180°

Horizon Online Co-Op Game Nearly Confirmed by Job Openings

Several job openings listed on Guerrilla's website essentially confirm the existence of a Horizon Online cooperative multiplayer game.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
RaidenBlack500d ago

The Horizon series is expanding, confirms Guerrilla, with multiple titles in development, including:

-New "solo adventures" with Aloy
-An online game featuring a new cast of characters and "unique stylized look"
-New "external project"

-Foxtrot500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

While it's great it's getting love I just don't want a repeat of Killzone where it was nothing BUT Killzone and they exhausted the franchise.

Hopefully the fact they have a new external project means they have a new IP up their sleeves.

Last thing I'd want in Horizon 3 is "Oh story plot point X, Y and a little bit of Z was explained in the multiplayer spin off game and also the VR game"

gangsta_red500d ago

I remember posting a while back that an MP, co-op feature would be extremely fun for this game.

jznrpg500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

I could get into that . I figure they would make a GAAS game possibly but co-op Monster Hunter ish would be great . Not really into Games as a service but if it has Sony quality I may give them a try , but i will always be a single player gamer mainly . I will play an MMO when my kids get older as I did love Everquest , FF11/14 but just don’t have the time .

shinoff2183500d ago

Not fun at all multilayer games eh

just_looken500d ago

Today its all about monster hunter but i remember and enjoyed the planetside series.

Planet side 2 coop inside the horizon universe you make your own character different tribes have different base ability buffs.

gangsta_red500d ago

For sure, I believe in my earlier post I did mention having different tribes and performing raids and such. The potential for gameplay options this universe is pretty big.

shinoff2183500d ago

I loved horizon. Thought just about everything about it was dope dope dope. Multi-player horizon. Pass. Multi-player just doesn't do it for me. Shame resources will be used.

Jin_Sakai500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

Well I’m interested so glad resources will go towards co-op.

CS7500d ago (Edited 500d ago )

I'm a simple man. I see Sony doing multiplayer games with existing single player IP's, I dislike.

I hope I'm wrong but it reeks of cash grab imo.

I highly doubt the Horizon multiplayer would exist due to an exuberance of creativity.

This is likely a "spreadsheet" game which is never good.

For multiplayer bring back SOCOM, Twisted Metal and Warhawk

MadLad500d ago

Sony announced they're looking into a bunch of GaaS titles with the purchase of Bungie.

It's going to be interesting.

Outside_ofthe_Box500d ago

Well, Guerilla have made multiplayer before with Killzone so this isn't exactly uncharted territory for them, although KZ2 was their only good one. Either way I wouldn't consider it a spreadsheet game or cash grab given Guerrilla's history with MP.

Show all comments (19)
60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever1h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218310h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies127h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC10h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21839h ago(Edited 9h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic8h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix6h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing699h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

120°

Baldur's Gate 4 Has a Huge Uphill Battle Without Larian

With confirmation that Larian Studios will not develop another Baldur's Gate game, the fourth entry has a major challenge on its hands.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
kythlyn12h ago

Larian had big shoes to fill themselves. Hopefully another studio can pull off the same miracle, but uphill battle is an understatement at this point. It feels impossible that BG3 even exists and accomplishes what it does.

franwex11h ago

I doubt anyone will attempt a Baldur’s Gate 4 for minimum a decade. It took about 20 years to get a third one for a a reason.

shinoff21839h ago

I'd just copy every single thing larian did obviously with different story and characters. Sometimes innovation isn't needed at that particular time.

RiseNShine1h ago

i remember in an interview that it was Larian asking constantly that they wanted to develop Baldurs Gate 3, there has to be some really ugly business going behind the scenes for them to leave in such a way, no DLC no sequel nothing, either they are getting very low return after the huge success, or some of the business practices they have seen are truly terrible.