540°

New Left 4 Dead Game Reportedly In Development

Valve is ready to resurrect a number of its long-dormant franchises, it seems.

For those that missed the big news last month, the publisher confirmed, following a number of leaks, that its iconic Half-Life series is finally set to receive its first release since 2007’s Episode Two expansion. Much to the surprise – and disbelief, considering how long fans have been waiting – of many, the reveal didn’t come in the form of Half-Life 3, but a spinoff title developed exclusively for virtual reality, no less.

Read Full Story >>
wegotthiscovered.com
Neonridr1598d ago

I wonder if it's the rumoured L4D VR game.

Shuckylad1598d ago

To fast paced for VR IMO. A full AAA L4D3 is what’s needed.

Neonridr1598d ago

Serious Sam worked perfectly fine in VR.

b163o11598d ago

This is one game I never got a chance to play, and after time has passed idk what the community is looking like...

D__RAiL1598d ago

Why are you getting down voted thats exactly what the game is. Valve has two other big VR titles and this is one and probably a original one or Team Fortress VR after.

Neonridr1598d ago

1) people don't like VR around here because those who don't enjoy it / embrace it miss out
2) people don't like me because I support both Nintendo and Sony and let's be real, this is N4G.

gazgriff2k121598d ago

hopefully its potal VR not team fortress VR

1598d ago
1598d ago Replies(3)
F0XH0UND9221598d ago

That's weird, my comment disappeared! Very odd, isn't it gangsta?

I serially hope so, too! L4D is a great co-op game!

OG_TK_Cole1598d ago

If this is that VR Game they have been whispering about, the Gaming Community is going to be pissed.

D__RAiL1598d ago

its exactly what it is...there is plenty of games like this now anyway ...go play GTFO or Vermintide ...its 100 percent a VR game.

Dom_Estos1598d ago (Edited 1598d ago )

F*ck em, then.

I'd rather a dev take risks and do what they want, than pander to the lowest common denominator. I mean, just look at the state of the so called "AAA" space now. The recent COD fiasco is proof its f*cked and will only get worse. People want more of that boring, cynical shit? They can keep it. Meanwhile I look forward to see what Valve does with VR, as they seem intent on actually pushing this tired industry forward.

FlyingFoxy1598d ago

VR is not the problem, it's whether the game can be played by VR and none VR players is the question. Alienating players from a multiplayer game would be a mistake unless they want a small online player base.. Which I'm guessing they don't.

D__RAiL1598d ago

VR adoption rate is through the roof just in the past month...i expect it to continue and it will sell atleast 2 million copies the first week...so yeah plenty of players

mandingo1598d ago

VR just isn’t ready yet. It’s cool from what I played but the visuals are so paired back compared to console or pc It’s tough to really get immersed. Just make it for console, pc, and vr boom everyone is happy. Why have ass it.

-Foxtrot1598d ago

VR? Are they taking the p***, especially after Half Life...

If true then I don’t understand why people can’t grasp why people are so ticked off.

VR should be an option so all fans can enjoy, we’ve waited long enough.

Guess Portal 3 and TF3 will be VR aswell...sigh

gangsta_red1598d ago

If this is the case then Valve is definitely trying to push VR by giving the titles everyone has been waiting for specifically to VR.

Shame.

TK-661598d ago (Edited 1598d ago )

"If true then I don’t understand why people can’t grasp why people are so ticked off."

Dozens of AAA non-VR games release every year, but all of a sudden VR gets one exclusive AAA game and people lose their shit over it. It's about time a studio, like Valve, stepped up to create high end games built from the ground up for this platform. Disagree? Then you can keep waiting.

-Foxtrot1598d ago

And? People have been waiting for a new instalment of Valves big franchises for years...YEARS. We finally get them and it’s like “oh yeah sorry too bad, got to pay big bucks for a VR or tough shit”

If it was optional then fair enough but it’s not

If you don’t even want options then that’s beyond f****** selfish and highly unfair to the fans who have waited forever for Valve to make games again

All they need was one solid game but Half Life and now L4D where does it end.

So yeah f**** me for supporting them for years and just wanting an optional standard mode for their new games. How selfish am I huh 🙄

TK-661598d ago (Edited 1598d ago )

@-Foxtrot

"And? People have been waiting for a new instalment of Valves big franchises for years...YEARS. We finally get them and it’s like “oh yeah sorry too bad, got to pay big bucks for a VR or tough shit”

And? This isn't an argument. The game doesnt appeal to you, but you're trying claim you have some sort of entitlement because you thought your wallet earned you a direct line to Gabes office. I've likely given more money to Valve than you, so do I now have a more superior claim? Valve have always been more interested in making games that push gameplay boundaries, and if they feel their vision can only be realised through making a VR exclusive game then I'm more than interested.

"If you don’t even want options then that’s beyond f****** selfish"

Yeah, sorry but this argument doesnt work. You're basically on par with the person demanding FromSoftware sacrifice their vision in Souls-Likes by making an easy mode. Valves vision requires VR. Dont like it? Dont buy it. Simplez.

"So yeah f**** me for supporting them for years and just wanting an optional standard mode for their new games. How selfish am I huh 🙄"

Entitled*

Not everything has to appeal to you, but you're more than welcome to buy the game and make an informed/reasoned critique about how this game would've benefitted from a "standard mode".

-Foxtrot1598d ago

Oh get the hell out of here with that crap

"entitled"

Really? Please look up the world and start using it properly

It would be totally different if it were free, you are acting like I'm saying get rid of VR because I don't want it when all I'm saying is "give everyone an option so everyone can enjoy it".

It's just selfish thinking from you to be honest.

TK-661598d ago (Edited 1598d ago )

@-Foxtrot

"So yeah f**** me for supporting them for years and just wanting an optional standard mode for their new games.”

You fit the definition ^^^

Entitled: believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment.

You're literally arguing that if someone has bought a lot of Valves products they deserve special treatment. You're demanding they cater to you because you've opened your wallet a lot for them. If you don't like the basic definitions of words in the English language then find a different language to speak.

"It's just selfish thinking from you to be honest."

The game is built from the ground up for VR. Demanding that Valve spend more time to make the game playable without the platform it was designed for is ridiculous. Requesting options is fine when the effort required is minimal; this is not one of those scenarios. Stop being selfish and demanding Valve alter their vision to cater to your stupid demands. If you don't like the vision you can say it, but don't bullshit in the thread and demand that developers change their entire product to make it so it appeals to you. It's like demanding every FPS have a TPS option BeCaUsE oPtIoNs ArE gOoD.

Not every game is made for you babe; just accept it.

Dom_Estos1598d ago (Edited 1598d ago )

And then add to the fact they moan that VR doesn't have any AAA games. They get the mother of all AAA games and they still bitch. Couldn't care less. VR is here now. It's everything it promised to be back in the early 90s and then some, and its here to stay, and no amount of crying will change that. I mean, just look at Foxtrot as a prime example. Crying his beans out over a game he's been waiting for as if he's the only one waiting for it. I've been waiting for it too. You want to play it? Cough up the dough and buy into a revolution, otherwise f*ck off and stop your crying.

Neonridr1598d ago

@Foxtrot - the difference here is the game isn't being designed for anything but VR. They've been working on this game for years. The index is the perfect opportunity to showcase this game and to deliver on their vision.

Yeah it sucks, but what can you do? Valve has a shiny new piece of hardware that they need to convince people to buy. How do you do that? By releasing some big named games for it. Oculus did the same thing for their headset and they reaped the rewards.

This isn't Resident Evil 7 were the VR was an afterthought and just tacked on halfway through development. Valve wasn't designing a 2D Half Life game and then midway through decided to say "screw it" and make it VR only.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1598d ago
Neonridr1598d ago

well Valve needs a reason to sell Index hardware no?

Show all comments (67)
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies1d 21h ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken1d 16h ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing692d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker2d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing692d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt1d 19h ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken1d 16h ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.

320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville39d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi38d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein38d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos38d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein38d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

Number1TailzFan39d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long38d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger8839d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake39d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts39d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername39d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai39d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Left 4 Dead Writer Explains The Drawbacks Of Releasing Games In Early Access

He wants to launch all his projects initially through close beta.