780°

PS5 And Xbox Series X SSD Difference Is a Matter of “Diminishing Returns,” Says Scorn Dev

The game’s director Ljubomir Peklar talks to GamingBolt about the pros and cons of next-gen SSDs.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721468d ago

This story reminds me of the SSD showdown that Linus did on his YT channel... https://youtu.be/4DKLA7w9ee...

RpgSama1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

Are these developers the only guys talking about the Series X? I mean every other day there's an article about Scorn and the Xbox.

It's literally only them.

KTF261467d ago

gamingbolt
one interview and 100 articles about it

darthv721467d ago

It's GB... they like to milk a source dry, and then squeeze out a little bit more for good measure.

scofios1467d ago

Rpgsama

You beat me to it

bouzebbal1467d ago

Gamingbolt and dualshockers.. Both a joke when it comes to milking news.

fr0sty1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

GB is far worse, the worst in the industry, about that. After they run out of info from this interview, they'll fall back on the old "have a no-name dev state the obvious" garbage... "Xbox Series X CPU increase over Xbox One will enable more realism in games: Dev" ... "SSD's in next gen consoles will reduce load times: Dev"

neutralgamer19921467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

RPG

Better get used to it because over the next 7 to 10 days Microsoft will really strong on this PR behind the Xbox series X

Expect to hear from many Microsoft executives on daily basis especially Phil Spencer. Over the last two to three weeks anytime sony has something to talk about or show the very same Microsoft releases bunch of articles in PR (not saying it's a good thing or a bad thing just stating what I think is going on)

morganfell1467d ago

"Gamingbolt and dualshockers.. Both a joke when it comes to milking news."

There is a third site doing it as well.

1467d ago
S2Killinit1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

With everything this dev has said about xbox I doubt it was all in the same interview. Can you imagine how biased that would look.

TheHan1467d ago

Similar to Naughty Dog.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1467d ago
RazzerRedux1467d ago

yeah.....but that is on PC that don't have the hardware for compression and APIs that the new consoles will have. I thought the same thing when consoles started talking about SSD because I researched SSD a while back and found the bottlenecks in PC negated much of the difference between standards.

We don't really know what it is going to mean for console games beyond what Sony and Microsoft are saying and they are both hyping their SSDs up a lot.

This scorn guy is backing up the console and the company who partnered with him so I am not putting a lot into his opinion. Just as many rightfully questioned Tim Sweeney's objectivity in what appeared to be a paid sponsorship of PS5 with his UE5 reveal.

ProjectVulcan1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

PC will have the DirectStorage API by the time Series X launches. It is designed to give low level access to NVMe drives and reduce decompression down from a multicore operation to a small percentage of a single CPU core.

RazzerRedux1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

@ProjectVulcan

Yep! Love that all this new tech will find its way to my PC. Linus will have to revisit this topic when PC games start taking advantage of the new APIs.

Jin_Sakai1467d ago

The developer making an Xbox exclusives game claims the SSD difference is a matter of diminishing returns? Yea ok.

I’ll wait and see what Sony’s 1st party teams are able to do with super fast SSD at their disposal.

battlegrog1467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

Sx loads pretty much instantly. The ps5 ssd is going to load a split second faster. I guarentee you both systems will be able todo the same thing and we wont see a revolutionary difference. And guess what that is ok. Im still buying a ps5 and the ps5 marketing can bullshit you all they want. The ps5 controller is nothing new either but they want you to think it is. Best shape design a ps controller has been yes but its nit a revolutionary difference and that is ok. People need to stop this nonsense.

They both will be very similar and the sooner people get they're shit together the better the industry will be. Nitpicking nonsense

Jin_Sakai1467d ago Show
Tacoboto1467d ago

@Jin It remains to be seen what that twice-as-quick means.

For third-party games, does that mean a 2 second load versus a 4-5 second one, instead of a 45 second current-gen one? We know they won't go to the effort of PS5-exclusive assets.

For first-party games, will it be like UE5's demo where devs will make the choice of a higher-asset 30fps mode and high-performance 60fps mode?

Or will it evenly balance out with Series X's 10GB-worth of faster RAM and higher CU count?

neutralgamer19921467d ago

Jin

We all know Sony will actually show games which are truly next generation and are only possible on next generation. This whole generation Sony has supported PlayStation 4 really well and they are ready to move on but PS4 will still get a lot of support from third parties for the next few years

Microsoft on the other hand has gone soft this generation and now when it's time to move on for some reason they want to stay behind to show support for older consoles. There is no way a game that has to run on a system with SSD and 12 teraflops can also be made to one on a system that is one teraflop that is the exact definition of holding back the developers

I guess more power to them they're giving Sony a huge advantage out of the gate. you could already play Xbox games on PC and on top of that their next generation machine isn't even required to play their games

Once again more power to them we will see once both consoles launch which company made the right call

mandingo1467d ago

It’s not about what first party does it’s about what third party does because that’s 90 percent of games. The record will show not a huge difference. Watch.

1467d ago
DOMination-1467d ago

The Xbox One X is twice as powerful as the base model PS4 but the games don't look twice as good and if anything they are twice as bad as anything Sony have published.

SSD is not new technology. Many on here will have m.2 drives in their computer or Laptop. I have a Samsung EVO 970 myself which is probably comparable to what will be in the XSX. Guess what? There is still loading. I just booted up Premiere Pro and it still took 20 seconds.

Rationally thinking, it depends on how optimised this is. If the XSX is only going to take a few seconds to load anyway, there isn't going to be much of an advantage. However, if we are talking about PS5 taking ten seconds and XSX taking 20 seconds, suddenly that becomes more important. Very interested to see it all in action across both platforms.

Imortus_san1467d ago

Ps5 will give you the worst experience in 99% of the games a bit faster.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1467d ago
Games1st1467d ago

That’s for pc that has many bottle necks between ssd and real time performance.

gravedigger1467d ago

Says the guy who works only for Xbox/PC platform and doesn't have a PS5 devkit. Basically a MS PR

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1467d ago
Malice-Flare1468d ago

seeing as your game has been in development before PCIe M.2 drives became standard on PCs, i'd blame your game design method more than the new tech for that diminishing returns...

Smclaren19851467d ago

Thank you my friend someone who is actually talking sense there litterally the only team that’s made such an idiotic statement there’s at least 10 other developers all raving about the diff a ssd will make and it’s more to do with IO throughput plus the vrtual memory on tap too so it’s not just standard ssd like it would be if you put one into you console today

CaptainObvious8781467d ago

I'd also be surprised if they had a ps5 dev kit, so how would they even know?

Aenea1467d ago

And I am sitting here wondering how the Scorn devs think about diminishing returns with only a 15-20% GPU power difference. Hmmmm

xer01467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

This dude hasn't even shown any game play... Apart from the thought provoking art direction, off the back of HR Geiger and Moebius - this game is looking kinda pointless and boring.

I think MS made a bad decision by purchasing exclusivity on a troubling title and a struggling development studio.

Profchaos1467d ago

The game was pretty troubled a while back it could be the studio is struggling so taking ms money may be the key to getting it out and they can also get a first party deal out of it and that's obviously what they are after

xX-oldboy-Xx1467d ago

Profchaos - Could be they bit off more than they can chew.

Scapton1467d ago

There is gameplay, albeit a very old demo that has apparently been reworked completely - https://www.youtube.com/wat...

In fact the game was originally on Kickstarter and barely scraped its funding goals. - https://www.kickstarter.com...

Kavorklestein1467d ago

I think the game looks intriguing and I have loved Xenomorphs and H.R. Giger since I was like 11 years old.
I don't think MS made a bad decision supporting a project like this. It's artistic and morbid and exciting from what I saw, and I hope it does well.
I think a lot if people would be SO much happier if they focused more on what makes gaming so great and less on the financial, marketing, and sales aspects of the Big 3 companies.
Like unless any of the big 3 were gonna go out of business then why worry about their money?
I'm just hoping next gen as a whole delivers like SONY and MS are saying it will.

Scorn looks like it should be good, it seems like a great idea/setting, so I have my fingers crossed.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1467d ago
Smclaren19851467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

Exactly lol the game they showed wasn’t even the actual game and it was running on a pc RTX 2080 lol

1467d ago
ApocalypseShadow1467d ago

The difference is in the developer knowledge and experience. Sony's developers have been making advanced game engines for a long time. And has a larger group of studios that have been sharing ideas in programming for a very long time. I believe they'll be realizing their visions a lot sooner than most in using the SSD efficiently. While not using something like UE5. UE5 is great but a middleware engine Sony helped with so that others can get up to speed and make some high quality games. Wouldn't make sense to leave 3RD parties and Indies out in the cold wondering how to make games.

We'll definitely see something in about a week. Yes sir. Then we can come back to this developer's article and review his comments.

ZeroX98761467d ago (Edited 1467d ago )

What game did this studio do in the past? I have absolutely no clue who this dev is....

Tross1467d ago

That's why they're featured in Gamingbolt says dev articles. It's practically mandatory that they feature relatively obscure devs.

1467d ago
Show all comments (130)
70°

XDefiant dev confirms release date for upcoming sniper nerf patch

Following a wave of community complaints, XDefiant executive producer Mark Rubin has confirmed when players can expect the sniper nerf patch to arrive.

200°

"We are the competitors of GTA 6, Forza, The Crew," says TDU: Solar Crown

Amaar writes: "Our recent interview with TDU: Solar Crown's game director reveals their ambitions to compete with titans in the gaming industry."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
anast1d 1h ago

So far, it doesn't look like it.

dumahim21h ago

I dunno. Might actually be better than Forza Motorsport 2023 was at launch.

dumahim16h ago

@DivineHand125

Yes. All of the ones on Xbox since the beginning. I even have the original Best Buy demo copy and FM2 limited edition that they didn't even sell in the US.

BeHunted8h ago

Did you actually read the article? They're talking about open world games like Forza Horizon, The Crew, etc. Not circuit racers; otherwise, they'd mention Gran Turismo.

MrBaskerville2h ago

Unpopular opinion it seems. But yeah, Forza Motorsport was the worst game in the series since Forza Motorsport 5. Huge letdown. Did they ever rework it? absolutely hated the campaign progression and the rpg systems relating to upgrading cars. Ended up just going back to 6 and 7 instead, those two also had a LOT more stages.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Jingsing23h ago

Only a competitor if your game works fully offline and isn't some service.

DigitallyAfflicted23h ago

it sounds like this game is stuck in last generation.

Skuletor23h ago

Personally, I wouldn't want my game compared with The Crew at all, I certainly wouldn't be the one making the comparison either.

ElaBosak11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

How so? It's a very successful and popular racing franchise. Any game entering the genre is competing with racing games including The Crew.

Skuletor10h ago

It wasn't very long ago Ubisoft shutdown the original The Crew's servers, making every copy unplayable. I wouldn't want to be associated with that controversy.

Show all comments (17)
510°

Days Gone Director Says Bend's Project Costs Over $250M; Says PS Co-CEO Doesn't Want 2 Zombies Games

Days Gone director claims Sony has already poured in at least a $250M in Bend's project; says Days Gone sold more than Death Stranding.

shinoff21835d ago

Well that sucks. Seems they want more online trash. I'd rather of had the sequel if it was single player

MrNinosan4d ago

What online trash games did PS Studios release last 10 years?

Notellin4d ago

The past has nothing to do with the future. This is such a terrible argument. Everyone knows about their current live service push.

_SilverHawk_4d ago

It's so tragic what happened to days gone. It is such an amazing game but bandwagoners trashed it and it underperformed in it's launch year. Days gone is the best open world zombie game released in the past five years. I was recently playing it on pc and I'm still amazed by it.

Games are very expensive to make and it seems like it's normal for a AAA game to cost over a quarter billion to make so if a quality game like days gone greatly underperforms then people shouldn't be upset when they see a lot of GAAS. I still remember a lot of bandwagoners calling days gone trash but years later it's now amazing when it's considered a failure by sony.

If a game isn't the best thing seen since hats with pockets then a lot of gamers who haven't played it automatically calls it rubbish and whoever made it should be incarcerated

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Co CEO prefers gamers to boycott.. so be it. I’ll never buy a gaas.
Just imagine buying a game you cannot replay in some years.. this shit must stop.

Days Gone did zombies in a very original way. The story was also so engaging. You actually only meet Zombie hordes later in the game. There are many more enemy groups to deal with.

MrNinosan4d ago

@Notelin
I am one of the few who bought Days Gone on release day and loved it completely.
However, "more online trash" is phrased like Sony has put out alot of trash online games.
We got what, 2 games? Helldivers 2 and GT7, 2 of the most sold Playstation games where both is loved by millions.

You, me and especially shinoff has no idea if Fairgames, Marathon and Concord will be trash.

Just because we (as in you and me) don't love or support online games, doesn't mean millions of other do.

And we don't know what Bend Studio is working with? We don't know if they're forced to make a online game or another amazing single player experience.

The only thing we do know is that it's not Days Gone, sadly due to poor sales the first 6 months.

shinoff21834d ago (Edited 4d ago )

More online trash wasmt meant how insee it comes across. I should've worded it different I was meaning the focus they currently have on it.

Anything online is online trash to me. How long did naughty dog spend on that dumba last of us multiplayer, how about Concord, or even the other couple we hear about. I fk with Sony because rpgs and their 1st party single player games. Been like that for years. I hate seeing them waste time, money, and talent on trash. I understand bot every game is gonna be for me but this focus they've seem to had on multiplayer is extremely disheartening. Even at the state of play the only things I was really feeling were Astrobot and silent hill 2 and I'm content with that, not everything is for me. It's just the online focus I hate. Ms bought up 3 to 4 wrpgs developers, Sony just ignores rpgs 1st party wise.

And a days gone 2 would've been much better then whatever online sht bend is working on. I do know sometimes I get very idk emotional. I do need to work on toning that down a bit lol

SimpleDad3d ago

Ammm let's see... That All-stars, Foamstars, Babilon 5 wass gaas...
Concord... can wait to play that...Marathon uuuu... Last of them gaas... U
Horizon Zero dawn has a project that leaked as a Fortnite lookalike.

They bought Destiny that is a dead gaas...people love ti.

Helldivers 2 was luck.

Jimbo was all in and pushed Sony single player games 5 years behind.

Spiderman gaas was cancelled... I mean every 1st party studio was doing gaas.

Bend had to pitch a gaas game... Open world coop something

I can't remember more... Of that crap.

tay87013d ago

@simpledad. Destiny 2 isn't a dead game. Its the number 5 most played game on steam. I dont play it, but alot of people do.

MrNinosan3d ago

@SimpleDad
You failed to mention a single PS Studios game that has been released last 10 years.
Either your reading skills are crap or you think Sony own every studio in the world.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
just_looken3d ago

I rolled my eyes at concord not only was it just yet another cookie cutter hero shooter but that qucik look for the hero select.

Already has a free section then paid section along with a they/them she/her dei crap top right.

Nothing like a day off of work to fire up concord to read about the new characters sexual identity and or preference then a paywall do you want o buy this character shit like no i just want to shoot my gun have fun.

-Foxtrot5d ago

It would be a shame if it was true that Hermen never gave the franchise a chance simply because he didn't like it and they already had a "Zombie" game with TLOU.

NaughtyDog are most likely moving onto a new IP next so it would have been the perfect time to do it.

ThinkThink4d ago

Here's where xbox steps in and releases state of decay 3 day and date on ps5.

shinoff21834d ago

I mean it's not out of the realm of possibility at this point.

Grilla4d ago

Days gone 2 was canceled before Herman was in charge. That happened like 4 years ago.

vfl5234d ago

4 years ago he was head of Playstation Studios. He would've probably had a hand in the cancelation.

Notellin4d ago

Man two seconds of research could have saved you from this comment. Amazing work Grilla you fit in with the uniformed N4G community who speaks before verifying anything that they say.

Redemption-644d ago

Maybe encourage people to buy the game at full price and not when it's heavily discounted or go on plus. If this game had sold well when it was full priced a sequel would have been in the works. They made a single-player game that most people didn't support until they dropped the price.

Cacabunga4d ago

The guy’s just a moron.. he should have stayed within game development. His choices will have a terrible impact on the brand in the long run.

tay87013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Dude is pretty pathetic. Sounds like a guy who's girl left him for someone better. Always talking about days gone sequel that never was, even though he is no longer at bend and hasnt been for a while. I for one am not upset about the lack of a sequel. It is one of the worst 1st party games in recent memory. Completely jank, played like an xbox game. The only redeeming quality was the hordes.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
excaliburps4d ago

Yep. Kind of weird since it wasn't a sales flop, no?

I know we have to take what Ross says with a grain of salt since we're hearing just one side of the story, but even so, the game wasn't bad at all. Heck, it's my brother's favorite last-gen game from what I recall.

The amount of zombies on screen, imagine that with the PS5 and SSD? That would be insanely fun!

Grilla4d ago

Most copies were sold on sale. Not enough ppl bought it at full price. I paid 20$ for it 6 -7 months after release.

Notellin4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Yeah we should never believe the creators side until we hear the corporate/big business side as history has shown we should always believe billion dollar corporations.

What a bootlicker statement.

derek4d ago

@Notellin, of course you'll believe an embittered ex-employee with an axe to grind because it's evil Sony he's complaining about. You guys act like days gone was this huge success and somehow Sony hates easy money a sequel would have generated. The game was mid and so was the response to it. They're still supporting the developer who is making a new ip that could be great.

shinoff21834d ago

Days gone was fantastic. I bought day one but didn't get around to it for months. When I finally did I was pissed at myself for waiting so long lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
P_Bomb4d ago

Well I don’t want 10 live service games, but they have no problem doing that lol. Ugh.

CrimsonWing694d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Oh great so we only get what the big wigs want… y’know, the people that really have their fingers on the pulse of what their consumers want. Faaaaantastic!

rippermcrip4d ago

Well consider they know the sales... they do know what the consumer wants.

It sold shit.

-Foxtrot4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

But if it’s true what this guy says it sold better than Death Stranding

Yet that got a sequel and Kojima aside out of them both DS didn’t really NEED a sequel compared to Days Gone which ended on such a cliff hanger twist.

Show all comments (75)