrap something that didn't pull in money via gaas, mts, or other means.