510°

Sony was Activision Blizzard’s largest customer by revenue in 2020, with Microsoft ranking fourth

When it comes to game sales, Sony remained one of the biggest customers of Activision Blizzard for years. Microsoft, however, has been trailing behind not only PlayStation, but Google and Apple as well.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
FallenAngel1984596d ago

Hence why their games will remain multiplat

Sonyslave3596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

Lol no make cod exclusive and watch the sheep flock to xbox ecosystem. It a reason why sony fear Xbox logo plaster all over Cod and no more best on playstation marketing.

Jin_Sakai596d ago

“Lol no make cod exclusive and watch the sheep flock to xbox ecosystem.“

I mean you’re right.

Lifexline596d ago

This right here it’s why Sony is crying Bloody Mary with this deal. They admit it themselves. A bunch of hypocrites. When companies buy studios no matter how small or big they are and exclude them from a group of people but when it happens to them they want whine. Not surprised about Google and Apple call of duty mobile is really huge right now.

Elda596d ago

Most of PS fanbase/loyalists will play COD on pc.

tay8701596d ago

dude playststion fans arent going to switch to xbox enmasse to play COD. MS thinks that is what will happen, but its not going to. playstation gamers are some of the most loyal customers out there. they will just find something else to play. between all the 1st party gaas games, the partnerships with deviation games and firewalk studios along with bungie there certainly wont be any shortages of multiplayer games available. going to take them a long time to recoup the 80 billion spent on this aquistition. xbox gamers dont buy games and it will be even worse once its free.

ED-E596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

MS cares more about Gamepass than Xbox tbh. Sony on the long run will too with their Plus stuff (thus their PC push). But at least currently you still have games exclusive to the console which are not on the PC, which, correct me if I'm wrong, is a concept not existing anymore on Xbox for a while now.

But once there will be a hard and software standard for TVs in case for gaming, Sony/MS will only sell premium controllers and headsets for their services. Or you be the weird kid who uses the controller which came with the TV.

Somehow I know I will miss those times then when there is no physical box anymore. But not the rivalry though, these were always stupid, today as it was 30 years ago when I first witnessed it and unfortunately was part of it.

MajorLazer596d ago

This is delusional at best. One or a handful of games don't define Playstation, unlike Xbox.

S2Killinit596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

MS paid more money for the deal than they’ve made in their entire time in gaming industry. Thats a major defeat by any standard.

MS was behind Sony by so much that they had to cannabalize the industry, and they are still a smaller gaming company that Playstation which should tell you how badly they have managed so far.(facts not opnion)

As to COD, it will go exclusive, and it will be a major disservice to gamers, and it will be the beginning of COD suffering the fate of Halo. Soon a multiplatform game will replace COD as the new COD for the masses.

MontyeKristo595d ago

Tay8701 - I think you are a fool, if you believe that. There will be numerous amounts of people who will switch to the Xbox to play Cod. No doubt about it. Especially if the games pick up in quality, due to MS backing. Online players typically want to play games with their friends - loyalty, it's not a thing to some plastic game box.

outsider1624595d ago

Lmao. Not gonna happen dude. It'll take more than CoD to actually jump ship to another console. And based on the headline...it doesn't make sense does it. If Sony is Activision's biggest revenue...how in the world making it exclusive to xbox is gonna add that revenue..lol.

CPTN MITCHELL595d ago

If you think I'm switching to Xbox because of cod you're stupid, not even gameass is enough for me to switch

ironmonkey595d ago

Nope in your dreams, try harder please.

Bathyj595d ago

Do you realise what a child you sound like?

Brazz595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

Not sure about this "massive Xbox migration"... You see, the coin have 2 sides. Yeah, Xbox can have massive gains with massive migration of players, but on the other hand... Playstation users can Just quit CoD, they can find another option for their FPS needs, just "quit CoD"!
Making CoD exclusive can either be a massive Win or a massive loss to xbox...

darthv72595d ago

I think many are missing the take away here. Sony can still be the biggest customer... MS's biggest customer that is. All they need to do to keep getting CoD is pay up to MS like they were doing with Activision. Why is that so hard for people to understand? Sony already has working relationship with Ms over the use of Azure servers for their Now+ service. Making a deal for more CoD is not that far out of possibility.

sinspirit595d ago

@darthv72

They were paying for promotional material. Not to get the game on their platform. That costs more money and is basically not worth it in a business sense unless you are struggling to release games. It's also kind of ridiculous to think they should give in to a company buying out so many major properties just to have access to properties they already had on their system. How are people really going to try and casually say they just need to pay MS rather than point out the obvious of how backwards it is to do so. If they end up having a good shooter in the works like has been suggested for years then this may even work out very well to give focus to that and not give in to bigger company tactics.

thorstein595d ago

The number one customer by revenue disappears and so will COD.
Sony has 1st party MP FPS that are amazing. Cross play with PC will be fine.
EA is salivating at this and already at work on a slew of new Battlefield titles. They are under new leadership, created new studios. Sure, chirp on 2042. It was a terrible launch and now it is playable but still lacking.

Soldierone595d ago

Or just not play at all. I have no intention of buying a new console just to play COD, ill find something else to waste time on.

darthv72595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

@sin... the game is still the same. Only the owner changed. MS wont have to pay activision for any specialized treatment because they own the series. sony can still pay like they did. None of that changes so why are you conflating things? MS said they will continue to release games up to and past the original contractual time frame. And for some reason Sony is not happy about basically getting another 3 years for free. Like i said, if sony paid Activision for any sort of special treatment, they can continue to do so to MS now.

Necr0philiac595d ago

I had a lot of my Xbox 360 friends jump to playstation last Gen because of Call of Duty. And yes that was the only game they ever played

sinspirit595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

@darthv72

What did I just say in response to your own words? They pay for something else entirely for CoD. Something also much cheaper than advertisements or content. You said they can just continue paying like they already have. It's not the same because it's payment for something else entirely, and it's not going to be comparable in how much would be paid for a deal like that.

MS also said they don't agree with exclusives before. And, then they bought a bunch of multiplatform devs and locked in their games to their console aside from contractual obligations. CoD is also a contractual obligation that they suddenly decide to extend. Why? Suddenly they are more generous with CoD than they would be for Bethesda games.

Do you realize that Sony didn't come in asking for specifically three years more? They didn't come up with the number. They obviously don't ever want the game to go. XBox are the ones that offered only three additional years. The talks of them trying to look better so that regulations don't prevent acquisitions makes a lot of sense since CoD, the most recognized multiplatform game to the general public alongside Minecraft, is the one being shown off to not be exclusive for as long.

It's so obvious that users are ignoring the reality of this behavior and not telling us how it is just because of a preference. Much lesser evil things done by competitors get harped on much worse than this actual act of bad business that affects all of us directly.

If you're trying to argue they just have to negotiate for more years for free, then obviously Sony will already be doing that. This is about how much would it cost them when they no longer offer it for free. Which, again is easily relatable to how big this case is for regulators to allow the acquisition.

Army_of_Darkness595d ago

If COD goes exclusive, sales and player count will drop.

Godmars290595d ago

@Lifexline:
Sony admits what? That Activision was most popular, sold the most, on their platforms despite during the 360 era COD along with Halo defined that console?

This is odd all around. Unless Overwatch took off on the PS3/4, became Activision's lead product, while COD declined.

If anything this speaks more of system momentum, of which the PS4 defiantly overtook the XB1.

+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
Crows90596d ago

Hence why they shouldn't be bought out by a competitor who only gains to keep them off other platforms and to annoy the largest base of players who had been enjoying the games on PlayStation.

JayRyu595d ago

Go tell that to Sony! Please ask them why they are paying for 2 years of exclusivity on Forespoken or why Final Fantasy 7 Remake has nor been released on any "other platforms" while you're at it? Thanks

-Foxtrot595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

@JayRyu

No offence but if your competition just bought 2 MASSIVE publishers then no wonder they have done that...

It's a reaction

Microsoft set the ball rolling

HardKnockKid24595d ago

@foxtrot the first publisher purchase happened at the beginning of this gen, how do you explain the Sony exclusivity deals from the whole PS4 gen. FF7 remake Ring a bell?

Sony set the ball rolling

DarkZane595d ago

@JayRyu and @HardKnockKid24

I am almost certain that even if Sony had never paid for an exclusive deal, it still wouldn't release on Xbox. Xbox doesn't make SE much money at all with japanese games.

Fluke_Skywalker595d ago

@JayRyu Sony has always had semi exclusive deals with Squenix, and Forespoken has no history or pre-existing fan base (and could even possibly be shite anyway) so that's not the same as taking a huge multiplat game with pre-existing fans on other platforms and making it exclusive.

Crows90595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

@jay
I would love to but I'm not in any position to do any kind of that communication. I personally hate timed exclusives but Sony has a history of actually funding these projects and making them happen versus what's going on with Microsoft. If PlayStation or Microsoft decide to fund the project to create a new time splitters or a remake of time splitters I'm perfectly on board and happy about that. And if that publisher decides that they are making an exclusive to their platform because they're paying for the whole project then that's fine. But to go and start buying existing IP that I've been enjoyed by the majority of people on PlayStation is just messed up. And then going ahead and making those titles exclusive currently or down the line is even worse. It's no longer timed bullcrap it's real bullcrap.

I'm not sure why you're so bent about forspoken. That game looks like crap.

HardKnockKid24595d ago

@ DarkZane, the PS and Xbox architectures are so similar it is almost effortless to port between the two platforms. Are you telling me that if I could effortlessly make an extra few million dollars it wouldn’t be worth it to port? They were most certainly paid

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
WiiU-Dude596d ago

I wouldn't count on that. Microsoft had more money than Sony and Nintendo combined several times over. If Microsoft wanted to see how things shakedown in making COD Xbox exclusive and not be overly concerned with the money lost in the short term ..it's Microsoft.

MadLad595d ago

Keep hearing that.
Keep being shown more and more information that indicates that statement won't be accurate not too long down the road.

neutralgamer1992595d ago

Life

That's so stupid that you will compare a studio being bought for $250 million (insomniac) to Microsoft buying Activision for almost $70 billion

And maybe you haven't noticed but Sony has started to put games on PC

DarkZane595d ago

Insomniac was making games exclusively for playstation 90% of the time. It was definitely not the same thing, since they've bought a studio that were already making games solely for them anyway.

Microsoft just bought 2 publishers, which isn't the same thing. Sony only reacted with Bungie after Microsoft did that.

Sony bought studios before, but most, if not all of them were making games for them exclusively already, so I say that it's okay.

Also, you know the rumor about Sony buying Square-Enix that keeps popping around? It's probably happening at some point. Where there is smoke, there is usually fire.

neutralgamer1992595d ago

Dark

Exactly but I don't like this mindset of some Xbox fanboys. I own a XSX and I don't like these practices

People don't realize these acquisitions mean we will have to buy multiple consoles now just to game. Buying studios is fine but buying publishers should be off limit. Phil Spencer is also a hypocrite because he said he wants more gamers to be able to play yet starfield is exclusive

If Sony buys square and or Capcom and make those games exclusives that means someone like me has no choice but to invest in PS5

But we can't all unite as gamers because we are so ready to defend these billion dollar companies

itsmebryan595d ago

Microsoft would love to take all PS owners money. Why wouldn't they?

ALMGNOON595d ago

should remain multiplat but will probably not be the case.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
Orchard596d ago

Interesting that iOS and Android are bigger than PS and Xbox, I would've expected console Warzone to be bigger.

Either way, it sounds like MS are in for a strong, stable & varied income stream w/ their Activision purchase.

Between COD and Minecraft, they may even be the highest earning publisher on PlayStation which is funny.

glennhkboy596d ago

Mobile gaming (iOS + Android) is the biggest gaming platform outside of US market.

Redemption-64596d ago

Nope, Activision + Bethesda + Xbox combined all make less than Playstation

GamerRN595d ago

Not sure where you get that info from, but you are very wrong. Microsoft gaming division has made more profit despite lower market share than PlayStation.

ChasterMies595d ago

It will all collapse into Xbox and for the short term, Microsoft’s gaming revenue is negative as they just spent $80B.

Redemption-64595d ago

@GamerRN

Where are you getting your information from. MS doesn't report of Xbox profits, seriously when did they do that. They just had their biggest year with Xbox at $16B, Playstation is currently sitting at $24B and that is with them unable to meet demand, if am not mistaken and you somehow think 16>24. In their acquisition post, MS was quick to point out, they will be in 3rd place, revenue wise behind Tencent and Sony.

DarkZane595d ago

@GamerRN

That would be wrong. In 2018, Sony made more money from PSN alone (yes, just PSN), then the entirety of Microsoft and Nintendo's entire gaming divisions combined. I am almost certain that this pretty much hasn't changed in 4 years.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 595d ago
darkrider596d ago

Maybe, maybe not. This could also mean the declined of the Cod franchise....

Crows90596d ago

Honestly that wouldnt be so bad.

Gamingsince1981596d ago

I dont think COD would die but it will lose a lot of players I imagine, some will just play on pc , a few may move to xbox but not that many.

MajorLazer595d ago

MW2 will be the last hurrah.

1Victor595d ago

Also remember that Sony owns the professional tournaments they ban CoD and it’s popularity will severely drop down.
Well halo didn’t kill CoD, KillZone didn’t kill CoD

It looks like Microsoft will be the one to kill CoD by making it exclusive to Xbox and PC 🤦🏿

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 595d ago
S2Killinit596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

MS + Activision and the rest of their studios are a smaller gaming division than Sony’s studios. So no, they will not be the highest earning publisher on Playstation.

Also, this was before Sony purchased Bungie, and the other studios they bought after that.

Orchard595d ago

Not sure that is an accurate statement, Minecraft + COD + Warzone makes more than 1st party Sony titles do each year.

But if it were true, then no reason the purchase shouldn't be allowed to proceed - isn't anti-competitive at all.

FGHFGHFGH595d ago

The title of this article says SONY was Activision's largest customer. "330°
Sony was Activision Blizzard’s largest customer by revenue in 2020" So IOS and Android are bigger than xbox.

Orchard595d ago

And if you had actually read the article, it says in 2021, iOS and Android overtook PS.

ChasterMies595d ago

Apple makes more $ from gaming than the big three combined.

595d ago
595d ago
595d ago
HannibalLecter595d ago

Orchard do you ever stop hanging from that MS teet? Seriously wondering cause everytime you post I can picture you just swinging from it.
Just looking at your votes, it's like everyone else except a handful of people feel the same way. Like people just roll their eyes as soon as your name pops up and hit that down vote without even reading your regurgitated MS teet milk.

595d ago
595d ago
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 595d ago
Knushwood Butt596d ago

That's weird what with Xbox owners buying so many games.

Orchard596d ago

You do realize the majority of the revenue on both platforms is from the free to play Warzone and has nothing to do with game sales, right?

The iOS and Android games (which outperform PS and Xbox) are also free to play.

crazyCoconuts595d ago

"sales" from an accounting perspective are probably including all the in-game purchases from that channel, so it's still probably relevant

595d ago
aaronaton596d ago

Two things here, it just shows how far Xbox has fallen to lose ground to PlayStation over Call of Duty (which was one of the main reasons the 360 did so well early on)
secondly, I'm tired of PlayStation relying on 3rd party for online experiences, they need to get back to 1st party, with the likes of SOCOM, Warhawk, Killzone, Resistance etc etc
There is this strange paradox that somehow Playstation thinks these games aren't popular, when they don't even exist in the market!

596d ago Replies(2)
tay8701596d ago

i generally dont like multiplayer games but i would LOVE for them to revive resistance and killzone series. they are sitting on a goldmine of multiplayer IPs resistance, killzone, socom, warhawk and mag.

ApocalypseShadow596d ago (Edited 596d ago )

Let's be real. Under the guise of "protecting the console game industry from companies outside it," with no actual proof that those companies were interested in buying, that those companies wouldn't then still make multiplatform games because there's money to be made on all platforms...

Microsoft goes and buys multiplatform PUBLISHERS, that made more money on PlayStation to either, make money off of Sony's run away sales. (Because we have seen every NPD where 3rd parties made more on PlayStation.) Or, take those franchises away from Sony because they're rich enough to monopolize the industry. Same company that joined in Sony's lawsuit with Immersion to make a profit off of the lawsuit. (You never seen Sony or Nintendo join in to make money off of a Microsoft lawsuit. But you'll hear the whataboutism anyway.)

It's not like they could compete with Sony on high quality games when they were worth 1 TRILLION. They still aren't competing at equal levels being worth 2 TRILLION with no releases for 2022. Or spending a half a billion on their biggest franchise that ended up unfinished and full of mtx. Had to give away the multiplayer because the base has diminished from such low quality releases of the franchise.

Microsoft knows that they couldn't compete. So they pulled out the checkbook to cut into sales. Then, give away those games in a cheap service grooming gamers on the idea that buying games is expensive, waiting to buy if you can't afford it is so 90s, or tangible, physical ownership. You've seen the "is it on game pass?" I'll wait until it's on game pass or $10." You've seen it. You've seen how they used MLB against Sony with buyers on sinus system compared to the "It's free/not free on game pass." No "I can't wait to BUY that game. Nope. Groomed and influenced towards subscriptions. Two actually. On top of each other. Even cloud play isn't free. It's part of the service. Not free like remote play. But hey.

Yup. Microsoft. Same monopolistic company under the guise of pro consumer. Ain't nothing changed. But the fans would say it's great for the industry for one player to buy it all up.

alb1899596d ago

But SONY pays for games and feature not to be on XBOX..... what's the difference?
When they did that they forgot the power of MS as a company.

FlavorLav01595d ago (Edited 595d ago )

Scouting the industry, supporting great projects early on, and getting timed exclusivity in exchange for financial support and aid is a lot different then buying the industry’s biggest PUBLISHERS(not just single development teams), then giving their products away for practically pennies on the dollar, conditioning Xbox fans not to pay for games at all. MS is subsidizing the industry into a cheap service, all about accessibility over quality. And still ZERO focus on getting out good AAA 1st party published games. They had major teams even before all the acquisitions, where are those games? If the drip feeding continues I really hope this grand experiment of focus on everything but publishing games blows up fantastically in MS’ face.

crazyCoconuts595d ago

The difference is SCALE. MS has inked the biggest acquisition in gaming history BY FAR with Activision, after completing the 3rd largest acquisition with Bethesda a short while earlier. These are MASSIVE buys aimed at crushing the competition. This is Microsoft, nothing new.

Petebloodyonion595d ago ShowReplies(1)
Show all comments (119)
110°

Outriders Dev's Next Game Has Been Canceled After Publishing Agreement With Take-Two Fell Through

Outriders developer People Can Fly's next game has been canceled after its publishing agreement with Take-Two Interactive fell through.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto1d 18h ago

"the capital group of PCF Group S.A."

If you're getting funding from a group that needs two different ways of Acronyming itself, things will not go the way you want them to.

banger881d 12h ago

If it was more online-only crap then good riddance.

jjb198123h ago

Outriders was crap. They slapped that game together and threw in a loot system to get players' attention. This game was absolutely jank and the always online nonsense made it stutter like crazy. People Can't Optimize.

thorstein21h ago

I liked Outriders but I could see where the artistic vision was compromised. The way the industry is now, it wouldn't surprise me that upper management would scrap something that didn't pull in money via gaas, mts, or other means.

290°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv721d 16h ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle1d 3h ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18811d ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio23h ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning7719h ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga1d 2h ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv7212h ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

neutralgamer19927h ago

Darth

30% physical sales: yet Phil and xbox division are in a rush go give up on that 30%. they don't have any right to give up any piece of the pie since the control such a little of the pie to begin with

also, the market is clearly speaking that the model Xbox is pushing isn't working right now the keyword being right now. you are right about freedom to play anywhere so i hope they put their games on steam

shinoff21831d 1h ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga1d ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan20h ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit13h ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus2319h ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv7219h ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

Chevalier7h ago

@Darth

You should stop parroting metrics like an idiot without context.

"Xbox content and services revenue grew 62% in Q3 from a year earlier, “driven by 61 points of net impact” from the purchase of the third-party video game giant, Microsoft said."

61 of the 62% was from their merger so net increase is ONLY 1%

https://www.mesaonline.org/...

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 7h ago
purple1011d 5h ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos1d 4h ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-18h ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac1d 4h ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1011d 3h ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic1d 1h ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead18h ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18h ago
Show all comments (45)
90°

An Update on This Year’s BlizzCon and Blizzard’s 2024 Live Events

Blizzard writes: "After careful consideration over the last year, we at Blizzard have made the decision not to hold BlizzCon in 2024. This decision was not made lightly as BlizzCon remains a very special event for all of us, and we know many of you look forward to it. While we’re approaching this year differently and as we have explored different event formats in the past, rest assured that we are just as excited as ever to bring BlizzCon back in future years."

Read Full Story >>
blizzcon.com
PRIMORDUS1d 13h ago

How about you not hold Blizzcon anymore period. You fucking POS company. I really hope Blizzard would just die.